Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Advertisement

The Role of Abnormal Uterine Junction Zone in the Occurrence and Development of Adenomyosis

  • Review
  • Published:
Reproductive Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Adenomyosis is a benign disease with a malignant behavior, bothering a lot of women at reproductive age who suffer from increased menstruation, prolonged menstruation, progressive dysmenorrhea, and infertility. At present, there is no effective treatment for adenomyosis. It seriously affects the life quality of these patients. However, the pathogenesis of adenomyosis is not yet clear. Recently, uterus junctional zone, defined as the inner 1/3 of myometrium between endometrium and myometrium, has gained broad attention. As is reported, the structure and function disorder of uterus junctional zone may play an important part in the occurrence and development of adenomyosis. In this issue, the present study generally reviews the role of uterine junction zone and the related mechanisms involved in adenomyosis, such as the local micro-damage, the formation of inflammatory and hypoxic microenvironment, changes of cytokines, and abnormalities of miRNA as well as signal pathways. It will provide new insights and potential therapeutic target strategies for clinical strategies in the management of adenomyosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Devlieger R, D'Hooghe T, Timmerman D. Uterine adenomyosis in the infertility clinic. Hum Reprod Update. 2003;9:139–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hricak H, Alpers C, Crooks LE, Sheldon PE. Magnetic resonance imaging of the female pelvis: initial experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1983;141:1119–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fusi L, Cloke B, Brosens JJ. The uterine junctional zone. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;20:479–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gianaroli L, Gordts S, D'Angelo A, Magli MC, Brosens I, Cetera C, Campo R, Ferraretti AP. Effect of inner myometrium fibroid on reproductive outcome after IVF. Reprod BioMed Online. 2005;10:473–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sofic A, Husic-Selimovic A, Carovac A, Jahic E, Smailbegovic V, Kupusovic J. The significance of MRI evaluation of the uterine junctional zone in the early diagnosis of adenomyosis. Acta Inform Med. 2016;24:103–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Maubon A, Faury A, Kapella M, Pouquet M, Piver P. Uterine junctional zone at magnetic resonance imaging: a predictor of in vitro fertilization implantation failure. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2010;36:611–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lazzarin N, Exacoustos C, Vaquero E, De Felice G, Manfellotto D, Zupi E. Uterine junctional zone at three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasonography in patients with recurrent miscarriage: a new diagnostic tool? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014;174:128–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Novellas S, Chassang M, Delotte J, Toullalan O, Chevallier A, Bouaziz J, Chevallier P. MRI Characteristics of the uterine junctional zone: from normal to the diagnosis of adenomyosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196:1206–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bergeron C, Amant F, Ferenczy A. Pathology and physiopathology of adenomyosis. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;20:511–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Xu S, Yang Y, Gregory CD, Vary JC, Liang Z, Dawson MJ. Biochemical heterogeneity in hysterectomized uterus measured by 31P NMR using SLIM localization. Magn Reson Med. 1997;37:736–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Campo S, Campo V, Benagiano G. Infertility and adenomyosis. Reprod BioMed Online. 2012;24:35–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kido A, Kataoka M, Koyama T, Yamamoto A, Saga T, Togashi K. Changes in apparent diffusion coefficients in the normal uterus during different phases of the menstrual cycle. Br J Radiol. 2010;83:524–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Hoad CL, Raine-Fenning NJ, Fulford J, Campbell BK, Johnson IR, Gowland PA. Uterine tissue development in healthy women during the normal menstrual cycle and investigations with magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192:648–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Campo S, Campo V, Benagiano G. Adenomyosis and infertility. Reprod BioMed Online. 2012;24:35–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Brosens JJ, Barker FG, DeSouza NM. Myometrial zonal differentiation and uterine junctional zone hyperplasia in the non-pregnant uterus. Hum Reprod Update. 1998;4:496–502.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim A, Lee JY, Ji YI, Lee HH, Lee ES, Kim HY, et al. Do endometrial movements affect the achievement of pregnancy during intrauterine insemination. Int J Fertil Steril. 2015;8:399–408.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Naftalin J, Jurkovic D. The endometrial–myometrial junction a fresh look at a busy crossing. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;34:1–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Abdallah Y, Naji O, Saso S, Pexsters A, Stalder C, Sur S, Raine-Fenning N, Timmerman D, Brosens JJ, Bourne T. Ultrasound assessment of the peri-implantation uterus a review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012;39:612–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kunz G, Leyendecker G. Uterine peristaltic activity during the menstrual cycle characterization, regulation, function and dysfunction. Reprod BioMed Online. 2002;4:5–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tocci A, Greco E, Ubaldi FM. Adenomyosis and 'endometrial-subendometrial myometrium unit disruption disease' are two different entities. Reprod BioMed Online. 2008;17:281–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Agostinho L, Cruz R, Osório F, Alves J, Setúbal A, Guerra A. MRI for Adenomyosis: A Pictorial Review. Insights Imaging. 2017;8:549–56.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Cockerham A. Adenomyosis: a challenge in clinical gynecology. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2012;57:212–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sa R, Song J. Relationship between ultrastructural features with the expression of connexin 43 in the uterine junction zone and pathogenesis of adenomyosis. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2010;45:762–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kido A, Togashi K, Nishino M, Miyake K, Koyama T, Fujimoto R, Iwasaku K, Fujii S, Hayakawa K. Cine MR imaging of uterine peristalsis in patients with endometriosis. Eur Radiol. 2007;17:1813–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kunz G, Beil D, Huppert P, Noe M, Kissler S, Leyendecker G. Adenomyosis in endometriosis—prevalence and impact on fertility. Evidence from magnetic resonance imaging. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:2309–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kissler S, Zangos S, Wiegratz I, Kohl J, Rody A, Gaetje R, et al. Utero-tubal Sperm transport and its impairment in endometriosis and adenomyosis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007;1101:38–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang Y, Zhou L, Li TC, Duan H, Yu P, Wang HY. Ultrastructural features of endometrial-myometrial interface and its alteration in adenomyosis. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2014;7:1469–77.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Mehasseb MK, Bell SC, Pringle JH, Habiba MA. Uterine adenomyosis is associated with ultrastructural features of altered contractility in the inner myometrium. Fertil Steril. 2010;93:2130–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Brosens JJ, de Souza NM, Barker FG. Uterine junctional zone: function and disease. Lancet. 1995;346:558–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lin S, Duan H, Wang S, Li LJ. Overexpression of Lin28B promoted the proliferation of adenomyotic smooth muscle cells of the junctional zone via regulating Let-7a. Reprod Sci. 2020;27:1156–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Baek D, Villén J, Shin C, Camargo F, Gygi S, Bartel D. The impact of microRNAs on protein output. Nature. 2008;455:64–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Lin S, Gregory RI. Identification of small molecule inhibitors of Zcchc11 TUTase activity. RNA Biol. 2015;12:792–800.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Nguyen LH, Zhu H. Lin28 and let-7 in cell metabolism and cancer. Transl Pediatr. 2015;4:4–11.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Benagiano G, Habiba M, Brosens I. The pathophysiology of uterine adenomyosis: an update. Fertil Steril. 2012;98:572–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Albanito L, Madeo A, Lappano R, Vivacqua A, Rago V, Carpino A, Oprea TI, Prossnitz ER, Musti AM, Andò S, Maggiolini M. G protein-coupled receptor 30 (GPR30) mediates gene expression changes and growth response to 17beta-estradiol and selective GPR30 ligand G-1 in ovarian cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2007;67:1859–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Smith HO, Arias-Pulido H, Kuo DY, Howard T, Qualls CR, Lee S, et al. GPR30 predicts poor survival for ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;114:465–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Li J, Duan H, Wang S, Sun F, Gan L, Tang Y, et al. Expression pattern of G-protein-coupled estrogen receptor in myometrium of uteri with and without Adenomyosis. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:5974693.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Aguilar HN, Mitchell BF. Physiological pathways and molecular mechanisms regulating uterine contractility. Hum Reprod Update. 2010;16:725–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Wang S, Duan H, Zhang Y, Sun FQ. Abnormal activation of RhoA/ROCK-I signaling in junctional zone smooth muscle cells of patients with adenomyosis. Reprod Sci. 2016;23:333–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Yotova IY, Quan P, Leditznig N, Beer U, Wenzl R, Tschugguel W. Abnormal activation of Ras/Raf/MAPK and RhoA/ROCKII signalling pathways in eutopic endometrial stromal cells of patients with endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:885–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Sun W, Mao X, Ma Q, Liu X. Dysmenorrhea and its severity are associated with increased uterine contractility and overexpression of oxytocin receptor (OTR) in women with symptomatic adenomyosis. Fertil Steril. 2013;99:231–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Kunz G, Noe M, Herbertz M, Leyendecker G. Uterine peristalsis during the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle effects of oestrogen, antioestrogen and oxytocin. Hum Reprod Update. 1998;4:647–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Mechsner S, Bartley J, Loddenkemper C, Salomon DS, Starzinski-Powitz A, Ebert AD. Oxytocin receptor expression in smooth muscle cells of peritoneal endometriotic lesions and ovarian endometriotic cysts. Fertil Steril. 2005;83:1220–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Zingg H, Rozen F, Chu K, Larcher A, Arslan A, Richard S, Lefèbvre D. Oxytocin and oxytocin receptor gene expression in the uterus. Recent Prog Horm Res. 1995;50:255–73.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Leyendecker G, Wildt L. A new concept of endometriosis and adenomyosis tissue injury and repair (TIAR). Horm Mol Biol Clin Invest. 2011;5:125–42.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Leyendecker G, Wildt L, Mall G. The pathophysiology of endometriosis and adenomyosis: tissue injury and repair. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009;280:529–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Werner H, LeRoith D. Insulin and insulin-like growth factor receptors in the brain: physiological and pathological aspects. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2014;24:1947–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Hayrabedyan S, Kyurkchiev S, Kehayov I. FGF-1 and S100A13 possibly contribute to angiogenesis in endometriosis. J Reprod Immunol. 2005;67:87–101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Drăghici I, Drăghici L, Cojocaru M, Gorgan C, Vrabie C. The immunoprofile of interstitial Cajal cells within adenomyosis/endometriosis lesions. Romanian J Morphol Embryol. 2015;56:133–8.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Mehasseb MK, Panchal R, Taylor AH, Brown L, Bell SC, Habiba M. Estrogen and progesterone receptor isoform distribution through the menstrual cycle in uteri with and without adenomyosis. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:2228–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Li Y, Zou S, Xia X, Zhang S. Human adenomyosis endometrium stromal cells secreting more nerve growth factor: impact and effect. Reprod Sci. 2014;22:1073–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Kobayashi H, Yamada Y, Morioka S, Niiro E, Shigemitsu A, Ito F. Mechanism of pain generation for endometriosis-associated pelvic pain. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014;289:13–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Che X, Yang B, Jiang X. Expression of PGP9.5 and S100 in endometrial myomentrial interface of adenomyosis and its clinical significance. Prog Obstet Gynecol. 2017;26:924–7.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Jiang X, Zhong S, Che X, Zhu W, Shen C, Zhu W. Expression and significance of Netrin-1 in the endometrial myomentrial interface in adenomyosis. Mod Pract Med. 2018;30:89–91.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Arnold J, de Arellano MLB, Rüster C, Vercellino GF, Chiantera V, Schneider A, et al. Imbalance between sympathetic and sensory innervation in peritoneal endometriosis. Brain Behav Immun. 2012;26:132–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Covaceuszach S, Cassetta A, Konarev PV, Gonfloni S, Rudolph R, Svergun DI, Lamba D, Cattaneo A. Dissecting NGF interactions with TrkA and p75 receptors by structural and functional studies of an anti-NGF neutralizing antibody. J Mol Biol. 2008;381:881–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Scheerer C, Bauer P, Chiantera V, Sehouli J, Kaufmann A, Mechsner S. Characterization of endometriosis-associated immune cell infiltrates (EMaICI). Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016;294:657–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Jiang C, Liu C, Guo J, Chen L, Luo N, Qu X, Yang W, Ren Q, Cheng Z. The expression of Toll-like receptors in eutopic and ectopic endometrium and its implication in the inflammatory pathogenesis of adenomyosis. Sci Rep. 2017;7:7365–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Han SJ, Jung SY, Wu S, Hawkins SM, Park MJ, Kyo S, et al. Estrogen receptor β modulates apoptosis complexes and the inflammasome to drive the pathogenesis of endometriosis. Cell. 2015;163:960–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Gonçalves G, Invitti A, Parreira R, Kopelman A, Schor E, Girão M. p27kip1 overexpression regulates IL-1β in the microenvironment of stem cells and eutopic endometriosis co-cultures. Cytokine. 2017;89:229–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Li B, Chen M, Liu X, Sun W. Constitutive and tumor necrosis factor-alpha-induced activation of nuclear factor-kappaB in adenomyosis and its inhibition by andrographolide. Fertil Steril. 2013;100:568–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Semenza GL. Hypoxia-inducible factors in physiology and medicine. Cell. 2012;148:399–408.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Kaidi A, Qualtrough D, Williams AC, Paraskeva C. Direct transcriptional up-regulation of cyclooxygenase-2 by hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1 promotes colorectal tumor cell survival and enhances HIF-1 transcriptional activity during hypoxia. Cancer Res. 2006;66:6683–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Greenhough A, Smartt HJM, Moore AE, Roberts HR, Williams AC, Paraskeva C, Kaidi A. The COX-2/PGE2 pathway: key roles in the hallmarks of cancer and adaptation to the tumour microenvironment. Carcinogenesis. 2009;30:377–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Liu H, Du Y, Zhang Z, Lv L, Xiong W, Zhang L, et al. Autophagy contributes to hypoxia-induced epithelial to mesenchymal transition of endometrial epithelial cells in endometriosis. Biol Reprod. 2018;99:968–81.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Qi Q, Liu X, Zhang Q, Guo S-W. Platelets induce increased estrogen production through NF-κB and TGF-β1 signaling pathways in endometriotic stromal cells. Sci Rep. 2020;10:1281.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Wynn T. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of fibrosis. J Pathol. 2008;214:199–210.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Garavaglia E, Audrey S, Annalisa I, Stefano F, Iacopo T, Laura C, Massimo C. Adenomyosis and its impact on women fertility. Iran J Reprod Med. 2015;13:327–36.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Suardika A, Pemayun TGA. New insights on the pathogenesis of endometriosis and novel non-surgical therapies. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2018;19:158–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Yang Y, Yang W. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in the development of endometriosis. Oncotarget. 2017;8:41679–89.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Tao Y, Wang H, Chen S, Du W, Fu X. Study on correlation between TGF-β1 and EMI microenvironment in adenomyosis. Chongqing Yixue. 2020;49:517–21.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Daimon E, Shibukawa Y, Wada Y. Calponin 3 regulates stress fiber formation in dermal fibroblasts during wound healing. Arch Dermatol Res. 2013;305:571–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Ibrahim MG, Sillem M, Plendl J, Chiantera V, Sehouli J, Mechsner S. Myofibroblasts are evidence of chronic tissue microtrauma at the endometrial-myometrial junctional zone in uteri with adenomyosis. Reprod Sci. 2017;24:1410–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Yin K, Yin W, Wang Y, Zhou L, Liu Y, Yang G, Wang J, Lu J. MiR-206 suppresses epithelial mesenchymal transition by targeting TGF-β signaling in estrogen receptor positive breast cancer cells. Oncotarget. 2016;7:24537–48.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Jiang M, Qiu J, Zhang L, LÜ D, Long M, Chen L, et al. Changes in tension regulates proliferation and migration of fibroblasts by remodeling expression of ECM proteins. Exp Ther Med. 2016;12:1542–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Leyendecker G, Bilgicyildirim A, Inacker M, Stalf T, Huppert P, Mall G, Böttcher B, Wildt L. Adenomyosis and endometriosis. Re-visiting their association and further insights into the mechanisms of auto-traumatisation. An MRI study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015;291:917–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Koike N, Tsunemi T, Uekuri C, Akasaka J, Ito F, Shigemitsu A, et al. Pathogenesis and malignant transformation of adenomyosis (review). Oncol Rep. 2013;29:861–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Presidential Foundation of Nanfang Hospital, China (Grant 2018A002).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to drafting the manuscript, and provided approval of the version to be published. All authors agree to be accountable for all aspects of the review.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Lili Zhou or Yali Song.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xie, T., Xu, X., Yang, Y. et al. The Role of Abnormal Uterine Junction Zone in the Occurrence and Development of Adenomyosis. Reprod. Sci. 29, 2719–2730 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-021-00684-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-021-00684-2

Keywords