Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Eddy-induced reduction of biological production in eastern boundary upwelling systems

Nature Geoscience volume 4, pages 787–792 (2011)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Eddies and other mesoscale oceanic processes, such as fronts, can enhance biological production in the ocean, according to several open-ocean studies. The effect is thought to be particularly pronounced in low-nutrient environments, where mesoscale processes increase the net upward flux of limiting nutrients. However, eddies have been suggested to suppress production in the highly productive eastern boundary upwelling systems. Here, we examine the relationship between satellite-derived estimates of net primary production, of upwelling strength, and of eddy-kinetic energy—a measure of the intensity of mesoscale activity—in the four most productive eastern boundary upwelling systems. We show that high levels of eddy activity tend to be associated with low levels of biological production, indicative of a suppressive effect. Simulations using eddy-resolving models of two of these upwelling systems support the suggestion that eddies suppress production, and show that the downward export of organic matter is also reduced. According to these simulations, the reduction in production and export results from an eddy-induced transport of nutrients from the nearshore environment to the open ocean. Eddies might have a similar effect on marine productivity in other oceanic systems that are characterized by intense eddy activity, such as the Southern Ocean.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Relationship of observationally based estimates of NPP to upwelling strength and EKE in the four major EBUS.
Figure 2: Modelled impact of eddies on the distribution of primary and export production in the CalCS.
Figure 3: Vertical distribution of modelled density, nitrate, and total organic matter along offshore sections.
Figure 4: Offshore sections illustrating the role of eddies in inducing a lateral loss of total nitrogen (TN) from the CalCS.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Falkowski, P. G., Barber, R. T. & Smetacek, V. Biogeochemical controls and feedbacks on ocean primary production. Science 281, 200–206 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gruber, N. & Sarmiento, J. L. in THE SEA: Biological–Physical Interactions in the Oceans Vol. 12 (eds Robinson, A. R., McCarthy, J. J. & Rothschild, B. J.) 337–399 (Wiley, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Williams, R. G. & Follows, M. J. in Ocean Biogeochemistry (ed. Fasham, M. J. R.) Ch. 2, 19–51 (Springer, 2003).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Sarmiento, J. L. & Gruber, N. Ocean Biogeochemical Dynamics (Princeton Univ. Press, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Falkowski, P. G., Laws, E. A., Barber, R. T. & Murray, J. W. in Ocean Biogeochemistry (ed. Fasham, M. J. R.) Ch. 4, 99–121 (Springer, 2003).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Jenkins, W. J. Nitrate flux into the euphotic zone near Bermuda. Nature 331, 521–523 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Falkowski, P. G., Ziemann, D., Kolber, Z. & Bienfang, P. K. Role of eddy pumping in enhancing primary production in the ocean. Nature 352, 55–58 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. McGillicuddy, D. J. et al. Influence of mesoscale eddies on new production in the Sargasso Sea. Nature 394, 263–266 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Oschlies, A. & Garçon, V. Eddy-induced enhancement of primary production in a model of the North Atlantic Ocean. Nature 394, 266–269 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. McGillicuddy, D. J., Anderson, L. A., Doney, S. C. & Maltrud, M. E. Eddy-driven sources and sinks of nutrients in the upper ocean: Results from a 0.1° resolution model of the North Atlantic. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 17, 1035 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. McGillicuddy, D. J. et al. Eddy/wind interactions stimulate extraordinary mid-ocean plankton blooms. Science 316, 1021–1026 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Benitez-Nelson, C. R. et al. Mesoscale eddies drive increased silica export in the subtropical Pacific Ocean. Science 316, 1017–1021 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Oschlies, A. Model-derived estimates of new production: New results point toward lower values. Deep Sea Res. II 48, 2173–2197 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Flierl, G. & McGillicuddy, D. J. in THE SEA: Biological-Physical interactions in the Sea Vol. 12 (eds Robinson, A. R., McCarthy, J. J. & Rothschild, B. J.) Ch. 4, 113–185 (Wiley, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rossi, V., Lopez, C., Sudre, J., Hernandez-Garcia, E. & Garçon, V. Comparative study of mixing and biological activity of the Benguela and Canary upwelling systems. Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, L11602 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rossi, V. et al. Surface mixing and biological activity in the four Eastern boundary upwelling systems. Nonlinear Process. Geophys. 16, 557–568 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pauly, D. & Christensen, V. Primary production required to sustain global fisheries. Nature 374, 255–257 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fréon, P., Barrange, M. & Aristegui, J. Eastern boundary upwelling ecosystems: Integrative and comparative approaches. Progr. Oceanogr. 83, 1–14 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Thomas, A. C. Seasonal distribution of satellite-measured phytoplankton pigment concentration along the Chilean coast. J. Geophys. Res. 104, 25877–25890 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Correa-Ramirez, M. A., Hormazábal, S. & Yuras, G. Mesoscale eddies and high chlorophyll concentrations off central Chile (29° S–39° S). Geophys. Res. Lett. 34, L12604 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Barber, R. T. & Smith, R. L. in Analysis of Marine Ecosystems (ed. Longhurst, A. R.) 31–68 (Academic, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Carr, M-E. Estimation of potential productivity in eastern boundary currents using remote sensing. Deep Sea Res. II 49, 59–80 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Carr, M-E. & Kearns, E. J. Production regimes in four eastern boundary current systems. Deep Sea Res. II 50, 3199–3221 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Chavez, F. P. & Messié, M. A comparison of eastern boundary upwelling ecosystems. Progr. Oceanogr. 83, 80–96 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gruber, N. et al. Eddy-resolving simulation of plankton ecosystem dynamics in the California current system. Deep Sea Res. I 53, 1483–1516 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lachkar, Z. & Gruber, N. What controls biological productivity in coastal upwelling systems? Insights from a comparative modeling study. Biogeosci. Discuss. 5617–5652 (2011).

  27. Shchepetkin, A. F. & McWilliams, J. C. The regional oceanic modeling system (ROMS): A split-explicit, free-surface, topography-following-coordinate oceanic model. Ocean Modelling 9, 347–404 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Marchesiello, P., McWilliams, J. C. & Shchepetkin, A. F. Equilibrium structure and dynamics of the California current system. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 33, 753–783 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Levy, M., Klein, P. & Treguier, A-M. Impact of sub-mesoscale physics on production and subduction of phytoplankton in an oligotrophic regime. J. Mar. Res. 59, 535–565 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Capet, X., Colas, F., McWilliams, J., Penven, P. & Marchesiello, in Ocean Modeling in an eddying regime (eds Hecht, M. & Hasumi, H.) 131–147 (Geophysical Monograph Series, no. 177, AGU, 2008).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  31. Marchesiello, P. & Estrade, P. Eddy activity and mixing in upwelling systems: A comparative study of Northwest Africa and California regions. Int. J. Earth Sci. 98, 299–308 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Lee, M-M. & Williams, R. G. The role of eddies in the isopycnic transfer of nutrients and their impact on biological production. J. Mar. Res. 58, 895–917 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Barth, J. A. et al. Injection of carbon from the shelf to offshore beneath the euphotic zone in the California current. J. Geophys. Res. 107, 3057 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Bograd, S. J. & Mantyla, A. W. On the subduction of upwelled waters in the California current. J. Mar. Syst. 63, 863–885 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Aristegui, J. et al. Variability in plankton community structure, metabolism, and vertical carbon fluxes along an upwelling filament (Cape Juby, NW Africa). Progr. Oceanogr. 62, 95–113 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Torres-Valdés, S. et al. Distribution of dissolved organic nutrients and their effect on export production over the Atlantic Ocean. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 23, GB4019 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Messié, M. et al. Potential new production estimates in four eastern boundary upwelling ecosystems. Progr. Oceanogr. 83, 151158 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Patti, B. et al. Factors responsible for the differences in satellite-based chlorophyll a concentration between the major upwelling areas. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 76, 775–786 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Chase, Z., Strutton, P. G. & Hales, B. Iron links river runoff and shelf width to phytoplankton biomass along the U.S. West Coast. Geophys. Res. Lett. 34, L04607 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Pasquero, C., Bracco, A. & Provenzale, A. Impact of the spatiotemporal variability of the nutrient flux on primary productivity in the ocean. J. Geophys. Res. 110, C07005 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. McWilliams, J. C. in Eddy-Resolving Ocean Modeling (eds Hecht, M. &Hasumi, H.) 5–15 (Geophysical Monograph Series, no. 177, AGU, 2008).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  42. Stammer, D. Global characteristics of ocean variability estimated from regional TOPEX/POSEIDON altimeter measurements. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 27, 1743–1769 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Bakun, A. Coastal ocean upwelling. Science 247, 198–201 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Behrenfeld, M. J. & Falkowski, P. G. Photosynthetic rates derived from satellite-based chlorophyll concentration. Limnol. Oceanogr. 42, 1–20 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Bakun, A. Coastal upwelling indices, west coast of North America, 1946–71. NOAA Tech. Rep. NMFS SSRF-671, U.S. Dept. of Commerce (1973).

  46. Yelland, M. & Taylor, P. K. Wind stress measurements from the open ocean. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 26, 541–558 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Volkov, D. L., Larnicol, G. & Dorandeu, J. Improving the quality of satellite altimetry data over continental shelves. J. Geophys. Res. 112, C06020 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported financially by ETH Zürich, by the FP7 project CarboChange (Project reference 264879), by the National Aeronautics and Space Agency (NASA-NNG04GJ89G), and by the US National Science Foundation (NSF-ITR and NSF-ICRR). We also thank the Center for Climate Systems Modelling (C2SM) for support. We are grateful to N. Lovenduski for providing us with high-resolution satellite-based climatologies of surface winds and primary production. The EKE product was produced by SSALTO/DUACS as part of the Environment and Climate European Enact project (EVK2-CT2001-00117) and distributed by AVISO, with support from CNES.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Gian-Kasper Plattner

    Present address: Present address: Climate and Environmental Physics, University of Bern, Bern 3012, Switzerland,

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Environmental Physics, Institute of Biogeochemistry and Pollutant Dynamics, ETH Zurich, Zurich 8092, Switzerland

    Nicolas Gruber, Zouhair Lachkar, Matthias Münnich & Gian-Kasper Plattner

  2. Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA

    Hartmut Frenzel & James C. McWilliams

  3. Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, LEGOS, 31400 Toulouse, France

    Patrick Marchesiello

  4. Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, UCLA, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA

    James C. McWilliams

  5. Tokyo University of Marine Science and Technology, Tokyo 108-8477, Japan

    Takeyoshi Nagai

Authors
  1. Nicolas Gruber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zouhair Lachkar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hartmut Frenzel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Patrick Marchesiello
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Matthias Münnich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. James C. McWilliams
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Takeyoshi Nagai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Gian-Kasper Plattner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

N.G. designed the study, co-analysed the data, and wrote the paper. Z.L. assisted in the design of the study, performed most of the experiments, and led the data analyses. H.F. and T.N. ran earlier experiments and assisted in the analyses. P.M., J.C.M., G.K.P. and M.M. provided conceptual and theoretical advice with regard to design and analyses. All authors discussed the results and implications and commented on the manuscript at all stages.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Nicolas Gruber or Gian-Kasper Plattner.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information (PDF 24558 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gruber, N., Lachkar, Z., Frenzel, H. et al. Eddy-induced reduction of biological production in eastern boundary upwelling systems. Nature Geosci 4, 787–792 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1273

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1273

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing Microbiology

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Microbiology newsletter — what matters in microbiology research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Microbiology