Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Advertisement

Prediction of Mechanical Properties of Steel Tubes Using a Machine Learning Approach

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Steel tubes produced in steelmaking plants are generally subjected to severe in-service conditions. Hence, quality control plays a key role in this process. The bottleneck is that this information is made available only after tube production from laboratory analysis. Given process complexity and current data availability, this work employs a series of machine learning techniques, namely neural networks, random forests and gradient boosting trees, to predict critical mechanical properties for steel tubes, namely yield strength, ultimate tensile strength and hardness. The model performance was kept high by combining different variable selection procedures. The prediction error was less than the inherent variability of each mechanical property, i.e., it is equal to 20 MPa for yield strength and ultimate tensile strength, and to 2 HRC, for hardness. This information in advance allows interventions before complete tube production contributing to more stable operations and, ultimately, to reduce rework and customer lead time. In sequence, an optimization problem for set point definition is illustrated. The neural predictive model previously identified for the yield strength was used in this application, exploring its predictive capabilities. The optimal solution yielded to lower amount of molybdenum and tube exit temperature from the tempering furnace, while keeping quality aspects, which means reduction in material and energy costs. Concluding, steelmaking processes, which are complex by nature, can strongly benefit from data-driven approaches, since data availability and computational processing are no longer a problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. W. Smith and J. Hashemi, Foundations of Materials Science and Engineering, 5th ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 2009

    Google Scholar 

  2. G. Totten and M. Howes, Steel Heat Treatment Handbook, 2nd ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. Pattanayak, S. Dey, S. Chatterjee, S. Chowdhury, and S. Datta, Computational Intelligence Based Designing of Microalloyed Pipeline Steel, Comput. Mater. Sci., 2015, 104, p 60–68

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. P. Sampaio, R. Corrêa, A. Braga, Modelagem das propriedades mecânicas de tubos de aço utilizando redes neurais artificiais (Mechanical properties modeling of steel tubes using artificial neural networks). Automation and IT Seminar, ABM (Brazilian Association of Metallurgy, Materials and Mining), 2015

  5. A. Agrawal, P. Deshpande, A. Cecen, G. Basavarsu, A. Choudhary, and S. Kalidindi, Exploration of Data Science Techniques to Predict Fatigue Strength of Steel from Composition and Processing Parameters, Integr. Mater. Manuf. Innov., 2014, 3, p 3–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. D. Jones, J. Watson, and K. Brown, Comparison of Hot Rolled Steel Mechanical Property Prediction Models Using Linear Multiple Regression, Non-linear Multiple Regression and Non-linear Artificial Neural Networks, Comput. Mater. Sci., 2013, 32(5), p 435–442

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. Mori and V. Mahalec, Planning and Scheduling of Steel Plates Production. Part II: Scheduling of Continuous Casting, Comput. Chem. Eng., 2017, 101(9), p 312–325

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. J. Mori and V. Mahalec, Planning and Scheduling of Steel Plates Production. Part I: Estimation of Production Times via Hybrid Bayesian Networks for Large Domain of Discrete Variables, Comput. Chem. Eng., 2015, 79(4), p 113–134

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. L. Tang, J. Liu, A. Rong, and Z. Yang, A Review of Planning and Scheduling Systems and Methods for Integrated Steel Production, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 2001, 133(1), p 1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. X. Chen, X. Chen, J. She, and M. Wu, A Hybrid Just-In-Time Soft Sensor for Carbon Efficiency of Iron Ore Sintering Process Based on Feature Extraction of Cross-sectional Frames at Discharge End, J. Process Control, 2017, 54, p 14–24

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. D. Laha, Y. Ren, and P. Suganthan, Modelling of Steelmaking Process with Effective Machine Learning Techniques, Expert Syst. Appl., 2015, 42(10), p 4687–4696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. M. Bevilacqua, E. Bottani, F.E. Ciarapica, F. Costantino, L. di Donato, A. Ferraro, G. Mazzuto, A. Monteriù, G. Nardini, M. Ortenzi, M. Paroncini, M. Pirozzi, M. Prist, E. Quatrini, M. Tronci, and G. Vignali, Digital Twin Reference Model Development to Prevent Operators’ Risk in Process Plants, Sustainability, 2020, 12(1088), p 1–17

    Google Scholar 

  13. N.A. Carvalho, L.F. Scavarda, and L.J. Lustosa, Implementing Finite Capacity Production Scheduling: Lessons from a Practical Case, Int. J. Prod. Res., 2014, 52(4), p 1215–1230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. R, The R Project for Statistical Computing, 2020. http://www.r-project.org/. Accessed 5 Oct 2019

  15. F. Coelho, A.P. Braga, and M. Verleysen, A Mutual Information Estimator for Continuous and Discrete Variables Applied to Feature Selection and Classification Problems, Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst., 2016, 9(4), p 726–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. F. Coelho, A.P. Braga, and M. Verleysen, Multi-objective semi-supervised feature selection and model selection based on Pearson’s correlation coefficient, Progress in Pattern Recognition, Image Analysis, Computer Vision, and Applications. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol 6419, I. Bloch and R.M. Cesar, Ed., Springer, Berlin, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  17. I. Guyon, S. Gunn, M. Nikravesh, and L. Zaded, Feature Extraction: Foundations and Applications, Springer, New York, 2006

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. D.C. Montgomery, E.A. Peck, and G.G. Vining, Introduction to Linear Regression Analysis, Wiley, New York, 2012

    Google Scholar 

  19. S. Haykin, Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  20. G. James, D. Witten, T. Hastie, and R. Tibshirani, An Introduction to Statistical Learning with Applications in R, Springer, New York, 2013

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. C. Gomes, A.L. Kaiser, J.P. Bas, A. Aissaoui, and M. Piette, Predicting the Mechanical Properties of a Quenched and Tempered Steel Thanks to a Tempering Parameter, Rev. Métall., 2010, 107, p 293–302

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. W. Callister, Materials Science and Engineering: An Introduction, Wiley, New York, 2007

    Google Scholar 

  23. M. Song, C. Sun, Y. Chen, Z. Shang, J. Li, Z. Fan, K.T. Hartwig, and X. Zhang, Grain Refinement Mechanisms and Strength-Hardness Correlation of Ultra-fine Grained Grade 91 Steel Processed by Equal Channel Angular Extrusion, Int. J. Press. Vessels Pip., 2019, 172, p 212–219

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. S.H. Hashemi, Strength–Hardness Statistical Correlation in API, X65 Steel, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2011, 528(3), p 1648–1655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. M.-L. Zhu and F.-Z. Xuan, Correlation Between Microstructure, Hardness and Strength in HAZ of Dissimilar Welds of Rotor Steels, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2010, 527(16–17), p 4035–4042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. E.J. Pavlina and J. Van Tyne, Correlation of Yield Strength and Tensile Strength with Hardness for Steels, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2008, 17, p 888–893

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. I.T. Jolliffe, Principal Component Analysis, Springer, New York, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  28. Y.S. Aurelio, G.M. Almeida, C.L. Castro, and A.P. Braga, Learning from Imbalanced Data Sets with Weighted Cross-entropy Function, Neural Process. Lett., 2019, 50, p 1937–1949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. E. Krause, Taxicab Geometry: An Adventure in Non-Euclidean Geometry, Dover Publications, New York, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  30. S. Rao, Engineering Optimization: Theory and Practice, Wiley, New York, 2009

    Book  Google Scholar 

  31. L. Scrucca, GA: A Package for Genetic Algorithms in R, J. Stat. Softw., 2013, 53(4), p 1–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Vallourec unit in Brazil for both the data sets and the financial support. They also thank Rodolfo Dollinger, a data scientist in this steelmaking plant, for his contribution with respect to process data analysis. Antonio P. Braga thanks CNPq for the financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gustavo M. Almeida.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Carneiro, M.V., Salis, T.T., Almeida, G.M. et al. Prediction of Mechanical Properties of Steel Tubes Using a Machine Learning Approach. J. of Materi Eng and Perform 30, 434–443 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-020-05345-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-020-05345-0

Keywords