Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Lessons Learned from an Extensive Spectrum Occupancy Measurement Campaign and a Stochastic Duty Cycle Model

  • Published:
Mobile Networks and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Several measurement campaigns have shown that numerous spectrum bands are vacant although licenses have been issued by the regulatory agencies. Dynamic spectrum access (DSA) has been proposed in order to alleviate this problem and increase the spectral utilization. In this paper we present our spectrum measurement setup and discuss lessons learned during our measurement activities. We compare measurement results gathered at three locations and show differences in the background noise processes. Additionally, we introduce a new model for the duty cycle distribution that has multiple applications in the DSA research. We point out that fully loaded and completely vacant channels should be modelled explicitly and discuss the impact of duty cycle correlation in the frequency domain. Finally, we evaluate the efficiency of an adaptive spectrum sensing process as an example for applications of the introduced model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. A primary user denotes a system possessing the license to access a frequency band. The systems accessing spectrum white spaces opportunistically are called secondary users [6]. Primary users are often also called incumbent users.

  2. Global System for Mobile Communication (GSM).

  3. IN: Latitude: 50° 47ʹ 24.01ʺ North, Longitude: 6° 3ʹ 47.42ʺ East.

  4. NE: Latitude: 50° 50ʹ 32.34ʺ North, Longitude: 5° 43ʹ 14.93ʺ East.

  5. AB: Latitude: 50° 46ʹ 8.90ʺ North, Longitude: 6° 4ʹ 42.59ʺ East.

  6. The ISM-band is reserved for industrial, scientific, and medical applications.

  7. For few samples the data transfer from the mote to the laptop failed but the slow changing temperature is still sufficiently described.

  8. The results presented in [32] have been computed using the whole measurement traces and kernel-based CDF estimation as offered by MATLAB. Here, we use representative subtraces that describe the daytime spectrum occupancy. Additionally, we use the empirical CDF since the kernel-based estimation does not accurately estimate steps in the CDF that may occur if single subbands show clearly different duty cycles.

  9. In [32] we applied the symmetric Kullback-Leibler divergence as goodness-of-fit metric. We switched to other metrics due to the characteristics of the applied CDF estimation. The kernel-based CDF estimation, as executed in [32], results in rather smooth curves but the empirical CDF is more realistic and reproduces further details, e.g., sharp steps. The Kullback-Leibler divergence is too sensitive to such characteristics and the other metrics turned out to be more robust for our application.

References

  1. Agilent Technologies (2006) PSA series spectrum analyzers, data sheet

  2. Akyildiz IF, Lee WY, Vuran MC, Mohanty S (2006) Next generation/dynamic spectrum access/cognitive radio wireless networks: a survey. Comput Networks (Elsevier) 50(13):2127–2159

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bacchus RB, Fertner AJ, Hood CS, Roberson DA (2008) Long-term, wide-band spectral monitoring in support of dynamic spectrum access networks at the IIT Spectrum Observatory. In: Proc. of 3rd IEEE symposium on new frontiers in dynamic spectrum access networks (DySPAN), Chicago

  4. Blaschke V, Jäkel H, Renk T, Klöck C, Jondral FK (2007) Occupation measurements supporting dynamic spectrum allocation for cognitive radio design. In: Proc. of international conference on cognitive radio oriented wireless networks and communications (CROWNCOM), Orlando, pp 50–57

  5. Brandes S, Cosovic I, Schnell M (2006) Reduction of out-of-band radiation in OFDM systems by insertion of cancellation carriers. IEEE Commun Lett 10(6):420–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brodersen RW, Wolisz A, Cabric D, Mishra SM, Willkomm D (2004) White paper: CORVUS—a cognitive radio approach for usage of virtual unlicensed spectrum. Tech. rep., University of California, Berkeley. http://bwrc.eecs.berkeley.edu/Research/MCMA/CR_White_paper_final1.pdf. Accessed 18 May 2009

  7. Cabric D, Tkachenko A, Brodersen RW (2006) Experimental study of spectrum sensing based on energy detection and network cooperation. In: Proc. of workshop on technology and policy for accessing spectrum (TAPAS), Boston

  8. Chiang RIC, Rowe GB, Sowerby KW (2007) A quantitative analysis of spectral occupancy measurements for cognitive radio. In: Proc. of IEEE vehicular technology conference (VTC), Dublin, pp 3016–3020

  9. Clauset A, Shalizi CR, Newman MEJ (2009) Power-law distributions in empirical data. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM) Review (SIREV)

  10. Cosovic I, Brandes S, Schnell M (2006) Subcarrier weighting: a method for sidelobe suppression in OFDM systems. IEEE Commun Lett 10(6):444–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Datla D, Rajbanshi R, Wyglinski AM, Minden GJ (2007) Parametric adaptive spectrum sensing framework for dynamic spectrum access networks. In: Proc. of IEEE symposium on new frontiers in dynamic spectrum access networks (DySPAN), Dublin, pp 482–485

  12. Ellingson SW (2005) Spectral occupancy at VHF: implications for frequency-agile cognitive radios. In: Proc. of IEEE vehicular technology conference (VTC), vol 2, Dallas, pp 1379–1382

  13. Geirhofer S, Tong L, Sadler BM (2007) Dynamic spectrum access in the time domain: modeling and exploiting white space. IEEE Commun Mag 45(5):66–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Haykin S (2005) Cognitive radio: brain-empowered wireless communications. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 23(2):201–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Holland O, Cordier P, Muck M, Mazet L, Klöck C, Renk T (2007) Spectrum power measurements in 2G and 3G cellular phone bands during the 2006 football world cup in Germany. In: Proc. of IEEE symposium on new frontiers in dynamic spectrum access networks (DySPAN), Dublin, pp 575–578

  16. Islam M, Koh C, Oh S, Qing X, Lai Y, Wang C, Liang YC, Toh B, Chin F, Tan G, Toh W (2008) Spectrum survey in Singapore: occupancy measurements and analyses. In: Proc. of international conference on cognitive radio oriented wireless networks and communications (CROWNCOM). Singapore

  17. Mitola J III (2000) Cognitive radio: an integrated agent architecture for software defined radio. Ph.D. thesis, KTH (Royal Institute of Technology), Stockholm

  18. Kim H, Shin KG (2008) Efficient discovery of spectrum opportunities with MAC-layer sensing in cognitive radio networks. IEEE Trans Mob Comput 7(5):533–545

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Köpke A, Willig A, Karl H (2003) Chaotic maps as parsimonious bit error models of wireless channels. In: Proc. of IEEE conference on computer communications (INFOCOM), vol 1, San Francisco, pp 513–523

  20. McHenry MA (2005) NSF spectrum occupancy measurements project summary. Tech. rep., Shared Spectrum Company

  21. McHenry MA, McCloskey D (2006) Multi-band, multi-location spectrum occupancy measurements. In: Proc. of international symposium on advanced radio technologies (ISART), Boulder, pp 167–175

  22. McHenry MA, Tenhula PA, McCloskey D, Roberson DA, Hood CS (2006) Chicago spectrum occupancy measurements & analysis and a long-term studies proposal. In: Proc. of workshop on technology and policy for accessing spectrum (TAPAS), Boston

  23. Pagadarai S, Rajbanshi R, Wyglinski A, Minden G (2008) Sidelobe suppression for OFDM-based cognitive radios using constellation expansion. In: Proc. of IEEE wireless communications and networking conference (WCNC), Las Vegas, pp 888–893

  24. Petrin A, Steffes PG (2005) Analysis and comparison of spectrum measurements performed in urban and rural areas to determine the total amount of spectrum usage. In: Proc. of international symposium on advanced radio technologies (ISART), Boulder, pp 9–12

  25. Polastre J, Szewczyk R, Culler D (2005) Telos: enabling ultra-low power wireless research. In: Proc. of international symposium on information processing in sensor networks (IPSN), special track on platform tools and design methods for network embedded sensors (SPOTS), Los Angeles, pp 364–369

  26. Roberson DA (2007) Structural support for cognitive radio system deployment. In: Proc. of international conference on cognitive radio oriented wireless networks and communications (CROWNCOM), Orlando, pp 401–407

  27. Rogers AEE, Salah JE, Smythe DL, Pratap P, Carter JC, Derome M (2005) Interference temperature measurements from 70 to 1500 MHz in suburban and rural environments of the Northeast. In: Proc. of IEEE symposium on new frontiers in dynamic spectrum access networks (DySPAN), Baltimore, pp 119–123

  28. Sanders FH (1998) Broadband spectrum surveys in Denver, CO, San Diego, CA, and Los Angeles, CA: methodology, analysis, and comparative results. In: Proc. of IEEE symposium on electromagnetic compatibility, vol 2, Denver, pp 988–993

  29. Shellhammer S, Chouinard G (2006) Spectrum sensing requirements summary. IEEE 802.22-05/22-06-0089-05-0000

  30. Wellens M, de Baynast A, Mähönen P (2008) Exploiting historical spectrum occupancy information for adaptive spectrum sensing. In: Proc. of IEEE wireless communications and networking conference (WCNC), Las Vegas, pp 717–722

  31. Wellens M, de Baynast A, Mähönen P (2008) On the performance of dynamic spectrum access based on spectrum occupancy statistics. IET Communications, Special Issue on Cognitive Spectrum Access 2(6):772–782

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wellens M, Mähönen P (2009) Lessons learned from an extensive spectrum occupancy measurement campaign and a stochastic duty cycle model. In: Proc. of international conference on testbeds and research infrastructures for the development of networks and communities (Tridentcom), Washington, D.C.

  33. Wellens M, Riihijärvi J, Mähönen P (2009) Empirical time and frequency domain models of spectrum use. Phys Comm, Special Issue on Cognitive Radio: Algorithms & System Design (Elsevier) 2(1–2):10–32

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wellens M, Wu J, Mähönen P (2007) Evaluation of spectrum occupancy in indoor and outdoor scenario in the context of cognitive radio. In: Proc. of international conference on cognitive radio oriented wireless networks and communications (CROWNCOM), Orlando, pp 420–427

  35. Zhao Q, Sadler B (2007) A survey of dynamic spectrum access. IEEE Signal Process Mag 24(3):79–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhao Q, Tong L, Swami A, Chen Y (2007) Decentralized cognitive MAC for opportunistic spectrum access in ad hoc networks: a POMDP framework. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 25(3):589–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the RWTH Aachen University and the German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, DFG) for providing financial support through UMIC research centre. We would also like to thank the European Union for providing partial funding of this work through the ARAGORN project. Additionally, we would like to thank the International School Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands, and Marten Bandholz and Sonja Bone for providing us access to the outdoor measurement locations. Finally, we would like to thank Jin Wu and Gero Schmidt-Kärst for their support during the measurements.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthias Wellens.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wellens, M., Mähönen, P. Lessons Learned from an Extensive Spectrum Occupancy Measurement Campaign and a Stochastic Duty Cycle Model. Mobile Netw Appl 15, 461–474 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-009-0199-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-009-0199-9

Keywords