Abstract
Engineering is a practice that must function in an environment of incomplete and uncertain knowledge. This environment has become even more difficult in an increasingly complex world. Engineering ethics has to be framed and taught in a way that addresses these realities. This paper proposes a combination of the philosophy of pragmatism and the ethic of care as a possible framework for the practice of engineering ethics that can provide flexibility and openness to address engineering ethics problems more realistically within the ethos and culture of engineering. Embedding values into practice, pragmatism and care provide a broad, reflective, and corrective framework for engineering ethics that can accommodate the realities in which engineering operates. It is shown that these two approaches are more consonant with design methodologies and have a natural fit with design thinking, so they mesh well with what engineers do and with the complexities of their work today. As humans more and more try to alter the socio-techno-natural world, e.g., the earth’s climate, the combination of pragmatism and care will allow enhanced ethical behavior. Alterations to complex adaptive systems will produce highly uncertain results that require engineers to have a mindset that allows them to act with humility in the face of significant uncertainty and potential catastrophic failures.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bernstein, R. (1988). Pragmatism, pluralism, and the healing of wounds. In L. Menand (Ed.), (1997). Pragmatism: A reader (pp. 382–401). New York, NY: Vintage Books.
Broome, T., & Peirce, J. (1997). The heroic engineer. Journal of Engineering Education,86(1), 51–55.
Bulleit, W. M. (2015). The engineering way of thinking: The idea. STRUCTURE, December, 58.
Bulleit, W. M. (2016a). The engineering way of thinking: Adaptation. STRUCTURE, 82.
Bulleit, W. M. (2016b). The engineering way of thinking: An analysis. STRUCTURE, February, 66.
Bulleit, W. M. (2016c). The engineering way of thinking: The future. STRUCTURE, January, 66.
Bulleit, W. M. (2017). Pragmatism and engineering. Chapter 2. In D. Michelfelder, B. Newberry, & Q. Zhu (Eds.), Philosophy and engineering: Exploring boundaries, expanding connections (pp. 13–22). Dordrecht: Springer.
Bulleit, W. M. (2018). Uncertainty in the design and maintenance of social systems. In C. Garcia-Diaz & C. Olaya (Eds.), Social systems engineering: The design of complexity (pp. 31–43). Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley.
Campbell, R. C. (2013). How can engineering students learn to care? How can engineering faculty teach to care? In J. Lucena (Ed.), Engineering education for social justice: Critical explorations and opportunities (Vol. 10, pp. 111–131). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6350-0_6.
Campbell, R. C., Yasuhara, K., & Wilson, D. (2015). Ethics in engineering students’ design considerations: Case studies of electric power systems for the ‘developing world’. In Proceedings of the 122nd annual conference and exposition (paper ID #13696). Seattle, Washington: American Society of Engineering Education.
Cross, H. (1952). Engineers and Ivory Towers, New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. Available at: https://engineering.purdue.edu/~ce573/Documents/Hardy_Cross_essays.pdf. Accessed 13 Dec 2018.
Davis, M. (1998). Thinking like an engineer. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Davis, M. (2017). In praise of emotion in engineering. Chapter 14. In D. Michelfelder, B. Newberry, & Q. Zhu (Eds.), Philosophy and engineering: Exploring boundaries, expanding connections (pp. 181–194). Dordrecht: Springer.
Dewey, J. (1888). The ethics of democracy. In L. Menand (Ed.), (1997). Pragmatism: A reader (pp. 182–204). New York, NY: Vintage Books.
Dewey, J. (1891). Moral theory and practice. International Journal of Ethics, 1(2), 186–203. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2375407. Accessed 13 Dec 2018.
Dewey, J. (1917). The need for a recovery in philosophy In part. In L. Menand (Ed.), (1997). Pragmatism: A reader (pp. 219–232). New York, NY: Vintage Books.
Dewey, J. (1938). Logic: The theory of inquiry. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Dewey, J. (1958). Experience and nature. New York, NY: Dover Publications Inc. (2nd Edition, 1929).
Dewey, J. (2008). The quest for certainty. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), The later works, 1925–1953 (Vol. 4, p. 1929). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois Press.
Emison, G. (2004). American pragmatism as a guide for professional ethical conduct for engineers. Science and Engineering Ethics,10(2), 225–233.
Fisher, B., & Tronto, J. (1991). Toward a feminist theory of care. In E. Abel & M. Nelson (Eds.), Circles of care: Work and identity in women’s lives (pp. 35–55). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Goldman, S. (1991). The social captivity of engineering. In P. Durbin (Ed.), Critical perspectives in nonacademic science and engineering (pp. 125–152). Bethlehem, PA: Lehigh University Press.
Grayson, L. P. (1993). The making of an engineer: An illustrated history of engineering in the United States and Canada. New York, NY: Wiley.
Groenhout, R. (1998). Care theory and the ideal of neutrality in public moral discourse. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy,23(2), 170–189.
Harris, C. E. (2013). Engineering ethics: From preventive ethics to aspirational ethics. Chapter 14. In D. Michelfelder, N. McCarthy, & D. E. Goldberg (Eds.), Philosophy and engineering: Reflections on practice, principles and process (pp. 177–188). Dordrecht: Springer.
Harris, C. E., Pritchard, M. S., & Rabins, M. J. (1995). Engineering ethics: Concepts and cases. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. (Second Edition, 2000).
Held, V. (2006). The ethics of care: Personal, political, and global. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Herkert, J. M. (2001). Future directions in engineering ethics research: Microethics, macroethics and the role of professional societies. Science and Engineering Ethics,7(3), 403–414.
Herkert, J. M. (2005). Ways of thinking about and teaching ethical problem solving: Microethics and macroethics in engineering. Science and Engineering Ethics,11(3), 373–383.
Hess, J. L., Beever, J., Strobel, J., & Brightman, A. O. (2017). Empathic perspective-taking and ethical decision-making in engineering ethics education. In D. Michelfelder, B. Newberry, & Q. Zhu (Eds.), Philosophy and engineering: Exploring boundaries, expanding connections (pp. 163–179). Dordrecht: Springer.
Hollander, R., & Kahl, N. (2010). Engineering, social justice and sustainable community development, summary of a workshop. Washington, D.C: National Academies Press.
Jafarinaimi, N., Nathan, L., & Hargraves, I. (2015). Values as hypotheses: The service that values provide. Design Issues,31(4), 90–103.
James, W. (1981). Introduction. In B. Kuklick (Ed.), Pragmatism. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing. (Originally published in 1907)
Jonas, H. (1985). The imperative of responsibility. In search of an ethics for the technological age. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Jones, S. A., Michelfelder, D., & Nair, I. (2015). Engineering managers and sustainable systems: The need for and challenges of using an ethical framework for transformative leadership. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.009.
Kardon, J. B. (2003). The standard of care for structural engineers. Ann Arbor, MI: UMI Dissertation Services.
Kardon, J. B. (2005). Concept of ‘care’ in engineering. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, ASCE,19(3), 256–260.
Keulartz, F. W., Korthals, J., Schermer, M. M., & Schwartz, T. M. (Eds.). (2002). Pragmatist ethics for a technological culture (p. xxv). Dordrecht: Springer.
Koen, B. V. (2003). Discussion of the method. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
LaFollette, H. (2007). The practice of ethics. Walden, MA: Blackwell.
Margolis, J. (1995). Historied thought, constructed world: A conceptual primer for the turn of the Millennium. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
Martin, M. W., & Schinzinger, R. (1983). Ethics in engineering. New York, NY: McGraw Hill. (4th ed. in 2005).
Menand, L. (Ed.). (1997). Pragmatism: A reader. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
Moriarty, G. (1995). Ethics, ethos and the professions: Some lessons from engineering. Professional Ethics,4(1), 75–93.
Moriarty, G. (2008). The engineering project: Its nature, ethics, and promise. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
NSPE 1 (n.d.). History of the code of ethics for engineers. https://www.nspe.org/resources/ethics/code-ethics/history-code-ethics-engineers. Accessed 13 Dec 2018.
NSPE 2 (n.d.). 100 years of engineering licensure. https://www.nspe.org/resources/press-room/resources/100-years-engineering-licensure. Accessed 13 Dec 2018.
Pantazidou, M., & Nair, I. (1999). Ethic of care: Guiding principles for engineering teaching and practice. Journal of Engineering Education,88(2), 205–212.
Peirce, C. S. (1877). The fixation of belief. In L. Menand (Ed.), (1997). Pragmatism: A reader (pp. 7–25). New York, NY: Vintage Books.
Peirce, C. S. (1878). How to make our ideas clear. In L. Menand (Ed.), (1997). Pragmatism: A reader (pp. 26–48). New York, NY: Vintage Books.
Peirce, C. S. (1904). A definition of pragmatism. In L. Menand (Ed.), (1997). Pragmatism: A reader (pp. 56–58). New York, NY: Vintage Books.
Perrow, C. (1984). Normal accidents: Living with high-risk technologies. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation. Journal of Interactive Marketing,18(3), 5–14.
Rorty, R. M. (2010). Philosophy as science, as metaphor, and as politics. In C. J. Voparil & R. J. Bernstein (Eds.), The Rorty reader (pp. 211–226). Chichester, West Sussex: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Schmidt, J. A. (2014). Changing the paradigm for engineering ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics,20(4), 985–1010.
Schon, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner. London, UK: Temple Smith.
Slote, M. (2007). The ethics of care and empathy. New York, NY: Routledge.
Smith, A. (1759). The theory of moral sentiments. London: A. Millars.
Smith, A. (1776). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. London: W. Strahan and T. Cadell.
Spelman, E. V. (2002). REPAIR: The impulse to restore in a fragile world. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Stanley, M. (1981). The technological conscience: Survival and dignity in an age of expertise. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Suckiel, E. K. (1982). The pragmatic philosophy of William James. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Thompson, P. B. (2002). Pragmatism, discourse ethics and occasional philosophy. In F. W. J. Keulartz, M. Korthals, M. Schermer, & T. E. Swierstra (Eds.), Pragmatist ethics for a technological culture (pp. 199–216). Dordrecht: Springer.
Tronto, J. C. (1995). Care as a basis for political judgments. Hypatia, 10(2), 141–149.
Trevelyan, J. (2010). Reconstructing engineering from practice. Engineering Studies,2(3), 175–195.
Tronto, J. C. (1993). Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. New York, NY: Routledge.
Walther, J., Miller, S. E., & Sochacka, N. W. (2017). A model of empathy in engineering as a core skill, practice orientation, and a way of being. Journal of Engineering Education,106(1), 123–148.
Weston, A. (1992). Toward better problems: New perspectives on abortion, animal rights, the environment, and justice. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
Zoltowski, C. B., Oakes, W. C., & Cardella, M. E. (2012). Students’ ways of experiencing human-centered design. Journal of Engineering Education,101(1), 28–59.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to extend sincere thanks to Jon A. Schmidt and Ryan Campbell and to the anonymous reviewers for their careful reading and helpful comments on our manuscript. Conversations with Joshua Kardon were very helpful in developing the section on care ethics.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nair, I., Bulleit, W.M. Pragmatism and Care in Engineering Ethics. Sci Eng Ethics 26, 65–87 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-018-0080-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-018-0080-y