Abstract
This paper investigates relationships among task uncertainty, level of centralization, and project team performance. Team performance is measured in three dimensions: cost, time, and quality. Adopting an information processing view and contingency theory, the authors discuss tradeoffs among the three performance dimensions of a project team. Results from the simulation study indicate that, under high task uncertainty, a decentralized team performs better in terms of cost and time, but a centralized team performs better in terms of quality. Under low task uncertainty, there is no performance difference between a centralized team and a decentralized team in terms of cost and time, but a centralized team performs better in terms of quality. The paper suggests that researchers pay attention to the relative impact of centralization and decentralization on different dimensions of organizational performance, and managers adopt an organizational structure that performs better in a performance dimension that counts more to enhance overall performance.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Bourgeois, L.J. III (1985), “Strategic Goals, Perceived Uncertainty, and Economic Performance in Volatile Environments,” Academy of Management Journal, 28(3), 548–573.
Burton, R.M. and B. Obel (1998), Strategic Organizational Diagnosis and Design: Developing Theory for Application. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA.
Burton, R.M. and B. Obel (1995), “The Validity of Computational Models in Organization Science: From Model Realism to Purpose of the Model,” Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 1(1), 57–71.
Campion, M.A., G.J. Medsker and A.C. Higgs (1993), “Relations Between Work Group Characteristics and Effectiveness: Implications for Designing Effective Work Groups,” Personnel Psychology, 46(4), 823–850.
Carley, K.M. (1995), “Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory: Perspective and Directions,” Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 1(1), 39–65.
Carley, K.M. and Z. Lin (1997), “A Theoretical Study of Organizational Performance under Information Distortion,” Management Science, 43(7), 976–997.
Carley, K.M. and D.M. Svoboda (1997), “Modeling Organizational Adaptation as a Simulated Annealing Process,” Sociological Methods and Research, 25(1), 138–168.
Chang, M. and J.H. Harrington, Jr. (1998), “Organizational Structure and Firm Innovation in a Retail Chain,” Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory, 3(4), 267–288.
Daft, R.L. and N.B. Macintosh (1981), “A Tentative Exploration into the Amount and Equivocality of Information Processing in Organizational Work Units,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 207–224.
D'Aveni, R.A. (1994), Hypercompetition: Managing the Dynamics of Strategic Maneuvering. Free Press, New York.
Donaldson, L. (1996), “Normal Science of Structural Contingency Theory,” in S.R. Clegg, C. Hardy and W.R. Nord (Eds.) Handbook of Organizational Studies. London: Sage.
Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989), “Making Fast Strategic Decisions in High-Velocity Environments,” Academy of Management Journal, 32(3), 543–575.
Eisenhardt, K.M. (1993), “High Reliability Organizations Meet High Velocity Environments: Common Dilemmas in Nuclear Power Plants, Aircraft Carriers, and Microcomputer Firms,” in K.H. Roberts (Ed.) New Challenges to Understanding Organizations. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
Galbraith, J. (1973), Designing Complex Organizations. Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Reading, MA.
Gigone, D. and R. Hastie (1993), “The Common Knowledge Effect: Information Sharing and Group Judgment,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 959–974.
Gittell, J.H. (2000), “Paradox of Coordination and Control,” California Management Review, 42(3), 101–117.
Guzzo, R.A. and M.W. Dickson (1996), “Teams in Organizations: Recent Research on Performance and Effectiveness,” Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 304–338.
Hackman, J.R. (1987), “The Design of Work Teams,” in J. Lorsch (Ed.) Handbook of Organizational Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Jayaram, J., C. Droge and S.K. Vickery (1999), “The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Manufacturing Performance,” Journal of Operations Management, 18, 1–20.
Jin, Y. and R.E. Levitt (1996), “The Virtual Team Design: A Computational Model of Project Organizations,” Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 2(3), 171–195.
Keats, B.W. and M.A. Hitt (1988), “A Causal Model of Linkages Among Environmental Dimensions, Macro Organizational Characteristics, and Performance,” Academy of Management Journal, 31(3), 570–598.
Kumar, A., P.S. Ow and M.J. Prietula (1993), “Organizational Simulation and Information Systems Design,” Management Science, 39(2), 218–240.
Lawrence, P.R. and J.W. Lorsch (1967), Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
Levine, J.M. and R.L. Moreland (1998), “Small Groups,” in D.T. Gilbert, S.T. Fiske and G. Lindzey (Eds.) The Handbook of Social Psychology. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Levitt, R.E., G.P. Cohen, J.C. Kunz, C.I. Nass, T. Christiansen and Y. Jin (1994), “The 'Virtual Design Team': Simulating How Organization Structure and Information Processing Tools Affect Team Performance,” in K.M. Carley and M.J. Prietula (Eds.) Computational Organization Theory. Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
Lin, Z. and K.M. Carley (1997), “Organizational Response: The Cost PerformanceTradeoff,”Management Science, 43(2), 217–234.
Lin, Z. and K.M. Carley (2003), Designing Stress Resistant Organizations: Computational Theorizing and Crisis Applications. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
March, J.G. and H.A. Simon (1958), Organizations. Wiley, New York.
McGrath, J.E. (1984), Groups: Interaction and Performance. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Mohr, L.B. (1971), “Organizational Technology and Organizational Structure,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 16(4), 444–459.
Murray, A.I. (1989), “Top Management Group Heterogeneity and Firm Performance,” Strategic Management Journal, 10, 125–141.
Nadler, D. and M. Tuhman (1988), Strategic Organization Design: Concepts, Tools, & Processes. Scott, Foresman and Company, Glenview, IL.
O'Leary-Kelly, A.M., J.J. Martocchio and D.D. Frink (1994), “A Review of the Influence of Group Goals on Group Performance,” Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1285–1301.
Pennings, J.M. (1975), “The Relevance of the Structural-Contingency Model for Organizational Effectiveness,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 20(3), 393–410.
Perrow, C. (1967), “A Framework for the Comparative Analysis of Organizations,” American Sociological Review, 32, 194–208.
Phelan, S.E. and Z. Lin (2001), “Promotion Systems and Organizational Performance: A Contingency Model,” Computational Mathematical Organization Theory, 7, 207–232.
Pfeffer, J. (1978), Organizational Design. Harlan Davidson, Inc., Arlington Heights, IL.
Pfeffer, J. (1997), New Directions for Organization Theory. Oxford University Press, New York.
Roberts, K.H. (1990a), “Some Characteristics of One Type of High Reliability Organization,” Organization Science, 1(2), 160–176.
Safizadeh, M.H. (1991), “The Case ofWorkgroups in Manufacturing Operations,” California Management Review, 33(4), 61–82.
Schoonhoven, C. (1981), “Problems with Contingency Theory: Testing Assumptions HiddenWithin the Language of Contingency 'Theory,'” Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(3), 349–377.
Shrivastava, P. and I.I. Mitroff (1987), “Strategic Management of Corporate Crisis,” Columbia Journal of World Business, 22(1), 5–11.
Stasser, G. and D. Stewart (1992), “Discovery of Hidden Profiles by Decision-Making Groups: Solving a Problem Versus Making a Judgment,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 426–434.
Stasser, G., D. Stewart and G.M. Wittenbaum (1995), “Expert Roles and Information Exchange During Discussion: The Importance of Knowing Who Knows What,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 244–265.
Steiner, I.D. (1972), Group Process and Group Productivity. Academic Press, New York.
Thompson, J.D. (1967), Organizations in Action. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Victor, B. and R.S. Blackburn (1987), “Determinants and Consequences of Task Uncertainty: A Laboratory and Field Investigation,” Journal of Management Studies, 24(4), 387–404.
Vité Inc. (2002), SimVision Version 3.8. Mountain View, CA.
Ward, P.T., J.K. McCreery, L.P. Ritzman and D. Sharma (1998), “Competitive Priorities in Operations Management,” Decision Sciences, 29(4), 1035–1046.
Weick, K.E. and K.H. Roberts (1993), “Collective Mind in Organizations: Heedful Interrelating on Flight Decks,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(3), 357–381.
Wong, S.S. and R.M. Burton (2001), “Virtual Teams: What are Their Characteristics, and Impact on Team Performance?” Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 6, 339–360.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, J., Burton, R.M. The Effect of Task Uncertainty and Decentralization on Project Team Performance. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory 8, 365–384 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025472702927
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025472702927