Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Model analysis and application case for complex multi-system evolutionary optimization

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Evolutionary Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A complex system is made up of multiple related and coupled subsystems. Each subsystem has its own set of multiple constraints and objectives, and is commonly found in real-world applications. Biogeography-based complex system optimization (BBO/Complex) is a population-based evolutionary intelligence paradigm that has been developed to solve complex system problems. The paper first presents the framework of the proposed method that consists of within-subsystem migration, cross-subsystem migration, and mutation operators. Then a theoretical model of the proposed method is derived using Markov chain and the probability transition matrix of each operator, along with the generalized multinomial theorem. The model provides exact mathematical formulas that predict the limiting probabilities of optimization performance for each possible population in the proposed method. Additionally, simulation results of two sample problems, which include multiple subsystems and multiple objectives, confirm the Markov model derived. Finally, the performance of the proposed method is investigated on an application of a battery charging system, and numerical simulation shows that the proposed method is a promising optimization method for the studied complex system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Data availability

Enquires about data availability should be directed to the authors.

References

  1. Abell J, Du D (2010) A framework for multi-objective, biogeography-based optimization of complex system families. In: Proceeding of AIAA/ISSMO Multidiscipline Analysis Optimization Conference, Fort Worth, Texas, pp1–8

  2. Allison J (2004) Complex system optimization: a review of analytical target cascading, collaborative optimization, and other formulations. M. S. Thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI

  3. Balesdent M, Berend N, Depince P et al (2012) A survey of multidisciplinary design optimization methods in launch vehicle design. Struct Multidiscip Optim 45(5):619–642

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Beaulieu N (1991) On the generalized multinomial distribution, optimal multinomial detectors, and generalized weighted partial decision detectors. IEEE Trans Commun 39(2):193–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen X, Song S, Ji J et al (2020) Incorporating a multiobjective knowledge-based energy function into differential evolution for protein structure prediction. Inf Sci 540:69–88

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Costa M, Coelho L, Lebensztajn L (2012) Multi-objective biogeography-based optimization based on predator-prey approach. IEEE Trans Magn 48(2):951–954

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S et al (2002) A fast and elitist multi-objective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 6(2):182–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Du D, Simon D (2013) Complex system optimization using biogeography-based optimization, Mathematical Problem of Engineering, ID: 147457

  9. Grinstead C, Snell J (1998) Introduction to probability. American Mathematical Society

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gupta A, Ong YS, Feng L et al (2016) Multiobjective multifactorial optimization in evolutionary multitasking. IEEE Trans Cybern 47(7):1652–2166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hammond W (2001) Design methodologies for space transportation systems. Am Inst Aeronaut Astronaut 16(2):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hanh T, Thanh P, Binh H (2021) Evolutionary algorithm and multifactorial evolutionary algorithm on clustered shortest-path tree problem. Inf Sci 553:280–304

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Hathaway R, Bezdek J (2001) Fuzzy c-means clustering of incomplete data. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern-Part B 31(5):735–744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jangir P, Buch H, Mirjalili S, Manoharan P (2023) MOMPA: multi-objective marine predator algorithm for solving multi-objective optimization problems. Evol Intel 16:169–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kodiyalam S, Scobieski J (2001) Multidisciplinary design optimization – some formal methods, framework requirements, and application to vehicle design. Int J Veh Des 25(1–2):3–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu K, Li K, Yang Z et al (2017) An advanced Lithium-ion battery optimal charging strategy based on a coupled thermoelectric model. Electrochim Acta 225:330–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ma H, Simon D, Fei M et al (2013) Variations of biogeography-based optimization and Markov analysis. Inform Sci 220(1):492–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ma H, Su S, Simon D et al (2015) Ensemble multi-objective biogeography-based optimization with application to automated warehouse scheduling. Eng Appl Artif Intell 44:79–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ma H, Simon D, Fei M et al (2017) Interactive Markov models of optimization search strategies. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern: Syst 47(5):808–825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ma H, You P, Liu K, et al. (2017) Optimal battery charging strategy based on complex system optimization, In: International Conference on Life System Modeling and Simulation, pp 371–378

  21. Martins J, Lambe A (2013) Multidisciplinary design optimization: a survey of architectures. The AIAA J 51(9):2049–2075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mehta R (2023) Genetic algorithm based bi-objective optimization of sigmoidal utility and throughput in ad-hoc wireless networks. Evol Intel 16:1259–1269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mordecai Y, Orhof O, Dori D (2018) Model-based interoperability engineering in systems-of-systems and civil aviation. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern: Syst 48(4):637–648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Palakonda V, Mallipeddi R, Suganthan PN (2021) An ensemble approach with external archive for multi- and many-objective optimization with adaptive mating mechanism and two-level environmental selection. Inf Sci 555:164–197

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Qasim S, Ismail M (2023) MOSA/D: multi-operator evolutionary many-objective algorithm with self-adaptation of parameters based on decomposition. Evol Intel 16:849–871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Reeves C, Rowe J (2006) Genetic algorithms: principles and perspectives. Kluwer

    Google Scholar 

  27. Simon D (2013) Evolutionary optimization algorithms. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, USA

    Google Scholar 

  28. Simon D (2008) Biogeography-based optimization. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 12(6):702–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Simon D, Ergezer M, Du D et al (2011) Markov models for biogeography-based optimization. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern-Part B 41(1):299–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Suzuki J (1995) A Markov chain analysis on simple genetic algorithms. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern-Part B 25(4):655–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Suzuki J (1998) A further result on the Markov chain model of genetic algorithms and its application to a simulated annealing-like strategy. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern-Part B 28(1):95–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Tan F, Chai Z, Li Y (2023) Multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for vehicle routing problem with time window under uncertainty. Evol Intel 16:493–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Tomczyk M, Kadzinski M (2021) Decomposition-based co-evolutionary algorithm for interactive multiple objective optimization. Inf Sci 549:178–199

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. Wang Z, Ma J, Zhang L (2017) State-of-health estimation for lithium-ion batteries based on the multi-island genetic algorithm and the Gaussian process regression. IEEE Access 5:21286–21295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Wright A, Zhao Y (1999) Markov chain models of genetic algorithms, In: Proceeding of Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, pp 734–741

  36. Zhang X, Cheng R, Feng L, Jin Y (2023) Machine learning assisted evolutionary multi-objective optimization. IEEE Comput Intell Mag 18(2):16–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhao Z, Liu B, Zhang C, Liu H (2019) An improved adaptive NSGA-II with multi-population algorithm. Appl Intell 49(2):569–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Zhao F, Zhou Z, Hu C et al (2018) A new evidential reasoning-based method for online safety assessment of complex systems. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern: Syst 48(6):954–966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Zou F, Yen GG, Tang L et al (2021) A reinforcement learning approach for dynamic multi-objective optimization. Inf Sci 546:815–834

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This article was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 52077213, the U.S. National Science Foundation under Grant No. 1344954, and the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. LY19F030011.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Electrical Engineering, Shaoxing University, Shaoxing, Zhejiang, China

    Haiping Ma & Shengyi Sun

  2. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, OH, USA

    Dawei Du & Dan Simon

Authors
  1. Haiping Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shengyi Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dawei Du
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Dan Simon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

HM performed the data analyses and wrote the main manuscript text; SS performed the experiment; DD helped perform the analysis with constructive discussions; SD contributed to the conception of the study. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haiping Ma.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Consent for publication

This article is approved by all authors for publication.

Human and animals participants

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ma, H., Sun, S., Du, D. et al. Model analysis and application case for complex multi-system evolutionary optimization. Evol. Intel. 17, 2733–2748 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12065-024-00910-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12065-024-00910-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation