Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Matters Arising
  • Published:

Methane as a dominant absorber in the habitable-zone sub-Neptune K2-18 b

Nature Astronomy volume 6, pages 537–540 (2022)Cite this article

Subjects

arising from A. Tsiaras et al. Nature Astronomy https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-019-0878-9 (2019)

We modelled the composition of K2-18 b using the Exo-REM radiative-equilibrium model7,8,9 adapted for irradiated giant exoplanets10 and calculated the expected transit spectra. Beyond H2/He, Exo-REM incorporates 12 gaseous absorbers, including all potential ones in the HST transit data: that is, H2O, CO, CO2, CH4, NH3 and H2S, but no cloud opacity. Mixing ratio profiles are calculated either from thermochemical equilibrium or allowing for some non-equilibrium chemistry between C-, O- and N-bearing compounds11. We investigated a range of metallicity of 1–1,000, defined here as the ratio of the abundance of elements heavier than hydrogen or helium (relative to hydrogen) to that in the Sun. For the eddy-mixing coefficient (Kzz), a parameter that controls the transport-induced quenching of chemical equilibria, we investigated a range of 106–1010 cm2 s-1.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Transmission spectra of K2-18 b calculated for different atmospheric compositions.
Fig. 2: Relative contributions of H2O and CH4 to the transit depth.

Data availability

The observational data that support the findings of this study are included in refs. 4,6. The model data that support the plots within this paper are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Code availability

The Exo-REM source code and the input files used in this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. The current version of Exo-REM is available through the Observatoire de Paris GitHub website: https://gitlab.obspm.fr/Exoplanet-Atmospheres-LESIA/exorem.

References

  1. Montet, T. et al. Stellar and planetary properties of K2 Campaign 1 candidates and validation of 17 planets, including a planet receiving Earth-like insolation. Astrophys. J. 809, 25 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cloutier, R. et al. Characterization of the K2-18 multi-planetary system with HARPS. A habitable zone super-Earth and discovery of a second, warm super-Earth on a non-coplanar orbit. Astron. Astrophys. 608, A35 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cloutier, R. et al. Confirmation of the radial velocity super-Earth K2-18c with HARPS and CARMENES. Astron. Astrophys. 621, A49 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Benneke, B. et al. Water vapor and clouds on the habitable-zone sub-Neptune exoplanet K2-18b. Astrophys. J. Lett. 887, L14 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Benneke, B. et al. Spitzer observations confirm and rescue the habitable-zone super-Earth K2-18b for future characterization. Astrophys. J. 834, 187 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Tsiaras, A., Waldmann, I. P., Tinetti, G., Tennyson, J. & Yurchenko, S. N. Water vapour in the atmosphere of the habitable-zone eight-Earth-mass planet K2-18 b. Nat. Astron. 3, 1086–1091 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Baudino, J.-L. et al. Interpreting the photometry and spectroscopy of directly imaged planets: a new atmospheric model applied to β Pictoris b and SPHERE observations. Astron. Astrophys. 582, A83 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Baudino, J.-L. et al. Toward the analysis of JWST exoplanet spectra: identifying troublesome model parameters. Astrophys. J. 850, 150 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Charnay, B. et al. A self-consistent cloud model for brown dwarfs and young giant exoplanets: comparison with photometric and spectroscopic observations. Astrophys. J. 854, 172 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Blain, D., Charnay, B. & Bézard, B. 1 D atmospheric study of the temperate sub-Neptune K2-18b. Astron. Astrophys. 66, A15 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zahnle, K. J. & Marley, M. S. Methane, carbon monoxide and ammonia in brown dwarfs and self-luminous giant planets. Astrophys. J. 797, 41 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rey, M., Nikitin, A. V. & Tyuterev, V. G. Accurate theoretical methane line lists in the infrared up to 3000 K and quasi-continuum absorption/emission modeling for astrophysical applications. Astrophys. J. 847, 105 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Benneke, B. et al. A sub-Neptune exoplanet with a low-metallicity methane-depleted atmosphere and Mie-scattering clouds. Nat. Astron. 3, 813–821 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Benneke, B. & Seager, S. How to distinguish between cloudy mini-Neptunes and water/volatile-dominated super-Earths. Astrophys. J. 778, 153 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mahusudhan, N., Nixon, M. C., Welbanks, L., Piette, A. A. A. & Booth, R. A. The interior and atmosphere of the habitable-zone exoplanet K2-18b. Astrophys. J. Lett. 891, L7 (2020).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Polyansky, O. L. et al. ExoMol molecular line lists XXX: a complete high-accuracy line list for water. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 480, 2597–2608 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Charnay, B., Blain, D., Bézard, B., Leconte, J. & Turbet, M. Formation and dynamics of water clouds on temperate sub-Neptunes: the example of K2-18b. Astron. Astrophys. 646, A171 (2021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Peacock, S., Barman, T., Shkolnik, E. L., Hauschildt, P. H. & Fuhrmeister, B. Predicting the extreme ultraviolet radiation environment of exoplanets around low-mass stars: GJ 832, GJ 176, and GJ 436. Astrophys. J. 886, 77 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Loyd, R. O. P. et al. The MUSCLES treasury survey. III. X-ray to infrared spectra of 11 M and K stars hosting planets. Astrophys. J. 824, 102 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rogers, L. A. & Seager, S. A framework for quantifying the degeneracies of exoplanet interior compositions. Astrophys. J. 722, 974 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lodders, K. in Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Planetary Science. https://oxfordre.com/planetaryscience/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190647926.001.0001/acrefore-9780190647926-e-145 (2020).

  22. Thorngren, D. P., Fortney, J. J., Murray-Clay, R. A. & Lopez, E. D. The mass-metallicity relation for giant planets. Astrophys. J. 831, 64 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Al-Refaie, A. F., Changeat, Q., Waldmann, I. P. & Tinetti, G. TauREx III: a fast, dynamic, and extendable framework for retrievals. Astrophys. J. 917, 37 (2021).

Download references

Acknowledgements

D.B. acknowledges financial support from the ANR (Agence Nationale de la Recherche) project e-PYTHEAS (ANR-16-CE31-0005-01). This work received funding from the Programme National de Planétologie (PNP) of the Institut National des Sciences de l’Univers (INSU) of the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), co-funded by the Centre National d’Études Spatiales (CNES).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Doriann Blain

    Present address: Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, Heidelberg, Germany

Authors and Affiliations

  1. LESIA, Observatoire de Paris, Université PSL, Sorbonne Université, Université Paris Cité, CNRS, Meudon, France

    Bruno Bézard, Benjamin Charnay & Doriann Blain

Authors
  1. Bruno Bézard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Benjamin Charnay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Doriann Blain
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

B.B. initiated the development of the Exo-REM model, performed the analysis and wrote the paper with the help of B.C. and D.B. B.C. contributed to the development of the Exo-REM model, compared Exo-REM and TauREx outputs and wrote the relevant section. D.B. calculated the tables of c-k absorption coefficients and adapted the Exo-REM model to irradiated planets, with contributions from B.B and B.C. All authors contributed to the interpretation of the results and commented on the manuscript at all stages.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruno Bézard.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Comparison of model transmission spectra with the observational data set.

The transmission spectrum of K2-18b calculated from our best-fitting self-consistent model (red) is compared with the HST/WFC3 data6, the Kepler/K2 data point4 and the Spitzer/IRAC measurements4 at 3.5 and 4.5 μm. A model including only H2O absorption is shown in blue. For each model, the planet’s radius has been adjusted to minimize the χ2 residuals. The location of the main absorption bands of H2O (blue squares) and CH4 (green squares) are indicated. While both models are similar in the spectral range covered by the HST data, they vastly differ at longer wavelengths where the CH4 bands no longer coincide with the strong H2O bands. The rightmost vertical axis represents the pressure levels for our best-fitting model having a metallicity of 180 (red).

Extended Data Fig. 2 Best-fit atmospheric model.

Temperature profile (thick black line) and abundance profiles of selected molecular absorbers (coloured lines) for our best-fit Exo-REM model. The metallicity is 180 and the eddy mixing coefficient is 108 cm2 s−1. In this model, water vapour does not condense and water clouds are not expected to form. The mean molecular mass is 6.2 amu.

Extended Data Fig. 3 Transmission spectra of K2-18 b calculated for different atmospheric compositions.

Spectra calculated from our self-consistent model Exo-REM for a metallicity of 180 and an eddy mixing coefficient of 108 cm2 s-1, are compared with HST data as reduced by Benneke et al.4. All absorbers are included in the spectral calculation shown in red. Spectra including absorption from H2O only (blue) and from CH4 only (green) are also shown. The planet’s radius has been adjusted in each case to minimize the residuals with the whole dataset4.

Extended Data Fig. 4 Contributions of different absorbers to the transit depth.

Transmission spectra of K2-18 b calculated for the atmospheric composition shown in Extended Data Fig. 2 using the forward model of TauREx 3 (ref.23). The orange line corresponds to the spectrum with molecular absorption from H2O, CH4, CO, NH3 and collision-induced absorption (CIA) from H2-H2 and H2-He. Other coloured lines show the contribution of each molecule.

Extended Data Fig. 5 Posterior distributions obtained from free retrievals.

The retrieval tool TauREx 3 (https://taurex3-public.readthedocs.io/en/latest/) was applied to the HST data reduced by Tsiaras et al.6 with planetary radius (expressed in Jovian radius), temperature, log of H2O, CH4 and N2 volume mixing ratios, and cloud-top pressure (Pa) as free parameters. The posterior distributions of the log(H2O) and log(CH4) are very broad with a denser region for the ranges [−3.5:−1] and [−4:−0.3] respectively. A large fraction of the parameter space corresponds to a CH4-rich atmosphere whose absorption at 1.4 micron is dominated by CH4. The parameters of our best fit Exo-REM model having a metallicity of 180 (Extended Data Fig. 2), shown as an orange dot in the log(CH4)-log(H2O) space, are globally consistent with the TauREx retrievals.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bézard, B., Charnay, B. & Blain, D. Methane as a dominant absorber in the habitable-zone sub-Neptune K2-18 b. Nat Astron 6, 537–540 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-022-01678-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-022-01678-z

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing