Abstract
Online auctions are a profitable, exciting, and dynamic part of electronic commerce, and behave in ways, which do not match classical auction theory. This paper models an online auction in terms of a Markov chain on a state space defined by the current price of the item and the number of bidders who have been previously “bumped”. It provides a mathematical model, some approximations, which were necessary to convert it into a tractable problem and solutions to a small and a medium-sized theoretical auction. The model results were validated through a comparison with real-world online auction data, showing promise as a predictor of final auction prices. The results of the auction model are also useful in solving an optimization problem that incorporates inventory management considerations in determining optimal auction size.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
C. Beam and A. Segev, Auctions on the Internet: a field study, Working Paper 98-WP-1032, Fisher Center for Information Technology and Marketplace Transformation, University of California, Berkeley; available at http://haas.berkeley.edu/citm.
C. Beam, A. Segev and J.G. Shanthikumar, Electronic negotiation through Internet-based auctions, Working Paper 96-WP-1019, Fisher Center for Information Technology and Marketplace Transformation, University of California, Berkeley; available at http://haas.berkeley.edu/citm.
M. Bichler and A. Segev, Electronic market design, Information Technology Management (2000), forthcoming.
R. Cassady, Auctions and Auctioneering (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, 1967).
M. Kumar and S. Feldman, Business negotiations on the Internet, IBM Institute for Advanced Commerce; available at http://www.ibm.com/iac/reports-technical/reports-bus-neg-internet.html.
D. Lucking-Reiley, Magic on the Internet: Experimental tests of auction theory, Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Economics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1996).
R.P. McAfee and J. McMillan, Auctions and bidding, Journal of Economic Literature(June 1987) 699–738.
P.Milgrom, Auctions and bidding: a primer, Journal of Economic Perspectives (Summer 1989) 3–22.
M.H. Rothkopf and R.M. Harstad, Modeling competitive bidding: a critical essay, Management Science 40(3) (1994) 364–384.
J. Rust and D. Friedman, eds., The Double Auction Market: Institutions, Theories, and Evidence, Workshop on Double Auction Markets, Santa Fe, NM, 1991 (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1993).
A. Segev C. Beam, Brokering strategies in electronic commerce markets, in: ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, Denver, CO, 1999.
A. Segev and J. Gebauer, B2B procurement and marketplace transformation, Journal of Information Technology and Management, Special Issue on E-Commerce in Procurement and the Supply Chain (2000).
H. Varian, Economic mechanism design for computerized agents, presented at the USENIXWorkshop on Electronic Commerce, 11-12 July 1995, New York; available at http://www.sims.berkeley.edu/ ~hal/people/.
W. Vickrey, Counterspeculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders, The Journal of Finance (March 1961) 9–37.
R. Wilson, Strategic analysis of auctions, in: Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications, Vol. 1, eds. R. Aumann and S. Hart (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1992).
P.R.Wurman, M.P.Wellman and W.E.Walsh, The Michigan Internet AuctionBot: A configurable auction server for human and software agents, in: 2nd International Conference on Autonomous Agents, 1998; available at hau http://auction.eecs.umich.edu.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Segev, A., Beam, C. & Shanthikumar, J.G. Optimal Design of Internet-Based Auctions. Information Technology and Management 2, 121–163 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011411801246
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011411801246