Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Predicting the Future

  • Published:
Information Systems Frontiers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present a novel methodology for predicting future outcomes that uses small numbers of individuals participating in an imperfect information market. By determining their risk attitudes and performing a nonlinear aggregation of their predictions, we are able to assess the probability of the future outcome of an uncertain event and compare it to both the objective probability of its occurrence and the performance of the market as a whole. Experiments show that this nonlinear aggregation mechanism vastly outperforms both the imperfect market and the best of the participants. We then extend the mechanism to prove robust in the presence of public information.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson L., Holt C. Information cascades in the laboratory. American Economic Review 1997;87:847-862.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camerer C., Weigelt K. Information mirages in experimental asset Markets. Journal of Business 1991;64:463-493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsythe R., Lundholm R. Information aggregation in an experimental market. Econometrica 1990;58:309-347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsythe R., Palfrey T., Plott C. Asset valuation in an experimental market. Econometrica, 1982;50:537-567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek F. The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review, 1945;35(4):519-530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iowa Electronic Markets. http.//www.biz.uiowa.edu/iem.

  • Kullback S., Leibler R.A. On information and sufficiency. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1952;22:79-86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz H. Portfolio Selection, NY: Wiley, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nöth M., Camerer C., Plott C., Weber M. Information traps in experimental asset markets, Submitted to Review of Financial Studies, 1999.

  • Nöth M., Weber M. Information aggregation with random ordering: Cascades and overconfidence. University of Mannheim, Discussion Paper, presented at the Summer 1998 ESA Meetings, 1998.

  • O'Brien J., Srivastava S. Dynamic stock markets with multiple assets. Journal of Finance 1991;46:1811-1838.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennock D., Lawrence S., Giles C., Nielsen F. The power of play: Efficient and forecast accuracy in web market games. NEC Research Institute Technical Report 2000-168, 2000.

  • Plott C., Sunder S. Efficiency of experimental security markets with insider information: An application of rational expectations models. Journal of Political Economy 1982;90:663-698.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plott C., Sunder S. Rational expectations and the aggregation of diverse information in laboratory security markets. Econometrica 1988;56:1085-1118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plott C., Wit J., Yang W. Pari-mutuel betting markets as information aggregation devices: Experimental results. Social Science Working Paper 986, California Institute of Technology, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharfstein D., Stein J. Herd behavior and investment. American Economic Review 1990;80:465-479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunder S. Markets for information: Experimental evidence. Econometrica 1992;60:667-695.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, KY., Fine, L.R. & Huberman, B.A. Predicting the Future. Information Systems Frontiers 5, 47–61 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022041805438

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022041805438