Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Use and misuse of landscape indices

  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Landscape ecology has generated much excitement in the past two decades. One reason was that it brought spatial analysis and modeling to the forefront of ecological research. However, high expectations for landscape analysis to improve our understanding and prediction of ecological processes have largely been unfulfilled. We identified three kinds of critical issues: conceptual flaws in landscape pattern analysis, inherent limitations of landscape indices, and improper use of pattern indices. For example, many landscape analyses treat quantitative description of spatial pattern as an end itself and fail to explore relationships between pattern and process. Landscape indices and map data are sometimes used without testing their ecological relevance, which may not only confound interpretation of results, but also lead to meaningless results. In addition, correlation analysis with indices is impeded by the lack of data because of difficulties in large-scale experimentation and by complicated behavior of indices because of their varying responses to changes in scale and spatial pattern. These problems represent significant challenges to landscape pattern analysis, especially in terms of relating pattern to process. In this perspective paper, we examine the underlying problems of these challenges and offer some solutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen R.F.H., O’Neill R.V. and Hoekstra T.W. 1984. Interlevel relations in ecological research and management: Some working principles from hierarchy theory. USDA Forest Service General Tech Report RM-110, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.

  • Bian L. and Butler R. 1999. Comparing effects of aggregation methods on statistical and spatial properties of simulated spatial data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 65: 73–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt J. 1998. Key concepts and interdisciplinarity in landscape ecology: a summing-up and outlook. In: Dover J.W. and Bunce R.G.H. (eds), Key Concepts in Landscape Ecology, pp. 421–434. UK Association of International Association for Landscape Ecology (IALE-UK), Garstang, Great Britain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cale W.G., Henebry G.M. and Yeakley J.A. 1989. Inferring process from pattern in natural communities. BioScience 39: 600–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter S.R. 1992. Replication and treatment strength in whole-lake experiments. Ecology 73: 453–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter S.R. 1996. Microcosm experiments have limited relevance for community and ecosystem ecology. Ecology 77: 453–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale M.R.T. 1999. Spatial Pattern Analysis in Plant Ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flather C.H. and Sauer J.R. 1996. Using landscape ecology to test hypotheses about large-scale abundance in migratory birds. Ecology 77: 28–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner R.H., Milne B.T., Turner M.G. and O’Neill R.V. 1987. Neutral models for the analysis of broad-scale landscape pattern. Landscape Ecology 1: 19–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson E.J. 1998. Quantifying landscape spatial pattern: What is the state of the art? Ecosystems 1: 143–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamel P.B. 1992. The Land Manager’s Guide to the Birds in the South. The Nature Conservancy, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haines-Young R. and Chopping M. 1996. Quantifying landscape structure: a review of landscape indices and their application to forested landscapes. Progress in Physical Geography 20: 418–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargis C.D., Bissonette J.A. and David J.L. 1998. The behavior of landscape metrics commonly used in the study of habitat fragmentation. Landscape Ecology 13: 167–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargrove W.W. and Pickering J. 1992. Pseudoreplication: A sine qua non for regional ecology. Landscape Ecology 6: 251–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris L.D. and Sanderson J. 2000. The re-membered landscape. In: Sanderson J. and Harris L.D. (eds), Landscape Ecology: A Top-Down Approach, pp. 91–112. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurlbert S.H. 1971. The nonconcept of species diversity: a critique and alternative parameters. Ecology 52: 577–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurlbert S.H. 1984. Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecological Monographs 54: 187–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jelinski D.E. and Wu J. 1996. The modifiable areal unit problem and implications for landscape ecology. Landscape Ecology 11: 129–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Justice C.O., Markham B.L., Townshend J.R.G. and Kennard R.L. 1989. Spatial degradation of satellite data. International Journal of Remote Sensing 10: 1539–1561.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krummel J.R., Gardner R.H., Sugihara G., O’Neill R.V. and Coleman P.R. 1987. Landscape patterns in a disturbed environment. Oikos 48: 321–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin S.A. 1992. The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology 73: 1943–1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li H. and Reynolds J.F. 1993. A new contagion index to quantify spatial patterns of landscapes. Landscape Ecology 8: 155–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li H. and Reynolds J.F. 1994. A simulation experiment to quantify spatial heterogeneity in categorical maps. Ecology 75: 2446–2455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li H. and Reynolds J. F. 1995. On definition and quantification of heterogeneity. Oikos 73: 280–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li H., Gartner D., Mou P. and Trettin C.C. 2000. A landscape model (LEEMATH) to evaluate effects of management impacts on timber and wildlife habitat. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 27: 263–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovejoy S. 1982. Area-perimeter relation for rain and cloud areas. Science 216: 185–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig J.A., Wiens J.A. and Tongway D.J. 2000. A scaling rule for landscape patches and how it applies to conserving soil resources in Savannas. Ecosystems 3: 84–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milne B.T. 1991. Lessons from applying fractal models to landscape patterns. In: Turner M.G. and Gardner R.H. (eds), Quantitative Methods in Landscape Ecology, pp. 199–235. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naveh Z. and Lieberman A.S. 1984. Landscape Ecology: Theory and Application. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oksanen L. 2001. Logic of experiments in ecology: Is pseudoreplication a pseudoissue? Oikos 94: 27–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill R.V., DeAngelis D.L., Waide J.B. and Allen T.F.H. 1986. A Hierarchical Concept of Ecosystems. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill R.V., Krummel J.R., Gardner R.H., Sugihara G., Jackson B., DeAngelis D. L., Milne B.T., Turner M.G., Zygmunt B., Christensen S.W., Dale V.H. and Graham R.L. 1988. Indices of landscape pattern. Landscape Ecology 1: 153–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill R.V., Riitters K.H., Wickham J.D. and Jones K.B. 1999. Landscape pattern metrics and regional assessment. Ecosystem Health 5: 225–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Openshaw S. 1984. The Modifiable Areal Unit Problem. Geo Books, Norwich, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickett S.T.A. and Cadenasso M.L. 1995. Landscape ecology: spatial heterogeneity in ecological systems. Science 269: 331–334.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pickett S.T.A., Kolasa J. and Jones C.G. 1994. Ecological Understanding. Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Risser P.G., Karr J.R. and Forman R.T.T. 1984. Landscape Ecology: Directions and Approaches. Illinois Natural History Survey Special Publ. 2, Champaign, Illinois, USA.

  • Riitters K.H., O’Neill R.V., Hunsaker C.T., Wickham J.D., Yankee D.H., Timmins K.B.J. and Jackson B.L. 1995. A factor analysis of landscape pattern and structure metrics. Landscape Ecology 10: 23–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saura S. and Martinez-Millan J. 2001. Sensitivity of landscape pattern metrics to map spatial extent. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 67: 1027–1036.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner M.G. 1989. Landscape ecology: the effect of pattern on process. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 20: 171–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner M.G. 1990. Spatial and temporal analysis of landscape pattern. Landscape Ecology 4: 21–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner M.G. and Gardner R.H. 1991. Quantitative Methods in Landscape Ecology: The Analysis and Interpretation of Landscape Heterogeneity. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner M.G., Gardner R.H. and O’Neill R.V. 2001. Landscape Ecology in Theory and Practice: Pattern and Process. Springer-verlag, New York, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner M.G., O’Neill R.V., Gardner R.H. and Milne B.T. 1989. Effects of changing spatial scale on the analysis of landscape pattern. Landscape Ecology 3: 153–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urban D.L., O’Neill R.V. and Shugart H.H. 1987. Landscape ecology: A hierarchical perspective can help scientists understand spatial patterns. BioScience 37: 119–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickham J.D. and Riitters K.H. 1995. Sensitivity of landscape metrics to pixel size. International Journal of Remote Sensing 16: 3585–3595.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickham J.D., O’Neill R.V., Riitters K.H., Wade T.G. and Jones K.B. 1997. Sensitivity of landscape metrics to land cover misclassification and differences in land cover composition. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 63: 397–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens J.A. 1989. Spatial scaling in ecology. Functional Ecology 3: 385–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens J.A., Stenseth N.C., Van Horne B. and Ims R.A. 1993. Ecological mechanisms and landscape ecology. Oikos 66: 369–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu J. 1999. Hierarchy and scaling: Extrapolating information along a scaling ladder. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing 25: 367–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu J. 2000. Landscape Ecology: Pattern, Process, Scale and Hierarchy. Higher Education Press, Beijing, China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu J. 2004. Effects of changing scale on landscape pattern analysis: Scaling relations. Landscape Ecology 19: 125–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J. and Hobbs R. 2002. Key issues and research priorities in landscape ecology: An idiosyncratic synthesis. Landscape Ecology 17: 355–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu J. and Loucks O.L. 1995. From balance-of-nature to hierarchical patch dynamics: A paradigm shift in ecology. Quarter Review of Biology 70: 439–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu J., Shen W. Sun W. and Tueller P.T. 2002. Empirical patterns of the effects of changing scale on landscape metrics. Landscape Ecology 17: 761–782.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. USDA Forest Service Southern Research Station, Center for Forested Wetlands Research, 2730 Savannah Highway, Charleston, SC, 29414, USA

    Harbin Li

  2. Faculty of Ecology, Evolution, and Environmental Science, School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287-4501, USA

    Jianguo Wu

Authors
  1. Harbin Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jianguo Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harbin Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, H., Wu, J. Use and misuse of landscape indices. Landscape Ecol 19, 389–399 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:LAND.0000030441.15628.d6

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:LAND.0000030441.15628.d6

Search

Navigation