Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Optimal FOPID/PID controller parameters tuning for the AVR system based on sine–cosine-algorithm

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Evolutionary Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To enhance the controller performance, an advanced sine–cosine-algorithm (SCA) is employed for Fractional order PID (FOPID) controller tuning in this paper. The SCA-FOPID controller is based on model-based controller design method of physical systems to get better performance. The FOPID controller is designed by SCA optimization technique using the time domain objective function for AVR system. The SCA technique is responsible to optimize five parameters of FOPID controller based on minimum value of objective function of the controller design. The proposed SCA-FOPID controller is design at a global optimum of objective function is acheived. Then, the AVR system has good regulation of terminal voltage at the output to meet desired performance. The proposed method has a good reference tracking ability and frequency responses. This method is compared with the PID and FOPID controller designs of AVR system in the recent years, the proposed SCA-FOPID controller gives an excellent performance from the extensive simulations studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. TangEmail Y, Zhao L, Han Z, Bi X, Guan X (2016) Optimal gray PID controller design for automatic voltage regulator system via imperialist competitive algorithm. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 7(2):229–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zamani M, Karimi-Ghartemani M, Sadati N, Parniani M (2009) Design of a fractional order PID controller for an AVR using particle swarm optimization. Control Eng Pract 17(2):1380–1387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Basu A, Mohanty S, Sharma R (2016) Designing of the PID and FOPID controllers using conventional tuning techniques. In: International conference on inventive computation technologies (ICICT), pp 1–6

  4. Gaing Z-L (2004) A particle swarm optimization approach for optimum design of PID controller in AVR system. IEEE Trans Energy Convers 19(2):384–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gong C (2019) Jaya algorithm optimized PID controller for AVR system. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on intelligent, interactive systems and applications (IISA2018), pp 384–393

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Uniyal I, Sikander A (2018) A comparative analysis of PID controller design for AVR based on optimization techniques. Intell Commun Control Devices Adv Intell Syst Comput 624:1315–1323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ramezanian H, Balochian S, Zare A (2013) Design of optimal fractional order PID controllers using particle swarm optimization algorithm for automatic voltage regulator (AVR) system. J Control Autom Electr Syst 24(5):601–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Xiao L, Ying W, Ning L, Minyu H, Yinggan T, Fucai L (2017) Optimal fractional order PID controller design for automatic voltage regulator system based on reference model using particle swarm optimization. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 8(5):1595–1605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sahu RK, Sekhar GC, Priyadarshani S (2019) Differential evolution algorithm tuned tilt integral derivative controller with filter controller for automatic generation control. Evolut Intell. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12065-019-00215-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jailsingh B, Ravi Kumar J (2019) PID controller design for decentralized TITO process using modified differential evolution algorithm. Mechatron Syst Control. https://doi.org/10.2316/J.2019.201-2947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ahuja A, Aggarwal SK (2014) Design of fractional order PID controller for DC motor using evolutionary optimization techniques 3 evolutionary optimization. WSEAS Trans Syst Control 9:171–82

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sharma S, Kumar S, Sharma K (2019) Improved Gbest artificial bee colony algorithm for the constraints optimization problems. Evolut Intell. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12065-019-00231-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hafsi S, Laabidi K, Farkh R (2015) A new tuning method for stabilization time delay systems using \(P I^{\lambda } D^{\mu }\) controllers. Asian J Control 17(3):821–831

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Lahcene R, Abdeldjalil S, Aissa K (2017) Optimal tuning of fractional order PID controller for AVR system using simulated annealing optimization algorithm. In: 5th international conference on electrical engineering—Boumerdes (ICEE-B), pp 1–6

  15. Verma SK, Yadav S, Nagar SK (2017) Optimization of fractional order PID controller using grey wolf optimizer. J Control Autom Electr Syst 28(3):314–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zafer B, Karahan O (2018) A novel performance criterion approach to optimum design of PID controller using cuckoo search algorithm for AVR system. J Frankl Inst 355(13):5534–5559

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Blondin a MJ, Sanchis J, Sicard P, Herrero JM (2018) New optimal controller tuning method for an AVR system using a simplified Ant Colony Optimization with a new constrained Nelder–Mead algorithm. Appl Soft Comput 62:216–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Shah P, Agashe S (2016) Review of fractional PID controller. Mechatronics 38:29–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Haji VH, Monje CA (2017) Fractional-order PID control of a chopper-fed DC motor drive using a novel firefly algorithm with dynamic control mechanism. Soft Comput 22(18):6135–6146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Podlubny I (1999) Fractional-order systems and controllers. IEEE Trans Autom Control 44(1):208–214

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Roy P, Kar B, Kumar A, Roy BK (2016) Level control of two tank system by fractional order integral state feedback controller tuned by PSO with experimental validation. In: 2016 IEEE first international conference on control measurement and instrumentation, pp 224–228

  22. Babu GS, Dinesh K (2015) Implementation of fractional order PID controller for an AVR system. In: IEEE international conference on energy power and environment: towards sustainable growth (ICEPE), pp 1–6

  23. Charef A, Sun HH, Tsao YY, Onaral B (1992) Fractal system as represented by singularity function. IEEE Trans Autom Control 37(9):1465–1470

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Mirjalili S (2016) SCA: a sine cosine algorithm for solving optimization problems. Knowl Based Syst 96:120–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Nenavath H, Jatoth RK (2018) Hybridizing sine cosine algorithm with differential evolution for global optimization and object tracking. Appl Soft Comput 62:1019–1043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Panda S, Sahu BK, Mohanty PK (2012) Design and performance analysis of PID controller for an automatic voltage regulator system using simplified particle swarm optimization. J Frankl Inst 349(8):2609–2625

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Parinya A, Zongli L (2017) Fractional order PID control of rotor suspension by active magnetic bearings. Actuators 6(1):1–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ekinci S, Hekimoglu B (2019) Improved kidney-inspired algorithm approach for tuning of PID controller in AVR system. IEEE Access 7:39935–39947

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of ECE, NIT Warangal, Hanamkonda, Telangana, India

    Jailsingh Bhookya & Ravi Kumar Jatoth

Authors
  1. Jailsingh Bhookya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ravi Kumar Jatoth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jailsingh Bhookya.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bhookya, J., Jatoth, R.K. Optimal FOPID/PID controller parameters tuning for the AVR system based on sine–cosine-algorithm. Evol. Intel. 12, 725–733 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12065-019-00290-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12065-019-00290-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation