Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Applying a Social Constructivist Approach to an Online Course on Ethics of Research

  • Original Research/Scholarship
  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The growing trend of shifting from classroom to distance learning in ethics education programs raises the need to examine ways for adapting best instructional practices to online modes. To address this need, the current study was set to apply a social constructivist approach to an online course in research ethics and to examine its effect on the learning outcomes of science and engineering graduate students. The study applied a pre-test post-test quasi-experimental research design within a framework of a mixed-methods approach. The study compared the learning outcomes of students who participated in a social constructivist online course (N = 175) with those who studied in a conventional online course (N = 170). The data were collected via questionnaires and interviews. The findings indicated that both the conventional and the social constructivist online learners gained knowledge of facts and regulations. Yet, the social constructivist learners were more successful in demonstrating knowledge of practices that are used to establish research ethics, and in understanding the importance of conducting research in a responsible manner. The social constructivist online learners were also more successful in demonstrating awareness of ethical dilemmas, by identifying ethical dilemmas and providing solutions to ethical problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott, L. E., Andes, A., Pattani, A. C., et al. (2020). Authorship not taught and not caught in undergraduate research experiences at a research university. Science and Engineering Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-020-00220-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E. E., Solomon, S., Heitman, E., DuBois, J. M., Fisher, C. B., Kost, R. G., et al. (2012). Research ethics education for community-engaged research: A review and research agenda. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 7(2), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2012.7.2.3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, M. A. (2016). Pedagogical support for responsible conduct of research training. Hastings Center Report, 46(1), 18–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, T. (2012). What is social constructivism? Grounded Theory Review, 11(1), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antes, A. L., Kuykendall, A., & DuBois, J. M. (2019). The lab management practices of “research exemplars” that foster research rigor and regulatory compliance: A qualitative study of successful principal investigators. PLoS ONE, 14(4), e0214595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antes, A. L., Murphy, S. T., Waples, E. P., Mumford, M. D., Brown, R. P., Connelly, S., et al. (2009). A meta-analysis of ethics instruction effectiveness in the sciences. Ethics & Behavior, 19(5), 379–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagdasarov, Z., Thiel, C. E., Johnson, J. F., Connelly, S., Harkrider, L. N., Devenport, L. D., & Mumford, M. D. (2013). Case-based ethics instruction: The influence of contextual and individual factors in case content on ethical decision-making. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19(3), 1305–1322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bairaktarova, D., & Woodcock, A. (2017). Engineering student’s ethical awareness and behavior: A new motivational model. Science and Engineering Ethics, 23, 1129–1157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barak, M. (2017). Science teacher education in the twenty-first century: A pedagogical framework for technology-integrated social constructivism. Research in Science Education, 47(2), 283–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barak, M., & Asakle, S. (2018). AugmentedWorld: Facilitating the creation of location-based questions. Computers & Education, 121, 89–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barak, M., & Green, G. (2020). Novice researchers’ expectations and views regarding online ethics education and the design components that may foster ethical practice. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26(3), 1403–1421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barak, M., Watted, A., & Haick, H. (2016). Motivation to learn in massive open online courses: Examining aspects of language and social engagement. Computers & Education, 94, 49–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briggle, A., & Mitcham, C. (2012). Ethics and science: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2000). Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, T. M., & Cunningham, D. J. (1996). Constructivism: Implications for the design and delivery of instruction. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology. New York: Simon & Schuster Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, A. (2017). Discovering statistics using SPSS (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giamellaro, M. (2014). Primary contextualization of science learning through immersion in content-rich settings. International Journal of Science Education, 36(17), 2848–2871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, C. (2016). Scientific misconduct. Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 693–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harding, T. S., Carpenter, D. D., & Finelli, C. J. (2013). Two years later: A longitudinal look at the impact of engineering ethics education. In Proceedings of the 2013 ASEE annual conference & exposition. Atlanta, GA.

  • Hussein-Farraj, R., Barak, M., & Dori, Y. J. (2012). Lifelong learning at the Technion: Graduate students’ perceptions of and experiences in distance learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 8(1), 115–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, J. L. (2001). Articulating communities: Sociocultural perspectives on science education. Journal of research in science teaching, 38(3), 296–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitcham, C., & Englehardt, E. (2019). Ethics across the curriculum: Prospects for broader (and deeper) teaching and learning in research and engineering ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 25, 1735–1762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, L. A. (2020). Situating moral agency: How post-phenomenology can benefit engineering ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26, 1377–1401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2017). PISA 2015 assessment and analytical framework: Science, reading, mathematic, financial literacy and collaborative problem solving (revised). Paris: PISA, OECD Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Palincsar, M. S. (1998). Social constructivist perspectives on teaching and learning. Annual Review Psychology, 49, 75–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, T., Nestor, F., Beach, G., & Heitman, E. (2018). America COMPETES at 5 years: An analysis of research-intensive universities’ RCR training plans. Science and Engineering Ethics, 24(1), 227–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinkus, R. L., Gloeckner, C., & Fortunato, A. (2015). The role of professional knowledge in case-based reasoning in practical ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 21(3), 767–787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shamoo, A., & Resnik, D. (2015). Responsible conduct of research. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taebi, B., & Kastenberg, W. E. (2019). Teaching engineering ethics to PhD students: A Berkeley-Delft initiative. Science and Engineering Ethics, 25, 1763–1770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, B. L., & Lee, J. S. C. (2020). A reflective account of a research ethics course for an interdisciplinary cohort of graduate students. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26, 1089–1105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thiel, C. E., Connelly, S., Harkrider, L., Devenport, L. D., Bagdasarov, Z., Johnson, J. F., & Mumford, M. D. (2013). Case-based knowledge and ethics education: Improving learning and transfer through emotionally rich cases. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19(1), 265–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornberg, R. (2017). Strengthening socio-cultural ways of learning moral reasoning and behavior in teacher education. In D. J. Clandinin & J. Husu (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of research on teacher education. Los Angeles: SAGE Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd, E. M., Watts, L. L., Mulhearn, T. J., Torrence, B. S., Turner, M. R., Connelly, S., & Mumford, M. D. (2017). A meta-analytic comparison of face-to-face and online delivery in ethics instruction: The case for a hybrid approach. Science and Engineering Ethics, 23(6), 1719–1754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Usher, M., & Barak, M. (2020). Team diversity as a predictor of innovation in projects of online and face-to-face learners. Computers & Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watts, L. L., Medeiros, K. E., Mulhearn, T. J., Steele, L. M., Connelly, S., & Mumford, M. D. (2017). Are ethics training programs improving? A meta-analytic review of past and present ethics instruction in the sciences. Ethics & Behavior, 27(5), 351–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willig, C. (2013). Introducing qualitative research in psychology. Buckingham: Open University.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study was funded by the Planning and Budgeting Committee of the Israeli Council for Higher Education. We thank the Committee for their generous support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Faculty of Education in Science and Technology, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, 320003, Haifa, Israel

    Miri Barak & Gizell Green

Authors
  1. Miri Barak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gizell Green
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miri Barak.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Barak, M., Green, G. Applying a Social Constructivist Approach to an Online Course on Ethics of Research. Sci Eng Ethics 27, 8 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-021-00280-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-021-00280-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation