Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

GIS-based modeling of rainfall-induced landslides using data mining-based functional trees classifier with AdaBoost, Bagging, and MultiBoost ensemble frameworks

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main objective of this study is to propose and verify a novel ensemble methodology that could improve prediction performances of landslide susceptibility models. The proposed methodology is based on the functional tree classifier and three current state-of-the art machine learning ensemble frameworks, Bagging, AdaBoost, and MultiBoost. According to current literature, these methods have been rarely used for the modeling of rainfall-induced landslides. The corridor of the National Road 32 (Vietnam) was selected as a case study. In the first stage, the landslide inventory map with 262 landslide polygons that occurred during the last 20 years was constructed and then was randomly partitioned into a ratio of 70/30 for training and validating the models. Second, ten landslide conditioning factors were prepared such as slope, aspect, relief amplitude, topographic wetness index, topographic shape, distance to roads, distance to rivers, distance to faults, lithology, and rainfall. The model performance was assessed and compared using the receiver operating characteristic and statistical evaluation measures. Overall, the FT with Bagging model has the highest prediction capability (AUC = 0.917), followed by the FT with MultiBoost model (AUC = 0.910), the FT model (AUC = 0.898), and the FT with AdaBoost model (AUC = 0.882). Compared with those derived from popular methods such as J48 decision trees and artificial neural networks, the performance of the FT with Bagging model is better. Therefore, it can be concluded that the FT with Bagging is promising and could be used as an alternative in landslide susceptibility assessment. The result in this study is useful for land use planning and decision making in landslide prone areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aguirre-Gutiérrez J, Carvalheiro LG, Polce C, van Loon EE, Raes N, Reemer M, Biesmeijer JC (2013) Fit-for-purpose: species distribution model performance depends on evaluation criteria—Dutch hoverflies as a case study. PLoS One 8:e63708. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0063708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajit Krisshna NL, Deepak VK, Manikantan K, Ramachandran S (2014) Face recognition using transform domain feature extraction and PSO-based feature selection. Appl Soft Comput 22:141–161. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2014.05.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Althuwaynee OF, Pradhan B, Park H-J, Lee JH (2014) A novel ensemble decision tree-based CHi squared Automatic Interaction Detection (CHAID) and multivariate logistic regression models in landslide susceptibility mapping. Landslides 11:1063–1078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayalew L, Yamagishi H (2005) The application of GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Kakuda-Yahiko Mountains. Central Jpn Geomorphol 65:15–31. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2004.06.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beven KJ, Kirkby MJ (1979) A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology/Un modèle à base physique de zone d’appel variable de l’hydrologie du bassin versant. Hydrol Sci Bull 24:43–69. doi:10.1080/02626667909491834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breiman L (1996) Bagging predictors. Mach Learn 24:123–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Burby RJ (1998) Cooperating with nature: confronting natural hazards with land-use planning for sustainable communities. Joseph Henry Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Caniani D, Pascale S, Sdao F, Sole A (2008) Neural networks and landslide susceptibility: a case study of the urban area of Potenza. Nat Hazards 45:55–72. doi:10.1007/s11069-007-9169-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng M-Y, Hoang N-D (2015) A Swarm-Optimized Fuzzy Instance-based Learning approach for predicting slope collapses in mountain roads. Knowl Based Syst 76:256–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung CJF, Fabbri AG (2003) Validation of spatial prediction models for landslide hazard mapping. Nat Hazards 30:451–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung C-J, Fabbri AG (2008) Predicting landslides for risk analysis—spatial models tested by a cross-validation technique. Geomorphology 94:438–452. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.12.036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung CJF, Fabbri AG, Van Westen CJ (1995) Multivariate regression analysis for landslide hazard zonation. In: Carrara A, Guzzetti F (eds) Geographical information systems in assessing natural hazards, vol 5. Springer, New York, pp 107–133

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen J (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 20:37–46. doi:10.1177/001316446002000104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanzo D, Rotigliano E, Irigaray C, Jiménez-Perálvarez JD, Chacón J (2012) Factors selection in landslide susceptibility modelling on large scale following the gis matrix method: application to the river Beiro basin (Spain). Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 12:327–340. doi:10.5194/nhess-12-327-2012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanzo D, Chacón J, Conoscenti C, Irigaray C, Rotigliano E (2014) Forward logistic regression for earth-flow landslide susceptibility assessment in the Platani river basin (southern Sicily, Italy). Landslides 11:639–653. doi:10.1007/s10346-013-0415-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross M (2002) Landslide susceptibility mapping using the Matrix Assessment Approach: a Derbyshire case study. In: Griffiths JS (ed) Mapping in engineering geology, vol 15. The Geological society, Key Issue in Earth Sciences, London, pp 247–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Dai J, Xu Q (2013) Attribute selection based on information gain ratio in fuzzy rough set theory with application to tumor classification. Appl Soft Comput 13:211–221. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2012.07.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai F, Lee C, Li J, Xu Z (2001) Assessment of landslide susceptibility on the natural terrain of Lantau Island. Hong Kong Environ Geol 40:381–391

    Google Scholar 

  • Dai FC, Lee CF, Ngai YY (2002) Landslide risk assessment and management: an overview. Eng Geol 64:65–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doetsch P et al (2009) Logistic model trees with AUC split criterion for the KDD cup 2009 small challenge. In KDD Cup, pp 77–88

  • Doshi M, Chaturvedi SK (2014) Correlation based feature selection (CFS) technique to predict student performance. Int J Comput Netw Commun (UCNC) 6:197–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Dou J et al (2015) Optimization of causative factors for landslide susceptibility evaluation using remote sensing and GIS data in parts of Niigata, Japan. PLoS One 10:e0133262. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0133262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ercanoglu M (2005) Landslide susceptibility assessment of SE Bartin (West Black Sea region, Turkey) by artificial neural networks. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 5:979–992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett T (2006) An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recogn Lett 27:861–874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fayyad UM, Piatetsky-Shapiro G, Smyth P, Uthurusamy R (1996) Advances in knowledge discovery and data mining. AAAI press, Menlo Park, California (USA)

    Google Scholar 

  • Felicisimo A, Cuartero A, Remondo J, Quiros E (2013) Mapping landslide susceptibility with logistic regression, multiple adaptive regression splines, classification and regression trees, and maximum entropy methods: a comparative study. Landslides 10:175–189. doi:10.1007/s10346-012-0320-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández T, Irigaray C, El Hamdouni R, Chacón J (2003) Methodology for landslide susceptibility mapping by means of a GIS. Application to the Contraviesa Area (Granada, Spain). Nat Hazards 30:297–308. doi:10.1023/B:NHAZ.0000007092.51910.3f

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Floris M, Iafelice M, Squarzoni C, Zorzi L, Agostini AD, Genevois R (2011) Using online databases for landslide susceptibility assessment: an example from the Veneto Region (northeastern Italy). Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 11:1915–1925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freund Y, Schapire R (1997) A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting. J Comput Syst Sci 55:119–139. doi:10.1006/jcss.1997.1504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gama J (2004) Functional trees. Mach Learn 55:219–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganjisaffar Y, Caruana R, Lopes CV (2011) Bagging gradient-boosted trees for high precision, low variance ranking models. In: Proceedings of the 34th international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval. ACM, pp 85–94

  • Gautheir TD (2001) Detecting trends using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. Environ Forensics 2:359–362. doi:10.1080/713848278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez H, Kavzoglu T (2005) Assessment of shallow landslide susceptibility using artificial neural networks in Jabonosa River Basin, Venezuela. Eng Geol 78:11–27. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2004.10.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzzetti F, Carrara A, Cardinali M, Reichenbach P (1999) Landslide hazard evaluation: a review of current techniques and their application in a multi-scale study, Central Italy. Geomorphology 31:181–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagen A (2002) Multi-method assessment of map similarity. In: Proceedings of the fifth AGILE conference on geographic information science, Palma, Spain, pp 171–182

  • Highland L, Bobrowsky PT (2008) The landslide handbook: a guide to understanding landslides. US Geological Survey Reston

  • Ho TC et al (2010) Combination of structural geology, remote sensing, and GIS for the study of current status and prediction of flash floods and landslides at the National Road No. 32 section from the Yen Bai to the Lai Chau Provinces. Vietnam Institute of Geosciences and Mineral Resources, Hanoi

  • Hoang N-D, Tien Bui D (2016) A novel relevance vector machine classifier with cuckoo search optimization for spatial prediction of landslides. J Comput Civil Eng. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000557

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoang N-D, Tien Bui D, Liao K-W (2016) Groutability estimation of grouting processes with cement grouts using Differential Flower Pollination Optimized Support Vector Machine. Appl Soft Comput 45:173–186. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2016.04.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong H, Pradhan B, Xu C, Tien Bui D (2015a) Spatial prediction of landslide hazard at the Yihuang area (China) using two-class kernel logistic regression, alternating decision tree and support vector machines. Catena 133:266–281. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2015.05.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong H, Xu C, Revhaug I, Tien Bui D (2015b) Spatial prediction of landslide hazard at the Yihuang Area (China): a comparative study on the predictive ability of backpropagation multi-layer perceptron neural networks and radial basic function neural networks. In: Robbi Sluter C, Madureira Cruz CB, Leal de Menezes PM (eds) Cartography—maps connecting the world. Lecture notes in geoinformation and cartography. Springer, Cham, pp 175–188. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-17738-0_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hong H, Chen W, Xu C, Youssef AM, Pradhan B, Tien Bui D (2016) Rainfall-induced landslide susceptibility assessment at the Chongren area (China) using frequency ratio, certainty factor, and index of entropy. Geocarto Int. doi:10.1080/10106049.2015.1130086

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilia I, Tsangaratos P (2016) Applying weight of evidence method and sensitivity analysis to produce a landslide susceptibility map. Landslides 13:379–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irigaray C, Fernández T, El Hamdouni R, Chacón J (2007) Evaluation and validation of landslide-susceptibility maps obtained by a GIS matrix method: examples from the Betic Cordillera (southern Spain). Nat Hazards 41:61–79. doi:10.1007/s11069-006-9027-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jebur MN, Pradhan B, Tehrany MS (2014) Optimization of landslide conditioning factors using very high-resolution airborne laser scanning (LiDAR) data at catchment scale. Remote Sens Environ 152:150–165. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2014.05.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kavzoglu T, Sahin E, Colkesen I (2014) Landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis, support vector machines, and logistic regression. Landslides 11:425–439. doi:10.1007/s10346-013-0391-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kavzoglu T, Kutlug Sahin E, Colkesen I (2015) An assessment of multivariate and bivariate approaches in landslide susceptibility mapping: a case study of Duzkoy district. Nat Hazards 76:471–496. doi:10.1007/s11069-014-1506-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar YJ, Salim N, Raza B (2012) Cross-document structural relationship identification using supervised machine learning. Appl Soft Comput 12:3124–3131. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2012.06.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landwehr N, Hall M, Frank E (2005) Logistic model trees. Mach Learn 59:161–205. doi:10.1007/s10994-005-0466-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lay MG (2009) Handbook of road technology. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Ryu JH, Min KD, Won JS (2003) Landslide susceptibility analysis using GIS and artificial neural network. Earth Surf Proc Land 28:1361–1376. doi:10.1002/esp.593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee M-J, Choi J-W, Oh H-J, Won J-S, Park I, Lee S (2012) Ensemble-based landslide susceptibility maps in Jinbu area. Korea Environ Earth Sci 67:23–37. doi:10.1007/s12665-011-1477-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Won J-S, Jeon SW, Park I, Lee MJ (2014) Spatial landslide hazard prediction using rainfall probability and a logistic regression model. Math Geosci 47:565–589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lineback Gritzner M, Marcus WA, Aspinall R, Custer SG (2001) Assessing landslide potential using GIS, soil wetness modeling and topographic attributes, Payette River, Idaho. Geomorphology 37:149–165. doi:10.1016/S0169-555X(00)00068-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magliulo P, Di Lisio A, Russo F, Zelano A (2008) Geomorphology and landslide susceptibility assessment using GIS and bivariate statistics: a case study in southern Italy. Nat Hazards 47:411–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manzo G, Tofani V, Segoni S, Battistini A, Catani F (2013) GIS techniques for regional-scale landslide susceptibility assessment: the Sicily (Italy) case study. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 27:1433–1452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martín B, Alonso JC, Martín CA, Palacín C, Magaña M, Alonso J (2012) Influence of spatial heterogeneity and temporal variability in habitat selection: a case study on a great bustard metapopulation. Ecol Model 228:39–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-Álvarez F, Reyes J, Morales-Esteban A, Rubio-Escudero C (2013) Determining the best set of seismicity indicators to predict earthquakes. Two case studies: Chile and the Iberian Peninsula. Knowl Based Syst 50:198–210. doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2013.06.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maudes J, Rodriguez JJ, Garcia-Osorio C, Garcia-Pedrajas N (2012) Random feature weights for decision tree ensemble construction. Inf Fusion 13:20–30. doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2010.11.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mennis J, Guo D (2009) Spatial data mining and geographic knowledge discovery—an introduction Computers. Environ Urban Syst 33:403–408. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2009.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers L, Sirois MJ (2014) Spearman correlation coefficients, differences between. In: Wiley StatsRef: statistics reference online. Wiley. doi:10.1002/9781118445112.stat02802

  • Park I, Lee S (2014) Spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility using a decision tree approach: a case study of the Pyeongchang area. Korea Int J Remote Sens 35:6089–6112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Passman MA et al (2011) Validation of Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) with other venous severity assessment tools from the American Venous Forum, National Venous Screening Program. J Vasc Surg 54:2S–9S. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2011.05.117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pham B, Tien Bui D, Pourghasemi H, Indra P, Dholakia MB (2015) Landslide susceptibility assessment in the Uttarakhand area (India) using GIS: a comparison study of prediction capability of naïve bayes, multilayer perceptron neural networks, and functional trees methods. Theor Appl Climatol. doi:10.1007/s00704-015-1702-9

    Google Scholar 

  • Pham BT, Pradhan B, Tien Bui D, Prakash I, Dholakia MB (2016a) A comparative study of different machine learning methods for landslide susceptibility assessment: a case study of Uttarakhand area (India). Environ Model Softw. doi:10.1016/jenvsoft201607005

    Google Scholar 

  • Pham BT, Tien Bui D, Prakash I, Dholakia MB (2016b) Rotation forest fuzzy rule-based classifier ensemble for spatial prediction of landslides using GIS. Nat Hazards. doi:10.1007/s11069-016-2304-2

    Google Scholar 

  • Pontius RG (2000) Quantification error versus location error in comparison of categorical maps. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 66:1011–1016

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B (2013) A comparative study on the predictive ability of the decision tree, support vector machine and neuro-fuzzy models in landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS. Comput Geosci 51:350–365. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2012.08.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Lee S (2010) Landslide susceptibility assessment and factor effect analysis: backpropagation artificial neural networks and their comparison with frequency ratio and bivariate logistic regression modelling. Environ Model Softw 25:747–759. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2009.10.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Sezer EA, Gokceoglu C, Buchroithner MF (2010) Landslide susceptibility mapping by neuro-fuzzy approach in a landslide-prone area (Cameron Highlands, Malaysia). IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 48:4164–4177. doi:10.1109/tgrs.2010.2050328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prasad AM, Iverson LR, Liaw A (2006) Newer classification and regression tree techniques: bagging and random forests for ecological prediction. Ecosystems 9:181–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinlan JR (1993) C45: programs for machine learning. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinlan JR (1996) Improved use of continuous attributes in C4.5. J Artif Intell Res 4:77–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez JJ, Kuncheva LI, Alonso CJ (2006) Rotation forest: a new classifier ensemble method. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 28:1619–1630. doi:10.1109/TPAMI.2006.211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rokach L (2010) Ensemble-based classifiers. Artif Intell Rev 33:1–39. doi:10.1007/s10462-009-9124-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senthamarai Kannan S, Ramaraj N (2010) A novel hybrid feature selection via Symmetrical Uncertainty ranking based local memetic search algorithm. Knowl Based Syst 23:580–585. doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2010.03.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shun B, Wenjia W (2006) Investigation on diversity in homogeneous and heterogeneous ensembles. In: International joint conference on neural networks, 2006. IJCNN’06. 16–21 July 2006, pp 3078–3085. doi:10.1109/IJCNN.2006.247268

  • Sørensen R, Zinko U, Seibert J (2006) On the calculation of the topographic wetness index: evaluation of different methods based on field observations. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Dis 10:101–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suzen ML, Doyuran V (2004) A comparison of the GIS based landslide susceptibility assessment methods: multivariate versus bivariate. Environ Geol 45:665–679. doi:10.1007/s00254-003-0917-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang C, Zhu J, Qi X (2010) Landslide hazard assessment of the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake: a case study in Beichuan area. Can Geotechn J 48:128–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tien Bui D, Lofman O, Revhaug I, Dick O (2011) Landslide susceptibility analysis in the Hoa Binh province of Vietnam using statistical index and logistic regression. Nat Hazards 59:1413–1444. doi:10.1007/s11069-011-9844-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tien Bui D, Pradhan B, Lofman O, Revhaug I (2012a) Landslide susceptibility assessment in Vietnam using Support vector machines, decision tree and Naïve Bayes models. Math Prob Eng 2012:1–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tien Bui D, Pradhan B, Lofman O, Revhaug I, Dick OB (2012b) Application of support vector machines in landslide susceptibility assessment for the Hoa Binh province (Vietnam) with kernel functions analysis. In: Seppelt R, Voinov AA, Lange S, Bankamp D (eds) Proceedings of the iEMSs sixth biennial meeting: international congress on environmental modelling and software (iEMSs 2012). International Environmental Modelling and Software Society, Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  • Tien Bui D, Pradhan B, Lofman O, Revhaug I, Dick OB (2012c) Landslide susceptibility assessment in the Hoa Binh province of Vietnam: a comparison of the Levenberg–Marquardt and Bayesian regularized neural networks. Geomorphology 171–172:12–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tien Bui D, Pradhan B, Lofman O, Revhaug I, Dick OB (2012d) Landslide susceptibility mapping at Hoa Binh province (Vietnam) using an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system and GIS. Comput Geosci 45:199–211. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2011.10.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tien Bui D, Pradhan B, Lofman O, Revhaug I, Dick OB (2012e) Spatial prediction of landslide hazards in Hoa Binh province (Vietnam): a comparative assessment of the efficacy of evidential belief functions and fuzzy logic models. Catena 96:28–40. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2012.04.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tien Bui D, Ho TC, Revhaug I, Pradhan B, Nguyen D (2013a) Landslide susceptibility mapping along the National Road 32 of Vietnam using GIS-based J48 decision tree classifier and its ensembles. In: Buchroithner M, Prechtel N, Burghardt D (eds) Cartography from pole to pole. Lecture notes in geoinformation and cartography. Springer, Berlin, pp 303–317. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-32618-9_22

    Google Scholar 

  • Tien Bui D, Tin DQ, Ha VP, Revhaug I, Lien VN, Ha TT, Hoa LB (2013b) Spatial prediction of landslide hazard along the National Road 32 of Vietnam: a comparison between support vector machines, radial basis function neural networks, and their ensembles. In: Geohazards: impacts and challenges for society development in Asian Countries, 49th CCOP annual session, Sendai, Japan. Geological Survey of Japan, pp 161–171. doi:10.13140/RG.2.1.3073.2327

  • Tien Bui D, Pradhan B, Revhaug I, Trung Tran C (2014) A comparative assessment between the application of fuzzy unordered rules induction algorithm and J48 decision tree models in spatial prediction of shallow landslides at Lang Son City, Vietnam. In: Srivastava PK, Mukherjee S, Gupta M, Islam T (eds) Remote sensing applications in environmental research, society of earth scientists series. Springer, Cham, pp 87–111. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-05906-8_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tien Bui D, Pradhan B, Revhaug I, Nguyen DB, Pham HV, Bui QN (2015) A novel hybrid evidential belief function-based fuzzy logic model in spatial prediction of rainfall-induced shallow landslides in the Lang Son city area (Vietnam) Geomatics. Nat Hazards Risk 6:243–271. doi:10.1080/19475705.2013.843206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tien Bui D, Le K-T, Nguyen V, Le H, Revhaug I (2016a) Tropical forest fire susceptibility mapping at the Cat Ba National Park Area, Hai Phong City, Vietnam, using GIS-based Kernel logistic regression. Remote Sens 8:347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tien Bui D, Nguyen Q-P, Hoang N-D, Klempe H (2016b) A novel fuzzy K-nearest neighbor inference model with differential evolution for spatial prediction of rainfall-induced shallow landslides in a tropical hilly area using GIS. Landslides. doi:10.1007/s10346-016-0708-4

    Google Scholar 

  • Tien Bui D, Pham TB, Nguyen Q-P, Hoang N-D (2016c) Spatial prediction of rainfall-induced shallow landslides using hybrid integration approach of least squares support vector machines and differential evolution optimization: a case study in Central Vietnam. Int J Digit Earth. doi:10.1080/1753894720161169561

    Google Scholar 

  • Tien Bui D, Pradhan B, Nampak H, Quang Bui T, Tran Q-A, Nguyen QP (2016d) Hybrid artificial intelligence approach based on neural fuzzy inference model and metaheuristic optimization for flood susceptibility modelling in a high-frequency tropical cyclone area using GIS. J Hydrol 540:317–330. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.06.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tien Bui D, Tuan TA, Klempe H, Pradhan B, Revhaug I (2016e) Spatial prediction models for shallow landslide hazards: a comparative assessment of the efficacy of support vector machines, artificial neural networks, kernel logistic regression, and logistic model tree. Landslides 13:361–378. doi:10.1007/s10346-015-0557-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trawiński K, Cordón O, Quirin A, Sánchez L (2013) Multiobjective genetic classifier selection for random oracles fuzzy rule-based classifier ensembles: how beneficial is the additional diversity? Knowl Based Syst 54:3–21. doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2013.08.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trigila A, Iadanza C, Esposito C, Scarascia-Mugnozza G (2015) Comparison of Logistic Regression and Random Forests techniques for shallow landslide susceptibility assessment in Giampilieri (NE Sicily, Italy). J Geomorphol. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.06.001

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsangaratos P, Ilia I (2015) Landslide susceptibility mapping using a modified decision tree classifier in the Xanthi Perfection, Greece. Landslides. doi:10.1007/s10346-015-0565-6

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Den Eeckhaut M, Vanwalleghem T, Poesen J, Govers G, Verstraeten G, Vandekerckhove L (2006) Prediction of landslide susceptibility using rare events logistic regression: a case-study in the Flemish Ardennes (Belgium). Geomorphology 76:392–410. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2005.12.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Westen CJ, Rengers N, Soeters R (2003) Use of geomorphological information in indirect landslide susceptibility assessment. Nat Hazards 30:399–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vergari F, Della Seta M, Del Monte M, Fredi P, Lupia Palmieri E (2011) Landslide susceptibility assessment in the Upper Orcia Valley (Southern Tuscany, Italy) through conditional analysis: a contribution to the unbiased selection of causal factors. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 11:1475–1497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visser H, de Nijs T (2006) The map comparison kit. Environ Model Softw 21:346–358. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2004.11.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb GI (2000) MultiBoosting: a technique for combining boosting and wagging. Mach Learn 40:159–196. doi:10.1023/a:1007659514849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Were K, Tien Bui D, Dick ØB, Singh BR (2015) A comparative assessment of support vector regression, artificial neural networks, and random forests for predicting and mapping soil organic carbon stocks across an Afromontane landscape. Ecol Indic 52:394–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witten IH, Frank E, Mark AH (2011) Data mining: practical machine learning tools and techniques, 3rd edn. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington

    Google Scholar 

  • Yalcin A, Reis S, Aydinoglu AC, Yomralioglu T (2011) A GIS-based comparative study of frequency ratio, analytical hierarchy process, bivariate statistics and logistics regression methods for landslide susceptibility mapping in Trabzon, NE Turkey. Catena 85:274–287. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2011.01.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Q, Shao J, Scholz M, Plant C (2011) Feature selection methods for characterizing and classifying adaptive Sustainable Flood Retention Basins. Water Res 45:993–1004. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2010.10.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao X, Tham LG, Dai FC (2008) Landslide susceptibility mapping based on support vector machine: a case study on natural slopes of Hong Kong, China. Geomorphology 101:572–582. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2008.02.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz I (2009) Landslide susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio, logistic regression, artificial neural networks and their comparison: a case study from Kat landslides (Tokat-Turkey). Comput Geosci 35:1125–1138. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2008.08.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang F, Pei X, Chen W, Liu G, Liang S (2014) Spatial variation in geotechnical properties and topographic attributes on the different types of shallow landslides in a loess catchment. China Eur J Environ Civil Eng 18:470–488. doi:10.1080/19648189.2014.881754

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Geographic Information System group, University College of Southeast Norway, Bø i Telemak, Norway.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Geographic Information System Group, Department of Business Administration and Computer Science, University College of Southeast Norway, 3800, Bø i Telemark, Norway

    Dieu Tien Bui

  2. Department of Tectonics and Geomorphology, Vietnam Institute of Geosciences and Mineral Resources, Hanoi, Vietnam

    Tien-Chung Ho

  3. Department of Civil Engineering, Geospatial Information Science Research Center (GISRC), Faculty of Engineering, University Putra Malaysia, 43400, Serdang, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia

    Biswajeet Pradhan

  4. Department of Civil Engineering, Gujarat Technological University, Nr.Visat Three Roads, Visat - Gandhinagar Highway, Chandkheda, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, 382424, India

    Binh-Thai Pham

  5. Department of Engineering Geology, Hanoi University of Mining and Geology, Duc Thang, Bac Tu Liem, Hanoi, Vietnam

    Viet-Ha Nhu

  6. Department of Mathematical Sciences and Technology, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, P.O. Box 5003 IMT, 1432, Aas, Norway

    Inge Revhaug

  7. Department of Geoinformation Engineering, Choongmu-gwan, Sejong University, 209 Neungdong-ro Gwangjingu, Seoul, 05006, Republic of Korea

    Biswajeet Pradhan

Authors
  1. Dieu Tien Bui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tien-Chung Ho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Biswajeet Pradhan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Binh-Thai Pham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Viet-Ha Nhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Inge Revhaug
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dieu Tien Bui.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tien Bui, D., Ho, TC., Pradhan, B. et al. GIS-based modeling of rainfall-induced landslides using data mining-based functional trees classifier with AdaBoost, Bagging, and MultiBoost ensemble frameworks. Environ Earth Sci 75, 1101 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-5919-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-5919-4

Keywords