Abstract
Many companies find it difficult to maintain commonality and economies of scale in products with strict customer design requirements that may vary greatly from contract-to-contract or piece-to-piece. These strict and varied requirements typically result in highly customized products that are costly to manufacture, involve small production runs, and require long delivery times. In this paper, we discuss how the strategic incorporation of product platforms into the design process can leverage the design effort of individually customized products. The example involves the design of cross-sections for yokes used to mount valve actuators in the nuclear power industry. Through this example we demonstrate the process of creating a market segmentation grid, choosing a targeted segment, creating a product platform for the yoke cross-section, and subsequently defining the yoke product family using the product platform concept exploration method. The end result is a platform-based product family that will improve response to customer requests, reduce design and manufacturing costs, and improve time to market for companies that make small production runs of highly customized products.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ASME (1997) Power Threads. ASME ANSI B1.1, ASME, New York.
ASME (2000) ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section II, Part D, Materials\3-Properties, ASME, New York.
Belegundu, A. D. and Chandrupatla, T. R. (1999) Optimization Concepts and Applications in Engineering, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Dahmus, J. B., Gonzalez-Zugasti, J. P. and Otto, K. N. (2000) Modular product architecture, in ASME 2000 Design Engineering Technical Conferences\3-Design Theory and Methodology Conference (DTM'00), Allen, J. K. (ed.), 10–13 September, Baltimore, MD, ASME, Paper No. DETC2000/DTM-14565.
Ezekoye, L. I. (1978) A Simplified Method for Calculating the Natural Frequency of Valve Superstructures, ASME, Paper No. 78-PVP-4.
Farrell, R. S. (1999) Automatic Optimization of Valve Bolted Flanges, MS Thesis, Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering, Penn State University, University Park, PA.
Gonzalez-Zugasti, J. P. and Otto, K. N. (2000) Modular platform-based product family design, in ASME 2000 Design Engineering Technical Conferences\3-Design Automation Conference, Renaud, J. E. (ed.), 10–13 September, Baltimore, MD, ASME, Paper No. DETC2000/DAC-14238.
Hernandez, G., Simpson, T. W., Allen, J. K., Bascaran, E., Avila, L. F. and Salinas, F. (2001) Robust design of families of products with production modeling and evaluation. ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, 123(2), 183-190.
Martin, M. V. and Ishii, K. (2000) Design for variety: a methodology for developing product platform architectures. ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences\3-Design for Manufacturing, 10–13 September, Baltimore, MD, ASME, Paper No. DETC2000/DFM-14021.
Mather, H. (1995) Product variety\3-friend or foe? Proceedings of the 1995 38th American Production and Inventory Control Society International Conference and Exhibition, Orlando, FL, APICS, pp. 378-381.
Maupin, A. J. and Stauffer, L. A. (2000) A design tool to help small manufacturers reengineer a product family, in ASME 2000 Design Engineering Technical Conferences\3-Design Theory and Methodology Conference (DTM'00), Allen, J. K. (ed.), 10–13 September, Baltimore, MD, ASME, Paper No. DETC2000/DTM-14568.
Messac, A., Martinez, M. P. and Simpson, T. W. (2002) Effective product family design using physical programming, Engineering Optimization, 34(3), 245-261.
Meyer, M. H. (1997) Revitalize your product lines through continuous platform renewal. Research Technology Management, 40(2), 17-28.
Meyer, M. H. and Lehnerd, A. P. (1997) The Power of Product Platforms: Building Value and Cost Leadership, Free Press, New York.
Nayak, R. U., Chen, W. and Simpson, T. W. (2002) A variation-based method for product family design. Engineering Optimization, 34(1), 65-81.
Pessina, M. W. and Renner, J. R. (1998) Mass customization at Lutron Electronics\3-A total company process. Agility and Global Competition, 2(2), 50-57.
Roark, R. J. and Young, W. C. (1989) Formulas for Stress and Strain, 6th edn, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Sanderson, S. W. and Uzumeri, M. (1997) Managing Product Families, Irwin, Chicago, IL.
Simpson, T. W., Maier, J. R. A. and Mistree, F. (1999) A product platform concept exploration method for product family design. Design Theory and Methodology\3-DTM'99, September 12–15, Las Vegas, Nevada, ASME, Paper No. DETC99/DTM-8761.
Simpson, T. W., Maier, J. R. A. and Mistree, F. (2001) Product platform design: method and application. Research in Engineering Design, 13(1), 2-22.
Simpson, T. W., Seepersad, C. C. and Mistree, F. (2001) Balancing commonality and performance within the concurrent design of multiple products in a product family. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, 9(3), 177-190.
Simpson, T. W., Peplinski, J., Koch, P. N. and Allen, J. K. (2001c) Metamodels for computer-based engineering design: survey and recommendations. Engineering with Computers, 17(2), 129-150.
Ulrich, K. (1995) The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. Research Policy, 24(3), 419-440.
Zamirowksi, E. J. and Otto, K. N. (1999) Identifying product portfolio architecture modularity using function and variety heuristics, Design Theory and Methodology\3-DTM'99, September 12–15, Las Vegas, NV, ASME, Paper No. DETC99/DTM-8760.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Farrell, R.S., Simpson, T.W. Product platform design to improve commonality in custom products. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 14, 541–556 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1027306704980
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1027306704980