Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Advertisement

Sediment yield assessment and identification of check dam sites for Rawal Dam catchment

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sediment yield is the amount of erosional debris from drainage basin deposited in reservoirs. The economic life of storage reservoir depends upon the estimation of the time it takes for the reservoir to be filled with the deposition of sediments. This research is based on assessing the sediment yield in Rawal Dam catchment by using Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model. Digital Elevation Model (DEM), land use maps, soil maps, and weather data of the study watershed were used as input to SWAT model. Monthly sedimentation data of year 2010 and discharge data from 1998 to 2005 is being used for model calibration and validation, respectively. Whereas simulations are being generated from 1998 to 2011 for both sedimentation and discharge. Modified Universal Soil Loss Equation (MUSLE) was used for the estimation of sediment yield. The Nash and Sutcliffe coefficient of the model was found to be 0.79 which depicts its effectiveness. After the estimation of the sediment yield and discharge by using SWAT model, double mass curve was used to evaluate the sedimentation rate. The rate of sediment transport can be reduced by the construction of check dams. Various sites have also been proposed for check dams construction to prevent the sediments transported into the Rawal Catchment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://srtm.usgs.gov

  2. http://www.sfripunjab.gov.pk/

References

  • Arekhi S, Shabani A, Rostamizad G (2012) Application of the modified universal soil loss equation (musle) in prediction of sediment yield (case study: Kengir watershed, Iran). Arab J Geosci 5(6):1259–1267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold JG, Srinivasan R, Muttiah RS, Williams JR (1998) Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment part i: model development1. JAWRA J Am Water Resour Assoc 34(1):73–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagherzadeh A, Daneshvar MRM (2013) Evaluation of sediment yield and soil loss by the mpsiac model using gis at golestan watershed, northeast of iran. Arab J Geosci 6(9):3349–3362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biot Y, Lu X (1995) Loss of yield caused by soil erosion on sandy soils in the UK. Soil Use Manag 11(4):157–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruce R, Langdale G, West L, Miller W (1995) Surface soil degradation and soil productivity restoration and maintenance. Soil Sci Soc Am J 59(3):654–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandra P, Patel P, Porey P, Gupta I (2014) Estimation of sediment yield using swat model for upper tapi basin. ISH J Hydraul Eng 20(3):291–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chutachindakate C, Sumi T (2008) Sediment yield and transportation analysis. Proc Hydraul Eng 52:157–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das RK (2012) Sediment yield estimation for watershed prioritization: a remote sensing study. Indian J Sci Technol 5(3):2374–2378

    Google Scholar 

  • Dost RJ (2005) Hydrologic information systems as a support tool for water quality monitoring. Ph.D. thesis, MSc Thesis). International Institute For Geo Information Science and Earth Observation, Enschede, The Netherlands, 93 pp. http://www.itc.nl/library/papers_2005/msc/wrem/dost.pdf

  • Goldman SJ, Jackson K, Bursztynsky TA (1986) Erosion and sediment control handbook. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamid Q, Chauhdry MS, Mahmood S, Farid MS (2016) Arc GIS and 3D visualization of land records: a case study of urban areas in Punjab. Natl Acad Sci Lett 1–5. doi:10.1007/s40009-016-0442-4

  • Javaid MS, Shahid M, Gabriel HF, Nabi A (2015) Irrigation and drainage—sustainable strategies and systems. InTech

  • Kerr JT, Ostrovsky M (2003) From space to species: ecological applications for remote sensing. Trends Ecol Evol 18(6):299–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kothyari UC, Jain SK (1997) Sediment yield estimation using gis. Hydrol Sci J 42(6):833–843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraemer C, Sudhanshu S (2009) Automating arc hydro for watershed delineation. In: Proceedings of the 2009 Georgia water resources conference, held at the University of Georgia

  • Lin C (1997) A study on the width and placement of vegetated buffer strips in a mudstone-distributed watershed. J Chin Soil Water Conserv 29(3):250–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Mateen H, Garstang R (2008) Environmental monitoring of natural streams/nullahs in sector F-7, Islamabad: detailed analytical baseline report of surface water. Tech. rep., Ministry of Environment Pakistan

  • Millward AA, Mersey JE (1999) Adapting the rusle to model soil erosion potential in a mountainous tropical watershed. Catena 38(2):109–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris GL, Fan J (1998) Reservoir sedimentation handbook: design and management of dams, reservoirs, and watersheds for sustainable use. McGraw Hill Professional

  • Mosbahi M, Benabdallah S, Boussema MR (2013) Assessment of soil erosion risk using swat model. Arab J Geosci 6(10):4011–4019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nasir A, Uchida K, Ashraf M (2006) Estimation of soil erosion by using rusle and GIS for small mountainous watersheds in pakistan. Pak J Water Resour 10(1):11–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldeman L, Hakkeling RU, Sombroek WG et al (1990) World map of the status of human-induced soil degradation: an explanatory note. International Soil Reference and Information Centre

  • Pakistan I (2005) Rapid environmental appraisal of developments in and around murree hills. Tech. rep., IUCN Pakistan

  • Pandey A, Chowdary V, Mal B (2007) Identification of critical erosion prone areas in the small agricultural watershed using usle, gis and remote sensing. Water Resour Manag 21(4):729– 746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratnam KN, Srivastava Y, Rao VV, Amminedu E, Murthy K (2005) Check dam positioning by prioritization of micro-watersheds using syi model and morphometric analysis—remote sensing and gis perspective. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 33(1):25–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renard G, Lane L, Foster G, Laflen J, Agassi M et al (1995) Soil loss estimation. In: Agassi M (ed) Soil erosion, conservation and rehabilitation. Marcel Dekker Inc, New York, pp 169–202

  • Saeed M, Ashraf A (2011) Monitoring deforestation and urbanization growth in rawal watershed area using remote sensing and gis techniques. Sci J COMSATS-Science Vis 16:93–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Savant G, Wang L, Truax D (2002) Remote sensing and geospatial applications for watershed delineation. In: Integrating remote sensing at the global, regional and local scale. Pecora 15/land satellite information IV conference

  • Searcy J, Hardison C (1962) Double-mass curves. Manual of hydrology—part 1—general surface-water techniques, methods and practices of the geological survey. US Geological Survey water-supply paper. Waterlow and Sons

  • Singh V, Fiorentino M (eds) (2013) Geographical information systems in hydrology. Springer Science & Business Media, vol 26

  • Steven MD, Clark JA (eds) (2013) Applications of remote sensing in agriculture. Elsevier, Amsterdam

  • Tombuṡ FE, Yüksel M, Ṡahi̇n M, Ozulu M, Coṡar M (2012) Assessment of soil erosion based on the method usle; ċorum province example. In: Knowing to manage the territory, protect the environment, and evaluate the cultural heritage, pp 6–10

  • Usha K, Singh B (2013) Potential applications of remote sensing in horticulture—a review. Sci Hortic 153:71–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang G, Gertner G, Fang S, Anderson AB (2003) Mapping multiple variables for predicting soil loss by geostatistical methods with tm images and a slope map. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 69(8):889–898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wangpimool W, Pongput K, Sukvibool C, Sombatpanit S, Gassman PW (2013) The effect of reforestation on stream flow in upper nan river basin using soil and water assessment tool (swat) model. Int Soil Water Conserv Res 1(2):53–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wischmeier WH, Smith DD et al (1978) Predicting rainfall erosion losses-A guide to conservation planning. United States. Dept. of Agriculture, Agriculture handbook (USA)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nida Samad.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Samad, N., Chauhdry, M.H., Ashraf, M. et al. Sediment yield assessment and identification of check dam sites for Rawal Dam catchment. Arab J Geosci 9, 466 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-016-2484-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-016-2484-9

Keywords