Abstract
Most labor contract evaluations rely on performance evaluations by human resource management, which is time-consuming and costly. However, there has been little research into quantitative contract evaluations. This paper embedded a Stacked Autoencoder into a weighted two-stage data envelopment analysis model to evaluate NBA rookie seasonal contracts in an attempt to quantitatively assess contract execution efficiency. It was found that the model was able to effectively evaluate the NBA rookie contracts and provide guidance to the coach regarding their on-court performances. The NBA rookie contract execution analyses also found that performance and therefore contract fulfilment was possibly affected by time allocation problems. Finally, a dynamic and comprehensive contract evaluation system that has significant possible commercial value was constructed to assist the player, coach and manager make timely decisions, which may be a breakthrough in objective human resource management performance evaluation systems.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adler N, Golany B (2002) Including principal component weights to improve discrimination in data envelopment analysis. J Oper Res Soc 53:985–991. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601400
Adler N, Yazhemsky E (2010) Improving discrimination in data envelopment analysis: PCA-DEA or variable reduction. Eur J Oper Res 202:273–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009.03.050
Akee R, Zhao L, Zhao Z (2019) Unintended consequences of China’s new labor contract law on unemployment and welfare loss of the workers. China Econ Rev 53:87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2018.08.008
Allen DG, Shanock LR (2013) Perceived organizational support and embeddedness as key mechanisms connecting socialization tactics to commitment and turnover among new employees. J Organ Behav 34:350–369. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1805
Amzat IH (2017) Key performance indicators for excellent teachers in Malaysia. Int J Product Perform Manag 66:298–319. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-06-2015-0094
Bai C, Sarkis J (2014) Determining and applying sustainable supplier key performance indicators. Supply Chain Manag 19:275–291. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-12-2013-0441
Basso A, Casarin F, Funari S (2018) How well is the museum performing? A joint use of DEA and BSC to measure the performance of museums. Omega 81:67–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2017.09.010
Bauer T, Erdogan B (2011) Organizational socialization: the effective onboarding of new employees. In: Zedeck SE (ed) APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, vol 3. American Psychological Association, Washington, pp 51–64
Bengio Y, Lamblin P, Popovici D, Larochelle H (2006) Greedy layer-wise training of deep networks. In: Proceedings of the 19th international conference on neural information processing systems, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, pp 153–160. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2976456.2976476. Accessed 15 Aug 2018
Berrios R, McKinney JB (2017) Contracting and accountability under leaner government. Public Integr 19:559–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2016.1239493
Chaiwuttisak P (2019) Measuring efficiency of Thailand’s football premier leagues using data envelopment analysis. Springer, Cham, pp 691–700
Chan PP, Lin Z, Hu X, Tsang EC, Yeung DS (2017) Sensitivity based robust learning for stacked autoencoder against evasion attack. Neurocomputing 267:572–580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2017.06.032
Chen WC, Johnson AL (2010) The dynamics of performance space of major league baseball pitchers 1871–2006. Ann Oper Res 181:287–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-010-0743-9
Chitnis A, Vaidya O (2014) Performance assessment of tennis players: application of DEA. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 133:74–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.171
Constandt B, De Waegeneer E, Willem A (2018) Coach ethical leadership in soccer clubs: an analysis of its influence on ethical behavior. J Sport Manag 32:185–198. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.2017-0182
Cooper W, Ruiz JL, Sirvent I (2009) Selecting non-zero weights to evaluate effectiveness of basketball players with DEA. Eur J Oper Res 195:563–574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2008.02.012
DeMers D, Cottrell GW (1993) Non-linear dimensionality reduction. In: Advances in neural information processing systems, vol 5, [NIPS Conference], Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA, pp 580–587. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=645753.668078. Accessed 13 Aug 2018
Dong F, Mitchell PD, Knuteson D, Wyman J, Bussan A, Conley S (2016) Assessing sustainability and improvements in US midwestern soybean production systems using a PCA-DEA approach. Renew Agric Food Syst 31:524–539. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170515000460
Feng S, Duarte MF (2018) Graph autoencoder-based unsupervised feature selection with broad and local data structure preservation. Neurocomputing 312:310–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2018.05.117
Ferris GR, Munyon TP, Basik K, Buckley MR (2008) The performance evaluation context: social, emotional, cognitive, political, and relationship components. Hum Resour Manag Rev 18:146–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2008.07.006
Galariotis E, Germain C, Zopounidis C (2018) A combined methodology for the concurrent evaluation of the business, financial and sports performance of football clubs: the case of France. Ann Oper Res 266:589–612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2631-z
Gallagher M, Giles J, Park A, Wang M (2015) China’s 2008 labor contract law: implementation and implications for China’s workers. Hum Relat 68:197–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726713509418
Golman R, Bhatia S (2012) Performance evaluation inflation and compression. Account Organ Soc 37:534–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2012.09.001
Hofler RA, Payne JE (1997) Measuring efficiency in the national basketball association 1. Econ Lett 55:293–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1765(97)00083-9
Jacob B, Lefgren L (2008) Can principals identify effective teachers? Evidence on subjective performance evaluation in education. J Labor Econ 26:101–136. https://doi.org/10.1086/522974
Jiang L, Song Z, Ge Z, Chen J (2017) Robust self-supervised model and its application for fault detection. Ind Eng Chem Res 56:7503–7515. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.7b00949
Kucukaltan B, Irani Z, Aktas E (2016) A decision support model for identification and prioritization of key performance indicators in the logistics industry. Comput Hum Behav 65:346–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.045
Landete M, Monge JF, Ruiz JL (2017) Robust DEA efficiency scores: a probabilistic/combinatorial approach. Expert Syst Appl 86:145–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2017.05.072
Leidner DE, Gonzalez E, Koch H (2018) An affordance perspective of enterprise social media and organizational socialization. J Strat Inf Syst 27:117–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2018.03.003
Lewis HF (2014) Performance measurement of major league baseball teams using network DEA. Springer, Boston, pp 475–535. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-8068-7-20
Liao J, Huang M, Xiao B (2017) Promoting continual member participation in firm-hosted online brand communities: an organizational socialization approach. J Bus Res 71:92–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.10.013
Modak M, Pathak K, Ghosh KK (2017) Performance evaluation of outsourcing decision using a BSC and fuzzy AHP approach: a case of the Indian coal mining organization. Resour Policy 52:181–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2017.03.002
Moreno P, Lozano S (2014) A network DEA assessment of team efficiency in the NBA. Ann Oper Res 214:99–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-012-1074-9
Morrison EW (1993) Newcomer information seeking: exploring types, modes, sources, and outcomes. Acad Manag J 36:557–589. https://doi.org/10.5465/256592
Nan Z, Fei Y (2019) Method selection: a conceptual framework for public sector PPP selection. Built Environ Proj Asset Manag 9:214–232. https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-01-2018-0018
Nara EOB, Sordi DC, Schaefer JL, Schreiber JNC, Baierle IC, Sellitto MA, Furtado JC (2019) Prioritization of OHS key performance indicators that affecting business competitiveness—a demonstration based on MAUT and neural networks. Saf Sci 118:826–834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.06.017
NBA Advanced Stats, 2018, Draft history. https://www.stats-nba.com/. Accessed 4 June 2018
Oukil A (2018) Ranking via composite weighting schemes under a DEA cross-evaluation framework. Comput Ind Eng 117:217–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.01.022
Poldaru R, Roots J (2014) A PCA-DEA approach to measure the quality of life in Estonian counties. Socio Econ Plan Sci 48:65–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2013.10.001
Ruiz JL, Pastor D, Pastor JT (2013) Assessing professional tennis players using data envelopment analysis (DEA). J Sports Econ 14:276–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527002511421952
Saha M, Mitra P, Nanjundiah RS (2016) Predictor discovery for early-late Indian summer monsoon using stacked Autoencoder. Procedia Comput Sci 80:565–576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.05.337
Sancho MR (2016) BSC best practices in professional training and teaching for the HPC ecosystem. J Comput Sci 14:74–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocs.2015.12.004
Sexton TR, Lewis HF (2003) Two-stage DEA: an application to major league baseball. J Prod Anal 19:227–249. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022861618317
Soebbing BP, Wicker P, Watanabe NM (2016) The effects of performance expectations on total compensation of division I—football bowl subdivision head coaches. J Sport Manag 30:70–81. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.2014-0305
Toloo M (2013) The most efficient unit without explicit inputs: an extended MILP-DEA model. Measurement 46:3628–3634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2013.06.030
Trinkūnienė E, Podvezko V, Zavadskas EK, Jokšienė I, Vinogradova I, Trinkūnas V (2017) Evaluation of quality assurance in contractor contracts by multi-attribute decision-making methods. Econ Res 30:1152–1180. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2017.1325616
Villa G, Lozano S (2016) Assessing the scoring efficiency of a football match. Eur J Oper Res 255:559–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.05.024
Volz BD (2016) DEA applications to major league baseball: evaluating manager and team efficiencies. Springer, Boston, pp 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7684-0-5
Wang F, Song H, Cheng Y, Luo N, Gan B, Feng J, Xie P (2016) Converging divergence: the effect of China’s Employment Contract Law on signing written employment contracts. Int J Hum Resour Manag 27:2075–2096. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2016.1164223
Wu HY, Tzeng GH, Chen YH (2009) A fuzzy MCDM approach for evaluating banking performance based on Balanced Scorecard. Expert Syst Appl 36:10135–10147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.01.005
Yang CH, Lin HY, Chen CP (2014) Measuring the efficiency of NBA teams: additive efficiency decomposition in two-stage DEA. Ann Oper Res 217:565–589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-014-1536-3
Zabalza J, Ren J, Zheng J, Zhao H, Qing C, Yang Z, Du P, Marshall S (2016) Novel segmented stacked Autoencoder for effective dimensionality reduction and feature extraction in hyperspectral imaging. Neurocomputing 185:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2015.11.044
Zhou T, Han G, Xu X, Lin Z, Han C, Huang Y, Qin J (2017) delta-agree Adaboost stacked autoencoder for short-term traffic flow forecasting. Neurocomputing 247:31–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2017.03.049
Zhou X, Xu Z, Chai J, Yao L, Wang S, Lev B (2018) Efficiency evaluation for banking systems under uncertainty: a multi-period three-stage DEA model. Omega. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2018.05.012
Acknowledgements
Funding was provided by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 71471141, 91646113 and 71350007).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhu, Q., Zuo, R., Li, Y. et al. A system evaluation of NBA rookie contract execution efficiency with stacked Autoencoder and hybrid DEA. Oper Res Int J 21, 2771–2807 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-019-00537-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-019-00537-6