Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Key Action Extraction for Learning Analytics

  • Conference paper
21st Century Learning for 21st Century Skills (EC-TEL 2012)

Abstract

Analogous to keywords describing the important and relevant content of a document we extract key actions from learners’ usage data assuming that they represent important and relevant parts of their learning behaviour. These key actions enable the teachers to better understand the dynamics in their classes and the problems that occur while learning. Based on these insights, teachers can intervene directly as well as improve the quality of their learning material and learning design. We test our approach on usage data collected in a large introductory C programming course at a university and discuss the results based on the feedback of the teachers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Siemens, G., Long, P.: Penetrating the Fog: Analytics in learning and Education. Educause Review 46(5) (September/October2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Schmitz, H.C., Scheffel, M., Friedrich, M., Jahn, M., Niemann, K., Wolpers, M.: CAMera for PLE. In: Cress, U., Dimitrova, V., Specht, M. (eds.) EC-TEL 2009. LNCS, vol. 5794, pp. 507–520. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Zinn, C., Scheuer, O.: Getting to Know Your Student in Distance Learning Contexts. In: Nejdl, W., Tochtermann, K. (eds.) EC-TEL 2006. LNCS, vol. 4227, pp. 437–451. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Kosba, E., Dimitrova, V., Boyle, R.: Using Student and Group Models to Support Teachers in Web-Based Distance Education. In: Ardissono, L., Brna, P., Mitrović, A. (eds.) UM 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3538, pp. 124–133. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Mazza, R., Dimitrova, V.: CourseVis: A Graphical Student Monitoring Tool for Supporting Instructors in Web-based Distance Courses. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 65(2), 125–139 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jovanovic, J., Gasevic, D., Brooks, C.A., Devedzic, V., Hatala, M.: LOCO-Analyst: A Tool for Raising Teachers’ Awareness in Online Learning Environments. In: Duval, E., Klamma, R., Wolpers, M. (eds.) EC-TEL 2007. LNCS, vol. 4753, pp. 112–126. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Schmitz, H.C., Kirschenmann, U., Niemann, K., Wolpers, M.: Contextualized Attention Metadata. In: Roda, C. (ed.) Human Attention in Digital Environments, pp. 186–209. Cambridge University Press (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rose, S., Engel, D., Cramer, N., Cowley, W.: Automatic Keyword Extraction from Individual Documents. In: Berry, M.W., Kogan, J. (eds.) Text Mining, pp. 1–20. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hulth, A.: Improved Automatic Keyword Extraction Given More Linguistic Knowledge. In: Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP 2003, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 216–223 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dörre, J., Gerstl, P., Seiffert, R.: Volltextsuche und Text Mining. In: Carstensen, K.U., Ebert, C., Endriss, E., Jekat, S., Klabunde, R., Langer, H. (eds.) Computerlinguistik und Sprachtechnologie, pp. 425–441. Spektrum, Heidelberg (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Scheffel, M., Niemann, K., Pardo, A., Leony, D., Friedrich, M., Schmidt, K., Wolpers, M., Delgado Kloos, C.: Usage Pattern Recognition in Student Activities. In: Delgado Kloos, C., Gillet, D., Crespo García, R.M., Wild, F., Wolpers, M. (eds.) EC-TEL 2011. LNCS, vol. 6964, pp. 341–355. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Niemann, K., Schmitz, H.C., Scheffel, M., Wolpers, M.: Usage Contexts for Object Similarity: Exploratory Investigations. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, LAK 2011, pp. 81–85. ACM, New York (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Romero Zaldívar, V.A., Pardo, A., Burgos, D., Delgado Kloos, C.: Monitoring Student Progress Using Virtual Appliances: A Case Study. Computers & Education 58(4), 1058–1067 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Scheffel, M. et al. (2012). Key Action Extraction for Learning Analytics. In: Ravenscroft, A., Lindstaedt, S., Kloos, C.D., Hernández-Leo, D. (eds) 21st Century Learning for 21st Century Skills. EC-TEL 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7563. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33263-0_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33263-0_25

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-33262-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-33263-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics