Abstract
Hydrological process in a catchment consists of multiple internal processes with complex interactions. The conventional practice of using a single variable to calibrate a hydrological model can lead to equifinality, which can result in substantial uncertainty in capturing the internal processes. Since multi-objective calibration process can be a way to solve this problem, a novel stepwise series of calibration experiments are employed by integrating (i) spatiotemporal remotely sensed actual evapotranspiration (AET) data in multi objective calibration process, (ii) Leaf area index (LAI) data, and (iii) AET and LAI data together in multi-objective calibration with Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT). This calibration process aims for reducing the equifinality by improving the connected hydrologic internal processes rather than improvement in the assessment metrics at the catchment outlet. The results suggest that the integration of remotely sensed AET and LAI data in multi-objective calibration tend to increase model accuracy and reduce the prediction uncertainty, including significant improvement in simulated evapotranspiration and streamflow. In comparison with the traditional SWAT model, which is based on user input and semiempirical equations to simulate hydrologic processes, AET and LAI integration in multi-objective calibration notably captured the improved evapotranspiration and actual vegetation dynamics estimations, which resulted improvement in streamflow calibration. The findings showed the necessity of integrating remotely sensed AET and LAI data to improve the calibration and reduce the equifinality of hydrologic model simulations. The presented methodology can be replicated through other hydrological models and remote sensing data sources in diverse hydrological systems in the world.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Data availability
Not applicable.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Abbaspour KC, Johnson CA, Van Genuchten MT (2004) Estimating uncertain flow and transport parameters using a sequential uncertainty fitting procedure. Vadose Zone J 3(4):1340–1352. https://doi.org/10.2113/3.4.1340
Abbaspour KC (2013) Swat-cup 2012. SWAT calibration and uncertainty program—A user manual.
Abbaspour KC, Rouholahnejad E, Vaghefi SR, Srinivasan R, Yang H, Kløve B (2015) A continental-scale hydrology and water quality model for Europe: calibration and uncertainty of a high-resolution large-scale SWAT model. J Hydrol 524:733–752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.03.027
Adhav V (2021) Crop health monitoring using geospatial technologies for Nashik district. Maharashtra Int J Modern Agric 10(2):1395–1409
Aher S, Shinde S, Gawali P, Deshmukh P, Venkata LB (2019) Spatio-temporal analysis and estimation of rainfall variability in and around upper Godavari River basin. India Arab J Geosci 12(22):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-019-4869-z
Ahmadzadeh H, Mansouri B, Fathian F, Vaheddoost B (2022) Assessment of water demand reliability using SWAT and RIBASIM models with respect to climate change and operational water projects. Agric Water Manag 261:107377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107377
Alam S, Ali MM, Islam Z (2016) Future streamflow of Brahmaputra river basin under synthetic climate change scenarios. J Hydrol Eng 21(11):05016027. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001435
Al-Kaisi M, Brun LJ, Enz JW (1989) Transpiration and evapotranspiration from maize as related to leaf area index. Agric Meteorol 48(1–2):111–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1923(89)90010-5
Alemayehu T, Griensven AV, Woldegiorgis BT, Bauwens W (2017) An improved SWAT vegetation growth module and its evaluation for four tropical ecosystems. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 21(9):4449–4467. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-4449-2017
Aouissi J, Benabdallah S, Chabaane ZL, Cudennec C (2016) Evaluation of potential evapotranspiration assessment methods for hydrological modelling with SWAT—Application in data-scarce rural Tunisia. Agric Water Manag 174:39–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2016.03.004
Arnold JG, Moriasi DN, Gassman PW, Abbaspour KC, White MJ, Srinivasan R, Santhi C, Harmel RD, Van Griensven A, Van Liew MW, Kannan N, Jha MK (2012) SWAT: Model use, calibration, and validation. Trans ASABE 55(4):1491–1508. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.42256
Ashraf Vaghefi S, Abbaspour KC, Faramarzi M, Srinivasan R, Arnold JG (2017) Modeling crop water productivity using a coupled SWAT–MODSIM model. Water 9(3):157. https://doi.org/10.3390/w9030157
Ayivi F, Jha MK (2018) Estimation of water balance and water yield in the Reedy Fork-Buffalo Creek watershed in North Carolina using SWAT. Int Soil Water Conserv Res 6(3):203–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswcr.2018.03.007
Arnold JG, Srinivasan R, Muttiah RS, Williams JR (1998) Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment part I: model development 1. JAWRA J Am Water Res Assoc 34(1):73–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.1998.tb05961.x
Chanapathi T, Thatikonda S (2020) Investigating the impact of climate and land-use land cover changes on hydrological predictions over the Krishna river basin under present and future scenarios. Sci Total Environ 721:137736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137736
CGWB (2014) Groundwater information Nashik district Maharashtra. Central Ground Water Board, 1–17. http://cgwb.gov.in/district_profile/maharashtra/nashik.pdf. Accessed 1 Jan 2022
Cibin R, Sudheer KP, Chaubey I (2010) Sensitivity and identifiability of stream flow generation parameters of the SWAT model. Hydrol Process Int J 24(9):1133–1148. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7568
Fernandez-Palomino CA, Hattermann FF, Krysanova V, Vega-Jácome F, Bronstert A (2021) Towards a more consistent eco-hydrological modelling through multi-objective calibration: a case study in the Andean Vilcanota River basin. Peru Hydrol Sci J 66(1):59–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2020.1846740
Fu C, James AL, Yao H (2015) Investigations of uncertainty in SWAT hydrologic simulations: a case study of a Canadian shield catchment. Hydrol Process 29(18):4000–4017. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10477
Gao Y, Long D (2008) Intercomparison of remote sensing-based models for estimation of evapotranspiration and accuracy assessment based on SWAT. Hydrol Process Int J 22(25):4850–4869. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7104
Garg KK, Bharati L, Gaur A, George B, Acharya S, Jella K, Narasimhan B (2012) Spatial mapping of agricultural water productivity using the SWAT model in Upper Bhima Catchment. India Irrig Drain 61(1):60–79. https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.618
Ghumman AR, Ahmad S, Rahman S, Khan Z (2018) Investigating management of irrigation water in the upstream control system of the upper swat canal. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Civ Eng 42(2):153–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-018-0097-0
GSI (2001) District resources map. Geological survey of India publications Calcutta
Guo T, Engel BA, Shao G, Arnold JG, Srinivasan R, Kiniry JR (2019) Development and improvement of the simulation of woody bioenergy crops in the soil and water assessment tool (SWAT). Environ Model Softw 122:104295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.08.030
Ha LT, Bastiaanssen WG, Griensven AV, van Dijk AI, Senay GB (2017) SWAT-CUP for calibration of spatially distributed hydrological processes and ecosystem services in a Vietnamese river basin using remote sensing. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Discuss. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2017-251
Her Y, Chaubey I (2015) Impact of the numbers of observations and calibration parameters on equifinality, model performance, and output and parameter uncertainty. Hydrol Process 29(19):4220–4237. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10487
Jothityangkoon C, Sivapalan M, Farmer DL (2001) Process controls of water balance variability in a large semi-arid catchment: downward approach to hydrological model development. J Hydrol 254(1–4):174–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00496-6
Kadam SA, Gorantiwar SD, Mandre NP, Tale DP (2021) Crop coefficient for potato crop evapotranspiration estimation by field water balance method in semi-arid region, Maharashtra, India. Potato Res 64(3):421–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11540-020-09484-8
King KW, Arnold JG, Bingner RL (1999) Comparison of Green-Ampt and curve number methods on Goodwin Creek watershed using SWAT. Trans ASAE 42(4):919. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.13272
Kondo T, Sakai N, Yazawa T, Shimizu Y (2021) Verifying the applicability of SWAT to simulate fecal contamination for watershed management of Selangor River. Malays Sci Total Environ 774:145075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145075
Krysanova V, White M (2015) Advances in water resources assessment with SWAT—an overview. Hydrol Sci J 60(5):771–783. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2015.1029482
Kucukmehmetoglu M, Geymen A (2009) Urban sprawl factors in the surface water resource basins of Istanbul. Land Use Policy 26(3):569–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.08.007
Lai G, Luo J, Li Q, Qiu L, Pan R, Zeng X, Zhang L, Yi F (2020) Modification and validation of the SWAT model based on multi-plant growth mode, a case study of the Meijiang river basin. Chin J Hydrol 585:124778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124778
Lee S, McCarty GW, Moglen GE, Yen H, Lei F, Anderson M, Gao F, Crow W, Yeo IY, Sun L (2021) Enhanced Watershed Modeling by Incorporating Remotely Sensed Evapotranspiration and Leaf Area Index. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Discuss. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2020-669
Li Z, Yu P, Wang Y, Webb AA, He C, Wang Y, Yang L (2017) A model coupling the effects of soil moisture and potential evaporation on the tree transpiration of a semi-arid larch plantation. Ecohydrology 10(1):e1764. https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.1764
Li Y, Grimaldi S, Pauwels VR, Walker JP (2018) Hydrologic model calibration using remotely sensed soil moisture and discharge measurements: the impact on predictions at gauged and ungauged locations. J Hydrol 557:897–909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.01.013
López-Ballesteros A, Senent-Aparicio J, Srinivasan R, Pérez-Sánchez J (2019) Assessing the impact of best management practices in a highly anthropogenic and ungauged watershed using the SWAT model: a case study in the El Beal watershed (southeast Spain). Agronomy 9(10):576. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9100576
Loukas A, Vasiliades L, Domenikiotis C, Dalezios NR (2005) Basin-wide actual evapotranspiration estimation using NOAA/AVHRR satellite data. Phys Chem Earth Parts A/B/C 30(1–3):69–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2004.08.023
Ma T, Duan Z, Li R, Song X (2019) Enhancing SWAT with remotely sensed LAI for improved modelling of ecohydrological process in subtropics. J Hydrol 570:802–815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.01.024
Moriasi DN, Gitau MW, Pai N, Daggupati P (2015) Hydrologic and water quality models: performance measures and evaluation criteria. Trans ASABE 58(6):1763–1785. https://doi.org/10.13031/trans.58.10715
Munoth P, Goyal R (2020) Impacts of land use land cover change on runoff and sediment yield of upper Tapi river sub-basin, India. Int J River Basin Manag 18(2):177–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2019.1613413
Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I—A discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10(3):282–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6
Negewo TF, Sarma AK (2021) Estimation of water yield under baseline and future climate change scenarios in Genale watershed, Genale Dawa river basin, Ethiopia, using SWAT model. J Hydrol Eng 26(3):05020051. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0002047
Neitsch SL, Arnold JG, Kiniry JR, Williams JR (2011) Soil and water assessment tool theoretical documentation version 2009. Texas Water Resources Institute
Nugroho P, Marsono D, Sudira P, Suryatmojo H (2013) Impact of land-use changes on water balance. Procedia Environ Sci 17:256–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2013.02.036
Odusanya AE, Mehdi B, Schürz C, Oke AO, Awokola OS, Awomeso JA, Adejuwon JO, Schulz K (2019) Multi-site calibration and validation of SWAT with satellite-based evapotranspiration in a data-sparse catchment in southwestern Nigeria. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 23(2):1113–1144. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-1113-2019
Odusanya AE, Schulz K, Biao EI, Degan BA, Mehdi-Schulz B (2021) Evaluating the performance of streamflow simulated by an eco-hydrological model calibrated and validated with global land surface actual evapotranspiration from remote sensing at a catchment scale in West Africa. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies 37:100893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2021.100893
Paul M, Rajib A, Negahban-Azar M, Shirmohammadi A, Srivastava P (2021) Improved agricultural water management in data-scarce semi-arid watersheds: value of integrating remotely sensed leaf area index in hydrological modeling. Sci Total Environ 791:148177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148177
Parajuli PB, Jayakody P, Ouyang Y (2018) Evaluation of using remote sensing evapotranspiration data in SWAT. Water Resour Manage 32(3):985–996. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1850-z
Pei T, Wu X, Li X, Zhang Y, Shi F, Ma Y, Wang P, Zhang C (2017) Seasonal divergence in the sensitivity of evapotranspiration to climate and vegetation growth in the Yellow river basin. Chin J Geophys Res Biogeosci 122(1):103–118. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JG003648
Petzold R, Schwärzel K, Feger KH (2011) Transpiration of a hybrid poplar plantation in Saxony (Germany) in response to climate and soil conditions. Eur J Forest Res 130(5):695–706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-010-0459-z
Pfannerstill M, Bieger K, Guse B, Bosch DD, Fohrer N, Arnold JG (2017) How to constrain multi-objective calibrations of the SWAT model using water balance components. JAWRA J Am Water Res Assoc 53(3):532–546. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12524
Poméon T, Diekkrüger B, Springer A, Kusche J, Eicker A (2018) Multi-objective validation of SWAT for sparsely-gauged West African river basins—A remote sensing approach. Water 10(4):451. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10040451
Rajib MA, Merwade V, Yu Z (2016) Multi-objective calibration of a hydrologic model using spatially distributed remotely sensed/in-situ soil moisture. J Hydrol 536:192–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.02.037
Rajib MA, Merwade V (2016) Improving soil moisture accounting and streamflow prediction in SWAT by incorporating a modified time-dependent curve number method. Hydrol Process 30(4):603–624. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10639
Rajib A, Merwade V, Yu Z (2018a) Rationale and efficacy of assimilating remotely sensed potential evapotranspiration for reduced uncertainty of hydrologic models. Water Resour Res 54(7):4615–4637. https://doi.org/10.1029/2017WR021147
Rajib A, Evenson GR, Golden HE, Lane CR (2018b) Hydrologic model predictability improves with spatially explicit calibration using remotely sensed evapotranspiration and biophysical parameters. J Hydrol 567:668–683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.10.024
Rajib A, Kim IL, Golden HE, Lane CR, Kumar SV, Yu Z, Jeyalakshmi S (2020) Watershed modeling with remotely sensed big data: MODIS leaf area index improves hydrology and water quality predictions. Remote Sensing 12(13):2148. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12132148
Rane N, Jayaraj GK (2021) Evaluation of multiwell pumping aquifer tests in unconfined aquifer system by Neuman (1975) method with numerical modeling. Groundwater resources development and planning in the semi-arid region. Springer, Cham, pp 93–106
Rane NL, Jayaraj GK (2021) Comparison of multi-influence factor, weight of evidence and frequency ratio techniques to evaluate groundwater potential zones of basaltic aquifer systems. Environ Dev Sustain. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01535-5
Rane N, Jayaraj GK (2021c) Stratigraphic modeling and hydraulic characterization of a typical basaltic aquifer system in the Kadva river basin, Nashik, India. Model Earth Syst Environ 7(1):293–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-020-01008-0
Ritchie JT (1985) A user-orientated model of the soil water balance in wheat. Wheat growth and modelling. Springer, Boston MA, pp 293–305
Running S, Mu Q, Zhao M, Moreno A (2019) MOD16A2GF MODIS/Terra Net Evapotranspiration Gap-Filled 8-Day L4 Global 500 m SIN Grid V006. NASA EOSDIS Land Processes DAAC. https://doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MOD16A2GF.006. Accessed 01 Aug 2021
Sahoo S, Dhar A, Debsarkar A, Kar A (2018) Impact of water demand on hydrological regime under climate and LULC change scenarios. Environ Earth Sci 77(9):1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-7531-2
Saraf VR, Regulwar DG (2018) Impact of climate change on runoff generation in the Upper Godavari River Basin, India. J Hazard Toxic Radioactive Waste 22(4):04018021. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.0000416
Senay GB, Leake S, Nagler PL, Artan G, Dickinson J, Cordova JT, Glenn EP (2011) Estimating basin scale evapotranspiration (ET) by water balance and remote sensing methods. Hydrol Process 25(26):4037–4049. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.8379
Shah S, Duan Z, Song X, Li R, Mao H, Liu J, Ma T, Wang M (2021) Evaluating the added value of multi-variable calibration of SWAT with remotely sensed evapotranspiration data for improving hydrological modeling. J Hydrol 603:127046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.127046
Shahvari N, Khalilian S, Mosavi SH, Mortazavi SA (2019) Assessing climate change impacts on water resources and crop yield: a case study of Varamin plain basin. Iran Environ Monit Assess 191(3):134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7266-x
Srinivasan R, Ramanarayanan TS, Arnold JG, Bednarz ST (1998) Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment part II: model application 1. JAWRA J Am Water Res Assoc 34(1):91–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.1998.tb05962.x
Srinivasan R, Zhang X, Arnold J (2010) SWAT ungauged: hydrological budget and crop yield predictions in the Upper Mississippi river basin. Trans ASABE 53(5):1533–1546. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.34903
Strauch M, Volk M (2013) SWAT plant growth modification for improved modeling of perennial vegetation in the tropics. Ecol Model 269:98–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.08.013
Thomas T, Ghosh NC, Sudheer KP (2021) Optimal reservoir operation—A climate change adaptation strategy for Narmada basin in central India. J Hydrol 598:126238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126238
Tobin KJ, Bennett ME (2017) Constraining SWAT calibration with remotely sensed evapotranspiration data. JAWRA J Am Water Res Assoc 53(3):593–604. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12516
Triana JS, Chu ML, Guzman JA, Moriasi DN, Steiner JL (2019) Beyond model metrics: the perils of calibrating hydrologic models. J Hydrol 578:124032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124032
Tuo Y, Marcolini G, Disse M, Chiogna G (2018) A multi-objective approach to improve SWAT model calibration in alpine catchments. J Hydrol 559:347–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.02.055
Visakh S, Raju PV, Kulkarni SS, Diwakar PG (2019) Inter-comparison of water balance components of river basins draining into selected delta districts of Eastern India. Sci Total Environ 654:1258–1269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.162
Wagh VM, Panaskar DB, Jacobs JA, Mukate SV, Muley AA, Kadam AK (2019) Influence of hydro-geochemical processes on groundwater quality through geostatistical techniques in Kadava river basin. Western India Arab J Geosci 12(1):1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-018-4136-8
Wang D, Zhan Y, Yu T, Liu Y, Jin X, Ren X, Chen X, Liu Q (2020) Improving meteorological input for surface energy balance system utilizing mesoscale weather research and forecasting model for estimating daily actual evapotranspiration. Water 12(1):9. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12010009
Williams JR, Jones CA, Dyke PT (1984) A modeling approach to determining the relationship between erosion and soil productivity. Trans ASAE 27(1):129–0144. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.32748
Xie X, Cui Y (2011) Development and test of SWAT for modeling hydrological processes in irrigation districts with paddy rice. J Hydrol 396(1–2):61–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.10.032
Xu CY, Singh VP (1998) A review on monthly water balance models for water resources investigations. Water Resour Manage 12(1):20–50. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007916816469
Yang J, Reichert P, Abbaspour KC, Xia J, Yang H (2008) Comparing uncertainty analysis techniques for a SWAT application to the Chaohe basin in China. J Hydrol 358(1–2):1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.05.012
Yang D, Shao W, Yeh PJ, Yang H, Kanae S, Oki T (2009) Impact of vegetation coverage on regional water balance in the nonhumid regions of China. Water Resour Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR006948
Zhang L, Walker GR, Dawes WR (2002) Water balance modelling: concepts and applications. ACIAR Monograph Series 84:31–47
Zhou Q, Luo Y, Zhou X, Cai M, Zhao C (2018) Response of vegetation to water balance conditions at different time scales across the karst area of southwestern China—A remote sensing approach. Sci Total Environ 645:460–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.148
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to express their gratitude to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations for providing the soil data information, which can be found at http://www.fao.org/. We would also like to thank Adnan Rajib, Texas A&M University, Kingsville for providing new SWAT source code and the Water Resources Department (WRD), Government of Maharashtra, for providing the precipitation data.
Funding
No funding was received.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
No conflict of interest.
Additional information
Editorial responsibility: Shahid Hussain.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rane, N.L., Jayaraj, G.K. Enhancing SWAT model predictivity using multi-objective calibration: effects of integrating remotely sensed evapotranspiration and leaf area index. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 20, 6449–6468 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-022-04293-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-022-04293-7