Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Blockchains als Grundlage digitaler Geschäftsmodelle

  • Schwerpunkt
  • Blockchain
  • Published:
Datenschutz und Datensicherheit - DuD Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Durch eine erfolgreiche Umsetzung von Digitalisierungsstrategien könne Europa, so eine Studie im Auftrag des Bundesverbandes der Deutschen Industrie, bis 2025 einen Zuwachs von 1,25 Billionen Euro an industrieller Bruttowertschöpfung erzielen. Blockchains werden in diesem Kontext zunehmend als vielversprechende Technologie zur Realisierung von Effizienz steigerungen in unterschiedlichen Anwendungsfeldern und Szenarien diskutiert. Der vorliegende Beitrag untersucht, welche Geschäftsmodelle bereits basierend auf der Blockchain-Technologie realisiert werden und welche wirtschaftlichen Potenziale hieraus resultieren. Schließlich werden die herausgearbeiteten Geschäftsmodelle in das abstraktere Konzept der mehrseitigen Plattformen eingeordnet.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  • Armstrong M (2006) Competition in two-sided markets. RAND J Econ 37:668–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong M, Wright J (2007) Two-sided Markets, Competitive Bottlenecks and Exclusive Contracts. Econ Theory 32:353–380.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Becker J, Breuker D, Heide T, et al (2013) Can we afford integrity by proof-of-work? scenarios inspired by the bitcoin currency. In: The Economics of Information Security and Privacy. pp 135–156.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Böhme R, Christin N, Edelman B, Moore T (2015) Bitcoin: Economics, Technology, and Governance. J Econ Perspect 29:213–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenig C, Schwarz J, Rückeshäuser N (2016) Value of Decentralized Consensus Systems–Evaluation Framework. In: ECIS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough H, Rosenbloom RS (2002) The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: evidence from Xerox Corporation’s technology spin-off companies. Ind Corp Chang 11:529–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough HW, Appleyard MM (2007) Open Innovation and Strategy. Calif Manage Rev 50:57–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans-Greenwood P, Hillard R, Harper I, Williams P (2016) Bitcoin, Blockchain & distributed ledgers: Caught between promise and reality.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyal I, Sirer EG (2014) Majority is not enough: Bitcoin mining is vulnerable. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics). pp 436–454

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanning K, Centers DP (2016) Blockchain and Its Coming Impact on Financial Services. J Corp Account Financ 27:53–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagiu A, Wright J (2015) Multi-sided platforms. Int J Ind Organ 43:162–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karame GO, Androulaki E, Capkun S (2012) Double-spending fast payments in bitcoin. Proc ACM Conf Comput Commun Secur 906.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kujala S, Artto K, Aaltonen P, Turkulainen V (2010) Business models in project-based firms–Towards a typology of solution-specific business models. Int J Proj Manag 28:96–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mainelli M, Smith M (2015) Sharing ledgers for sharing economies: an exploration of mutual distributed ledgers (aka blockchain technology). J Financ Perspect 3:38–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris M, Schindehutte M, Allen J (2005) The entrepreneur’s business model: Toward a unified perspective. J Bus Res 58:726–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narayanan A, Bonneau J, Felten E, et al (2016) Bitcoin and Cryptocurrency Technologies: A Comprehensice Introduction. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Osterwalder A, Pigneur Y (2010) Business Model Generation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Probst L, Frideres L, Cambier B, Martinez-Diaz C (2016) Blockchain Applications & Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rochet J-C, Tirole J (2003) Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets. J Eur Econ Assoc 1:990–1029.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rückeshäuser N (2017) Do We Really Want Blockchain-Based Accounting? Decentralized Consensus as Enabler of Management Override of Internal Controls. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik. St. Gallen, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Rückeshäuser N (2017a): Typology of Distributed Ledger Based Business Models. To be presented at: European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), June 5-10, Guimaraes, Protugal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrier D, Wu W, Pentland A (2016) Blockchain & Infrastructure (Identity, Data Security).

    Google Scholar 

  • Staykova K, Damsgaard J (2014) A Model of Digital Payment Infrastructure Formation and Development: The EU Regulator´s Perspective. In: 2014 International Conference on Mobile Business. p Paper 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • West J, Gallagher S (2006) Challenges of open innovation: the paradox of firm investment in open-source software. R D Manag 36:319–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zwicky F, Wilson a. G (1967) New Methods of Thought and Procedure. Contributions to the Symposium on Methodologies. Symp Methodol May 22-24, 1967, Pasadena 1–15.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nadine Rückeshäuser.

Additional information

Nadine Rückeshäuser ist wissenschaftliche Mitarbeiterin der Abteilung Telematik des Instituts für Informatik und Gesellschaft (IIG) an der Albert-Ludwig-Universität Freiburg.

Dr. Christian Brenig ist wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter der Abteilung Telematik des Instituts für Informatik und Gesellschaft (IIG) an der Albert-Ludwig-Universität Freiburg.

Prof. Dr. Dr.h.c. Günter Müller leitet die Abteilung Telematik des Instituts für Informatik und Gesellschaft (IIG) an der Albert-Ludwig-Universität Freiburg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rückeshäuser, N., Brenig, C. & Müller, G. Blockchains als Grundlage digitaler Geschäftsmodelle. Datenschutz Datensich 41, 492–496 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11623-017-0818-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11623-017-0818-8