Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Conformational energy penalties of protein-bound ligands

  • Published:
Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The conformational energies required for ligands to adopt their bioactive conformations were calculated for 33 ligand–protein complexes including 28 different ligands. In order to monitor the force field dependence of the results, two force fields, MM3 and AMBER, were employed for the calculations. Conformational analyses were performed in vacuo and in aqueous solution by using the generalized Born/solvent accessible surface (GB/SA) solvation model. The protein-bound conformations were relaxed by using flat-bottomed Cartesian constraints. For about 70% of the ligand–protein complexes studied, the conformational energies of the bioactive conformations were calculated to be ≤3 kcal/mol. It is demonstrated that the aqueous conformational ensemble for the unbound ligand must be used as a reference state in this type of calculations. The calculations for the ligand–protein complexes with conformational energy penalties of the ligand calculated to be larger than 3 kcal/mol suffer from uncertainties in the interpretation of the experimental data or limitations of the computational methods. For example, in the case of long-chain flexible ligands (e.g. fatty acids), it is demonstrated that several conformations may be found which are very similar to the conformation determined by X-ray crystallography and which display significantly lower conformational energy penalties for binding than obtained by using the experimental conformation. For strongly polar molecules, e.g. amino acids, the results indicate that further developments of the force fields and of the dielectric continuum solvation model are required for reliable calculations on the conformational properties of this type of compounds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Siebel, G.L. and Kollman, P.A., In Hansch, C., Sammes, P.G., Taylor, B. and Ramsden, C.A. (Eds.) Comprehensive Medicinal Chemistry, Vol. 4, Pergamon, Oxford, 1990, pp. 125–138.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Liljefors, T. and Pettersson, I., In Krogsgaard-Larsen, P., Liljefors, T. and Madsen, U. (Eds.) A Textbook of Drug Design and Development, 2nd ed., Overseas Publishers Association, Amsterdam, 1996, pp. 60–93.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pettersson, I. and Liljefors, T., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 1 (1987) 143.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bengtsson, M., Liljefors, T. and Hansson, B.S., Bioorg. Chem., 15 (1987) 409.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cramer III, R.D., DePriest, S.A., Patterson, D.E. and Hecht, P., In Kubinyi, H. (Ed.) 3D QSAR in Drug Design: Theory, Methods and Applications, ESCOM, Leiden, 1993, pp. 443–485.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Marshall, G.R. and Motoc, I., In Burgen, A.S.V., Roberts, G.C.K. and Tute, M.S. (Eds.) Molecular Graphics and Drug Design, Elsevier, New York, NY, 1986, pp. 115–156.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Protein Data Bank, Brookhaven National Laboratory, http://www.pdb.bnl.gov.

  8. Nicklaus, M.C., Wang, S., Driscoll, J.S. and Milne, G.W.A., Bioorg. Med. Chem., 3 (1995) 411.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Spark, M.J., Winkler, D.A. and Andrews, P.R., Int. J. Quantum Chem., 9 (1982) 321.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Poulos, T. and Howard, A.J., Biochemistry, 26 (1987) 8165.

    Google Scholar 

  11. MacroModel v. 5.0, Mohamadi, F., Richards, N.G.J., Guida, W.C., Liskamp, R., Lipton, M., Caufield, C., Chang, G., Hendrickson, T. and Still, W.C., J. Comput. Chem., 11 (1990) 440.

    Google Scholar 

  12. INSIGHTII (v. 95.0), Molecular Simulations, Cambridge, U.K.

  13. Gundertofte, K., Liljefors, T., Norrby, P.-O. and Pettersson, I., J. Comput. Chem., 17 (1996) 429.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Chang, G., Guida, W.C. and Still, W.C., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 111 (1989) 4379.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Still, W.C., Tempczyk, A., Hawley, R.C. and Hendrickson, T., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 112 (1990) 6127.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Howard, A.E., Singh, U.C., Billeter, M. and Kollman, P.A., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 110 (1988) 6984.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Meng, E.C., Cieplak, P., Caldwell, J.W. and Kollman, P.A., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 116 (1994) 12061.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Morton, A., Baase, W.A. and Matthews, B.W., Biochemistry, 34 (1995) 8564.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Green, N.M., Methods Enzymol., 184 (1990) 51.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Weber, P.C., Wendoloski, J.J., Pantoliano, M.W. and Salemme, F.R., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 114 (1992) 3197.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Richieri, G.V., Ogata, R.T. and Kleinfeld, A.M., J. Biol. Chem., 39 (1994) 23918.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Leslie, A.G.W., J. Mol. Biol., 213 (1990) 167.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boström, J., Norrby, PO. & Liljefors, T. Conformational energy penalties of protein-bound ligands. J Comput Aided Mol Des 12, 383 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008007507641

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008007507641