Abstract
The EuFe2âxNixAs2 (with 0ââ¤âxââ¤â0.4) compounds exhibiting 3d and/or 4f magnetic order were investigated by means of 57Fe and 151Eu Mössbauer spectroscopy. Additionally, results for EuNi2As2 are reported for comparison. It was found that spin-density-wave order of the Fe itinerant moments is monotonically suppressed by Ni-substitution. However, the 3d magnetic order survives at the lowest temperature up to at least xâ=â0.12 and it is certainly completely suppressed for xâ=â0.20. The Eu localized moments order regardless of the Ni concentration, but undergo a spin reorientation with increasing x from alignment parallel to the a-axis in the parent compound, toward c-axis alignment for xâ>â0.07. Change of the 4f spins ordering from antiferromagnetic to ferromagnetic takes place simultaneously with a disappearance of the 3d spins order what is the evidence of a strong coupling between magnetism of Eu2+ ions and the conduction electrons of [Fe2âxNixAs2]2- layers. The Fe nuclei experience the transferred hyperfine magnetic field due to the Eu2+ ordering for Ni-substituted samples with xâ>â0.04, while the transferred field is undetectable in EuFe2As2 and for compound with a low Ni-substitution level. It seems that the 4f ferromagnetic component arising from a tilt of the Eu2+ moments to the crystallographic c-axis leads to the transferred magnetic field at the Fe atoms. Superconductivity is not observed down to 1.8 K, although a comparison with 57Fe and 151Eu Mössbauer data for EuFe2As2-based superconductors indicates a similar magnetic structure.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The EuFe2As2-based compounds are unique laboratory for investigations of interplay between magnetism and superconductivity (SC), as well as they are a playground for peculiar competition between itinerant 3d magnetic order of the spin-density-wave (SDW) type and the localized 4f magnetic moments. EuFe2As2 belongs to the â122â family of parent compounds of iron-based superconductors, the same as AFe2As2 (Aâ=âCa, Sr, Ba)1. It crystallizes in the tetragonal ThCr2Si2-type structure with a space group I4/mmm at room temperature, distorted into orthorhombic structure with space group Fmmm upon cooling. Structural transition is accompanied by the Fe-3d itinerant SDW ordering at TSDWâ=â190 K with saturation moment Msatâ=â0.99 µB along a-axis. The Eu-4f localized magnetic moments order in an antiferromagnetic (AFM) A-type structure at TNâ=â19 K with effective moment µeffâ=â7.94 µB2. The neutron diffraction studies suggest rather weak coupling between the Fe and Eu magnetism, but it was found that the strength of interplay between 3d and 4f electrons can be tunable by chemical doping. The Fe magnetic order drives the structural phase transition, which indicates a strong coupling between structural and magnetic components2. The Eu2+ ions are located in the planes perpendicular to the c-axis separating [Fe2As2]2- layers. They are in a divalent 8S7/2 state without orbital contribution to the 4f magnetic moments and a spin-only moments are aligned along the crystallographic a-axis. The A-type order of Eu2+ moments means that they are coupled ferromagnetically within the plane and antiferromagnetically between the planes. Adjacent europium planes are about 6 à apart2, hence direct overlap of interplanar 4f orbitals can be neglected. It can be assumed that the charge carrier mediated Ruderman-Kittel-Kasuya-Yosida (RKKY) interaction is responsible for the AFM exchange between interplanar Eu moments. An interesting observation is a field-induced spin reorientation in the presence of a magnetic field along both the a and c axes, which causes that the ground-state AFM configuration of Eu2+ moments transforms into a ferromagnetic (FM) structure with moments along the applied field direction3. Another interesting effect for EuFe2As2 is that the SDW transition is suppressed by applied pressure and bulk superconductivity appears in the pressure range from 2.5 to 3 GPa4,5. The Eu2+ AFM order and the Néel temperature TN reveal no changes up to 3 GPa, then the applied pressure above 6 GPa causes a 4f spin reorientation and the Eu2+ FM order, while further pressure increase above 8 GPa results in suppression of the FM state, which is connected with the Eu valence change from a divalent state to a nearly trivalent state6,7.
Superconductivity in EuFe2As2-based compounds can be achieved by substitutions on either one of three lattice sites as well as by pressure. There are many possibilities for hole and electron doping or isovalent substitution leading to SC, e.g. Eu1âxAxFe2As2 with Aâ=âK, Na, La, and EuFe2âxTxAs2 with Tâ=âCo, Ru, Ir, or EuFe2(As1âxPx)21. It is interesting to note, that 4f magnetic order occurs within superconducting material as well, and doping leading to superconductivity usually causes some 4f magnetic moment reorientation (canting) with a generation of the 4f FM component8,9,10. The iron-based superconductors are known as materials for which the SC occurs in proximity to a magnetic instability and the magnetic fluctuations could play a key role in the Cooper pairs formation. Hence, it is important to establish the nature of magnetism in these materials.
The electron doping is achieved by partial substitution of the Fe by Ni in EuFe2âxNixAs2 system with structural stability up to xâ=â0.4, while the Eu sublattice remains chemically intact. Although Ni-substitution causes suppression of the SDW, nevertheless the SC has not been observed down to 2Â K11.
The Mössbauer spectroscopy for 57Fe and 151Eu isotopes is a useful local probe for simultaneous investigations of the mutual interaction between the magnetic Fe and Eu sublattices. It has also been shown that the Mössbauer hyperfine parameters are sensitive to change of the electronic charge modulations in the iron-based superconductors12,13,14. A previous 57Fe and 151Eu Mössbauer investigations have found a significant coupling between the 3d and 4f magnetic subsystems in the EuFe2As2-based compounds8,10,15,16,17,18,19,20. The transferred magnetic hyperfine field from the 4f-Eu order to the Fe nuclei even in the superconducting state was reported for the first time by Nowik and Felner for EuFe2(As1âxPx)210. An enhancement of Fe spin dynamics closely above superconducting critical temperature and related to enhanced Eu spin fluctuations was reported for superconducting EuFe2(As0.81P0.19)215 and EuFe2(As0.7P0.3)216. EuFe2âxTxAs2 with the same substitution level x â 0.2 for Tâ=âCo (superconductor) and Tâ=âNi (non-superconductor) show practically the same Mössbauer spectra, confirming that only the Fe magnetic state affects the ordered Eu sublattice direction17 and the 4f electronic system is unaffected by the SC transition. Substitution of Eu site by K atoms gives rise to superconductivity, but long-range 4f magnetic order is suppressed due to the magnetic moment dilution at the rare-earth site in Eu0.5K0.5Fe2As2 system18. In Eu(Fe0.86Ir0.14)2As2, the SDW order is fully suppressed and the Eu2+ moments order magnetically with an appreciable FM component, which causes resistivity reentrance below the superconducting transition temperature19. These brief examples of Mössbauer spectroscopy studies show peculiar phenomena existing in the EuFe2As2-based systems due to the 3d-4f spin interplay.
On the other hand, the electron doping by the Ni atoms substituting the Fe atoms causes interesting effects in the iron-pnictide superconducting compounds. In (Eu0.5K0.5)Fe2âxNixAs2, the compensation of holes (K doping at the Eu site) by the electrons (Ni doping at the Fe site) leads to the reappearance of the resistivity anomaly presumably due to the SDW transition21, which is fully suppressed for (Eu0.5K0.5)Fe2As2. In particular, the anomaly associated with the SDW is observed at about 200Â K for xâ=â0.24, which is close to the SDW transition temperature for parent EuFe2As2. It means that the electron doping almost compensates holes in (Eu0.5K0.5)Fe1.76Ni0.24As221. The itinerant FM ordering associated with the Co/Ni spins was discovered in Eu(Co1-xNix)2As222, while it is known that the Co atoms do not participate in the magnetic ordering in EuCo2As2. The same phenomenon occurs in CaK(Fe1-xNix)4As4 where the itinerant SDW magnetism and superconductivity coexist, while no magnetic hyperfine field (e.g. no static magnetic order) was detected for CaKFe4As4 superconductor23. The Ni doping leads to superconductivity of the â112â compound EuFeAs2, i.e. the magnetism of the 4f-Eu order at 44Â K and the 3d-Fe SDW order at 57Â K coexist with the superconducting transition at 14Â K for EuFe0.97Ni0.03As224,25.
The Ni doping of the â122â iron-pnictide parent compounds AFe2As2 (Aâ=âCa, Sr, Ba) changes these systems in the same following way: 1) the SDW is suppressed with increasing Ni concentration, 2) the SC appears. The maximum critical temperature and optimal substitution level x for AFe2âxNixAs2 (Aâ=âCa26, Sr27, Ba28) are as follows: 15Â K for xâ=â0.06, 10Â K for xâ=â0.18, and 21Â K for xâ=â0.10, respectively. The same effect of the SDW suppression is observed in the fourth member of â122â family, i.e. EuFe2âxNixAs211. Hence, it raised the question âwhy is it not a superconductor?â. Of course the suspect culprit is the 4f magnetism.
The EuFe2âxNixAs2 system was studied by means of Mössbauer spectroscopy in early years of a fascination with the iron-based superconductors and the results for one composition with xâ=â0.20 and for selected temperatures were reported17,29,30. The present contribution reports Mössbauer results obtained by means of 57Fe and 151Eu spectroscopy applied to systematic investigations of the magnetic properties of the Ni-substituted EuFe2As2 compounds with an emphasis on study of the 3d-4f spin interaction.
Experiment
Single crystals of EuFe2âxNixAs2 were grown using the Sn flux method. The starting materials, high-purity elements of Ca, Fe, Ni, As, and Sn, were taken in the atomic ratio of Eu:Fe:Ni:As:Snâ=â1:(1âx):10x:2:3026. The constituent components were loaded into alumina crucibles and placed in silica ampules sealed under vacuum. The ampules were heated to 1050 °C and kept at this temperature for 10 h to ensure complete dissolving of all components in molten Sn. Next, the ampules were slowly (2â3 °C/h) cooled down to 600 °C, then the liquid Sn flux was removed by centrifugation. The chemical composition of the obtained crystals was determined using the energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDX) and the following Ni content has been received: xâ=â0, 0.04, 0.07, 0.08, 0.10, 0.12, 0.20, and 0.40. Crystal lattice constants and phase purity were characterized by powder x-ray diffraction (XRD) using PANalytical XâPert Pro diffractometer. Resistivity measurements were performed by the four probe technique using Quantum Design PPMS system.
57Fe Mössbauer spectroscopy measurements were performed in transmission mode for 14.41-keV transition. The samples with xâ=â0, 0.04, 0.07, 0.10, 0.12, and 0.40 were selected for this investigation. The RENON MsAa-4 spectrometer operated in the round-corner triangular mode and equipped with the LND Kr-filled proportional detector was applied. The HeâNe laser based interferometer was used to calibrate a velocity scale. A single line commercial 57Co(Rh) source made by RITVERC GmbH was kept at room temperature. The source linewidth Îsâ=â0.106(5) mm/s and the effective source recoilless fraction were derived from fit of the Mössbauer spectrum of 10-μm-thick α-Fe foil. The absorbers were prepared using 31 mg of the EuFe2âxNixAs2 samples in the powder form and mixed with a fine powder of B4C carrier. The absorber thickness (surface density) for 57Fe Mössbauer measurements amounted to 15 mg/cm2 of investigated material. The SVT-400 cryostat by Janis Research Inc. was used to maintain temperature of absorbers.
151Eu Mössbauer transmission spectra for 21.6-keV resonant transition were collected applying 151SmF3 source kept at room temperature and a scintillation detector. The samples with xâ=â0, 0.07, and 0.10 were selected for this investigation. Additionally, the sample of EuNi2As2 was measured. The absorbers were made in the same way, albeit they contained about twice as much the EuFe2âxNixAs2 material per unit area. Data for 57Fe and 151Eu Mössbauer hyperfine parameters were processed by means of the Mosgraf-2009 software within the transmission integral approximation. Europium and iron nuclei in EuFe2âxNixAs2 experience almost axially symmetric electric field gradient (EFG) with the principal component aligned with the c-axis of the crystallographic unit cell. The 57Fe spectra with SDW component were processed by treating the electric quadrupole interaction in the first order approximation. Remaining spectra were processed by application the full Hamiltonian diagonalization in both nuclear states. The europium hyperfine anomaly (the Bohr-Weisskopf effect) was accounted for 151Eu spectra. The spectral center shifts are reported with respect to the center shift of the room temperature α-Fe or room temperature 151SmF3 source, respectively.
Mössbauer spectra evaluation within SDW model
A transmission integral approximation has been applied to fit Mössbauer spectra exhibiting magnetic hyperfine interaction. The SDW magnetism should be viewed as modulations of the spin polarization of the itinerant electrons. The absorption profile of the SDW spectral component was processed by applying a quasi-continuous distribution of the magnetic hyperfine field B. For the Fe magnetic moment being collinear with the hyperfine filed, the amplitude of SDW along the direction parallel to the SDW wave vector can be expressed as a series of odd harmonics31,32,33,34:
where B(qx), q, x, and qx denote respectively the magnetic hyperfine field arising from SDW, the wave number of SDW, relative position of Fe atom along the propagation direction of stationary SDW, and phase shift. The symbols h2nâ1 denote the amplitudes of subsequent harmonics. The index N enumerates maximum relevant harmonic. Amplitudes up to seven subsequent harmonics (Nâ=â7) have been fitted to the spectral shape. The constant number of N harmonics was chosen in such a way as to obtain a good-quality fit of the experimental spectrum represented by the parameter Ï2 per degree of freedom of the order of 1.0. The argument qx satisfies the following condition: 0ââ¤âqxââ¤â2Ï due to the periodicity of the SDW. Further details of the Mössbauer spectra evaluation within SDW model can be found in Ref.31. Because the average amplitude of SDW described by expression (1) equals zero, thus the root-mean-square amplitude of SDW expressed asâ<âBâ>ââ=â\({\sqrt {\left\langle {B^{2} } \right\rangle } = \sqrt {\frac{1}{2}\sum\limits_{n = 1}^{N} {h_{2n - 1}^{2} } } }\) was used as the average magnetic hyperfine field of the SDW33. Here, the parameterâ<âBâ>âis proportional to the value of the electronic magnetic moment per unit volume.
Results and discussion
Lattice parameters and electrical resistivity
Lattice parameters of the tetragonal unit cell of EuFe2âxNixAs2 at room temperature are shown in Fig. 1. In the range from xâ=â0 to xâ=â0.40, the lattice constant a increases slightly by about 0.3%, while the constant c contracts by 1.1%. Hence, the volume of the unit cell decreases by 0.5%, leading to the more compact packing of the [Fe2As2] layers and a decrease in the distance between Eu planes.
Figure 2 shows relative resistivity plotted versus temperature for various nickel concentrations x. A sharp uplift of resistivity is visible for xâ=â0 and 0.04 at about 190 K and 165 K, respectively, while a broad hump appears for xâ=â0.07, 0.10 and 0.12 starting at about 130 K, 90 K and 65 K respectively. Both behaviors are caused by the iron magnetism, but with a gradual ordering of 3d spins in the second case. Upon entering the magnetic state, the metallic behavior changes due to partial gapping of the Fermi surface leading to decrease of the carrier concentration. On the other hand, the spin scattering is reduced owing to the increasing spin order. The first mechanism leads to the upturn, while the second to the downturn of the resistivity with lowering of the temperature. The resistivity anomaly associated with SDW order is invisible for xâ=â0.20 and xâ=â0.40 due to lack of this type of magnetism for such high nickel concentration. The europium magnetic ordering is seen as much less pronounced kink on the resistivity at about 20 K. The SC is not observed down to 1.8 K for any of these compounds.
57Fe Mössbauer measurements
Magnetic hyperfine interactions
57Fe Mössbauer spectra measured at selected temperatures of 4.2, 25, 80 and 300 K are shown in Fig. 3. The 25 K was chosen because it was the lowest temperature of our measurements without europium magnetic order. Spectra were fitted with the SDW model in the magnetically ordered region and with a quadrupole doublet otherwise. Apart from the spectra for the parent compound and the spectra for the compound with the highest Ni content, all other spectra were fitted with superposition of two components. Spectra at 300 K have a shape of pseudo-single line due to small electric quadrupole hyperfine interaction. The precise case is that they are unresolved spectral doublets with small average quadrupole splitting ranging from about 0.1 mm/s for the parent compound to about 0.2 mm/s for the compound with the highest substitution level xâ=â0.40. An asymmetrical spectral broadening is observed with increasing x due to doping-induced disorder and perturbation of the Fe plane site by the Ni atoms. Spectra at 25 K and 80 K have a shape resulting from the coexistence of the magnetic component and the ânon-magneticâ second component. The magnetic spectral component associated with SDW order is described by the average magnetic hyperfine fieldâ<âBâ>â. The second spectral component is described by the average quadrupole splittingâ<âÎâ>âand has significantly broadened line-width. The latter component at the low temperatures was fitted applying some hyperfine magnetic field BQ with a low value of about 1 â 2 T. Further broadening of spectra and change of their shape are observed at 4.2 K and it results from the hyperfine transferred field Bt from ordered magnetic moments of the Eu2+ atoms. The presence of two spectral components is somewhat similar to the so-called double-Q magnetic phase with spatially non-uniform magnetization caused by a coherent superposition of two SDWs, leading to both constructive and destructive interference of the SDWs on alternate Fe sites35. The spin amplitudes at the Fe sites are nonuniform, vanishing on half of the sites and doubling on the others. But this scenario requires a constant ratio between contribution of both spectral components, which, as will be shown further in the article, is not the case of EuFe2âxNixAs2 system.
Spectra of EuFe1.96Ni0.04As2 compound across magnetic transition are shown in Fig. 4. The magnetic component with low hyperfine field of 1.5 T appears at 200 K. Its contribution and the magnetic field increase with decreasing temperature. Half of the iron moments are magnetically ordered at about 175 K and the complete order of all iron spins is observed at 4.2 K withâ<âBâ>ââ=â7.1 T, which is comparable toâ<âBâ>ââ=â8.1 T for the parent compound. The transferred hyperfine field at iron due to the magnetic ordering of europium is undetectable for EuFe2âxNixAs2 with xâ=â0 and 0.04. Since the Fe plane is in the middle of the distance along the c-axis between adjacent Eu planes, hence, in the case of θâ=â90°, the Bt is zero due to a cancellation of the internal magnetic induction from the nearest-neighbor Eu planes of FM-aligned moments corresponding to an A-type collinear AFM state. However, it should be mentioned that some small increase of the Fe hyperfine field of about 0.2 T around temperature of the Eu order in the parent compound EuFe2As2 was reported by Ikeda et al.36. Processing of our spectra for xâ=â0.07, 0.10, and 0.12 at 4.2 K gives the transferred field with fairly similar values for both spectral components and with clearly visible difference in the shape of the spectra compared to the temperature of 25 K, i.e. before the Eu magnetism.
The contribution of SDW magnetic component A together with its average magnetic fieldâ<âBâ>âversus temperature are shown in Fig. 5. The EuFe2âxNixAs2 compounds with xâ=â0.07, 0.10, 0.12 contain a predominant contribution of the SDW phase at the lowest measured temperature reaching of about 90%, 80%, 70% respectively. Moreover, a significant reduction of the hyperfine field of the SDW magnetic component toâ<âBâ>ââ=â5.5, 4.8, 4.6 T at 4.2 K was observed, respectively. Temperature evolution of the SDW hyperfine fieldâ<âBâ>â(T) for EuFe1.96Ni0.04As2 was fitted within the model described in Ref.31 and compared with the results for EuFe2As231. The static critical exponent of 0.130(4) and the coherent SDW order temperature of 184(2) K were obtained. We note that the critical exponent in the substituted system EuFe1.96Ni0.04As2 is almost the same as that in the parent compound31. The value close to 1/8 indicates that the universality class (1, 2) is retained and it means that the electronic spin system with SDW obeys the Ising model (one-dimensional spin space) and has two dimensions in the configuration space (magnetized planes). It is difficult to draw such conclusions for compounds with xâ=â0.07, 0.10, 0.12, but one can see that the magnetic ordering starts at about 160, 130 and 100 K, respectively. These temperatures are significantly higher than a temperatures of the resistivity anomaly associated with iron magnetism which are shown in Fig. 2. This is because the Mössbauer spectroscopy is much more sensitive to the electron spin density and even to an incoherent spin density wavelets typical for a critical region of the SDW. The low panel of Fig. 5 shows temperature dependence of a low hyperfine field BQ resulting from broadening of the second spectral component. Due to the small contribution of this component, the origin of such weak magnetism and even its existence is doubtful.
The average hyperfine field of SDWâ<âBâ>âfor the EuFe2As2 at 4.2 K is 8.1 T and this value is related to 0.99 µB magnetic moment determined from the neutron-diffraction measurements2. Such small moment results from itinerant character of iron magnetism. The Ni-substitution causes decreasing of the hyperfine fieldâ<âBâ>âand related magnetic moment can be estimated asâ<âBâ>ââ=âα μFe, where μFe is the on-site magnetic moment of iron atom and α denotes the constant, which is specific for a given compound37. To convert the hyperfine magnetic field to the iron magnetic moment, we used αâ=â8.18 T/μB. The average hyperfine field of SDW at 4.2 K and related 3d itinerant magnetic moment of iron versus Ni-substitution x in EuFe2âxNixAs2 system are shown in Fig. 6. The magnetic moment of SDW is halved for the Ni substitution xâ=â0.12 and it decreases linearly in this dopant concentration range. Taking into account the decreasing contribution of SDW component A with increasing Ni content, the weighted average field and corresponding weighted average magnetic moment was presented by triangles in Fig. 6.
Transferred magnetic field from Eu to Fe
The EuFe1.60Ni0.40As2 displays no magnetic dipole hyperfine interaction in the whole studied temperature range, as the SDW does not develop for such high concentration of nickel. One has sole non-magnetic component with clearly visible influence of the transferred magnetic hyperfine field Btâ=â1.38(2) T at 4.2 K from europium order. It gives an opportunity to estimate the angle θ between the principal component of the electric field gradient (EFG) at the Fe nuclei (i.e. the crystallographic c-axis in the present case) and the Eu2+ localized magnetic moment. It is assumed that the transferred field points in the same direction as that of the Eu magnetic moment. The angle θâ=â39(1)° is determined reliably for this spectrum and indicates canting of europium moments from ab-plane of about 90° â θâ=â51°. The lack of iron magnetism and almost the same angle θâ=â36° for Btâ=â1.37 T at 4.2 K was found previously for EuFe1.80Ni0.20As2 by Nowik and Felner29,30. The Eu2+ spin reorientation phenomenon will be also discussed later in this article based on data from the 151Eu Mössbauer spectroscopy.
It seems that the transferred field of about 1 T is typical for the EuFe2As2-based compounds with suppressed SDW magnetism and even in the superconducting state. The transferred magnetic hyperfine field acting in the superconducting layer was observed for the first time in the EuFe2(As1âxPx)2 system with xâ>â0.210. The advantage of this discovery was that the coexistence of SC and magnetic field in the FeâAs based layer was observed on the same sample under the same experimental conditions, by the local probe, i.e. 57Fe Mössbauer spectroscopy. The value of Btâ=â0.93(5) T was reported for optimally doped superconductor with xâ=â0.3, while Btâ=â0.85(2) T for xâ=â0.75, and 0.97(2) T for xâ=â1, i.e. EuFe2P210. For the latter case, the angle θâ=â15(5)° was obtained. Another report shows Btâ=â1.2(1)T and θâ=â40° for the optimally doped EuFe2(As1-xPx)2 superconductor with xâ=â0.2815. Almost the same values of the Bt for different substitution level x indicate that the electron spin density at the position of the Fe nucleus is the same whether the system is normal or superconducting. Another examples of the Eu to Fe magnetic field transfer and the Eu canting are: Eu(Fe0.71Co0.29)2As2 with Btâ=â1.27(2)T and θâ=â40(1)°8, or Eu(Fe0.75Ru0.25)2As2 with Btâ=â0.71(2) T38. An interesting results of the Btâ=â0.6 T were reported for the ferromagnetic superconductors AEuFe4As4 (Aâ=âRb39 and Cs40) with Eu moments laying in the ab-plane.
Electric hyperfine interactions and relative spectral area
Temperature dependencies of the spectral center shift δ and the quadrupole splitting Î for both spectral components (if present) are shown in Fig. 7. The SDW phase seems to have a lower value of the δ (i.e. a higher value of the s-electron charge density) than the ânon-magneticâ phase in cases of compounds and temperature ranges where both components occur. But some effect of a fitting artifact canât be excluded due to a low content of one of the components in the temperature ranges discussed. Hence, the weighted average value of spectral center shift should be considered as a reliable parameter. Generally, the δ is almost insensitive to Ni-substitution level x and keeps the value of about 0.41 and 0.54 mm/s at temperature of 300 and 4.2 K, respectively. The same insignificant Ni-concentration dependence of the δ was found for CaK(Fe1-xNix)4As4 superconductors23. It means that Ni-doping does not noticeably affect the s-electron charge density at the Fe nuclei. From this Mössbauer spectroscopy point of view, the Ni should be considered as isovalent dopant in the EuFe2âxNixAs2 system. However, other effects leading to such an outcome, such as opposite influence of the lattice volume effect and the d-electrons shielding effect, cannot be ruled out. Hence, based on these results, the Ni atoms commonly recognized as electron dopant in the EuFe2âxNixAs2 canât be called into question. The value of δ indicates that Fe atoms are in a low-spin Fe(II) electronic configuration.
The temperature evolution of weighted average spectral center shiftâ<âδâ>â, shown in Fig. 7, represents a typical second-order Doppler shift dependence on temperature and it could be treated in terms of the Debye model for the lattice vibrations of iron atoms. The Debye temperatures ÎD obtained on the basis of this model are typical for a strongly bound metal-covalent system. It increases with Ni substitution level x from about 400 K for the parent compound to about 500 K for xâ=â0.10. On the other hand, further increasing x to 0.40 causes the return to the almost initial value of ÎD. It means that the (Fe/Ni)âAs bonds become stiffer with increasing Ni content up to xâ=â0.10. The xâ=â0.10 is close to the critical substitution level for the AFM-FM transition. It seems that some magneto-elastic effect accompanies this critical Ni concentration resulting in lattice hardening and jump of ÎD.
The right panel of Fig. 7 shows the parameter of the electric quadrupole hyperfine interaction, i.e. the quadrupole spitting Î. At 300 K, the Î systematically increases from about 0.12 mm/s for the parent compound to about 0.23 mm/s for the Ni-substitution xâ=â0.40. It means that the EFG at iron site increases with x in EuFe2âxNixAs2 system. This is a symptom of an increase in disorder and perturbation of the Fe atoms surrounding in Fe-plane caused by the Ni atoms. The absolute value of Î for the ânon-magneticâ phase increases as the temperature decreases. At 4.2 K, the Î of the SDW phase keeps almost constant and negative value of about â0.10 mm/s. This is a manifestation of a greater strength of the magnetic dipole hyperfine interaction than the electric quadrupole interaction, which masks the EFG perturbation caused by increasing Ni substitution. It should be noted that additional magnetic transferred field form europium order perturbs the Mössbauer spectra at 4.2 K. Accordingly, when the 3d magnetism of SDW is weakened by Ni-substitution xâ>â0.04, the 4f transferred magnetism causes difference of the Î between 4.2 and 25 K. For xâ=â0.40, for which the iron 3d magnetism was not observed in whole studied temperature range, the 4f magnetism at 4.2 K causes a positive sign of the Îâ=ââ+0.224(7) mm/s (point not shown in Fig. 7).
The Mössbauer recoilless fraction can be approximated by the relative spectral area (RSA), which is defined as:
where C denotes the number of data channels for folded spectrum, N0 is the average number of counts per channel far-off resonance, namely the baseline, and Nn stands for the number of counts in the channel n. The RSA can be directly evaluated from measured spectra as a quantity independent of any physical model. The temperature evolutions of the relative spectral areas for EuFe2âxNixAs2 with xâ=â0.04, 0.10, 0.40 are displayed in Fig. 8. Here, the RSAs are calculated for the Mössbauer spectra recorded versus increasing temperature in the non-interrupted series of measurements carried out in the same experimental conditions (radioactive source, geometry, velocity scale, number of data channels, background under the resonance line, and linear response range of the detector system) and for the same mass of each of the samples. The RSA slightly increases with decreasing temperature due to the thermal effect. Some slight jump of RSA at about 180 K for xâ=â0.04 is observed due to an increase in the recoilless fraction probably arising from the weak magneto-elastic effect, which results in a fine hardening of lattice vibrations upon development of the magnetic order. Such an effect, but much stronger, is observed upon magnetic transition for other compounds with the ironâpnictogen bonds41,42. In this case, it may be suppressed due to the Ni perturbation of the Fe-plane. For comparison, the compound with xâ=â0.40 without any 3d magnetism has almost flat temperature dependence of RSA and without any irregularity.
151Eu Mössbauer measurements
It should be noted that 151Eu Mössbauer spectroscopy is very sensitive to the angle between principal component of EFG and hyperfine magnetic field B on the 151Eu nucleus, i.e. for the angle between the c-axis (in this case of tetragonal or orthorhombic structure) and the Eu2+ magnetic moment. The spin reorientation phenomenon can be easily recognized (even by eye) due to characteristic change of the relative intensity of spectral lines, see Fig. 9.
151Eu Mössbauer spectra for the parent compound and the Ni-substituted compounds with xâ=â0.07 and 0.10 are shown in Fig. 10, while obtained hyperfine parameters are listed in Table 1. The symbol \(\varepsilon = \tfrac{1}{4}(c/E_{0} )eQ_{g} V_{zz}\) stands for the quadrupole coupling constant for Eu2+ under assumption that the EFG is axially symmetric with the main axis aligned with the c-axis of the unit cell. The symbol c stands for the speed of light in vacuum, the symbol E0 denotes transition energy, while the symbol e stands for the positive elementary charge. The symbol Qgâ=ââ+0.903 b denotes spectroscopic nuclear electric quadrupole moment in the ground state of 151Eu, while the symbol Vzz stands for the principal component of EFG on Eu2+ nucleus. For spectra with the europium hyperfine magnetic field one obtained the quadrupole shift \(\varepsilon = \tfrac{1}{4}(c/E_{0} )eQ_{g} V_{zz} (3\cos^{2} \theta - 1)/2\).
The hyperfine magnetic field B on the Eu2+ ions in the spectrum collected at lowest temperatures for the parent EuFe2As2 and for xâ=â0.07 are almost the same. The angle θ equal to or close to the right angle indicates that AFM order of europium 4f spins between subsequent ab-planes is preserved for these compounds. However, it must be admitted that by fitting the Mössbauer spectra at 4.2 K for EuFe2As2 and EuFe1.93Ni0.07As2 one obtained a slight canting of the Eu2+ moments out of the ab-plane of 13(3)° and 7(6)°, respectively. The same result of 13(7)° andâ~â10° was indicated for EuFe2As2 studied by means of Mössbauer spectroscopy10 and magnetic torque measurements43, respectively. To our knowledge, the canting of Eu2+ moments out of the ab-plane for EuFe2As2 has not been observed (yet) by the neutron diffraction and resonant x-ray measurements. Hence, a wary notation θâ~â90° is used in Fig. 10.
On the other hand, for xâ=â0.10 the angle θ between hyperfine field on Eu2+ and the main component of EFG on the same ion amounts to 31(2)° at 4.2 K. The main component of EFG is oriented along the crystallographic c-axis, while the hyperfine field is aligned with the Eu2+ magnetic moment. Hence, the magnetic moment of europium is tilted by 90° â θâ=â59(2)° from the ab-plane, while in the parent compounds is perpendicular to the c-axis. It means that in EuFe1.90Ni0.10As2 magnetic moments of Eu2+ tend to rotate on the c-axis in similarity to the superconducting EuFe2As2-based compounds with some canting leading to the ferromagnetic component of the 4f origin8,10.
Another proof of the AFM to FM transition in EuFe1.90Ni0.10As2 is the hyperfine field Bâ=â27.5Â T, hence about 1 Tesla higher than for the parent compound and the compound with a slightly lower substitution level xâ=â0.07. Increased hyperfine field for Eu2+ spins almost aligned along c-axis was observed for EuFe2As2-based substituted compounds10.
Both phenomena, i.e. the spin reorientation and the accompanying increase in the hyperfine field, were previously observed by means of the 151Eu Mössbauer spectroscopy for other substituted EuFe2As2-based compounds. For Eu(Fe0.75Ru0.25)2As2 superconductor with Tscâ=â23 K, the Eu2+ spins order ferromagnetically below 19.5 K with the hyperfine field 28.8 T at 5 K tilted away from the c-axis by 20(3)°38, while for EuRu2As2 one obtained Bâ=â30.2 T and θâ~â0°44. For Eu(Fe0.86Ir0.14)2As2 superconductor with Tscâ=â22.5 K and double reentrance at lower temperature, the Eu2+ moments order magnetically at 18 K with an appreciable FM component and the Eu hyperfine field of 28.5 T at 4.2 K19. The EuFe2(As1âxPx)2 system preserves the AFM order for xââ¤â0.2 with the angle θâ=â77(7)° and the hyperfine field Bâ=â26.2 T10,15. While, the canting effect and Eu hyperfine field increase with accompanying the Eu to Fe transferred field (~â1 T) have been observed for xâ>â0.2, with reported values of θâ=â12(8)° and Bâ=â28.4 T for xâ=â0.316, or θâ=â22(3)° and Bâ=â30.8 T for xâ=â1, i.e. EuFe2P210,45.
It can be additionally noted that the FM order of Eu magnetic moments laying in the ab-plane was detected by 151Eu Mössbauer measurements for superconducting AEuFe4As4 (Aâ=âRb39 and Cs40) with the europium hyperfine field of 22.5 T and 22.4 T, respectively. In this case, the sheets of Eu atoms are separated by the AFe4As4 unit which rules out the possibility of any strong interaction between the Eu planes. In particular, no magnetic coupling is expected to exist between the Eu atoms along the c-direction. On the other hand, the AFM order was reported for parent EuFeAs2 and superconductor EuFeNi0.03As224 with Bâ=â29.4 T and 29.1 T, respectively.
Traces of Eu3+ makes about 2.6% contribution to the spectra of EuFe1.90Ni0.10As2 in similarity to the superconducting and/or overdoped EuFe2As2-based compounds studied previously by 151Eu Mössbauer spectroscopy8. The Eu3+ component of spectra was usually assigned to a unidentified foreign phase or a result of oxidation. But some change in valence of the Eu2+ belonging to the main phase due to local chemical pressure induced by nickel substitution cannot be ruled out8,46. However, in the present case one cannot prove that trivalent europium is in the main phase of the sample.
The magnetic structures resulting from 57Fe and 151Eu Mössbauer spectra are shown in lower panel of Fig. 10. For parent compound, the Fe-SDW itinerant moments align along a direction and order antiferromagnetically in both a and c directions, while the Eu localized moments align along a direction and order antiferromagnetically in c direction only. The reduction of the Fe moments follows for xâ=â0.07 without changes of the 3d and 4f spins order directions. The further lowering of 3d moment by almost half for xâ=â0.10 results in the 4f spin reorientation.
EuNi2As2
Additionally, 151Eu Mössbauer spectra for compound with iron fully replaced by nickel, i.e. EuNi2As2, are shown in Fig. 11 and the hyperfine parameters are listed in Table 1. We used exactly the same EuNi2As2 single crystal sample (from the same batch) that was used in Ref.47, only powdered for our use. This compound possess a tetragonal structure (space group I4/mmm with aâ=â4.1145 à and câ=â10.091 à ) at room temperature, similar to EuFe2As2, but without structural phase transition and magnetic ordering of the 3d transition metal (i.e. Ni). The neutron diffraction measurements of this sample47 found that the Eu2+ moments form an incommensurate antiferromagnetic spiral-like structure below the Néel temperature of TNâ=â15 K. They align ferromagnetically in the ab-plane and rotate spirally by 165.6° around the c-axis from layer to layer47. It must be noted, however, that our 151Eu Mössbauer investigation indicates some canting of the europium moments out of the ab-plane and θâ=â65(2)° was obtained. On the other hand, we note that 151Eu Mössbauer spectroscopy is not sensitive to the rotation of the Eu2+ moments around the c-axis in this case due to axially symmetric EFG in EuNi2As2 (c-axis is the main axis of the EFG) and, therefore, a spiral-like order of Eu2+ moments cannot be seen by this method. The EuNi2As2 was studied by 151Eu Mössbauer spectroscopy in the past48, but unlike our results, negligible quadrupole interaction and some different value of the hyperfine field was reported48.
Conclusions
57Fe Mössbauer measurements on EuFe2âxNixAs2 show that Ni doping monotonically suppresses the SDW ground state of itinerant magnetic moments and iron diamagnetism is achieved for xâ>â0.12, i.e. certainly for xâ=â0.20. While, 151Eu Mössbauer spectra indicate that Eu2+ magnetic moments order regardless of the Ni-substitution level. However, for the parent EuFe2As2 and for low Ni-substituted compounds up to about xââ¤â0.07, the localized 4f spins order perpendicular to the c-axis, whereas from about xââ¥â0.10, the magnetic ordering of europium changes from AFM to FM with the angle of deviation from the c-axis of about 30°. It seems that the FM order of Eu2+ spins causes the transferred hyperfine magnetic field sensed by 57Fe nuclei. But, it should be noted that some transferred field was also detected for 57Fe spectrum at the lowest temperature for xâ=â0.07, hence close to the range border of the europium AFM order. However, due to broad magnetic 57Fe spectrum for xâ=â0.07 at 4.2 K, the transferred field may be somewhat doubtful for this compound and a hypothesis that mainly FM component of the Eu order is responsible for the transferred field seems reasonable. Another explanation that can possibly be proposed is some shielding effect, i.e. the disclosure of the transferred field only after a significant weakening of the iron SDW magnetism caused by the Ni dopant. Also note that Ni substitution in EuFe2âxNixAs2 reduces c lattice constant of the unit cell (see Fig. 1) and shortens the distance between the Eu planes, which can strengthens the coupling between them.
Based on these and previous results, it can be concluded that the 4f-Eu magnetism in the EuFe2As2-based systems is strongly affected by the magnetic behavior of the Fe-As layer. As long as Fe-plane remains unperturbed, for the parent EuFe2As2 and a low substituted compounds for which the 3d-SDW order is present, the Fe magnetic anisotropy pulls the Eu magnetic moment direction to be parallel to the ab-plane. On the other hand, a chemical substitution leads to a continuous suppression of the SDW ordering and for the sufficiently substituted compounds (specific to a particular substituent), when the Fe magnetism is strongly suppressed or absent, the direction of the Eu moments tend to turn parallel to the c-axis and the FM order is partly or fully achieved. The disappearance of the SDW changes the RKKY interaction and increases interplanar coupling which leads to a FM arrangement of the Eu moments. This rearrangement of the 4f spins as the result of the disappearance of the 3d spins magnetism proves a strong coupling between the magnetism of Eu2+ ions and the conduction electrons of [Fe2âxNixAs2]2- layers. Additionally, the transferred magnetic hyperfine field with value of about 1 Tesla at 4.2Â K from the magnetically ordered Eu sublattice to the Fe atoms is observed for substituted samples, but it is undetected for the parent and a low-substituted samples. This effect may result in competition between magnetism and superconductivity in EuFe2As2-based superconductors, because the Zeeman effect, which arises due to the FM order, strongly disfavors formation of the Cooper pair. However, as shown for many EuFe2As2-based compounds, this does not prevent the occurrence of superconductivity10,39,40. Eventually, the reentrant effect in some cases was observed19,20. Another effect is the anisotropic resistivity when the interplay between Eu-ferromagnetism and Fe-superconductivity causes zero resistance and diamagnetism only when the supercurrent flows within ab-planes, but in comparison, the out-of-plane resistivity does not go to zero38.
When trying to answer the question posed in introduction of this article âwhy is EuFe2âxNixAs2 not a superconductor?â, it must be said that the phenomena seen by the Mössbauer spectroscopy and described above for this system are the same as for many other EuFe2As2-based superconductors. This indicates a similar magnetic structure regardless of whether the system is normal conducting or superconducting. Hence, the reason for the lack of superconductivity in EuFe2âxNixAs2 (at least above 1.8 K) is an open question.
References
Zapf, S. & Dressel, M. Europium-based iron pnictides: A unique laboratory for magnetism, superconductivity and structural effects. Rep. Prog. Phys. 80, 016501 (2017).
Xiao, Y. et al. Magnetic structure of EuFe2As2 determined by single-crystal neutron diffraction. Phys. Rev. B 80, 174424 (2009).
Xiao, Y. et al. Field-induced spin reorientation and giant spin-lattice coupling in EuFe2As2. Phys. Rev. B 81, 220406(R) (2010).
Terashima, T. et al. EuFe2As2 under high pressure: An antiferromagnetic bulk superconductor. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 78, 083701 (2009).
Kurita, N. et al. Phase diagram of pressure-induced superconductivity in EuFe2As2 probed by high-pressure resistivity up to 3.2 GPa. Phys. Rev. B 83, 214513 (2011).
Matsubayashi, K. et al. Pressure-induced changes in the magnetic and valence state of EuFe2As2. Phys. Rev. B 84, 024502 (2011).
Kumar, R. S. et al. Pressure induced valence change of Eu in EuFe2As2 at low temperature and high pressures probed by resonant inelastic x-ray scattering. Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 042601 (2014).
BÅachowski, A. et al. Interplay between magnetism and superconductivity in EuFe2-xCoxAs2 studied by 57Fe and 151Eu Mössbauer spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. B 84, 174503 (2011).
Jin, W. T. et al. Phase diagram of Eu magnetic ordering in Sn-flux-grown Eu(Fe1-xCox)2As2 single crystals. Phys. Rev. B 94, 184513 (2016).
Nowik, I., Felner, I., Ren, Z., Cao, G. H. & Xu, Z. A. Coexistence of ferromagnetism and superconductivity: Magnetization and Mössbauer studies of EuFe2(As1-xPx)2. J. Phys. 23, 065701 (2011).
Ren, Z. et al. Suppression of spin-density-wave transition and emergence of ferromagnetic ordering of Eu2+ moments in EuFe2-xNixAs2. Phys. Rev. B 79, 094426 (2009).
Jasek, A. K. et al. Electric field gradient wave (EFGW) in iron-based superconductor Ba0.6K0.4Fe2As2 studied by Mössbauer spectroscopy. J. Alloys Compd. 609, 150 (2014).
Jasek, A. K. et al. Change of the charge modulation during superconducting transition in SmFeAsO0.91F0.09 seen by 57Fe Mössbauer spectroscopy. J. Alloys Compd. 658, 520 (2016).
KomÄdera, K. et al. Mössbauer studies of spin and charge modulations in BaFe2(As1-xPx)2. Phys. Rev. B 103, 024526 (2021).
Goltz, T. et al. Interplay of magnetism and superconductivity in EuFe2(As1-xPx)2 single crystals probed by muon spin rotation and 57Fe Mössbauer spectroscopy. J. Phys. 551, 012025 (2014).
Munevar, J. et al. Magnetism in superconducting EuFe2As1.4P0.6 single crystals studied by local probes. Solid State Comm. 187, 18 (2014).
Nowik, I., Felner, I., Ren, Z., Cao, G. H. & Xu, Z. A. 57Fe and 151Eu Mössbauer spectroscopy and magnetization studies of Eu(Fe0.89Co0.11)2As2 and Eu(Fe0.9Ni0.1)2As2. New J. Phys. 13, 023033 (2011).
Anupam, V. K., Paulose, P. L., Jeevan, H. S., Geibel, C. & Hossain, Z. Superconductivity and magnetism in K-doped EuFe2As2. J. Phys. 21, 265701 (2009).
Paramanik, U. B. et al. Magnetic and superconducting properties of Ir-doped EuFe2As2. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 27, 075012 (2014).
KomÄdera, K. et al. Mössbauer study of Eu0.57Ca0.43Fe2As2 and Eu0.73Ca0.27(Fe0.87Co0.13)2As2: A comparison to â122â iron-based superconductors parent compounds EuFe2As2 and CaFe2As. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 457, 1 (2018).
Anupam, V. K., Anand, P. L., Paulose, S. R., Geibel, C. & Hossain, Z. Effect of Ni doping on magnetism and superconductivity in Eu0.5K0.5Fe2As2. Phys. Rev. B 85, 144513 (2012).
Sangeetha, N. S. et al. Magnetic phase transitions in Eu(Co1-xNix)2-yAs2 single crystals. Phys. Rev. Mater. 4, 084407 (2020).
Budko, S. L. et al. Coexistence of superconductivity and magnetism in CaK(Fe1-xNix)4As4 as probed by 57Fe Mössbauer spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. B 98, 144520 (2018).
Liu, Y.-B., Liu, Y., Jiao, W.-H., Ren, Z. & Cao, G.-H. Magnetism and superconductivity in Eu(Fe1-xNix)As2 (x= 0, 0.04). Sci. China-Phys. Mech. Astron. 61, 127405 (2018).
Albedah, M. A., Stadnik, Z. M., Fedoryk, O., Liu, Y.-B. & Cao, G.-H. Magnetic properties of EuFeAs2 and the 14 K superconductor EuFe0.97Ni0.03As2. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 503, 166603 (2020).
Kumar, N. et al. Evolution of the bulk properties, structure, magnetic order, and superconductivity with Ni doping in CaFe2-xNixAs2. Phys. Rev. B 80, 144524 (2009).
Saha, S. R., Butch, N. P., Kirshenbaum, K. & Paglione, J. Evolution of bulk superconductivity in SrFe2As2 with Ni substitution. Phys. Rev. B 79, 224519 (2009).
Nowik, I., Felner, I., Ni, N., Budâko, S. L. & Canfield, P. C. Mössbauer studies of Ba(Fe1-xNix)2As2. J. Phys. 22, 355701 (2010).
Nowik, I. & Felner, I. Mössbauer spectroscopy studies of oxypnictides superconductors. Physica C 469, 485 (2009).
Nowik, I., Felner, I., Ren, Z., Xu, Z. A. & Cao, G. H. Mössbauer studies of spin density wave-superconducting Fe-As systems. J. Phys. 217, 012121 (2010).
BÅachowski, A. et al. Shape of spin density wave versus temperature in AFe2As2 (A = Ca, Ba, Eu): A Mössbauer study. Phys. Rev. B 83, 134410 (2011).
CieÅlak, J. & Dubiel, S. M. Harmonic analysis of Mössbauer spectra. Nucl. Instrum. Methods B 95, 131 (1995).
Bonville, P., Rullier-Albenque, F., Colson, D. & Forget, A. Incommensurate spin density wave in Co-doped BaFe2As2. EPL 89, 67008 (2010).
KomÄdera, K. et al. Magnetism of PrFeAsO parent compound for iron-based superconductors: Mössbauer spectroscopy study. J. Alloys Compd. 717, 350 (2017).
Allred, J. M. et al. Double-Q spin-density wave in iron arsenide superconductors. Nature Phys. 12, 493 (2016).
Ikeda, S., Yoshida, K. & Kobayashi, H. Magnetic interactions on single-crystal EuFe2As2 studied by 57Fe Mössbauer spectroscopy. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 81, 033703 (2012).
Dubiel, S. M. Relationship between the magnetic hyperfine field and the magnetic moment. J. Alloys Compd. 488, 18 (2009).
Jiao, W.-H. et al. Anisotropic superconductivity in Eu(Fe0.75Ru0.25)2As2 ferromagnetic superconductor. EPL 95, 67007 (2011).
Albedah, M. A., Nejadsattari, F., Stadnik, Z. M., Liu, Y. & Cao, G.-H. Mössbauer spectroscopy measurements on the 35.5 K superconductor Rb1-δEuFe4As4. Phys. Rev. B 97, 144426 (2018).
Albedah, M. A., Nejadsattari, F., Stadnik, Z. M., Liu, Y. & Cao, G.-H. Magnetism of the 35 K superconductor CsEuFe4As4. J. Phys. 30, 155803 (2018).
BÅachowski, A., Ruebenbauer, K., Å»ukrowski, J. & Bukowski, Z. Magnetic anisotropy and lattice dynamics in FeAs studied by Mössbauer spectroscopy. J. Alloys Compd. 582, 167 (2014).
KomÄdera, K., Jasek, A. K., BÅachowski, A., Ruebenbauer, K. & KrztoÅ-Maziopa, A. Magnetic anisotropy in FeSb studied by 57Fe Mössbauer spectroscopy. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 399, 221 (2016).
Guguchia, Z. et al. Anisotropic magnetic order of the Eu sublattice in single crystals of EuFe2-xCoxAs2 (x = 0, 0.2) studied by means of magnetization and magnetic torque. Phys. Rev. B 84, 144506 (2011).
Jiao, W. H., Felner, I., Nowik, I. & Cao, G. H. EuRu2As2: A new ferromagnetic metal with collapsed ThCr2Si2-type structure. J. Supercond. Nov. Magn. 25, 441 (2012).
Feng, Ch. et al. Magnetic ordering and dense Kondo behavior in EuFe2P2. Phys. Rev. B 82, 094426 (2010).
Sun, L. et al. Valence change of europium in EuFe2As1.4P0.6 and compressed EuFe2As2 and its relation to superconductivity. Phys. Rev. B 82, 134509 (2010).
Jin, W. T. et al. Spiral magnetic ordering of the Eu moments in EuNi2As2. Phys. Rev. B 99, 014425 (2019).
Raffius, H. et al. Magnetic properties of ternary lanthanoid transition metal arsenides studied by Mössbauer and susceptibility measurements. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 54, 135 (1993).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by National Science Centre, Poland (Grant No. 2018/29/N/ST3/00705). M.B. and Z.B. acknowledge financial support from National Science Centre, Poland (Grant No. 2017/25/B/ST3/02868). D.R. acknowledges support by National Science Centre, Poland (Grant No. 2018/30/E/ST3/00377). We thank Professor CzesÅaw Kapusta (AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland) for helpful discussions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
K.K., J.G., A.D., and A.B. â57Fe Mössbauer measurements and data analysis, preparation of manuscript and figures; J.Å». and D.R. â151Eu Mössbauer measurements and data analysis; M.B. and Z.B.âsamples preparation, XRD and resistivity measurements; A.B.âwrote the manuscript text. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
KomÄdera, K., Gatlik, J., BÅachowski, A. et al. 57Fe and 151Eu Mössbauer studies of 3d-4f spin interplay in EuFe2âxNixAs2. Sci Rep 11, 11484 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90657-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90657-x
This article is cited by
-
Effects of Ni/Co doping on structural and electronic properties of 122 and 112 families of Eu based iron pnictides
Scientific Reports (2023)
-
Canted antiferromagnetic order in EuZn2As2 single crystals
Scientific Reports (2022)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.