Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Numerical Experience with a Reduced Hessian Method for Large Scale Constrained Optimization

  • Published:
Computational Optimization and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The reduced Hessian SQP algorithm presented in Biegler et al. [SIAM J. Optimization, Vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 314–347, 1995.] is developed in this paper into a practical method for large-scale optimization. The novelty of the algorithm lies in the incorporation of a correction vector that approximates the cross term ZTWYpY. This improves the stability and robustness of the algorithm without increasing its computational cost. The paper studies how to implement the algorithm efficiently, and presents a set of tests illustrating its numerical performance. An analytic example, showing the benefits of the correction term, is also presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J.T. Betts and P.D. Frank, “A sparse nonlinear optimization algorithm,” JOTA, vol. 82, pp. 519-541, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  2. L.T. Biegler, “Optimization strategies for complex process models,” Advances in Chemical Engineering, vol. 8, p. 197, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  3. L.T. Biegler, J. Nocedal, and C. Schmid, “A reduced Hessian method for large-scale constrained optimization,” SIAM J. Optimization, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 314-347, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  4. L.T. Biegler, C. Schmid, and D. Ternet, in A Multiplier-Free, Reduced Hessian Method For Process Optimization, Large-Scale Optimization with Applications, Part II: Optimal Design and Control, L.T. Biegler, T.F. Coleman, A.R. Conn, and F.N. Santosa (Eds.), Springer Verlag, p. 101, 1997.

  5. P.T. Boggs, J.W. Tolle, and A.J. Wang, “A Practical Algorithm for General Large Scale Nonlinear Optimization Problems,” Internal Report, National Institute of Standards, 1994.

  6. I. Bongartz, A.R. Conn, N.I.M. Gould, and Ph.L. Toint, “CUTE: Constrained and Unconstrained Testing Environment,” Research Report, IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  7. R.H. Byrd, “An example of irregular convergence in some constrained optimization methods that use the projected Hessian,” Math. Programming, vol. 32, pp. 232-237, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R.H. Byrd and J. Nocedal, An analysis of reduced Hessian methods for constrained optimization, Math. Programming, vol. 49, pp. 285-323, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  9. R.M. Chamberlain, C. Lemarechal, H.C. Pedersen, and M.J.D. Powell, “The watchdog technique for forcing convergence in algorithms for constrained optimization,” Math. Programming Studies, vol. 16, pp. 1-17, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  10. T.F. Coleman and A.R. Conn, “On the local convergence of a quasi-Newton method for the nonlinear programming problem,” SIAM J. Numer. Anal., vol. 21, pp. 755-769, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  11. I.S. Duff, A.M. Erisman, and J.K. Reid, Direct Methods for Sparse Matrices, Clarendon Press: Oxford, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  12. S.K. Eldersveld, Large-Scale Sequential Quadratic Programming Algorithms, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Operations Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. Fletcher, “An exact penalty for nonlinear programming with inequalities,” Math. Programming, vol. 5, pp. 129-150, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. Fletcher, Practical Methods of Optimization, 2nd edition, John Wiley and Sons: Chichester, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  15. D. Gabay, “Reduced quasi-Newton methods with feasibility improvement for nonlinearly constrained optimization,” Math. Programming Studies, vol. 16, pp. 18-44, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J.C. Gilbert, “On the local and global convergence of a reduced quasi-Newton method,” Optimization, vol. 20, pp. 421-450, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  17. J.C. Gilbert, “Maintaining the positive definiteness of the matrices in reduced Hessian methods for equality constrained optimization,” Math. Programming, vol. 50, pp. 1-28, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  18. P.E. Gill, W. Murray, and M. Saunders, “An SQP Algorithm for Large Scale Optimization,” Working Paper, EESOR Department, Stanford University, 1996.

  19. P.E. Gill, W. Murray, and M.H. Wright, Practical Optimization, Academic Press: London, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  20. M. Gulliksson, Algorithms for Nonlinear Least Squares with Applications to Orthogonal Regression, UMINF-178.90, University of Umea, Sweden, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  21. C.B. Gurwitz and M.L. Overton, “SQP methods based on approximating a projected Hessian matrix,” SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comp., vol. 10, pp. 631-653, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Harwell Subroutine Library, A catalogue of subroutines (release 12). AEA Technology, Harwell, Oxfordshire, England, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  23. W. Hock and K. Schittkowski, “Test Examples for Nonlinear Programming Codes,” in Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol. 187, Springer Verlag: Berlin, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  24. M. Lalee, J. Nocedal, and T. Plantenga, “On the Implementation of an Algorithm for Large-Scale Equality Constrained Optimization,” SIAM J. Optimization, submitted.

  25. W. Murray and F.J. Prieto, “A Sequential Quadratic Programming Algorithm Using an Incomplete Solution of the Subproblem,” Technical Report, Department of Operations Research, Stanford University, 1992.

  26. J. Nocedal and M.L. Overton, “Projected Hessian updating algorithms for nonlinearly constrained optimization,” SIAM J. Numer. Anal., vol. 22, pp. 821-850, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  27. E.O. Omojokun, Trust Region Algorithms for Optimization with Nonlinear Equality and Inequality Constraints, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Colorado, 1991.

  28. C.E. Orozco, Large-Scale Shape Optimization: Numerical Methods, Parallel Algorithms and Applications to Aerodynamic Design, Ph.D. Dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University, 1993.

  29. E.R. Panier and A.L. Tits, “On combining feasibility, descent and superlinear convergence in inequality constrained optimization,” Mathematical Programming, vol. 59, 261-276, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Schmid, C. and L.T. Biegler, “Quadratic Programming Methods for Tailored Reduced Hessian SQP,” Computers and Chemical Engineering, vol. 18, no. 9, p. 817, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Tanartkit, P. and L.T. Biegler, “Stable decomposition for dynamic optimization,” I & EC Research, vol. 34, p. 1253, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  32. D.J. Ternet and L.T. Biegler, “Recent Improvements to a Multiplier Free Reduced Hessian Successive Quadratic Programming Algorithm,” Computers and Chemical Engineering, to appear.

  33. Ph.L. Toint, “An assessment of non-monotone line search techniques for unconstrained optimization,” SIAM Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing, 17, vol. 3, pp. 725-739, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  34. S.Vasantharajan and L.T. Biegler, “Large-scale decomposition for successive quadratic programming,” Comp. Chem. Engr., vol. 12, no. 11, p. 1087, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Y. Xie, Reduced Hessian Algorithms for Solving Large-Scale Equality Constrained Optimization Problems, Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Computer Science, University of Colorado, Boulder, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Y. Yuan, “An only 2-step Q-superlinear convergence example for some algorithms that use reduced Hessian approximations,” Math. Programming, vol. 32, pp. 224-231, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Biegler, L.T., Nocedal, J., Schmid, C. et al. Numerical Experience with a Reduced Hessian Method for Large Scale Constrained Optimization. Computational Optimization and Applications 15, 45–67 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008723031056

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008723031056