Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Advertisement

An Agent-Based Model of Innovation Emergence in Organizations: Renault and Ford Through the Lens of Evolutionism

  • Published:
Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Based on evolutionist theories and project management knowledge, a connectionist model based on genetic algorithm is built to simulate innovation process in organizations. Transformation and selection produce micro dynamics to create macro behavior in the agents' population. Results clarify Darwinian Lamarckian adaptation mechanisms as their relation to environment and their interactions. Simulations show the existence of an optimal level of experimentation and selection of projects upstream the innovation process, demonstrate that the efficiency of evolutionist processes is contingent to environment complexity and allow exploring interdependencies and coexistence between two paths of evolution. The model validity is approached through similarity to admitted theory and through a comparative study of the innovation processes of two car makers (Renault and Ford).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Anderson, P. (1999), “Complexity Theory and Organization Science,” Organization Science, 10(3), 216–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, P. and M.L. Tushman (1990), “Technological Discontinuities and Dominant Designs: A Cyclical Model of Technological Change,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(4), 604–633.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, P. (1997), “Advancing the Art of Simulation in the Social Sciences,” Santa Fe Institute, Paper no. 97-05-048.

  • Carley, K.M. (1995), “Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory: Perspective and Directions,” Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 1(1), 39–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carley, K.M. and V. Hill (2001), “Structural Change and Learning within Organizations,” in A. Lomi (Ed.) Dynamics of Organizational Societies: Models, Theories and Methods.MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, G. (1993), Economics and Evolution: Bringing Life Back into Economics.Policy Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J.H. (1975), Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems.University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, S. (1993), The Origins of Order: Self Organization and Selection in Evolution.Oxford University Press, Oxford, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinthal, D.A. (1997), “Adaptation on Rugged Landscapes,” Management Science, 43(7), 934–950.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKelvey, B. (1994), “Evolution and Organization Science,” in J.A.C. Baum and J.V. Singh (Eds.) Evolutionary Dynamics of Organizations, Oxford University Press, Oxford, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKelvey, B. (2001), “Model-Centered Organizational Epistemology,” in J.A.C. Baum (Ed.), Companion to Organizations.Basil Blackwell, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKelvey, M. (1996), Evolutionary Innovations.Oxford University Press, Oxford, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G. (1997), Images of Organization.Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cartier, M. An Agent-Based Model of Innovation Emergence in Organizations: Renault and Ford Through the Lens of Evolutionism. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory 10, 147–153 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CMOT.0000039167.91320.df

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CMOT.0000039167.91320.df