Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Solar farside magnetograms from deep learning analysis of STEREO/EUVI data

Nature Astronomy volume 3, pages 397–400 (2019)Cite this article

Subjects

Matters Arising to this article was published on 12 February 2021

Abstract

Solar magnetograms are important for studying solar activity and predicting space weather disturbances1. Farside magnetograms can be constructed from local helioseismology without any farside data2,3,4, but their quality is lower than that of typical frontside magnetograms. Here we generate farside solar magnetograms from STEREO/Extreme UltraViolet Imager (EUVI) 304-Å images using a deep learning model based on conditional generative adversarial networks (cGANs). We train the model using pairs of Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO)/Atmospheric Imaging Assembly (AIA) 304-Å images and SDO/Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI) magnetograms taken from 2011 to 2017 except for September and October each year. We evaluate the model by comparing pairs of SDO/HMI magnetograms and cGAN-generated magnetograms in September and October. Our method successfully generates frontside solar magnetograms from SDO/AIA 304-Å images and these are similar to those of the SDO/HMI, with Hale-patterned active regions being well replicated. Thus we can monitor the temporal evolution of magnetic fields from the farside to the frontside of the Sun using SDO/HMI and farside magnetograms generated by our model when farside extreme-ultraviolet data are available. This study presents an application of image-to-image translation based on cGANs to scientific data.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Comparison between HMI magnetograms and AI-generated ones from SDO/AIA 304-Å images.
Fig. 2: A series of 304-Å images and magnetograms.
Fig. 3: A temporal evolution of total unsigned magnetic flux of the NOAA active region 12087 from 3 to 19 June 2014.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The code is available at https://github.com/tykimos/SolarMagGAN. In the readme file, we explain the architecture and selected hyperparameters. The SDO data are available from the SDO data centre (https://sdo.gsfc.nasa.gov/data/), the Joint Science Operations Center (http://jsoc.stanford.edu/) and the Korean Data Center for SDO (http://sdo.kasi.re.kr/). The STEREO data are available from the STEREO Science Center (https://stereo-ssc.nascom.nasa.gov/data.shtml). We used the following open-source packages: NumPy (http://www.numpy.org) and Keras (https://keras.io/).

References

  1. Solanki, S. K., Inhester, B. & Schussler, M. The solar magnetic field. Rep. Prog. Phys. 69, 563–668 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lindsey, C. & Braun, D. C. Seismic images of the far side of the Sun. Science 287, 1799–1801 (2000).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Braun, D. C. & Lindsey, C. Seismic imaging of the far hemisphere of the Sun. Astrophys. J. Lett. 560, 189–192 (2001).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lindsey, C. & Braun, D. C. Seismic imaging of the Sun’s far hemisphere and its applications in space weather forecasting. Space Weather 15, 761–781 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Goodfellow, I. et al. Generative adversarial nets. Adv. Neur. 2014, 2672–2680 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Isola, P., Zhu, J.-Y., Zhou, T. & Efros, A. A. Image-to-image translation with conditional adversarial networks. IEEE Proc. Comput. Vision Pattern Recog. 2017, 1125–1134 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pesnell, W. D., Thompson, B. J. & Chamberlin, P. C. The Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO). Sol. Phys. 275, 3–15 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lemen, J. R. et al. The Atmospheric Imaging Assembly (AIA) on the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO). Sol. Phys. 275, 17–40 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Schou, J. et al. Design and ground calibration of the Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI) instrument on the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO). Sol. Phys. 275, 229–259 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Howard, R. A. et al. Sun Earth Connection Coronal and Heliospheric Investigation (SECCHI). Space Sci. Rev. 136, 67–115 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kaiser, M. L. et al. The STEREO mission: an introduction. Space Sci. Rev. 136, 5–16 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Dere, K. P. et al. CHIANTIan atomic database for emission lines. Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. 125, 149–173 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Landi, E., Zanna, G. D., Young, P. R., Dere, K. P. & Mason, H. E. CHIANTI—an atomic database for emission lines. XII. Version 7 of the database. Astrophys. J. 744, 99–107 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Nitta, N. V. et al. Soft X-ray fluxes of major flares far behind the limb as estimated using STEREO EUV images. Sol. Phys. 288, 241–254 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu, Y. et al. Comparison of line-of-sight magnetograms taken by the Solar Dynamics Observatory/Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager and Solar and Heliospheric Observatory/Michelson Doppler Imager. Sol. Phys. 279, 295–316 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the numerous team members who contributed to the success of the SDO mission, as well as the STEREO mission. We acknowledge the community efforts devoted to developing the open-source packages that were used in this work (NumPy and Keras). This work was supported by the BK21+ Program through the National Research Foundation (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education of Korea, the Basic Science Research Program through the NRF funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF-2016R1A2B4013131), a grant from the NRF funded by the Korean government (number NRF-2013M1A3A3A02042232), the Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute under the R&D programme supervised by the Ministry of Science and ICT, the Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute under the R&D programme ‘Development of a Solar Coronagraph on International Space Station (Project No. 2019-1-850-02)’ supervised by the Ministry of Science and ICT, a grant from the Institute for Information & Communications Technology Promotion (IITP) funded by the Korea government (MSIP) (number 2018-0-01422, ‘Study on Analysis and Prediction Technique of Solar Flares’), and the Artificial Intelligence Laboratory at the InSpace Co., Ltd. The SDO data were (partly) provided by the Korea Data Center (KDC) for SDO in cooperation with NASA and the SDO/HMI Team, which is operated by the KASI.

Author information

Author notes

  1. These authors contributed equally: Taeyoung Kim, Eunsu Park, Harim Lee.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Space Research, Kyung Hee University, Yongin, South Korea

    Taeyoung Kim, Eunsu Park, Harim Lee, Yong-Jae Moon & Daye Lim

  2. Department of Astronomy and Space Science, College of Applied Science, Kyung Hee University, Yongin, South Korea

    Harim Lee, Yong-Jae Moon & Il-Hyun Cho

  3. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, College of Electronics and Information, Kyung Hee University, Yongin, South Korea

    Sung-Ho Bae & Lokwon Kim

  4. Space Science Division, Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute, Daejeon, South Korea

    Soojeong Jang & Kyung-Suk Cho

  5. InSpace Co., Ltd., Daejeon, South Korea

    Myungjin Choi

  6. Department of Astronomy and Space Science, University of Science and Technology, Daejeon, South Korea

    Kyung-Suk Cho

Authors
  1. Taeyoung Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Eunsu Park
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Harim Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yong-Jae Moon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sung-Ho Bae
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Daye Lim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Soojeong Jang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Lokwon Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Il-Hyun Cho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Myungjin Choi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Kyung-Suk Cho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

T.K., E.P. and H.L. contributed equally to this study. T.K., E.P., H.L. and Y.-J.M. devised the method, analysed data and wrote the manuscript. S.-H.B. participated in discussing the results and contributed to improving the methodology. D.L., S.J., I.-H.C., L.K., M.C. and K.-S.C. participated in discussing the results.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yong-Jae Moon.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, T., Park, E., Lee, H. et al. Solar farside magnetograms from deep learning analysis of STEREO/EUVI data. Nat Astron 3, 397–400 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-019-0711-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-019-0711-5

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing AI and Robotics

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics newsletter — what matters in AI and robotics research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics