Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Assessing the efficiency of occupational pension funds in Greece

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Operational Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 21 February 2024

This article has been updated

Abstract

In countries like Greece where long-term fiscal imbalances and bailouts are to a large extent attributed to particularly high pension expenditures as a share of Gross Domestic Product (GDP), (e.g., 15.5% of GDP in 2017) (pre)funded pension schemes are expected to play an important role. This is the first study that analyzes the technical efficiency of occupational pension schemes in Greece by applying the methodology of Data Envelopment Analysis on a sample of sixteen decision-making units for the period 2017–2020. The study also provides up-to-date information on the spread of occupational pension schemes in Greece. The results indicate that one out of two Greek occupational pension funds operated fairly efficiently and that the sector displayed a considerable variation and a systematic upward trend. Total equity and debt are the main determinants of occupational pension funds’ efficiency, followed by total assets and operating expenses. Furthermore, scale acts as a restriction on the efficient performance of small occupational pension funds. These findings imply a need for resource reallocation (e.g., reduction of the level of inputs used) and for favoring economies of scale (e.g., through the operation of ‘open’ pension funds).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Source: Pissarides et al. (2020)

Fig. 2

Source: OECD (2022)

Fig. 3

Source: Authors’ calculations derived from EIOPA (2021a), Bank of Greece (2021 and 2022), Eurostat database (2023), and EIOPA Database (2023)

Fig. 4

Source: EIOPA (2021a), Bank of Greece (2021 and 2022), and Eurostat database (2023)

Fig. 5

Source: Authors’ calculations from EIOPA (2021a)

Fig. 6

Source: Hellenic Union of Institutions for Occupational Retirement Provision (HUIORP)

Fig. 7

Source: Authors’ calculations derived from EIOPA (2021a), Bank of Greece (2021 and 2022), and Eurostat database (2023)

Fig. 8

Source: Authors’ calculations from EIOPA (2021a)

Fig. 9

Source: Bank of Greece (2021, 2022, and 2023)

Fig. 10

Source: Bank of Greece (2021, 2022, and 2023)

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

Notes

  1. Occupational schemes (pillar II) and statutory public schemes (pillar I) aimed at avoiding old age poverty should ensure pension adequacy (that is prevention of poverty in old age, inter-generational solidarity, and the maintenance of living standards in old-age), leaving personal saving schemes (pillar III), mandatory or voluntary, as a tool for individuals to enhance their replacement rates (European Parliament 2014).

  2. Considering Greece's financial difficulties, these three programs provided loans to Greece conditional on the implementation of policy measures.

  3. This was the result of the consolidation of all PAYG pension funds into EFKA achieving administrative and operational unification (Law 4387/2016).

  4. The introduction of funded schemes was only on paper. Auxiliary funds of the pillar I (PAYG) have not been gradually transformed into funded occupational schemes managed by social partners and the size of the very few schemes established is too limited (Romanias 2007).

  5. IORP II aims to establish a better system for governing occupational pension funds, to increase information transparency for pension savers, and to clarify the procedures for carrying out cross-border transfers and activities.

  6. FEIR (2022) analyzes the institution’s prospects and challenges and draws important conclusions regarding the positive macroeconomic effect that the development of the second pillar may have on the Greek economy.

  7. There are considerable differences relating to the size, the institutional and operational framework of the national occupational pension fund sectors within the EEA (OECD 2021, for the OECD countries; European Parliament 2014; Curos et al. 2020, for the EU member states). Consequently, a comparative analysis should be made with caution.

  8. It is noteworthy that during the covid19 four new non-compulsory Occupational Insurance Funds have been established.

  9. The replacement rate expresses the average new pension as a share of the average gross wage at retirement.

  10. Their analysis is beyond the scope of the present analysis.

  11. Scale efficiency is described as a company's capability to operate very near to its most productive scale size.

References

References in the English language

References in the Greek language

  • FEIR (2022) Occupational insurance in Greece: Challenges and prospects. FEIR.

  • Giannitsis, T. (2016). The Pension Problem and the Crisis. Papazisis.

  • Government Official Journal. (2002). Law 3029: Issue 106. Athens, Greece, July 7, 2002. Retrieved from www.et.gr.

  • Government Official Journal. (2010). Law 3865: Issue 120. Athens, Greece, July 21, 2010. Retrieved from www.et.gr.

  • Government Official Journal. (2012). Law 4052: Issue 41. Athens, Greece, February 22, 2013. Retrieved from www.et.gr.

  • Government Official Journal. (2014). Law 4261: Issue 107. Athens, Greece, May 5, 2014. Retrieved from www.et.gr.

  • Government Official Journal. (2016). Law 4387: Issue 85. Athens, Greece, May 12, 2016. Retrieved from www.et.gr.

  • Government Official Journal. (2017). Law 4472: Issue 74. Athens, Greece, May 19, 2017. Retrieved from www.et.gr.

  • Government Official Journal. (2020). Law 4680: Issue 72. Athens, Greece, March 23, 2020. Retrieved from www.et.gr.

  • Government Official Journal. (2021). Law 4826: Issue 160. Athens, Greece, September 7, 2021. Retrieved from www.et.gr.

  • Hellenic Association of Insurance Companies. (2020). Annual Statistical Report 2020. Retrieved from http://www1.eaee.gr/sites/default/files/annual_stat_report_2020_gr.pdf.

  • HUIORP. (June 2019). Occupational Pension Funds in Greece: Assessments and Perspectives. HUIORP.

  • Pissarides, Chr., Vafianos, D., Vettas, N., & Megir, K. (2020). Growth plan for Greek economy, intermediate report. Retrieved from https://government.gov.gr/schedio-anaptixis-gia-tinelliniki-ikonomia-endiamesi-ekthesi.

  • Robolis, S., & Betsis, V. (2016). The social insurance Odyssey. Livanis.

  • Romanias, G. (2007). Greek and European Myths about Social Security. Vlassi Publishers.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Nikos Mylonidis, Christos Giannakoulas, and Michael Yates for helpful comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xakousti Chrysanthopoulou.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work. The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table

Table 8 Greek occupational insurance funds

8.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chrysanthopoulou, X., Mavrommati, A. & Migdalas, A. Assessing the efficiency of occupational pension funds in Greece. Oper Res Int J 23, 66 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-023-00807-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-023-00807-4

Keywords