Abstract
Despite the theoretical foundations and successful practical applications of auctions in infrastructure allocation, such as radio waves, wireless communications, airports, and ports, the use of this method in allocating rail infrastructure capacity is limited. This paper addresses this gap by proposing an intelligent auction-based capacity allocation algorithm for railways. Unlike previous timetable-based models, the algorithm utilizes a two-objective integer optimization model, offering a practical solution for real-world problems. An additional contribution of the proposed model is the consideration of two crucial objectives: increasing revenue (or profit) and improving freight transportation performance, which have been overlooked in previous algorithms. The algorithm incorporates the enhanced constraint method to generate the optimal Pareto curve. Empirical results from the Iranian railway experimental network demonstrate the algorithm's efficiency, with performance improvements of 6% or more and over a 150% increase in the profit margin of the infrastructure manager compared to the current traditional method.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Data availability
The raw data underlying the network analysis presented in this study are not publicly available due to restrictions imposed by the Iranian Railways. However, the authors are willing to collaborate with interested researchers to validate and extend the findings of this study.
Abbreviations
- IM:
-
Infrastructure manager
- TOC:
-
Train operator company
- TP:
-
Train path
References
Affuso L (2003) Auctions of rail capacity? Utilities Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0957-1787(02)00057-7
Ait Ali A, Eliasson J (2022a) European railway deregulation: an overview of market organization and capacity allocation. Transportmet A Transp Sci. https://doi.org/10.1080/23249935.2021.1885521
Ait Ali A, Eliasson J (2022b) European railway deregulation: an overview of market organization and capacity allocation. Transport A Transp Sci. https://doi.org/10.1080/23249935.2021.1885521
Ait Ali A, Warg J, Eliasson J (2020) Pricing commercial train path requests based on societal costs. Transp Res Part A: Policy Pract 132:452–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.12.005
Armstrong J, Preston J (2021) Congestion, allocation, and competition on the railway tracks. Int Encyclop Transp. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-102671-7.10072-7
Besharati R, Rezvani MH, Sadeghi MMG (2021) An Incentive-compatible offloading mechanism in fog-cloud environments using second-price sealed-bid auction. J Grid Comput 19(3):37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10723-021-09576-w
Börjesson M, Rushid AR, Liu C (2021) The impact of optimal rail access charges on frequencies and fares. Econ Transp 26–27:100217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecotra.2021.100217
Borndörfer R, Grötschel M, Lukac S, Mitusch K, Schlechte T, Schultz S, Tanner A (2006a) An auctioning approach to railway slot allocation. Compet Regul Netw Ind. https://doi.org/10.1177/178359170600100204
Borndörfer R, Grötschel M, Lukac S, Mitusch K, Schlechte T, Schultz S, Tanner A (2006b) An auctioning approach to railway slot allocation. Compet Regul Netw Ind. https://doi.org/10.1177/178359170600100204
Brewer PJ, Plott CR (1996) A binary conflict ascending price (BICAP) mechanism for the decentralized allocation of the right to use railroad tracks. Int J Ind Organ. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-7187(96)01014-4
Broman E, Eliasson J, Aronsson M (2022) Efficient capacity allocation on deregulated railway markets. J Rail Transp Plan Manag 21:100294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrtpm.2021.100294
Cherbonnier F, Salant DJ, van Der Straeten K (2022) Getting auctions for transportation capacity to roll. https://hal.science/hal-03629619
Gibson S (2003) Allocation of capacity in the rail industry. Utilities Policy 11(1):39–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0957-1787(02)00055-3
Harrod S (2013a) Auction pricing of network access for North American railways. Transp Res Part E Log Transp Rev. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2012.08.003
Harrod S (2013b) Auction pricing of network access for North American railways. Transp Res Part E Log Transp Rev. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2012.08.003
Isacsson G, Nilsson J-E (2003) An experimental comparison of track allocation mechanisms in the railway industry. J Transp Econ Pol 37(3): 3
Jacquillat A, Vaze V, Wang W (2022) Primary versus secondary infrastructure capacity allocation mechanisms. Eur J Oper Res 303(2):668–687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2022.03.003
Jamili A (2018) Computation of practical capacity in single-track railway lines based on computing the minimum buffer times. J Rail Transp Plan Manag. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrtpm.2018.03.002
Jansson K, Lang H (2013) Rail infrastructure charging EU-directive, Swedish concerns and theory. Res Transp Econ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2012.06.026
Khadem Sameni M, Moradi A (2022) Railway capacity: a review of analysis methods. J Rail Transp Plan Manag 24:100357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrtpm.2022.100357
Liao Q, Tu R, Zhang W, Wang B, Liang Y, Zhang H (2023) Auction design for capacity allocation in the petroleum pipeline under fair opening. Energy 264:126079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.126079
Mavrotas G (2009) Effective implementation of the ε-constraint method in multi-objective mathematical programming problems. Appl Math Comput. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2009.03.037
Montero JJ, Ramos Melero R (2022) Competitive tendering for rail track capacity: the liberalization of railway services in Spain. Compet Regul Netw Ind 23(1):43–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/17835917221082510
Nilsson J-E (1999) Allocation of track capacity: Experimental evidence on the use of priority auctioning in the railway industry. Int J Ind Organ. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7187(99)00016-8
Nilsson J-E (2002) Towards a welfare enhancing process to manage railway infrastructure access. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0965-8564(01)00011-8
Olarte-Bacares CA, Brunel J, Sigaud D (2022) The impact of access prices on train traffic: an econometric study for France. Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect 16:100679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2022.100679
Perennes P (2014) Use of combinatorial auctions in the railway industry: can the “invisible hand” draw the railway timetable? Transp Res Part A: Policy Pract 67:175–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2014.07.002
Stojadinović N, Bošković B, Bugarinović M (2019a) Bridging the gap between infrastructure capacity allocation and market-oriented railway: an algorithmic approach. Transport. https://doi.org/10.3846/transport.2019.11035
Stojadinović N, Bošković B, Trifunović D, Janković S (2019b) Train path congestion management: Using hybrid auctions for decentralized railway capacity allocation. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 129:123–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.08.013
Yousefi A, Pishvaee MS (2022) A hybrid machine learning-optimization approach to pricing and train formation problem under demand uncertainty. RAIRO Oper Res. https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/2022052
Yu H, Huang M, Chao X, Yue X (2022) Truthful multi-attribute multi-unit double auctions for B2B e-commerce logistics service transactions. Transp Res Part E: Log Transp Rev 164:102814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2022.102814
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Shahmohammadi, M., Fakhrzad, M.B., Nasab, H.H. et al. An intelligent auction-based capacity allocation algorithm in shared railways. J Ambient Intell Human Comput 15, 2565–2579 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-024-04773-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-024-04773-3