Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Weak Signal-Oriented Investigation of Ethical Dissonance Applied to Unsuccessful Mobility Experiences Linked to Human–Machine Interactions

  • Original Research/Scholarship
  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ethical dissonance arises from conflicts between beliefs or behaviors and affects ethical factors such as normality or conformity. This paper proposes a weak signal-oriented framework to investigate ethical dissonance from experiences linked to human–machine interactions. It is based on a systems engineering principle called human-systems inclusion, which considers any experience feedback of weak signals as beneficial to learn. The framework studies weak signal-based scenarios from testimonies of individual experiences and these scenarios are assessed by other people. For this purpose, the framework proposes several databases as sources of weak signals, formalization tools of experience feedback of weak signals, models of references of conformity, ethical factors, and a list of examples of ethical dissonance. It also includes sequential steps to make the latter credible regarding the results from the experimental protocols. The framework was used to investigate ethical dissonance by analyzing experiences pertaining to achieving inclusive mobility. The first example focuses on ethical dissonance in terms of hindrance that goes against autonomous mobility due to a misunderstanding of how the system functions in terms of negative and positive emotions. Two other examples present possible ethical dissonance when the use of safety systems such as car driver-assistance systems, may create danger. Investigating ethical dissonance can then help system-inclusive design or evaluation processes by taking into account scenarios from weak signal-based experiences and making them credible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abascala, J., & Nicolle, C. (2005). Moving towards inclusive design guidelines for socially and ethically aware HCI. Interacting with Computers, 17, 484–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arce, C. (2013). Cruise controls can be dangerous. Terrafemina, 12 juillet 2013, https://www.terrafemina.com/vie-pratique/voiture/articles/28300-les-regulateurs-de-vitesse-peuvent-etre-dangereux.html

  • Barkan, R., Ayal, S., & Ariely, D. (2015). Ethical dissonance, justifications, and moral behavior. Current Opinion in Psychology, 6, 157–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barroso, P. M., & Wilson, J. R. (2000). Human error and disturbance occurrence in manufacturing systems (HEDOMS): A framework and a toolkit for practical analysis. Cognition Technology & Work, 3(2), 82–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benabbou, A., Lourdeaux, D., & Lenne, D. (2020). Automated dilemmas generation in simulations. Cognition Technology & Work. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-019-00621-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentaïed, K. (2020). The augmented human and artificial intelligence: what ethic for the human of the future? The example of the exoskeleton. Hitotsubashi Journal of Law and Politics, 48, 63–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanco, S., Lesca, N. (2003). From weak signals to anticipative information : Learning from the implementation of an information selection method. In F. Orlando (Ed.), Search of Time: Proceedings of the International Conference ISIDA, Palermo, Italy, May 8–10 (pp. 197–209).

  • Bonnefon, J.-F., Shariff, A., & Rahwan, I. (2016). The social dilemma of autonomous vehicles. Science, 352, 1573–1576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonnemains, V., Saurel, C., & Tessier, C. (2018). Embedded ethics: some technical and ethical challenges. Ethics and Information Technology, 20(1), 41–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borg, J., Larsson, S., & Östergren, P.-O. (2011). The right to assistive technology: For whom, for what, and by whom? Disability & Society, 26(2), 151–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock, L., Mastroianni, A. C. (2013). Clinical ethics and law. Ethics in medicine online, University of Washington School of Medicine, Department of Bioethics & Humanities.

  • Cacciabue, P., Fujita, Y., Furuta, K., Hollnagel, E. (2000). The rational choice of “Error”. Cognition Technology & Work, 2(4), 179–181.

  • Cahen, P. (2010). Signaux faibles: mode d’emploi. Déceler les tendances, anticiper les ruptures. Paris: Eyrolles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cancino-Montecinos, S., Björklund, F., & Lindholm, T. (2018). Dissonance reduction as emotion regulation: Attitude change is related to positive emotions in the induced compliance paradigm. PLoS ONE, 13(12), e0209012. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carson, T. L. (2003). Self-interest and business ethics: Some lessons of the recent corporate scandals. Journal of Business Ethics, 43, 389–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C., Liu, Y., Kumar, M., Qina, J., & Ren, Y. (2019). Energy consumption modelling using deep learning embedded semi-supervised learning. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 135, 757–765.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, S. L. (2008). The role of law in models of ethical behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 77(4), 451–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coggin, T., & Pieterse, M. (2015). A right to transport? Moving towards a rights-based approach to mobility in the city. South African Journal on Human Rights, 31(2), 294–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Correa, T., & Pavez, I. (2016). Digital inclusion in rural areas: A qualitative exploration of challenges faced by people from isolated communities. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 21(3), 247–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coughlan, R., & Connolly, T. (2008). Investigating unethical decisions at work: Justification and emotion in dilemma resolution. Journal of Managerial Issues, 20(3), 348–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Roure, D., Page, K. R., Radanliev, P., Van Kleek, M. (2019). Complex coupling in cyber-physical systems and the threats of fake data. Living in the Internet of Things (IoT 2019), May 1–2 2019, London, UK. doi:https://doi.org/10.1049/cp.2019.0136.

  • Dekker, S. W. A. (2014). Deferring to expertise versus the prima donna syndrome: A manager’s dilemma. Cognition Technology & Work, 16(4), 541–548.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiLorenzo, V. (2005). Does the law encourage unethical conduct in the securities industry? St. John's Legal Studies Research, Paper No. 09-0025

  • Elster, J. (2010). Self-poisoning of the mind. Philosophical Transactions of Royal Society B, 365, 221–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flemisch, F., Abbink, D., Itoh, M., & Pacaux-Lemoine, M.-P. (2019). Special issue on shared and cooperative control. Cognition Technology & Work, 21, 553–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flemisch, F., Heesen, M., Hesse, T., Kelsch, J., Schieben, A., & Beller, J. (2012). Towards a dynamic balance between humans and automation: authority, ability, responsibility and control in shared and cooperative control situations. Cognition Technology & Work, 14, 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., et al. (2018). AI4People: An ethical framework for a good AI society: Opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Minds & Machines, 28, 689–707.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florido, L., Cowls, J., King, T., & Taddeo, M. (2020). How to design AI for social good: Seven essential factors. Science and Engineering Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-020-00213-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, B., & Kahn, P. H. (2003). Human values, ethics and design. In J. A. Jacko & A. Sears (Eds.), The human–computer interaction handbook (pp. 1177–1201). Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallez, C., Motte-Baumvol, B. (2018). Inclusive mobility or inclusive accessibility ? A European perspective. Cuadernos Europeos de Deusto, 2017, Governing Mobility in Europe: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, pp.79–104. ffhalshs-01683481f

  • Geisler, F. C. M., Vennewald, N., Kubiak, T., & Weber, H. (2010). The impact of heart rate variability on subjective well-being is mediated by emotion regulation. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 723–728.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gips, J. (2011). Towards the ethical robot. In M. Anderson & S. Anderson (Eds.), Machine ethics (pp. 244–253). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511978036.019.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gollwitzer, M., & Melzer, A. (2012). Macbeth and the Joystick: Evidence for moral cleansing after playing a violent video game. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 1356–1360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habibovic, A., Andersson, J., Englund, C. (2019). Automated vehicles: The opportunity to create an inclusive mobility system. Autonotive World, March 27, 2019, https://www.automotiveworld.com/articles/automated-vehicles-the-opportunity-to-create-an-inclusive-mobility-system/

  • Hebel, M. (2000). Human values and the management of technological change. Cognition Technology & Work, 2, 106–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herkert, J. R. (1997). Collaborative learning in engineering ethics. Science and Enginnering Ethics, 3, 447–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickling, E. M., & Bowie, J. E. (2013). Applicability of human reliability assessment methods to human–computer interfaces. Cognition Technology & Work, 15(1), 19–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hidalgo-Baz, M., Martos-Partal, M., & González-Benito, O. (2017). Attitudes vs. purchase behaviors as experienced dissonance: The roles of knowledge and consumer orientations in organic market. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 248. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hidalgo-Muñoz, A. R., Mouratille, D., Matton, N., Caussec, M., Rouillard, Y., & El-Yagoubi, R. (2018). Cardiovascular correlates of emotional state, cognitive workload and time on-task effect during a realistic flight simulation. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 128, 62–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgs, C., McIntosh, T., Connelly, S., & Mumford, M. (2020). Self-focused emotions and ethical decision-making: Comparing the effects of regulated and unregulated guilt, shame, and embarrassment. Science & Engineering Ethics, 26, 27–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeekel, J. F., & Martens, C. J. C. M. (2017). Equity in transport: Learning from the policy domains of housing, health care and education. European Transport Research Review, 9, 53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12544-017-0269-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kafaee, M. (2020). Technological enthusiasm: morally commendable or reprehensible? Science and Engineering Ethics, 26, 969–980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamezaki, M., Hayashi, H., Manawadu, U. E., & Sugano, S. (2020). Human-centered intervention based on tactical-level input in unscheduled takeover scenarios for highly-automated vehicles. International Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems Research, 18, 451–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandemir, C., & Celik, M. (2019). A human reliability assessment of marine auxiliary machinery maintenance operations under ship PMS and maintenance 4.0 concepts. Cognition Technology & Work. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-019-00590-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kervern, G.-Y. (1995). Eléments fondamentaux des cindyniques (Fondamental elements of cindynics). Paris: Economica Editions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirwan, B. (1997). Validation of human reliability assessment techniques: Part 1—Validation issues. Safety Science, 27(1), 25–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopacek, P. (2012). Roboethics. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 45(10), 67–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kouchaki, M., & Desai, S. D. (2015). Anxious, threatened, and also unethical: How anxiety makes individuals feel threatened and commit unethical acts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(2), 360–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwon, L.-N., Park, J.-H., Moon, Y.-H., Lee, B., Shin, Y.-H., & Kim, Y.-K. (2018). Weak signal detecting of industry convergence using information of products and services of global listed companies: Focusing on growth engine industry in South Korea. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 4, 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40852-018-0083-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laudante, E. (2017). Industry 4.0, innovation and design. A new approach for ergonomic analysis in manufacturing system. In: Design for Next, 12th European Academy of Design Conference, Roma, Italy, April 12–14, 2017

  • Lesca, H., Lesca, N. (2013). Weak signal for strategic intelligence: anticipation tool for managers. London, UK: ISTE Ltd and NY, USA: Wiley.

  • Lii, P. (2001). The impact of personal gains on cognitive dissonance for business ethics judgments. Teaching Business Ethics, 5, 21–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longo, F., Nicoletti, L., & Padovano, A. (2017). Smart operators in industry 4.0: A human-centered approach to enhance operators’ capabilities and competencies within the new smart factory context. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 113, 144–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahlmann, M. (2007). Ethics, law and the challenge of cognitive science. German Law Journal, 8(601), 577–615.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manzoor, M., & Vimarlund, V. (2018). Digital technologies for social inclusion of individuals with disabilities. Health and Technology, 8, 377–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, A., Boehler-Baedeker, S., Delgado, L., Durlin, T., Enache, M., & van der Pas, J.-W. (2017). Appropriate national policy frameworks for sustainable urban mobility plans. European Transport Research Review, 9, 7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12544-017-0224-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohn, T. (2014). Is cruise control dangerous?. http://www.bbc.com/autos/story/20130808-is-cruise-control-dangerous

  • Motro, D., Ordóñez, L. D., Pittarello, A., & Welsh, D. T. (2018). Investigating the effects of anger and guilt on unethical behavior: A dual-process approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 152, 133–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mühlroth, C., & Grottke, M. (2018). A systematic literature review of mining weak signals and trends for corporate foresight. Journal of Business Economics, 88(5), 643–687.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolescu, R., Huth, M., Radanliev, P., & De Roure, D. (2019). Mapping the values of IoT. Journal of Information Technology, 33(4), 345–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olphert, C. W., Damodaran, L., May, A. J. (2005). Towards digital inclusion: Engaging older people in the ‘digital world’. In: Accessible Design in the Digital World Conference 2005, August 23–25, 2005.

  • Pacaux-Lemoine, M.-P., & Trentesaux, D. (2019). Ethical risks of human–machine symbiosis in industry 4.0: Insights from the human–machine cooperation approach. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 52(19), 19–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman, R., Sheridan, T. B., & Wickens, C. D. (2000). A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans, 30(3), 286–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascal, B. (1670). Pensées. Éd. Guillaume Desprez (édition originale dite de Port-Royal), Paris, France.

  • Pedersen, E., & Etheridge, K. (1970). Conformist and deviant behaviour in high school: The merton typology adapted to an educational context. Canadian Review of Sociology, 7(1), 70–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlovsky, L., Cabanac, A., Bonniot-Cabana, M.-C., & Cabanac, M. (2013). Mozart effect, cognitive dissonance, and the pleasure of music. Behavioural Brain Research, 244(1), 9–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plaisance, E., Belmont, B., Vérillon, A., & Schneider, C. (2007). Intégration ou inclusion? Éléments pour contribuer au débat. La nouvelle revue de l’adaptation et de la scolarisation, 37, 159–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pooley, C. (2016). Mobility, transport and social inclusion: lessons from history. Social Inclusion, 4(3), 100–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulin, P. A., Corey, P. A., Mackenzie, S., Soloway, G., & Karayolas, E. (2008). Mindfulness training as an evidenced-based approach to reducing stress and promoting well-being among human services professionals. Journal International Journal of Health Promotion and Education, 46(2), 72–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pullin, G., Treviranus, J., Patel, R., & Higginbotham, J. (2017). Designing interaction, voice, and inclusion in AAC research. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 33(3), 139–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radanliev, P. D., Roure, D., Page, K., Van Kleek, M., Montalvo, R. M., Santos, O., et al. (2020). Artificial intelligence, machine learning and real-time probabilistic data for cyber risk (super)-forecasting: Red Teaming the Connected World (RETCON). Preprints, 2020, 2020030217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radanliev, P., De Roure, D. C., Nicolescu, R., Huth, M., Montalvo, R. M., Cannady, S., & Burnap, P. (2018). Future developments in cyber risk assessment for the internet of things. Computers in Industry, 102, 14–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauch, E., Linder, C., & Dallaseg, P. (2019). Anthropocentric perspective of production before and within Industry 4.0. Computers & Industrial Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.01.018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roff, H. M. (2014). The strategic robot problem: Lethal autonomous weapons in war. Journal of Military Ethics, 13(3), 211–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero, D., Bernus, P., Noran, O., Stahre, J., Fast-Berglund, Å. (2016). The operator 4.0: Human cyber-physical systems & adaptive automation towards human-automation symbiosis work systems. In: IFIP International Conference on Advances in Production Management Systems (APMS), September 3–7, 2016, Iguassu Falls, Brazil (pp. 677–686).

  • Ruppert, T., Jaskó, S., Holczinger, T., & Abonyi, T. (2018). Enabling technologies for operator 4.0: A survey. Applied Sciences, 8(9), 1650. https://doi.org/10.3390/app8091650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos, A. S., Aristides, I., Ferreira, A. I., & Costa Ferreira, P. (2019). The impact of cyberloafing and physical exercise on performance: A quasi-experimental study on the consonant and dissonant effects of breaks at work. Cognition Technology & Work. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-019-00575-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scotto d’Apollonia, L. (2016). La dissonance communicationnelle des « porteurs de l’alerte » climatique. VertigO - la revue électronique en sciences de l’environnement. https://doi.org/10.4000/vertigo.17733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segura, A., Diez, H. V., Barandiaran, I., Arbelaiz, A., Álvarez, H., Simões, B., et al. (2018). Visual computing technologies to support the operator 4.0. Computers & Industrial Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.11.060.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan, T. B. (1992). Telerobotics, automation, and human supervisory control. USA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shilton, K. (2018). Values and ethics in human-computer interaction. Foundations and Trends® in Human-Computer Interaction, 12(2), 107–171. https://doi.org/10.1561/1100000073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiwakoti, N., Tay, R., & Stasinopoulos, P. (2020). Development, testing, and evaluation of road safety poster to reduce jaywalking behavior at intersections. Cognition Technology & Work, 22, 389–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simões, R. B., Amaral, I., & Santos, S. C. (2020). Media education and digital inclusion: tackling the social exclusion of disadvantaged groups in Europe. In: Gómez Chova, L., López Martínez, A., & Candel Torres, I. (Eds.), Proceedings of INTED 2020 Conference, March 2–4 2020 (pp. 6527–6534)

  • Stramondo, J. A. (2019). The distinction between curative and assistive technology. Science & Engineering Ethics, 25, 1125–1145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stramondo, J. A. (2020). The right to assistive technology. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-020-09527-8.

  • Strenge, B., & Schack, T. (2020). AWOSE: A process model for incorporating ethical analyses in agile systems engineering. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26, 851–870.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullins, J. P. (2012). Robots, love, and sex: The ethics of building a love machine. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 4(3), 398–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarkkanen, K., Koskinen, J., & Harkke, V. (2015). Distorted usability design in IT tendering. SIGCAS Computers & Society, 45(3), 326–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treviranus, J. A. (2017). Are we teaching our machines our biases, presumptions and stereotypes? Global Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 1(2), 555560. https://doi.org/10.19080/GJIDD.2017.01.555560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tzafestas, S. G. (2018). Roboethics: fundamental concepts and future prospects. Information (Switzerland), 9(6), 148. https://doi.org/10.3390/info9060148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanderhaegen, F. (1999). Cooperative system organisation and task allocation: Illustration of task allocation in air traffic control. Le Travail Humain, 62, 197–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanderhaegen, F. (2012). Cooperation and learning to increase the autonomy of ADAS. Cognition Technology & Work, 14(1), 61–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanderhaegen, F. (2019). Pedagogical learning supports based on human–systems inclusion applied to rail flow control. Cognition Technology & Work. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-019-00602-2].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanderhaegen, F., Chalmé, S., Anceaux, F., & Millot, P. (2006). Principles of cooperation and competition: Application to car driver behavior analysis. Cognition, Technology & Work, 8, 183–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varner, G. (2008). Utilitarianism and the evolution of ecological ethics. Science and Engineering, 14, 551–573.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vislie, L. (2003). From integration to inclusion: Focusing global trends and changes in the western European societies. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 18(1), 17–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, H., Shen, Z., Miao, C., Leung, C., Lesser, V. R., Yang, Q. (2018). Building ethics into artificial intelligence. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI'18) (pp. 5527–5533).

  • Zhang, J., & Li, S. (2019). A deep learning scheme for mental workload classification based on restricted Boltzmann machines. Cognition Technology & Work, 19(4), 607–631.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zülch, G. (2014). Evaluating human work in the digital factory: A new German guideline. In: IFIP International Conference on Advances in Production Management Systems (APMS), September, Ajaccio, France

Download references

Acknowledgements

The present research work has been supported by the Scientific Research Network on Integrated Automation and Human-Machine Systems (GRAISyHM), and by the Regional Council of “Hauts-de-France” (Regional Council of Nord – Pas de Calais – Picardie from France), project CONPETISES (Pedagogical control of human driving tasks by automated systems). The author gratefully acknowledges the support of these institutions. The author also thanks the participants of the workshops on Ergonomics and Artificial Intelligence (ERGO-IA) in 2017 and 2019.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Univ. Polytechnique Hauts-de-France, LAMIH, CNRS, UMR 8201, Le Mont Houy, 59313, Valenciennes Cedex 9, France

    F. Vanderhaegen

  2. INSA Hauts-de-France, 59313, Valenciennes, France

    F. Vanderhaegen

Authors
  1. F. Vanderhaegen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Vanderhaegen.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vanderhaegen, F. Weak Signal-Oriented Investigation of Ethical Dissonance Applied to Unsuccessful Mobility Experiences Linked to Human–Machine Interactions. Sci Eng Ethics 27, 2 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-021-00284-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-021-00284-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation