Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Investigating the role of CSF’s for successful implementation of quality management practices in MSMEs

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to develop and propose a structural framework which may help in successful implementation of quality management (QM) practices in micro, small and medium enterprises. Extent review of literature on QM and quality performance in chronological order is carried out to accomplish the objective of this study. A total of 20 critical success factors (CSF) has been identified and a structural framework has been proposed. Further, to support the framework various hypotheses have been formulated and tested. The survey questionnaire was designed and responses from about 215 ISO certified companies have been used for empirical analyses. The data was analyzed using cross-tabulations and Chi square (χ2) test was used to test the stated hypotheses. Further, bivariate Pearson’s (r) coefficient was used to quantify the impact of relationship among CSF’s and QM practices. From the results, the value of χ2 coefficient was found between (121.01 < χ 2 > 267.28), which is statistically significant at (p < 0.001), suggesting that QM practice are not independent of CSF’s. Overall, all identified CSF’s were found statistically positive associated with regards to successful implementation of QM practices and their impact of association were found high as (0.588 < r < 0.828, p < 0.01). Moreover, the top management commitment was perceived as dominant factor for successful implementation of QM practices with higher correlation (r = 0.828, p < 0.01), followed by leadership quality with r = 0.822.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alan MR, Chang HO (2008) The international competitiveness of Asian firms. J Strategy Manag 1(1):57–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ana BECT, Juan CBL, Vicente RP (2001) Measuring the relationship between total quality management and sustainable competitive advantage: a resource based view. Total Qual Manag 12(7–8):932–938

    Google Scholar 

  • Antony J (2008) Can Six-Sigma be effective implemented in SMEs? Int J Product Perform Manag 57(5):420–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arostegui MN, Sanchez FB, Molina VB (2015) Exploring the relationship between information technology competence and quality management. Bus Res Q 18(1):4–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arumugam V, Ooi KB, Fong TC (2008) TQM practices and quality management performance—an investigation of their relationship using data from ISO 9001:2000 firms in Malaysia. TQM Mag 20(6):636–650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Attri R, Grover S, Dev N, Kumar D (2013) Analysis of barriers of total productive maintenance (TPM). Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 4(4):365–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbera L, Crespo A, Viveros P, Stegmaier R (2012) Advance model for maintenance management in a continuous improvement cycle: integration unto the business strategy. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 3(1):47–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhuiyan N, Alam N (2004) ISO 9001:2000 implementation: the North American experienced. Int J Product Perform Manag 53(1):10–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borade AB, Bansod SV (2012) Interpretive structural modeling-based framework for VMI adoption in Indian institutes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 58(9–12):1227–1242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brah SA, Wong JL, Rao BM (2000) TQM and business performance in the service sector: a Singapore study. Int J Oper Prod Manag 20(11):1293–1312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brkic VK, Djurduja T, Dondur N, Klarin MM, Tomic B (2013) An empirical examination of the impact of quality tools application on business performance: evidence from Serbia. Total Qual Manag 24(5):607–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown MG, Hitchcock DE, Willard ML (1994) Fails and what to do about it. Irwin, Burr Ridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess K, Singh P, Koroglu R (2006) Supply chain management: a structured literature review and implications for future research. Int J Oper Prod Manag 26(7):703–729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byoungho J, Moon HC (2006) The diamond approach to the competitiveness of Korea’s apparel industry. J Fash Mark Manag 10(2):195–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang G (2009) Total quality management in supply chain. Int Bus Res 2(4):81–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen JS, Tsou HT (2012) Performance effect of IT capability, service process innovation, and the mediating role of customer service. J Engg Technol Manag 29(1):71–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin KS, Pun KF (2002) A proposed framework for implementing TQM in Chinese organizations. Int J Qual Reliab Manag 19(3):272–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conca FJ, Llopis J, Tari JJ (2004) Development of a measure to assess quality management in certified firms. Eur J Oper Res 156:683–697

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Crosby PB (1979) Quality is free: the art of making quality certain. Hodder & Stoughton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Curkovic S, Melnyk S, Calantone R, Handfield R (2000) Validating the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award framework through structural equation modeling. Int J Prod Res 38(4):765–791

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Das A, Pau H, Swierczek FW (2008) Developing and validating total quality management (TQM) constructs in the context of Thailand’s manufacturing industries. Benchmarking Int J 15(1):52–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David G, Sharma B (2009) Investigation of the hard and soft quality management factors of Australian SMEs and their association with firm performance. Int J Qual Reliab Manag 26(9):865–880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David RJ, Strang D (2006) When fashion is fleeting: transitory collective beliefs and the dynamics of TQM consulting. Acad Manag J 49(2):215–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deming WE (1982) Quality, productivity and competitive positioning. MIT Center for Advance Engineering, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Deming WE (1986) Out of the crisis. MIT Center for Advance Engineering, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Deshmukh SV, Lakhe RR (2010) Six sigma awareness in central India SMEs. Int J Product Qual Manag 5(2):200–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson MW, Thornton AC, Grave S (2001) Technology portfolio management: optimizing interdependent projects over multiple time periods. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 48(4):518–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du Y, Mo H, Deng X, Sadiq R, Deng Y (2014) A new method in failure mode and effects analysis based on evidential reasoning. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 5(1):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubey R, Gunasekaran A, Ali SS (2015) Exploring the relationship, operational practices institutional pressure and environmental performance: a framework for green supply chain. Int J Prod Econ 160(1):120–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easton GS, Jarrell SL (1998) The effect of total quality management on cooperate performance: an empirical investigation. J Bus 71(2):253–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feigenbaum AV (1991) Total quality control. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fotopoulos CV, Psomas EL (2010) The structural relationships between total quality management factors and organizational performance. TQM J 22(5):539–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukushima T, Yamada S (2010) Software process improvement by process monitoring and quality evaluation activities. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 1(4):284–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goyal S, Grover S (2013) Manufacturing system’s effectiveness measurement by using combined approach of ANP and GTMA. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 4(4):404–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grover S, Agrawal VP, Khan IA (2006) Role of human factor in TQM: a graph theoretic approach. Int J Qual Sci 3(1):80–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta H, Bisen J, Kumar S, Das S (2015) ‘Developing a model of critical success factors for TQM implementation in MSMSs in India and their effect on internal and external quality of organization’. Int J Bus Excell (in press)

  • Ishikawa K (1976) Guide to quality control. Asian Productivity Organization, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishikawa K (1985) What is total quality control? The Japanese way. Prentice Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ismail SI (2009) Critical success factor for TQM implementation and their impact on performance of SMEs. Int J Product Perform Manag 58(3):215–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivanovic MD, Majstorovic VD (2006) Model developed for the assessment of quality management level in manufacturing systems. TQM Mag 18(4):410–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jitpaiboon T, Rao SS (2007) A meta-analysis of quality measures in manufacturing system. Int J Qual Reliab Manag 24(1):78–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jose CP (2008) TQM and performance in small medium enterprises: the mediating effect of customer orientation and innovation. Int J Qual Reliab Manag 25(3):256–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juran JM (1986) The quality trilogy: a universal approach to managing for quality. Qual Prog 19(8):19–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Juran JM (1988) On planning for quality. Collier Macmillan, Free Press, London, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanji GK, Wallace W (2000) Business excellence through customer satisfaction. Total Qual Manag 11(7):979–998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapur PK, Nagpal S, Khatri SK, Yadavalli VSS (2014) Critical success factors utility based tool for ERP health assessment: a general framework. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 5(2):133–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karim MA, Smith AJR, Halgamuge S (2008) Empirical relationship between some manufacturing practices and performance. Int J Prod Res 46(13):358–3613

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Karimi E, Rafiee M (2014) Analyzing the impact of supply chain management practices on organizational performance through competitive priorities. Int J Acad Res Account Finance Manag Sci 4(1):1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaushik P, Khanduja D, Mittal K, Jaglan P (2012) Application of Six Sigma methodology in a small and medium-sized manufacturing enterprise. TQM J 24(1):4–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaynak H (2003) The relationship between total management practices and their effect on firm’s performance. J Oper Manag 21(6):405–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khanna HK, Laroiya SC, Sharma DD (2011) Quality management in Indian manufacturing organizations: some observations and results from a pilot survey. Braz J Oper Prod Manag 7(1):141–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim DY, Kumar V, Kumar U (2012) Relationship between quality management practices and innovation. J Oper Manag 30(4):295–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koc T (2007) The impact of ISO 9000 quality management systems on manufacturing. J Mater Process Technol 18(6):207–213

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar S, Sharma RK (2014) An ISM based framework for structural relationship among various manufacturing flexibility dimensions. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag. doi:10.1007/s13198-014-0279-5

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar S, Sosnoski M (2009) Using DMAIC Six Sigma to systematically improve shop floor production quality and costs. Int J Product Perform Manag 58(3):254–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar U, Kumara V, Grosboisb D, Choisnea F (2009) Continuous improvement of performance measurement by TQM adopters. Total Qual Manag 20(6):603–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar R, Garg D, Garg TK (2011) Total quality management success factors in North Indian manufacturing and service industries. TQM J 23(1):36–46

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lai HK, Cheng TCE (2003) Initiative and outcomes of quality management implementation across industries. Int J Manag Sci 31(2):141–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee SM, Rho BN, Lee SG (2003) Impact of Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Awards criteria on organizational quality performance. Int J Prod Res 41(9):2003–2020

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis WG, Pun KF, Lalla TRM (2006a) Exploring soft versus hard factors for TQM implementation in small and medium-sized enterprises. Int J Product Perform Manag 55(7):539–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis WG, Pun KF, Lalla TRM (2006b) Empirical investigation of the hard and soft criteria of TQM in ISO 9001 certified small and medium-sized enterprises. Int J Qual Reliab Manag 23(8):964–985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li S, Lin B (2006) Accessing information sharing and information quality in supply chain management. Decis Support Syst 42(3):1641–1656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipovatz D, Stenos F, Vaka A (1999) Implementation of ISO 9000 quality system in Greek enterprises. Int J Qual Reliab Manag 16(6):534–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mady TM (2009) Quality management practices—an empirical investigation of associated constructs in two Kuwaiti industries. Int J Qual Reliab Manag 26(3):214–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmud N, Hilmi FM (2014) TQM and Malaysian SMEs performance: the mediating role of organization learning. Proc Soc Behav Sci 130:216–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthias T, Moacir GF, Mark S, Lawrence DF (2013) Competitive priorities of small manufacturers in Brazil. Ind Manag Data Syst 113(6):856–874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller WJ, Sumner AT, Deane RH (2009) Assessment of quality management practices within the healthcare industry. Am J Econ Bus Adm 1(2):105–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra P, Sharma RK (2011) Reengineering the supply chain human dimension using six-sigma framework. Int J Qual Res 5(3):193–203

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Mohan KK, Harun RS, Verma AK (2010) Quality framework for reliability improvement in SAP netweaver business intelligence environment through lean software development—a practical perspective. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 1(4):316–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nanda T, Gupta H, Kharub M, Singh N (2012) Diagnostics for pretesting questionnaires: a comparative analysis. Int J Technol Policy Manag 13(1):67–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narasimhan R, Nair A (2005) The antecedent role of quality, information sharing and supply chain proximity on strategic alliance formation and performance. Int J Prod Econ 96(3):301–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell T (1995) Total quality management as competitive advantage: a review and empirical study. Strateg Manag J 16(1):15–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prajogo DI, Brown A (2006) Approach to adopting quality in SMEs and the impact on quality management practices and performance. Total Qual Manag 17(5):555–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prajogo DI, McDermott CM (2005) The relationship between TQM practices and organizational culture. Int J Oper Prod Manag 25(11):1101–1122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quazi HA, Padibjo S (1998) A journey towards total quality management through ISO 9000 certification—a Singapore experience. Int J Qual Reliab Manag 9(5):489–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rich E (2008) Management fads and information delays: an exploratory simulation study. J Bus Res 61:1143–1151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romano P, Vinelli A (2001) Quality management in supply chain perspectives, strategies and operative choices in a textile-apparel network. Int J Oper Prod Manag 21(4):446–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadikoglu E, Zehir C (2010) Investigating the effects of innovation and employee performance on the relationship between TQM practices and firm performance: an empirical study of Turkish firms. Int J Prod Econ 127(1):13–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahran S, Zeinalnezhad M, Muriati M (2010) Quality management in small and medium enterprises: experiences from a developing country. Int Rev Bus Res Pap 6(6):164–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Samal A, Tripathy S, Aich S (2014) Study of critical success factors of TQM in Indian small and medium scale Enterprises. Int J Res Mech Eng Technol 4(1):12–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma RK, Kharub M (2014) Attaining competitive positioning through SPC—an experimental investigation from SME. Meas Bus Excell 18(4):86–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma RK, Kharub M (2015) Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of barriers hindering the growth of MSMEs. Int J Bus Excell 8(6):724–747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma RK, Sharma RG (2014) Integrating Six Sigma culture and TPM framework to improve manufacturing performance in SMEs. Qual Reliab Eng Int 30(5):745–765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shenaway EE, Baker T, Lemak DJ (2007) A meta-analysis of the effect of TQM on competitive advantage. Int J Qual Reliab Manag 25(5):442–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sila I (2007) Examining the effects of contextual factors on total quality management and performance through the lens of organizational theories: an empirical study. J Oper Manag 25(1):83–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh RK (2011) Developing the framework for co-ordinance in supply chain of SMEs. Bus Res Manag J 17(4):619–638

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh M, Khan IA, Grover S (2012) Development and comparison of quality awards: based on existing quality awards. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 3(3):209–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sit WY, Ooi KB, Lin B, Chong AY-L (2009) TQM and customer satisfaction in Malaysia’s service sector. Ind Manag Data Syst 109(7):957–975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sousa R, Voss CA (2002) Quality management re-visited: a reflective review and agenda for future research. J Oper Manag 20:91–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sroufe R, Curkovic S (2008) An examination of ISO 9000: 2000 and supply chain quality assurance. J Oper Manag 26(4):503–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su Q, Li Z, Zhang SX, Liu YY, Dang JX (2008) The impacts of quality management practices on business performance: an empirical investigation from China. Int J Qual Reliab Manag 25(8):809–823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sumaedi S, Rakhmawati T (2015) The effect of system design type on ISO 9001 implementation outcome: a proposed conceptual framework and future research agenda. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag. doi:10.1007/s13198-015-0336-8

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun H (2000) Total quality management, ISO 9000 certification and performance improvement. Int J Qual Reliab Manag 17(2):168–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talib F, Rahman Z (2010) Critical success factors of total quality management in service organization: a proposed model. Serv Mark Q 31(3):363–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talib F, Rahman Z, Qureshi MN (2013) An empirical investigation of relationship between total quality management practices and quality performance in Indian service companies. Int J Qual Reliab Manag 30(3):280–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tari JJ (2005) Component of successful total quality management. TQM Mag 17(2):182–194

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Tari JJ, Sabater V (2004) Quality tools and techniques: are they necessary for quality management? Int J Prod Econ 92(3):267–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tari JJ, Molina JF, Castejon JL (2007) The relationship between quality management practices and their effects on quality outcomes. Eur J Oper Res 183(2):483–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor WA, Wright GH (2003) A longitudinal study of TQM implementation: factors influencing success and failure. Int J Manag Sci 31(2):97–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Terziovski M (2006) Quality management practices and their relationship with customer satisfaction and productivity important. Manag Res News 29(7):414–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yahya S, Goh W (2001) The implementation of an ISO 9000 quality system. Int J Qual Reliab Manag 18(9):941–966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamada S, Yanashita T, Fukuta A (2010) Product quality prediction based on software process data with development-period estimation. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 1(1):72–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zu X, Fredendall LD, Douglas TJ (2008) The evaluating theory of quality management: the role of Six-Sigma. J Oper Manag 26(5):630–650

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to two anonymous reviewers for their constructive and very useful comments which helped to improve the presentation of paper considerably.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Hamirpur, Himachal Pradesh, 17705, India

    Manjeet Kharub & Rajiv Kumar Sharma

Authors
  1. Manjeet Kharub
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rajiv Kumar Sharma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manjeet Kharub.

Appendix

Appendix

Please tick on critical success factors which may help MSMEs in adoption of quality management practices on 1–5 scale with 1 = not important, 2 = some-what important, 3 = moderately important, 4 = important, 5 = very important

S. no.

Factors

Sub criterions

1

2

3

4

5

1

Strategic factors

Top-management commitment

     

Quality culture

     

Quality systems

     

Quality awards

     

Continuous improvement and innovation

     

Benchmarking

     

Technical expertise

     

Marketing expertise

     

Financial access

     

2

Tactical factors

Employee encouragement

     

Employee involvement

     

Training and education

     

Teamwork

     

Information and analysis

     

Supplier management

     

Communication

     

3

Operational factors

Product and service design

     

Process management

     

Customer focus

     

Human resource management

     

Industrial relations

     

Employee rewards and incentives

     

4

Tool cum technique

Factor of review current condition

     

Control charts

     

Flow chart

     

Check sheets

     

Route sheets

     

Factor for analysis current condition

     

Histogram

     

Pareto diagram

     

FMEA

     

Cause and effect diagram

     

Acceptance sampling quality circles

     

See Figs. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 and 22.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Effect of TMC on QMP

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure 4

Effect of quality culture on QMP

Full size image
Fig. 5
figure 5

Effect of quality assurance on QMP

Full size image
Fig. 6
figure 6

Effect of quality system on QMP

Full size image
Fig. 7
figure 7

Effect of continuous improvement on QMP

Full size image
Fig. 8
figure 8

Effect of benchmarking on QMP

Full size image
Fig. 9
figure 9

Effect of employee involvement on QMP

Full size image
Fig. 10
figure 10

Effect of training and education on QMP

Full size image
Fig. 11
figure 11

Effect of information and analysis on QMP

Full size image
Fig. 12
figure 12

Effect of supplier management on QMP

Full size image
Fig. 13
figure 13

Effect of communication systems on QMP

Full size image
Fig. 14
figure 14

Effect of leadership quality on QMP

Full size image
Fig. 15
figure 15

Effect of product and service design on QMP

Full size image
Fig. 16
figure 16

Effect of process management on QMP

Full size image
Fig. 17
figure 17

Effect of customer focus on QMP

Full size image
Fig. 18
figure 18

Effect of human resource management on QMP

Full size image
Fig. 19
figure 19

Effect of reorganizations and incentives design on QMP

Full size image
Fig. 20
figure 20

Effect of long vision on QMP

Full size image
Fig. 21
figure 21

Effect of uses of factors to review current condition on QMP

Full size image
Fig. 22
figure 22

Effect of uses of factors for analysis the current condition on QMP

Full size image

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kharub, M., Sharma, R.K. Investigating the role of CSF’s for successful implementation of quality management practices in MSMEs. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 7 (Suppl 1), 247–273 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-015-0394-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-015-0394-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation