Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Optimization of power management among an engine, battery and ultra-capacitor for a series HEV: A dynamic programming application

  • Published:
International Journal of Automotive Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a hybrid electric vehicle (HEV) system, it is an important issue on how to distribute the output power from multiple power generating components to operate a vehicle more efficiently. Many studies have been conducted on how to manage multiple power sources of a vehicle based on various optimization theories. In this study, an algorithm to calculate the optimization of a series HEV that has three power generating components, engine, battery and ultra-capacitor, is developed based on dynamic programming. Normally dynamic programming is applied to the optimization of power management and components sizing by estimating potential fuel economy for electrified vehicle such as HEV, Plug-in HEV or Fuelcell HEV. In contrast with most objective systems that have only two power generating components, the system in this study has three power sources. Since the system has three power sources, the number of state and control variables of optimization problem increases. Therefore the number of calculations increases unreasonably. To decrease the number and time of calculations, a new electric model that contains the both characteristics of battery and ultra-capacitor is developed with some assumptions. In comparison with the optimization algorithm which follows the theory of DP with no assumptions, the results from the newly developed algorithm has 1.04 % discrepancy in terms of fuel economy, even though the calculation time decreases to 4400 times less.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Abbreviations

I :

current, A

J :

total cost of optimization problem

k :

number of step

L :

cost of step

N :

total number of step

P :

power, W

Q :

quantity of power source, Ah

R :

resistance, Ω

SOC :

state of charge of energy storage system

u :

control variable

V :

voltage, V

x :

state variable

η :

efficiency

τ :

polarization time constant

bat, eng, ulc :

power source component models

aux, ctrl, mot, trans, veh :

powertrain and consumption models

elec :

electric energy model

i :

internal

References

  • Abkemeier, K. et al. (2014). Hybrid and Electric Vehicles. The Electric Drive Accelerates. http://www.ieahev.org

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehsani, M., Gao, Y. and Emadi, A. (2010). Modern Electric, Hybrid Electric and Fuel Cell Vehicles. Fundamentals, Theory, and Design. CRC Press. Boca Raton, Florida, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guzzella, L. and Sciarretta, A. (2005). Vehicle Propulsion Systems. Introduction to Modeling and Optimization. Springer. Verlag Berling Heidelberg. Heidelberg, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeong, J., Lee, D., Shin, C., Lim, W., Park, Y.-I. and Cha, S. W. (2011). Analysis of correlation of fuel efficiency and cost depending on component size of heavy-duty parallel hybrid system. Trans. Korean Society of Automotive Engineers 19, 3, 73–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeong, J., Lee, D., Shin, C., Jeong, D., Min, K., Cha, S. W. and Park, Y.-I. (2013). Comparison of the fuel economy of series and parallel hybrid bus system using dynamic programming. Trans. Korean Society of Automotive Engineers 21, 1, 93–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeong, J., Shin, C., Lim, W., Cha, S. W. and Jang, M. E. (2012). Development of backward simulator based on dynamic programming for the multiple power sources of series hybrid electric vehicle. Proc. 26th Int. Electr. Vehicle Symp. Los Angeles, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, V. H. (2002). Battery performance models in ADVISOR. J. Power Sources 110, 2, 321–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karbowski, D., Haliburton, C. and Rousseau, A. (2007). Impact of component size on plug-in hybrid vehicle energy consumption using global optimization. Proc. Electric Vehicle Symp., Anaheim, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H., Heo, S. and Kang, G. (2009a). Modeling and characteristic analysis of HEV li-ion battery using recursive least square estimation. Trans. Korean Society of Automotive Engineers 17, 1, 130–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, I. and Kim, H. (2013). Configuration analysis of plug-in hybrid systems using global optimization. Proc. Electric Vehicle Symp., Barcelona, Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, M., Jeong, D. and Min, K. (2010). Serie type hybrid bus research of SILS system. KSAE Annual Conf. Proc., Korean Society of Automotive Engineers, 2929–2934.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, M.-J. and Peng, H. (2007). Power management and design optimization of fuel cell/battery hybrid vehicles. J. Power Sources 165, 2, 819–832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, N., Ha, S., Jeong, J. and Cha, S. W. (2015). Sufficient conditions for optimal energy management strategies of fuel cell hybrid electric vehicles based on Pontryagin’s minimum principle. Proc. Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: J. Automobile Engineering 230, 2, 202–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, N., Cha, S. and Peng, H. (2011). Optimal control of hybrid electric vehicles based on Pontryagin’s minimum principle. IEEE Trans. Control Systems Technology 19, 5, 1279–1287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, N., Rousseau, A. and Rask, E. (2012). Vehicle-level control analysis of 2010 Toyota Prius based on test data. Proc. Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: J. Automobile Engineering 226, 11, 1483–1494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y.-G., Lee, H., Song, S., Kim, T. and Min, B. (2009b). Development of optimal control strategy for hybrid electric vehicle using dynamic programming and fuel equivalent factor. Proc. Electric Vehicle Symp., Stavanger, Norway.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, D. E. (1970). Optimal Control Theory. An Introduction. Prentice Hall. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D. H., Kim, N. W., Jeong, J. R., Park, Y. I. and Cha, S. W. (2013). Component sizing and engine optimal operation line analysis for a plug-in hybrid electric transit bus. Int. J. Automotive Technology 14, 3, 459–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, C.-C., Peng, H., Grizzle, J. W. and Kang, J.-M. (2003). Power management strategy for a parallel hybrid electric truck. IEEE Trans. Control Systems Technology 11, 6, 839–849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, W.-S. and Zheng, C.-H. (2011). Energy management of a fuel cell/ultracapacitor hybrid power system using an adaptive optimal-control method. J. Power Sources 196, 6, 3280–3289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J. and Peng, H. (2006). Control optimization for a power-split hybrid vehicle. Proc. American Control Conf., Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansour, C. and Clodic, D. (2012). Optimized energy management control for the toyota hybrid system using dynamic programming on a predicted route with short computation time. Int. J. Automotive Technology 13, 2, 309–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pisu, P. and Rizzoni, G. (2007). A comparative study of supervisory control strategies for hybrid electric vehicles. IEEE Trans. Control Systems Technology 15, 3, 506–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajamani, R. (2006). Vehicle Dynamics and Control. Springer. Berlin, Germany.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sciarretta, A., Back, M. and Guzzella, L. (2004). Optimal control of parallel hybrid electric vehicles. IEEE Trans. Control Systems Technology 12, 3, 352–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sciarretta, A. and Guzzella, L. (2007). Control of hybrid electric vehicles. IEEE Control Systems 27, 2, 60–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uzunoglu, M. and Alam, M. S. (2007). Dynamic modeling, design and simulation of a PEM fuel cell/ultra-capacitor hybrid system for vehicular applications. Energy Conversion and Management 48, 5, 1544–1553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, C. H., Oh, C. E., Park, Y. I. and Cha, S. W. (2012a). Fuel economy evaluation of fuel cell hybrid vehicles based on equivalent fuel consumption. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 37, 2, 1790–1796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, C. H., Kim, N. W. and Cha, S. W. (2012b). Optimal control in the power management of fuel cell hybrid vehicles. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 37, 1, 655–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suk Won Cha.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jeong, J., Kim, N., Lim, W. et al. Optimization of power management among an engine, battery and ultra-capacitor for a series HEV: A dynamic programming application. Int.J Automot. Technol. 18, 891–900 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-017-0087-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-017-0087-4

Keywords