Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Dependable Handling of Uncertainty

  • Published:
Reliable Computing

Abstract

Uncertainty quantification is an important approach to modeling in the presence of limited information about uncertain quantities. As a result recent years have witnessed a burgeoning body of work in this field. The present paper gives some background, highlights some recent work, and presents some problems and challenges.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Benford, F.: The Law of Anomalous Numbers, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 78 (1938), pp. 551–572.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Berleant, D. and Zhang, J.:UsingCorrelation to Improve Envelopes aroundDerivedDistributions, Reliable Computing 10(1) (2004), to appear,http://class.ee.iastate.edu/berleant/home/.

  3. Chandrakasan, A., Bowhill, W. J., and Fox, F. (eds):Design ofHigh-Performance Microprocessor Circuits, IEEE Press, 2001.

  4. Chang, C.-S.: Performance Guarantees in Communication Networks, Springer-Verlag, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Coolen, F. P. A., Coolen-Schrijner, P., and Yan, K. J.: Nonparametric Predictive Inference in Reliability, Reliability Engineering and System Safety 78 (2002), pp. 185–193.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cozman, F.: Credal Networks, Artificial Intelligence 120 (2000), pp. 199–233.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cui, W. C. and Blockley, D. I.: Interval Probability Theory for Evidential Support, International Journal of Intelligent Systems 5 (1990), pp. 183–192.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Davis, J. P. and Hall, J.W.:ASoftware-Supported Process forAssembling Evidence andHandling Uncertainty in Decision-Making, Decision Support Systems 35 (2003), pp. 415–433.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dubois, D. and Prade, H.: Possibility Theory: An Approach to Computerized Processing of Uncertainty, Plenum Press, 1988.

  10. Electronic Bulletin of the Rough Set Community, http://www2.cs.uregina.ca/″roughset/.

  11. Fagiuoli, E. and Zaffalon, M.:An Exact Interval Propagation Algorithmfor Polytreeswith Binary Variables, Artificial Intelligence 106(1) (1998), pp. 77–107.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Elsevier, http://www.elsevier.nl/locate/fss.

  13. Hampel, F.: Robust Statistics: A Brief Introduction and Overview, Research Report No. 94, Seminar f¨ur Statistik, Edgen¨ossische Technische Hochschule (ETH), Switzerland, 2001, http://stat.ethz.ch/Research-Reports/94.pdf. See also Huber, P. J.: Robust Statistics, Wiley, 1981. See also Int. Conf. on Robust Statistics 2003, http://win-www.uia.ac.be/u/icors03/.

  14. Hill, B. M.: Posterior Distribution of Percentiles: Bayes' Theorem for Sampling from a Population, Journal of the American Statistical Association 63 (1968), pp. 677–691.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hill, T. P.: The Difficulty of Faking Data, Chance 12(3) (1999), pp. 27–31.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hutchinson, T. P. and Lai, C. D.: Continuous Bivariate Distributions Emphasizing Applications, Rumsby Scientific Publishing, Adelaide, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  17. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, Elsevier.

  18. Kolmogoroff, A.: Confidence Limits for an Unknown Distribution Function, Annals of Mathematical Statistics 12 (4) (1941), pp. 461–463.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kyburg, H. E.: Interval-Valued Probabilities, http://ippserv.rug.ac.be/ documentation/interval prob/interval prob.html (as of 6/03).

  20. Kyberg, H. E. and Pittarelli, M.: Set-Based Bayesianism, IEEE Trans. On Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 26(3) (1996), pp. 324–339.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Levi, I.: The Enterprise of Knowledge, an Essay on Knowledge, Credal Probabiliy, and Chance, MIT Press, 1980.

  22. Little, R. J. and Rubin, D. B.: Statistical Analysis with Missing Data, Wiley, 1987.

  23. Manski, C. F.: Partial Identification of Probability Distributions, Springer-Verlag, 2003.

  24. Mehrotra, V.: Modeling the Effects of Systematic Process Variation on Circuit Performance, dissertation, MIT, 2001.

  25. Nelsen, R. B.: An Introduction to Copulas, Lecture Notes in Statistics 139, Springer-Verlag, 1999.

  26. Newcomb, S.:Note on the Frequency ofUse of theDifferentDigits inNaturalNumbers, American Journal of Mathematics 4 (1881), pp. 39–40.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sherwood, H. quoted at http://gro.creditlyonnais.fr/content/rd/home copulas.htm as of 6/03, notes the great, yet often under-recognized overlap among the areas of joint probability distributions with fixed marginals, copulas, doubly stochastic measures, Markov operators, and dependency relations.

  28. Staum, J.: Fundamental Theorems of Asset Pricing for Good Deal Bounds, Mathematical Finance, forthcoming. See also Technical Report 1351, Dept. of ORIE, Cornell University, 2002.

  29. The Imprecise Probabilities Project, http://ippserv.rug.ac.be/home/ipp.html.

  30. Vansteelandt, S. and Goetghebeur, E.: Analyzing the Sensitivity of Generalized Linear Models to Incomplete Outcomes via the IDE Algorithm, Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 10(4) (2001), pp. 656–672.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wang, Z.: Internet QoS: Architectures and Mechanisms for Quality of Service, Morgan-Kaufmann, 2001.

  32. www.gloriamundi.org, gro.creditlyonnais.fr, and www.risklab.ch are sources for reports on mathematical finance, copulas, and related items, including a few mentioning Spearman correlation (as of 6/03).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berleant, D., Cheong, MP., Chu, C. et al. Dependable Handling of Uncertainty. Reliable Computing 9, 407–418 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025888503247

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025888503247

Keywords