Abstract
Online reviews provide valuable information for product designers and the integration of online concerns into new product design has been investigated by different researchers. However, few of them exploit the value of online concerns on the comparison of series products. Analyzing online concerns of series products facilitates designers to obtain shared customer preferences regarding products in a series and recognize the strength and weakness of products in competitive series. Accordingly, a framework is designed to discover shared pros and cons of series products by exploring online customer concerns, in which representative opinionated sentences are sampled from reviews of series products. In particular, opinionated sentences of specific features are initially identified from product reviews. Then, opinionated sentences regarding the same series products are clustered, which helps to extract similar customer concerns. Finally, an optimization problem is formulated for the sampling of a few opinionated representative sentences. With a large number of real data from Amazon.com, categories of experiments were conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed approach. This study explores to integrate big consumer data for competitive intelligence in the market driven new product design, which helps the theoretical development on customer requirement management in the fierce market.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Alguliev RM, Aliguliyev RM, Isazade NR (2013) Multiple documents summarization based on evolutionary optimization algorithm. Expert Syst Appl 40(5):1675–1689
Bonzanini M, Martinez-Alvarez M, Roelleke T (2013) Extractive summarisation via sentence removal: condensing relevant sentences into a short summary. In: SIGIR ‘13, ACM, pp 893–896
Chen L, Qi L, Wang F (2012) Comparison of feature-level learning methods for mining online consumer reviews. Expert Syst Appl 39(10):9588–9601
Chen J, Huang DP, Hu S, Liu Y, Cai Y (2015) An opinion mining framework for Cantonese reviews. J Ambient Intel Hum Comput 6(5):541–547
Conrad T, Harrison MK (2011) Predicting emerging product design trend by mining publicity available customer review data. In: ICED’11. Copenhagen, Denmark, pp 43–52
Fellbaum C, Miller G (1998) WordNet: an electronic lexical database: MIT Press
Frey BJ, Dueck D (2007) Clustering by passing messages between data points. Science 315(5814):972–976
Ganapathibhotla M, Liu B (2008) Mining opinions in comparative sentences. In: Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on computational linguistics, vol. 1, ACL, pp. 241–248)
Hai Z, Cong G, Chang K, Liu W, Cheng P (2014) Coarse-to-fine review selection via supervised joint aspect and sentiment model. SIGIR ‘14, ACM, pp 617–626
Jin J, Ji P, Gu R (2016a) Identifying comparative customer requirements from product online reviews for competitor analysis. Eng Appl Artif Intell 49:61–73
Jin J, Ji P, Kwong CK (2016b) What makes consumers unsatisfied with your products: Review analysis at a fine-grained level. Eng Appl Artif Intell 47:38–48
Jin J, Liu Y, Ji P, Liu HG (2016c) Understanding big consumer opinion data for market-driven product design. Int J Prod Res 54(10):3019–3041
Jindal N, Liu B (2006a) Identifying comparative sentences in text documents. SIGIR ‘06, ACM, pp 244–251
Jindal N, Liu B (2006b) Mining comparative sentences and relations. AAAI ‘06 pp 1331–1336
Kim SM, Hovy E (2006) Automatic identification of pro and con reasons in online reviews. In Proceedings of the COLING/ACL on main conference poster sessions, ACL, pp 483–490)
Kim HD, Zhai C (2009) Generating comparative summaries of contradictory opinions in text. CIKM ‘09, ACM, pp 385–394
Korenek P, Šimko M (2014) Sentiment analysis on microblog utilizing appraisal theory. World Wide Web 17(4):847–867
Krestel R, Dokoohaki N (2011). Diversifying product review rankings: getting the full picture. In WI-IAT ‘11, IEEE, pp 138–145
Lappas T, Crovella M, Terzi E (2012) Selecting a characteristic set of reviews. KDD ‘12, ACM, pp 832–840
Liu B (2010) Sentiment analysis and subjectivity. In: Damerau NIAFJ (ed) Handbook of natural language processing, vol 30, 2nd edn. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 152–153
Liu Y, Jin J, Ji P, Harding JA, Fung RYK (2013) Identifying Helpful online reviews: a product designer’s perspective. Comput Aided Des 45(2):180–194
Lu Y, Zhai C, Sundaresan N (2009) Rated aspect summarization of short comments. In: WWW ‘09, ACM, 131–140
Ma Z, Sun A, Yuan Q, Cong G (2012) Topic-driven reader comments summarization. CIKM ‘12, ACM, pp 265–274
McDonald R (2007) A study of global inference algorithms in multi-document summarization. ECIR’07, pp 557–564
Netzer O, Feldman R, Goldenberg J, Fresko M (2012) Mine your own business: market-structure surveillance through text mining. Market Sci 31(3):521–543
Nguyen TS, Lauw HW, Tsaparas P (2013) Using micro-reviews to select an efficient set of reviews. CIKM’13, ACM, pp 1067–1076
Pang B, Lee L (2004) A sentimental education: Sentiment analysis using subjectivity summarization based on minimum cuts. ACL’04, ACL, p. 271
Paul MJ, Zhai C, Girju R (2010) Summarizing contrastive viewpoints in opinionated text. EMNLP ‘10, pp 66–76
Shen HC, Wang KC (2016) Affective product form design using fuzzy Kansei engineering and creativity. J Ambient Intell Hum Comput 7(6):875–888
Tao F, Zhao Y, Hu H, Zhou Z (2008) Resource service composition and its optimal-selection based on particle swarm optimization in manufacturing grid system. IEEE Trans Indus Inf 4(4):315–327
Tao F, Zhao D, Yefa H, Zhou Z (2010) Correlation-aware resource service composition and optimal-selection in manufacturing grid. Eur J Oper Res 201(1):129–143
Tao F, Zuo Y, Xu L, Zhang L (2014) IoT based intelligent perception and access of manufacturing resource towards cloud manufacturing. IEEE Trans Ind Inform 10(2):1547–1557
Tao F, Cheng J, Qi Q, Zhang M, Zhang H, Sui F (2017) Digital twin-driven product design, manufacturing and service with big data. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 1–14
Tian N, Xu Y, Li Y, Pasi G (2015). Quality-aware review selection based on product feature taxonomy. AIRS ‘15, pp 68–80
Tsaparas P, Ntoulas A, Terzi E (2011). Selecting a comprehensive set of reviews. KDD ‘11, ACM, pp 168–176
Wei W, Ming Z, Nie L, Li G, Li J, Zhu F, Shang T, Luo C (2016) Exploring heterogeneous features for query-focused summarization of categorized community answers. Inf Sci 330:403–423
Wilson T, Wiebe J, Hwa R (2004). Just how mad are you? Finding strong and weak opinion clauses. AAAI ‘04, vol 4, pp 761–769
Wilson T, Wiebe J, Hoffmann P (2005). Recognizing contextual polarity in phrase-level sentiment analysis. EMNLP ‘05, ACL, pp 347–354
Xu K, Liao SS, Li J, Song Y (2011) Mining comparative opinions from customer reviews for competitive intelligence. Decis Support Syst 50(4):743–754
Yu J, Zha ZJ, Wang M, Chua TS. (2011). Aspect ranking: identifying important product aspects from online consumer reviews. HLT ‘11, ACL, pp 1496–1505
Zhang K, Narayanan R, Choudhary AN. (2010). Voice of the customers: mining online customer reviews for product feature-based ranking. WOSN ‘10, pp 11–11
Zhang Z, Guo C, Goes P (2013) Product comparison networks for competitive analysis of online word-of-mouth. ACM Trans Manag Inf Syst 3(4):20
Zhu L, Gao S, Pan SJ, Li H, Deng D, Shahabi C. (2013). Graph-based informative-sentence selection for opinion summarization. In: International conference on social networks analysis and mining, pp. 408–412
Acknowledgements
The work described in this paper was supported by a Grants from the National Nature Science Foundation of China (project no. NSFC 71701019/G0114) and two Research Projects of The Hong Kong Polytechnic University (Project no. G-YBLR and G-YBFE).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jin, J., Ji, P. & Yan, S. Comparison of series products from customer online concerns for competitive intelligence. J Ambient Intell Human Comput 10, 937–952 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-017-0635-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-017-0635-9