Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Distance measures of hesitant complex neutrosophic sets and their applications in decision-making

  • Published:
Computational and Applied Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The fuzzy set (FS) and its generalizations are important tools in modelling decision-making problems. Although the FS is a successful tool in modeling one-dimensional information, it is insufficient in modeling two-dimensional information. This weakness is corrected with complex fuzzy set (CFS), which is a successful structure in representing two-dimensional information. In addition, the hesitant fuzzy set (HFS) is a very useful argument in group decision-making problems. The complex neutrosophic set (CNS) is an extension of the FS that was recently identified and attracted the attention of researchers. In this study, the concept of hesitant complex neutrosophic set (HCNS) is defined by combining the concepts of CNS and HFS. Also, distance measures between two HCNSs based on Euclidean, Hamming and Hausdorff distance measures are introduced and some relationships between them are examined. Moreover, a decision-making method using the proposed distance measures has been developed and an example including the computer purchasing problem is given to show the application process of the developed method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akram M, Bashir A, Garg H (2020) Decision-making model under complex picture fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operators. Comput Appl Math 39(3):1–38

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Akram M, Al-Kenani AN, Shabir M (2021) Enhancing ELECTRE I method with complex spherical fuzzy information. Int J Comput Intell Syst 14(1):1–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Akram M, Wasim F, Karaaslan F (2021) MCGDM with complex Pythagorean fuzzy-soft model. Expert Syst 38(8):e12783

    Google Scholar 

  • Akram M, Khan A, Karaaslan F (2021) Complex spherical Dombi fuzzy aggregation operators for decision-making. J Mult-Valued Logic Soft Comput 37(5):503–531

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Akram M, Wasim F, Al-Kenani AN (2021d) Complex q-rung orthopair fuzzy n-soft sets: a new model with applications, Complexity

  • Akram M, Ahmad U, Karaaslan F (2021) Complex Pythagorean fuzzy threshold graphs with application in petroleum replenishment. J Appl Math Comput 68:2125–2150

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Akram M, Ali M, Allahviranloo T (2022) A method for solving bipolar fuzzy complex linear systems with real and complex coefficients. Soft Comput 26(5):2157–2178

    Google Scholar 

  • Akram M, Zahid K, Alcantud JCR (2022) A new outranking method for multicriteria decision making with complex Pythagorean fuzzy information. Neural Comput Appl 34:8069–8102

    Google Scholar 

  • Akram M, Sattar A, Saeid AB (2022) Competition graphs with complex intuitionistic fuzzy information. Granul Comput 7(1):25–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Alhasan YA (2020) The general exponential form of a neutrosophic complex number. Int J Neutrosophic Sci 11(2):100–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali M, Smarandache F (2017) Complex neutrosophic set. Neural Comput Appl 28(7):1817–1834

    Google Scholar 

  • Alkouri AMJS, Salleh AR (2012) Complex intuitionistic fuzzy sets. AIP Conf Proc 1482(1):464–470

    Google Scholar 

  • Alkouri AUM, Salleh AR (2013) Complex Atanassov’s intuitionistic fuzzy relation. Abstract and Applied Analysis (Vol. 2013). Hindawi

  • Atanassov KT (1986) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Set Syst 20:87–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Biswas P, Pramanik S, Giri BC (2014) Entropy based grey relational analysis method for multi-attribute decision making under single valued neutrosophic assessments. Neutrosophic Sets Syst 2:102–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Biswas P, Pramanik S, Giri BC (2014) A new methodology for neutrosophic multi-attribute decision making with unknown weight information. Neutrosophic Sets Syst 3:42–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Biswas P, Pramanik S, Giri BC (2016) Value and ambiguity index based ranking method of single-valued trapezoidal neutrosophic numbers and its application to multi-attribute decision making. Neutrosophic Sets Syst 12:127–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Biswas P, Pramanik S, Giri BC (2016) TOPSIS method for multi-attribute group decision-making under single-valued neutrosophic environment. Neural Comput Appl 27(3):727–737

    Google Scholar 

  • Biswas P, Pramanik S, Giri BC (2016) Aggregation of triangular fuzzy neutrosophic set information and its application to multi-attribute decision making. Neutrosophic Sets Syst 12:20–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Biswas P, Pramanik S, Giri BC (2018) Multi-attribute group decision making based on expected value of neutrosophic trapezoidal numbers. New trends in neutrosophic theory and applications-Vol-II. Pons Editions, Brussells, pp 103–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Biswas P, Pramanik S, Giri BC (2018) TOPSIS strategy for multi-attribute decision making with trapezoidal neutrosophic numbers. Neutrosophic Sets Syst 19:29–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Biswas P, Pramanik S, Giri BC (2018) Distance measure based MADM strategy with interval trapezoidal neutrosophic numbers. Neutrosophic Sets Syst 19:40–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Biswas P, Pramanik S, Giri BC (2019) Neutrosophic TOPSIS with group decision making. In: Kahraman C, Otay I (eds) Fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making using neutrosophic sets, studies in fuzziness and soft computing, vol 369. Springer, Cham, pp 543–585

    Google Scholar 

  • Broumi S, Smarandache F (2013) Correlation coefficient of interval neutrosophic set. Appl Mech Mater 436:511–517

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley JJ (1992) Fuzzy complex analysis integration. Fuzzy Sets Syst 49(2):171–179

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chen N, Xu Z, Xia M (2013) Interval-valued hesitant preference relations and their applications to group decision making. Knowl-Based Syst 37:528–540

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuong B (2013a) Picture fuzzy sets-first results, Part 1 seminar neuro-fuzzy systems with applications. Preprint 03/2013. Institute of Mathematics, Hanoi, p 2013

  • Cuong B (2013b) Picture fuzzy sets-first results, Part 2 seminar neuro-fuzzy systems with applications. Preprint 04/2013. Institute of Mathematics, Hanoi, p 2013

  • Deli I (2018) Operators on single valued trapezoidal neutrosophic numbers and SVTNGroup decision making. Neutrosophic Set Syst 22:131–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Deli I (2019) A novel defuzzification method of SV-trapezoidal neutrosophic numbers and multi-attribute decision making: a comparative analysis. Soft Comput 23(23):12529–12545

    Google Scholar 

  • Deli I (2019) Some operators with IVGSVTrN-numbers and their applications to multiple criteria group decision making. Neutrosophic Sets Syst 25:33–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Deli I (2020) Linear optimization method on single valued neutrosophic set and its sensitivity analysis. TWMS J Appl Eng Math 10(1):128–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Deli I, Şubaş Y (2017) Some weighted geometric operators with SVTrN-numbers and their application to multi-criteria decision making problems. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 32(1):291–301

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Deli I, Şubaş Y (2017) A ranking method of single valued neutrosophic numbers and its applications to multiattribute decision making problems. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 8(4):1309–1322

    Google Scholar 

  • Farhadinia B (2013) Information measures for hesitant fuzzy sets and interval-valued hesitant fuzzy sets. Inf Sci 240:129–144

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Farhadinia B (2021) Picture hesitant fuzzy set. Computational intelligence methods and applications. Springer, Singapore, Hesitant fuzzy set. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7301-6-11

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Garg H (2018) Some hybrid weighted aggregation operators under neutrosophic set environment and their applications to multicriteria decision-making. Appl Intell 48(12):4871–4888

    Google Scholar 

  • Garg H, Rani D (2019) Exponential, logarithmic and compensative generalized aggregation operators under complex intuitionistic fuzzy environment, group decision and negotiation. Group Decis Negot 28(5):991–1050

    Google Scholar 

  • Garg H, Rani D (2019) Some generalized complex intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators and their application to multicriteria decision-making process. Arab J Sci Eng 44(3):2679–2698

    Google Scholar 

  • Garg H, Rani D (2020) Generalized geometric aggregation operators based on t-norm operations for complex intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their application to decision making, cognitive computation. Cogn Comput 12:679–698

    Google Scholar 

  • Garg H, Rani D (2020) Novel aggregation operators and ranking method for complex intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their applications to decision-making process. Artif Intell Rev 53:3595–3620

    Google Scholar 

  • Garg H, Rani D (2021) Multi-criteria decision making method based on Bonferroni mean aggregation operators of complex intuitionistic fuzzy numbers. J Ind Manag Optim 17(5):2279–2306

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Garg H, Mahmood T, Rehman UU, Ali Z (2021) CHFS: complex hesitant fuzzy sets-their applications to decision making with different and innovative distance measures. CAAI Trans Intell Technol 6(1):93–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Guang-Quan Z (1992) Fuzzy limit theory of fuzzy complex numbers. Fuzzy Sets Syst 46(2):227–235

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gulistan M, Wahab HA, Smarandache F, Khan S, Shah SIA (2018) Some linguistic neutrosophic cubic mean operators and entropy with applications in a corporation to choose an area supervisor. Symmetry 10(10):428

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanafy I, Salama A, Mahfouz K (2012) Correlation of neutrosophic data. Int Ref J Eng Sci (IRJES) 1(2):39–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanafy I, Salama A, Mahfouz M (2013) Correlation coefficients of neutrosophic sets by centroid method. Int Ref J Eng Sci (IRJES) 2(1):9–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Karaaslan F (2018) Gaussian single-valued neutrosophic numbers and its application in multi-attribute decision making. Neutrosophic Sets Syst 22(1):101–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Karaaslan F (2019) Correlation coefficient of neutrosophic sets and its applications in decision-making. In: Fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making using neutrosophic sets. Springer, Cham, pp 327–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaur G, Garg H (2022) A new method for image processing using generalized linguistic neutrosophic cubic aggregation operator. Syst Complex Intell. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-022-00718-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan M, Gulistan M, Ali M, Chammam W (2020) The generalized neutrosophic cubic aggregation operators and their application to multi-expert decision-making method. Symmetry 12(4):496

    Google Scholar 

  • Liao H, Xu Z, Zeng XJ (2014) Distance and similarity measures for hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and their application in multi-criteria decision making. Inf Sci 271:125–142

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Liu H, Rodrguez RM (2014) A fuzzy envelope for hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set and its application to multicriteria decision making. Inf Sci 258:220–238

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Liu P, Chu Y, Li Y, Chen Y (2014) Some generalized neutrosophic number Hamacher aggregation operators and their application to group decision making. Int J Fuzzy Syst 16(2):242–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu P, Mahmood T, Ali Z (2020) Complex q-rung orthopair fuzzy aggregation operators and their applications in multi-attribute group decision making. Information 11(1):2–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Majumdar P (2017) On new measures of uncertainty for neutrosophic sets. Neutrosophic Sets Syst 17:50–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Mani P, Muthusamy K, Sivaraman M, Smarandache F, Riaz M, Jafari S (2021) Multi criteria decision making algorithm via complex neutrosophic nano topological spaces. Int J Neutrosophic Sci 17(2):127–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Manna S, Basu TM, Mondal SK (2020) A soft set based Vikor approach for some decision-making problems under complex neutrosophic environment. Eng Appl Artif Intell 89:103–432

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendel JM (1995) Fuzzy logic systems for engineering a tutorial. Proc IEEE 83(3):345–377

    Google Scholar 

  • Meng F, Chen X, Zhang Q (2014) Multi-attribute decision analysis under a linguistic hesitant fuzzy environment. Inf Sci 267:287–305

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mondal K, Pramanik S (2014) Multi-criteria group decision making approach for teacher recruitment in higher education under simplified Neutrosophic environment. Neutrosophic Sets Syst 6:28–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Mondal K, Pramanik S (2015) Neutrosophic tangent similarity measure and its application to multiple attribute decision making. Neutrosophic Sets Syst 9:80–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Mondal K, Pramanik S (2015) Neutrosophic decision making model of school choice. Neutrosophic Sets Syst 7:62–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Mondal K, Pramanik S, Giri BC (2018) Single valued neutrosophic hyperbolic sine similarity measure based MADM strategy. Neutrosophic Sets Syst 20:3–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Mondal K, Pramanik S, Giri BC (2018) Hybrid binary logarithm similarity measure for MAGDM problems under SVNS assessments. Neutrosophic Sets Syst 20:12–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Naz S, Akram M, Saeed A (2022) A hybrid multiple-attribute decision-making model under complex q-rung orthopair fuzzy Hamy mean aggregation operators. Handbook of research on advances and applications of fuzzy sets and logic. IGI Global, Hershey, pp 149–191

  • Nery LE, Pazmino MAG, Fiallos DJ, Broumi S (2022) Analysis of the success factors of the quality of e-learning in the medical school in a neutrosophic environment. Int J Neutrosophic Sci 18(3):189–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen HT, Kandel A, Kreinovich V (2000) Complex fuzzy sets. Towards new foundations. IEEE 2:1045–1048

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng DH, Gao CY, Gao ZF (2013) Generalized hesitant fuzzy synergetic weighted distance measures and their application to multiple criteria decisionmaking. Appl Math Model 37(8):5837–5850

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Pramanik S, Biswas P, Giri BC (2017) Hybrid vector similarity measures and their applications to multi-attribute decision making under neutrosophic environment. Neural Comput Appl 28(5):1163–1176

    Google Scholar 

  • Pramanik S, Dalapati S, Alam S, Smarandache F, Roy TK (2018) NS-cross entropy based MAGDM under single valued neutrosophic set environment. Information 9(2):37

    Google Scholar 

  • Pramanik S, Mallick R, Dasgupta A (2018) Contributions of selected Indian researchers to multi-attribute decision making in neutrosophic environment. Neutrosophic Sets Syst 20:108–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Pramanik S, Dalapati S, Roy TK (2018) Neutrosophic multi-attribute group decision making strategy for logistic center location selection. In: Smarandache F, Basset MA, Chang V (eds) Neutrosophic operational research, vol III. Pons Asbl, Brussels, pp 13–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Qian G, Wang H, Feng X (2013) Generalized hesitant fuzzy sets and their application in decision support system. Knowl-Based Syst 37:357–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramot D, Milo R, Friedman M, Kandel A (2002) Complex fuzzy sets. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 10(2):171–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramot D, Friedman M, Langholz G, Kandel A (2003) Complex fuzzy logic. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 11(4):450–461

    Google Scholar 

  • Rani D, Garg H (2018) Complex intuitionistic fuzzy power aggregation operators and their applications in multicriteria decision-making. Expert Syst 35(6):e12325

    Google Scholar 

  • Rani D, Garg H (2020) Distance measures between the complex intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their applications to the decision-making process. Int J Uncertain Quantif 7(5):423–439

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez RM, Martinez L, Herrera F (2011) Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets for decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 20(1):109–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez RM, Martnez L, Herrera F (2013) A group decision making model dealing with comparative linguistic expressions based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets. Inf Sci 241:28–42

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sahin R (2014) Neutrosophic hierarchical clustering algorithms. Neutrosophic Sets Syst 2:18–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahin R, Küçük A (2015) Subsethood measure for single valued neutrosophic sets. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 29(2):525–530

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Smarandache F (1999) A unifying field in logics neutrosophic logic. Am Res Press 28(2):1–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Smarandache F (2005) Neutrosophic set-a generalization of the intuitionistic fuzzy set. Int J Pure Appl Math 24(3):287

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Szmidt E, Kacprzyk J (2000) Distances between intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 114(3):505–518

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Torra V (2010) Hesitant fuzzy sets. Int J Intell Syst 25(6):529–539

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Torra V, Narukawa Y (2009) On hesitant fuzzy sets and decision. In: 2009 IEEE international conference on fuzzy systems, vol 22, no 4, pp 1378–1382

  • Ullah K, Mahmood T, Ali Z, Jan N (2020) On some distance measures of complex Pythagorean fuzzy sets and their applications in pattern recognition. Complex Intell Syst 6(1):15–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Smarandache F, Sunderraman R, Zhang YQ (2005) Interval neutrosophic sets and logic: theory and applications in computing: theory and applications in computing (Vol. 5). Infinite Study

  • Wang H, Smarandache F, Zhang Y, Sunderraman R (2010) Single valued neutrosophic sets. Multispace Multistruct 4:410–413

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei G (2012) Hesitant fuzzy prioritized operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making. Knowl-Based Syst 31:176–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei G, Zhao X, Lin R (2013) Some hesitant interval-valued fuzzy aggregation operators and their applications to multiple attribute decision making. Knowl-Based Syst 46:43–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu Z, Xia M (2011) Distance and similarity measures for hesitant fuzzy sets. Inf Sci 181(11):2128–2138

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yager RR (2013a) Pythagorean fuzzy subsets. In: IEEE 2013 joint IFSA World Congress and NAFIPS annual meeting (IFSA/NAFIPS), pp 57–61

  • Yager RR (2013) Pythagorean membership grades in multicriteria decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 22(4):958–965

    Google Scholar 

  • Yager RR (2017) Generalized orthopair fuzzy sets. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 25(5):1222–1230

    Google Scholar 

  • Ye J (2013) Multicriteria decision-making method using the correlation coefficient under single-valued neutrosophic environment. Int J Gen Syst 24(4):386–394

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ye J (2014) A multicriteria decision-making method using aggregation operators for simplified neutrosophic sets. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 26(5):2459–2466

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ye J, Zhang Q (2014) Single valued neutrosophic similarity measures for multiple attribute decision-making. Neutrosophic Sets Syst 2:48–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu D, Zhang W, Xu Y (2013) Group decision making under hesitant fuzzy environment with application to personnel evaluation. Knowl-Based Syst 52:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh L (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 8(3):338–353

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z (2013) Hesitant fuzzy power aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute group decision making. Inf Sci 234:150–181

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang N, Wei G (2013) Extension of Vikor method for decision making problem based on hesitant fuzzy set. Appl Math Model 37(7):4938–4947

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z, Wu C (2014) A novel method for single-valued neutrosophic multi-criteria decision making with incomplete weight information. Neutrosophic Sets Syst 4:35–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu B, Xu Z, Xia M (2012) Hesitant fuzzy geometric Bonferroni means. Inf Sci 205:72–85

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann HJ (2011) Fuzzy set theory-and its applications. Springer Science and Business Media, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Cankiri Karatekin University, Cankiri, 18100, Turkey

    Faruk Karaaslan, Marwan Tareq Ahmed Ahmed & Mohammed Allaw Dawood Dawood

Authors
  1. Faruk Karaaslan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marwan Tareq Ahmed Ahmed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mohammed Allaw Dawood Dawood
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Faruk Karaaslan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Additional information

Communicated by Graçaliz Pereira Dimuro.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Karaaslan, F., Ahmed, M.T.A. & Dawood, M.A.D. Distance measures of hesitant complex neutrosophic sets and their applications in decision-making. Comp. Appl. Math. 41, 307 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-022-02009-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-022-02009-8

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Search

Navigation