Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Improved feedback modeling of transport in enlarging urban areas of developing countries

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Computer Science in China Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Toward the common issue of quick urban sprawls of many cities in developing countries today, this research incorporates the expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm into the feedback application process of a newly developed feedback model to improve the modeling studies of the urban transport prediction and planning for the developments of the cities with their urban areas enlarged in the future. By utilizing the survey data obtained in Jabodetabek metropolitan region of Indonesia in 2002, the study results numerically confirm that the iteratively computational calibrations to the K-factors for the newly urbanized areas of a developing city by employing the EM algorithm in the feedback process can truly improve the validity of the proposed feedback model’s application to effectively predict the urban transport developments of developing cities in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Beijing transportation research center (BTRC). The outline of Beijing transportation development: Beijing transportation research center. Beijing Municipal Committee of Communication, 2004

  2. Gakenheimer R. Urban mobility in the developing world. Transportation Research Part A, 1999, 33(7–8): 671–689

    Google Scholar 

  3. Soehodho S. Motorization in Indonesia and its impact to traffic accidents. International Association of Traffic and Safety Sciences (IATSS) Research, 2007, 31(2): 27–33

    Google Scholar 

  4. Steinberg F. Jakarta: environmental problems and sustainability. Habitat International, 2007, 31(3–4): 354–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mao B, Chen H, Chen S. Sustainability assessment of speed regulation of urban traffic. International Association of Traffic and Safety Sciences (IATSS) Research, 2002, 26(2): 18–24

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Japan international cooperation agency (JICA), National development planning agency, Republic of Indonesia (BAPPENAS). The study on integrated transportation master plan for Jabodetabek (Phase II), final report & summary report: Pacific Consultants International Almec Corporation, 2004

  7. Ding C. Impact analysis of spatial data aggregation on transportation forecasted demand: a GIS approach. In: Proceedings of URISA 1994 Annual Conference. Washington D.C.: Urban and Regional Information Systems Association. 1994, 362–375

    Google Scholar 

  8. Boyce D, Xiong C. Forecasting travel for very large cities: challenges and opportunities for China. Transportmetrica, 2007, 3(1): 1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. McNally M G. The activity-based approach. Handbook of Transport Modelling. New York: Pergamon, 2000, 53–69

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pravinvongvuth S, Chen A. Adaptation of the paired combinatorial logit model to the route choice problem. Transportmetrica, 2005, 1(3): 223–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Recker W, Duan J, Wang H. Development of an estimation procedure for an activity-based travel demand model. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 2008, 23(7): 483–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Anselin L. Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models. Kluwer Academic, 1988

  13. Miller H J. Modeling accessibility using space-time prism concepts within geographical information systems. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 1991, 5(3): 287–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fotheringham A S, Rogerson P A. GIS and spatial analytical problems. International Journal of Geographic Information Systems, 1993, 7(1): 3–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cressie N. Change of support and the modifiable areal unit problem. Geographical Systems, 1996, 3(2–3): 159–180

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Getis A, Mur J, Zoller H G. Spatial econometrics and spatial statistics. Palgrave Macmillan, 2004

  17. Cascetta E, Papola A. A trip distribution model involving spatial and dominance attributes. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 2008, 23(2): 116–124

    Google Scholar 

  18. Boyce D. Is the sequential travel forecasting paradigm counterproductive? Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 2002, 128(4): 169–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhao Y, Kockelman K M. The propagation of uncertainty through travel demand models: an exploratory analysis. Annals of Regional Science, 2002, 36(1): 145–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. McNally M G. The four-step model. Handbook of Transport Modelling. New York: Pergamon, 2000, 35–52

    Google Scholar 

  21. Boyce D, Zhang Y F, Lupa M R. Introducing “feedback” into fourstep travel forecasting procedure versus equilibrium solution of combined model. Transportation Research Record #1443. Washington D.C.: Transportation Research Board, 1994, 65–74

    Google Scholar 

  22. Siegel J D, De-Cea J, Fernandez J E, et al. Comparisons of urban travel forecasts prepared with the sequential procedure and a combined model. Networks and Spatial Economics, 2006, 6(2): 135–148

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Kwana M P, Weber J. Scale and accessibility: implications for the analysis of land use-travel interaction. Applied Geography, 2008, 28(2): 110–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Evans S P. Derivation and analysis of some models for combining trip distribution and assignment. Transportation Research, 1976, 10(1): 37–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Safwat K N A, Magnanti T L. A combined trip generation, trip distribution, modal split, and trip assignment model. Transportation Science, 1988, 22(1): 14–30

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Lam W H K, Huang H J. A combined trip distribution and assignment model for multiple user classes. Transportation Research Part B, 1992, 26(4): 275–287

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Walker W, Peng H. Alternative methods to iterate a regional travel simulation model: computational practicality and accuracy. Transportation Research Record #1493. Washington D.C.: Transportation Research Board, 1995, 21–28

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lan C J, Menendez M, Gan A. Incorporating feedback loop into FSUTMS for model consistency, final report (Volume I). Contract No.BC-791, Prepared for Office of the State Transportation Planner, Systems Planning Office, State of Florida Department of Transportation, 2003

  29. Boyce D, O’Neill C R, Scherr W. New computational results on solving the sequential travel forecasting procedure with feedback. In: Proceedings of the 11th Transportation Planning Applications Conference, Daytona Beach, FL, 2007

  30. Levinson D, Kumar A. Integrating feedback into the transportation planning model: structure and application. Transportation Research Record #1413. Washington D.C.: Transportation Research Board, 1994, 70–77

    Google Scholar 

  31. Bar-Gera H, Boyce D. Solving a non-convex combined travel forecasting model by the method of successive averages with constant step sizes. Transportation Research Part B, 2006, 40(5): 351–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Feng X, Zhang J, Fujiwara A, et al. Evaluating environmentally sustainable urban and transport policies for a developing city based on a travel demand model with feedback mechanisms. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 2007, 7(1881-1124): 751–765

    Google Scholar 

  33. Feng X, Zhang J, Fujiwara A, et al. Exploring sustainable urban form of Beijing with an integrated model. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Traffic and Transportation Studies. Reston: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2008, 111–120

    Google Scholar 

  34. Fotheringham A S, Wong D W S. The modifiable areal unit problem in multivariate statistical analysis. Environment and Planning A, 1991, 23(7): 1025–1044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Amrhein C G. Searching for the elusive aggregation effect: evidence from statistical simulations. Environment and Planning A, 1995, 27(1): 105–119

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. Guo J Y, Bhat C R. Modifiable areal units: a problem or a matter of perception in the context of residential location choice modeling? Transportation Research Record #1898. Washington D.C.: Transportation Research Board, 2004, 138–147

    Google Scholar 

  37. McLachlan G J, Krishnan T. The EM Algorithm and Extensions. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1997

  38. Hadiwinoto S, Leitmann J. Urban environmental profile: Jakarta. Cities, 1994, 11(3): 153–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Cybriwsky R, Ford L R. City profile: Jakarta. Cities, 2001, 18(3): 199–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Feng X, Zhang J, Fujiwara A. Analysis of feedback to obtain steady-state solutions in four-step modeling. Transportmetrica, 2009, 5(3): 215–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Dempster A P, Laird N M, Rubin D B. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, 1977, 39(1): 1–38

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  42. Little R J A, Rubin D B. Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2002

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Nagoya University, Nagoya, 464-8603, Japan

    Xuesong Feng, Yoshitsugu Hayashi & Hirokazu Kato

  2. Graduate School for International Development and Cooperation, Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima, 739-8529, Japan

    Junyi Zhang & Akimasa Fujiwara

Authors
  1. Xuesong Feng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Junyi Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Akimasa Fujiwara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yoshitsugu Hayashi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Hirokazu Kato
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xuesong Feng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Feng, X., Zhang, J., Fujiwara, A. et al. Improved feedback modeling of transport in enlarging urban areas of developing countries. Front. Comput. Sci. China 4, 112–122 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-009-0069-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-009-0069-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation