Abstract
Since Aristotle it is recognised that a valid syllogism cannot have two particular premises. However, that is not how a lay person sees it; at least as long as the premises read “many”, “most” etc, instead of a plain “some”. The lay people are right if one considers that these syllogisms do not have strict but approximate (Zadeh) validity. Typically there are only particular premises available in everyday life and one is dependent on such syllogisms. – Some rules on the usage of particular premises are given below.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Drösser, Ch. 1994. Fuzzy Logik: Methodische Einführung in krauses Denken. Hamburg: Rowohlt.
Haft, Fr. 1978, Juristische Rhetorik. Freiburg/München: Karl Alber.
Murphree, W.E. 1993. Expanding the traditional syllogism. Logique & Analyse 141–142, 105–120.
Philipps, L. 1993a. Vague legal concepts and fuzzy logic: An attempt to determine the required period of waiting after traffic accidents. Informatica e Diritto 37–51.
Philipps, L. 1993b. Kompensatorische Verknüpfungen in der Rechtsanwendung — ein Fall für fuzzy logic. In M. Martinek (ed.), Vestigia Iuris: Festschrift für Günther Jahr. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr.
Philipps, L. 1994. Ein bißchen fuzzy logic für Juristen. In M-T. Tinnefeld et al. (ed.), Institutionen und Einzelne im Zeitalter der Informationstechnik. München: Oldenbourg.
Philipps, L. 1995a. Just decisions using multiple criteria or: Who gets the Porsche? An application of Ronald R. Yager's fuzzy logic method, Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. College Park, MD: University of Maryland, pp. 195–200.
Philipps, L. 1995b. Eine Theorie der unscharfen Subsumtion — Die Subsumtionsschwelle im Lichte der fuzzy logic, Archiv für Rechts-und Sozialphilosophie 81, 405–417.
Zadeh, L. A. 1975. Fuzzy Logic and Approximate Reasoning, Synthese 30, 407–428..
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Philipps, L. Approximate syllogisms – on the logic of everyday life. Artificial Intelligence and Law 7, 227–234 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008369608852
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008369608852