Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Advertisement

The Relationships between Student Engagement and the Academic Achievement of First-Year University Students in Cambodia

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examined the relationships between student engagement in academically relevant activities and their academic achievement in the first year of university in Cambodia, and tested the presence of conditional effects of student engagement on achievement by students’ gender, geographical origin, and pre-university academic experience. The participants were 919 first-year students at nine universities in Phnom Penh City. Student engagement was measured using a revised version of the National Survey of Student Engagement and the College Student Experiences Questionnaire. The regression analyses revealed that the student engagement in time spent on out-of-class course-related tasks, homework/tasks, and active participation in classroom settings added significant values to Cambodian student achievement. Contrary to the extensive student engagement literature in developed countries, student engagement in out-of-class peer learning and extensive reading did not make any meaningful impacts on student achievement in the present study. Certain effects of student engagement on achievement tended to differ in magnitude by students’ pre-university academic experience and geographical origin. Implications for policy are discussed with a call for solid programs to promote and enhance the quality of student engagement activities on-and off-campus, especially among the academically disadvantaged students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Astin, A. W. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Development, 25, 297–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bai, H., & Pan, W. (2009). A multilevel approach to assessing the interaction effects on college student retention. Journal of College Student Retention, 11(2), 287–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carini, R. M., Kuh, G. D., & Kleint, S. P. (2006). Student engagement and student learning: Testing the linkages. Research in Higher Education, 47(1), 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, D. W. (2009). Education reforms and capacity development in higher education. In Y. Hirosato & Y. Kitamura (Eds.), The political economy of educational reforms and capacity development in Southeast Asia: Cases of Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam (pp. 91–109). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. Y., Sok, P., & Sok, K. (2007). Benchmarking potential factors leading to educational quality: A study on Cambodian higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, 15(2), 128–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chet, C. (2006). Cambodia. In UNESCO, Higher education in South-East Asia (pp. 13–33). Bangkok: UNESCO Bangkok.

  • Chhinh, S. (2003). Effect of pupil factor on mathematics achievement in Cambodian urban primary school. Asia Pacific Education Review, 4(2), 151–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, T. M., & Murrell, P. H. (1993). A structural model of perceived academic, personal, and vocational gains related to college student responsibility. Research in Higher Education, 34(3), 267–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). Dubai: Oriental Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, T. G., Marti, C. N., & McClenney, K. (2008). The effort-outcome gap: Differences for African American and Hispanic community college students in student engagement and academic achievement. The Journal of Higher Education, 79(5), 513–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahu, E. R. (2011). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education. doi:10.1080/03075079.2011.598505.

  • Kuh, G. D. (2003). What we are learning about student engagement from NSSE. Change, 35(2), 24–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, G. D., Cruce, T. M., Shoup, R., Kinzie, J., & Gonyea, R. M. (2008). Unmasking the effects of student engagement on first-year college grades and persistence. The Journal of Higher Education, 79(5), 540–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, G. D., & Hu, S. (2001). The effects of student-faculty interaction in the 1990s. The Review of Higher Education, 24(3), 309–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, G. D., Pace, C. R., & Vesper, N. (1997). The development of process indicators to estimate student gains associated with good practices in undergraduate education. Research in Higher Education, 38(4), 435–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwok, K., Chan, S., Heng, C., Kim, S., Neth, B., & Thon, V. (2010). Scoping study: Research capacities of Cambodia’s universities. Retrieved July 28, 2011 from http://www.drfcambodia.net/profiles/blogs/scoping: scoping study research.

  • Laird, T. F. N., & Cruce, T. M. (2009). Individual and environmental effects of part-time enrollment status on student-faculty interaction and self-reported gains. The Journal of Higher Education, 80(3), 290–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, J. H., Chinna, M. U., Nessay, P., Ngo Hok, U., Savoeun, V., Tinon, S., et al. (2009). Student achievement and education policy in a period of rapid expansion: Assessment data evidence from Cambodia. International Review of Education, 55(4), 393–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neau, V. (2003). The teaching of foreign languages in Cambodia: A historical perspective. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 16(3), 253–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pace, R. (1990). The undergraduates: A report of their activities and progress in college in the 1980s. Los Angeles: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E. T., Pierson, C. T., Wolniak, G. C., & Terenzini, P. T. (2004). First-generation college students: Additional evidence on college experiences and outcomes. The Journal of Higher Education, 75(3), 249–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E.T., & Terenzini, P.T. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

  • Pike, G. R., & Kuh, G. D. (2005). First-and second-generation college students: A comparison of their engagement and intellectual development. The Journal of Higher Education, 76(3), 276–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pike, G. R., Kuh, G. D., McCormick, A. C., Ethington, C. A., & Smart, J. C. (2011). If and when money matters: The relationships among educational expenditures, student engagement, and students’ learning outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 52, 81–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pike, G. R., Smart, J. C., Kuh, G. D., & Hayek, J. C. (2006). Educational expenditures and student engagement: When does money matter? Research in Higher Education, 47(7), 847–872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pit, C., & Ford, D. (2004). Cambodian higher education: Mixed visions. In P. G. Altbach & T. Umakoshi (Eds.), Asian universities: Historical perspectives and contemporary challenges (pp. 333–362). Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinto, V. (2007). Research and practice of student retention: What next? Journal of College Student Retention, 8(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (2011). Education and fragility in Cambodia. Paris: International Institute for Educational Planning.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kreng Heng.

Appendices

Appendix A

The table below entails all student engagement indicators used in the survey. Measures of student engagement in educationally purposeful activities were revised from the NSSE and CSEQ.

Original NSSE and CSEQ items (Very often = 4; Often = 3; Occasionally/Sometimes = 2; Never = 1)

Modified questionnaire items for survey (6 = always; 5 = usually; 4 = often; 3 = sometimes; 2 = rarely; 1 = never).

Active and collaborative learning

Came to class without completing readings or assignments.

Came to class without completing homework.

Came to class without completing the assigned reading tasks.

Revised a paper or composition two or more times before you were satisfied with it.

Turned in homework late.

Turned in homework with poor quality.

Did additional readings on topics introduced and discussed in class.

Did additional readings on topics introduced in class.

Read new materials as a preparation for the next class.

Summarized major points and information in your readings or notes.

Summarized information from your readings.

Made outlines from class notes or readings.

Took detailed notes from class.

Asked questions in class or contributed to class discussions.

Contributed ideas to whole class discussion.

Asked questions in class when you don’t understand.

Made a class presentation.

Made a class presentation from your group work.

Used a dictionary or thesaurus to look up the proper meaning of words.

Used a dictionary to search for the meaning of new words during class.

Used a dictionary to search for the meaning of new words before class.

Worked with other students on projects during class.

Worked actively with other students on the assigned task(s) in small group activities in class.

Discussed ideas from your readings or classes with others outside of class (students, family members, co-workers etc.).

Discussed ideas from your readings or classes with other students outside class.

Sought out a friend to help you with a personal problem.

Asked for help from friends when having (a) learning problem(s).

Tutored or taught other students.

Taught other students.

Been in a group where each person, including yourself, talked about his or her personal problems.

Had reviews of your performance on homework or quizzes with other students.

Had discussions with other students on learning difficulties.

Time on course-related reading

Number of hours per week spent on preparing for class

Hours per week spent reading course-related materials at home

Hours per week spent reading course-related materials at school/library

Time on homework

Number of hours per week spent on writing papers/reports

Hours per week spent doing assigned homework at school/library

Hours per week spent doing assigned homework at home

Time on extensive reading

Number of hours per week spent on other activities related to academic programs

Hours per week spent reading books in English

Hours per week spent reading articles or news in English on the internet

Hours per week spent reading magazines or newspaper in English

Appendix B

A list below describes student engagement indicators used for the data analysis.

Peer learning (α = .75)

Discussed ideas from your readings or classes with other students outside class.

Asked for help from friends when having (a) learning problem(s).

Had reviews of your performance on homework or quizzes with other students.

Had discussions with other students on learning difficulties.

Whole class active participation (α = .70)

Made a class presentation from your group work.

Contributed ideas to whole class discussion.

Worked actively with other students on the assigned task(s) in small group activities in class.

Asked questions in class when you don’t understand.

Used a dictionary to search for the meaning of new words during class.

Reading and class preparation (α = .73)

Read new materials as a preparation for the next class.

Did additional readings on topics introduced in class.

Summarized information from your reading.

Took detailed notes from class.

Homework/tasks (α = .68)

Turned in homework with poor quality.

Turned in homework late.

Came to class without completing homework.

Came to class without completing the assigned reading tasks.

(These negative items were reverse-coded.)

Time on course-related tasks

Hours per week spent reading course-related materials at home

Hours per week spent reading course-related materials at school/library

Hours per week spent doing assigned homework at home

Hours per week spent doing assigned homework at school/library

Time on extensive reading

Hours per week spent reading books in English

Hours per week spent reading articles or news in English on the internet

Hours per week spent reading magazines or newspaper in English

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heng, K. The Relationships between Student Engagement and the Academic Achievement of First-Year University Students in Cambodia. Asia-Pacific Edu Res 23, 179–189 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-013-0095-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-013-0095-8

Keywords