Introduction

Almost all known recent Odonata can be assigned to one of two groups: either to the Anisoptera (dragonflies) or to the Zygoptera (damselflies). A conspicuous exception are the few species of Epiophlebia, which combine characteristics of both groups1,2. Epiophlebia nymphs resemble those of the Anisoptera, respiring through a rectal chamber, while lacking the paddle shaped gills that arise from the tip of the abdomen1 and are characteristic of Zygoptera. Jet propulsion, an otherwise common behaviour in dragonfly nymphs, has not been documented for Epiophlebia3. At first glance the body-shape of Epiophlebia adults resembles the anisopteran type. Closer examination shows, that its fore- and hind wings look similar, are stalked and held together above the abdomen when in resting position, which is quite similar to what can be found in Zygoptera. Based on this presumably ancestral4 mixture of characters, Epiophlebia has been called a “living fossil”1, a relic, which was supposed to be the last extant member of a taxon that otherwise comprised mainly Jurassic species, the “Anisozygoptera”5. The “Anisozygoptera” were shown to be paraphyletic by Nel et al.5 and Lohmann6 later suggested a sister-group relationship between Epiophlebia and Anisoptera. This grouping was named Epiprocta with Epiophlebia on the most basal split in the Epiprocta-tree, followed by a comb of several extinct taxa on the branch leading to Anisoptera6.

Biogeography of Epiophlebia

Apart from its peculiar morphology, Epiophlebia also puzzled odonatologists by its distribution. The first species described, Epiophlebia superstes Sélys, 18897, is a common insect in Japan, whereas Epiophlebia laidlawi Tillyard, 19218 was discovered in small mountain enclaves in the Himalayas of India, Nepal9,10 and Bhutan11. It took 90 years to finally reduce this 5000 km gap by spotting a third species, Epiophlebia sinensis Li & Nel, 201112, in Northeast China and a fourth, Epiophlebia diana Carle, 201213, in Central-China. The latter three species have been poorly documented so far. Especially in the cases of E. sinensis and E. diana this is due to the very low number of collected specimens (two male adults of E. sinensis, two nymphs of E. diana). E. laidlawi lives in the Himalayas in isolated subtropical pine-forests9 in altitudes up to 3600 m a.s.l.14. According to Davies15, E. laidlawi flies on sunny mountaintops, which emerge above the cloud cover and it breeds close to high waterfalls. The nymphs favour fast running mountain streams at altitudes between 2200 to 2700 m a.s.l.14, with temperatures ranging from 3.1 to 17.9 °C throughout the year and water currents reaching 200 cm/s11. Tabaru3 reported that the nymphs of E. superstes undergo fourteen instars over a period of five to nine years until the last instar finally emerges from the water in spring.

Büsse et al.2 investigated phylogeographic aspects of the isolated Epiophlebia-populations. It was revealed that the degrees of similarity between the sequences of sections of 18S & 28S rDNA, ITS1, ITS2 and CO2 of E. superstes, E. laidlawi and E. sinensis are remarkably high. The genetic differences between the three species resemble those otherwise found between different populations of the same species in Odonata2. Furthermore, the validity of the newly described species of Epiophlebia – E. sinensis and E. diana – is challenged by odonatologists16.

Insect flight and thorax morphology

The evolutionary success of pterygote insects can be attributed largely to the evolution of the ability to fly17. Despite of this evolutionary importance, the origin and evolutionary development of the insect flight apparatus are still only partially understood17,18,19,20,21. Within Pterygota, the Odonata are among those groups that show the most impressive flight skills22.

The mechanism of wing movement is realized in different ways among Pterygota: The Odonata have an exclusively direct flight mechanism where dorso-ventral muscles are attached to elements of the wing base, actuating the wings directly. Dorsal longitudinal muscles, which are a crucial part of the flight musculature of all other pterygote insects, are either extremely small or missing in Odonata18,23,24,25. The mechanism that drives the wings in all other Pterygota works largely indirectly through deformation of the winged thoracic segments while the usually weaker direct flight muscles are mainly responsible for steering and flight control actions, e.g. adjusting the wing’s angle of attack, etc.

As exclusively aerial predators adult Odonata depend even more on the performance of their flight apparatus than many other Pterygota23. Therefore, understanding its complex morphology is necessary for a better understanding of behaviour, phylogeny and evolution of this group.

The thoracic musculature of adult Epiprocta1,23,24,25 as well as the pterothorax18 and to some degree the entire thorax1,19 of adult Zygoptera have been comprehensively investigated. The morphology and development of the nymphal thorax of Odonata, however, have only been studied superficially1,20,26,27. The present investigation of the ontogenesis of the thoracic musculature of Epiophlebia nymphs will substantially supplement the hitherto available information, leading to a better understanding of the evolution and development of the odonate thorax.

Results

To compare the thoracic muscles of E. laidlawi and E. superstes with Anisoptera, Zygoptera as well as Neoptera, each muscle is identified according to the homologization proposed by Büsse et al.18 and the muscle nomenclature proposed by Friedrich & Beutel28.

In total 75 muscles are identified in the thorax of Epiophlebia nymphs, 20 in the prothorax, 26 in the mesothorax and 29 in the metathorax (Table 1). This represents the highest number of thoracic muscles ever found in a species of Odonata1,18,20,27.

Table 1 Muscles present in the thorax of Epiophlebia.
Full size table

Detailed descriptions of the muscles together with information on the interpretation of their identity or homology are given in Supplementary data 1.

Cuticle (Supplementary Figures 1–3). 

For the skeletal elements of the thorax we use the nomenclature of Asahina1. Where necessary, this is supplemented with terms from Snodgrass29 and Ninomiya & Yoshizawa19.

The cuticle of Epiophlebia nymphs is ca. 1.5 to 2 times thicker than that of other Odonata investigated. The smooth sternites (Supplementary Figures 1& 2) each display two prominent furcal pits. On the inside, the corresponding three pairs of cone-shaped furcae (Supplementary Figures 1& 2: pro- (F1), meso- (F2) and metafurca (F3)) are attachment points for several muscles (see Supplementary data 1).

On the postero-lateral surface of each coxa a short process is present, which serves as attachment point for the large pronator muscle of each leg.

The tergites of the three thoracic segments (Supplementary Figure 3) are substantially different from each other. The prothoracic tergite is a broad plate covering the entire dorsum of the prothorax. In the centre of the prothoracic tergite a small spur, the first tergal apophysis, is present (Supplementary Figure 3: TEa1). The second, third and fourth tergal apophyses are represented by the segmental borders between pro- and mesothorax, meso- and metathorax and mesothorax and first abdominal segment, respectively (Supplementary Figure 3: TEa2, TEa3, TEa4). In the cranial half of the dorsal part of the mesothorax both pleurites arch towards each other and displace the mesothoracic tergite to a more caudal position. The meso- and metathoracic tergites are covered by the wing buds and each bears a stubby lateral process, which serves as attachment point for muscles (see Supplementary data 1).

The pleurites (Supplementary Figure 1) are divided into the episternum and the epimeron. Whereas the prothoracic pleurite has no distinct apodemes or extensions, the meso- and metathoracic pleurites have prominent arched interpleural ridges. The metathoracic preepisternal apodemes arise just behind the intersegmental border. The spoon-shaped structures on both sides of the body extend towards the median axis and are connected by a transverse muscle (see Supplementary data 1), above the nervous system. Asahina1 described a mesothoracic preepisternal apodeme in Epiophlebia superstes that serves as an attachment point for transverse muscles. Although these muscles could be identified in both species of Epiophlebia, determining the exact outline of the mesothoracic preepisternal apodemes was not possible in the specimens examined.

Discussion

In the following section the nymphal musculature of E. laidlawi and E. superstes is compared with that of zygopteran and anisopteran nymphs. Additional information is taken from the descriptions of Maloeuf27 and Büsse & Hörnschemeyer20 for Anisoptera, from Asahina’s1 work on E. superstes and from the analysis of the musculature of adult Zygoptera by Büsse et al.18. A comparison of muscle nomenclatures of different authors can be found in Supplementary table 1.

The muscle numbers used by Maloeuf27 and Asahina1 are given in parenthesis. An additional number in parentheses within the first set denotes the homologous muscle in the meso- or metathorax. Muscles not recognized by Maloeuf27 or Asahina1 are marked with (-). Muscles not mentioned by Friedrich & Beutel28 are marked with * and named according to their points of origin and insertion. Their abbreviations are numbered consecutively (Table 1, Supplementary data 1).

Dorsal longitudinal muscles

The dorsal longitudinal muscle IIdlm1 (Fig. 1) is small and is missing in nymphal Zygoptera. However, it is present but very small, consisting of just a few fibres, in adult Zygoptera18. This might indicate that IIdlm1 develops only in the latest instars and was not present in the instars investigated. It is present in nymphs of Anisoptera20.

Dorsoventral muscles

Idvm18 (14) (Fig. 2) originates from a large area of the prothoracic tergum that also encompasses the origin of Itpm3. Idvm18 inserts on an apodeme on the posterior base of the procoxa. It is by far the largest prothoracic muscle. Maloeuf27 described its lateral branch as a discrete muscle (15). Idvm18 does show a slight dichotomy, yet all of its fibres run from the tergum to the apodeme. E. superstes and E. laidlawi show the same characteristics. Neither in Anisoptera nor in Zygoptera Idvm18 shows any striking dichotomy that would suggest the presence of an independent muscle (15)18,20.

A muscle homologous to II (III)dvm7 (-) is not directly described by Maloeuf27 nor Asahina1, yet in Maloeuf’s table 8 muscle IIdvm4 is listed as being dichotomous. Given the position of IIdvm4, it is quite probable that one of its alleged portions in fact is equivalent to muscle IIdvm7. In the nymphs of Anisoptera20 and in the adults18 and nymphs of Zygoptera muscle II (III)dvm7 is missing. In the nymphs of E. laidlawi and E. superstes it originates anterior-median to II (III)dvm4, runs parallel to it and finally is attached through a tendon to the trochanter while II (III)dvm4 inserts laterally on the coxa. Consequently, both muscles II (III)dvm4 as well as II (III)dvm7 seem to be present in nymphs and in adults of Epiophlebia.

In Neoptera muscle II (III)dvm7 originates at the central region of the notum of its segment and inserts at the trochanter28. In the Epiophlebia nymphs II (III)dvm7 originates at the antero-ventral rim of the meso- and metathoracic wing bud, which is a part of the notum.

IIdvm8 (-) is an intersegmental muscle, stretching between the mesofurca and the metathoracic tergite. Its homologues are Idvm10 and IIIdvm8 as they connect similar structures. Muscle IIdvm8 was not found in Anisoptera20, or in the zygopteran thorax18 but in Neoptera28 and in both species of Epiophlebia. Therefore, IIdvm8 probably is a muscle of the pterygote ground pattern that was, among the Odonata, only preserved in Epiophlebia.

The four muscles II (III)dvm1 and II (III)dvm2 are not present in Epiophlebia but could be confirmed for Zygoptera nymphs. Muscle II (III)dvm1 is present in nymphs of Anisoptera and in adult Zygoptera18,20.

Muscle II (III)dvm3 seems to be unique for Zygoptera nymphs18,20. The muscles II (III)dvm2 were found in the nymphs of Zygoptera for the first time. They show the same points of origin as in Neoptera28, whereas the insertions lie at the anterior margins of the corresponding coxae and not on the trochantins as described by Friedrich and Beutel28. However, free trochantins are not present in Odonata30 and the points of insertion of II (III)dvm2 on the coxae may well represent the positions where the trochantins are fused to the coxae.

Sterno-coxal and pleuro-coxal muscles

The pleuro-coxal muscles (Fig. 3) II (III)pcm2 are among those that undergo the most extensive growth in the pterothoracic segments. They start out very slender in the early instars and grow to be among the largest muscles in the respective segment in the latest instars. In contrast to the description by Asahina1, we found clearly separated origins of II (III)pcm2 and II (III)pcm1.

Among the sterno-coxal muscles (Fig. 4) Iscm4 (-), IIscm4 (-) & IIIscm4 (-) were not mentioned by Maloeuf27 or Asahina1. All three muscles were found in the nymphs of E. laidlawi and E. superstes. A possible explanation could be that all three muscles only exist in juvenile stages. At least IIIscm4 is also present in nymphs of Anisoptera20 and IIscm4 was found in Zygoptera nymphs. However, none of the three muscles have been found in adult Zygoptera18. The homology established for IIscm4 in Büsse & Hörnschemeyer20 holds for Iscm4 and IIIscm4 as well.

IIscm1 (-) & IIIscm1 (-) are very thin muscles running close to the meso- and metasternum and inserting by means of an apodeme on the lateral side of the coxa. These two muscles were neither listed by Maloeuf27 nor Asahina1, but are present in E. laidlawi, E. superstes, in the Zygoptera and Anisoptera20. Not being mentioned by Büsse et al.18 for adult Zygoptera, IIscm1 and IIIscm1 seem to be exclusively nymphal muscles in Odonata.

IIscm8 (-) is a funnel shaped muscle connecting the mesothoracic coxa and the metathoracic preepisternal apodeme. It has no serial homologue in the pro- or metathorax. Its presence is confirmed for both species of Epiophlebia, the Zygoptera and the anisopteran nymphs20. Neither Maloeuf27 nor Asahina1 or Büsse et al.18 mentioned IIscm8, indicating that it also is a muscle that is restricted to Odonata nymphs.

IIIscm2 (-) connects the base of the metafurca and the posterior base of the metacoxa. It is confirmed for E. laidlawi, E. superstes, the Zygoptera and the Anisoptera20. Since it was not found in investigations of adult Odonata1,18,27, it probably also is an exclusively nymphal muscle. In the nymphs of the Ansioptera the homologue muscle IIscm2 could be identified20.

Sterno-pleural muscles

The sterno-pleural muscle (Fig. 4) Ispm1 (-) originates from the lateral surface of the apex of the profurca and inserts in the anterolateral area of the prothoracic epimeron. It was found in E. laidlawi, E. superstes, in Zygoptera and in Anisoptera nymphs20. Ispm1 resembles IIspm2 and IIIspm2, which originate from the apex of the meso- and metafurca, but it inserts in a different area. Ispm1 is a nymphal muscle1,18,27.

Tergo-pleural muscles

The origins and the insertions of the tergo-pleural muscles (Fig. 5) IItpm3 (-) & IIItpm3 (-) lie inside the wing buds. They are the smallest muscles in the nymphs. Both were found in the nymph of the two species of Epiophlebia and in the nymphs of the Anisoptera20. They are not present in the nymphs of the Zygoptera and are not known for adults of Zygoptera18 or Epiprocta1,27. Probably, they only occur in juvenile Epiprocta.

Similarly, the muscles Itpm7, Itpm8 and Itpm9 are found exclusively in Epiprocta nymphs.

Transverse muscles

The transverse ventral muscle (Fig. 6) II (III)tvm1* (-) was described by Maleouf27 as muscle (69). It is supposed to run transversely between intersegmental sterno-pleural processes. These processes, depicted by Maloeuf27 in an adult dragonfly, have been named preepisternal apodemes by Asahina1, who also found IItvm1 in the nymphs of E. superstes. However, both authors never described a transverse muscle by name. Maki30 indicates the presence of a transverse muscle but gives no description. This muscle is neither present in Zygoptera nor in Anisoptera18,20.

Ventral longitudinal muscles

Among the ventral longitudinal muscles (Fig. 1) Ivlm3 (11) & Ivlm3’ (11’) have been found in adults of Epiprocta1,27. E. laidlawi, E. superstes and the nymphs of the Anisoptera20 do not show a division of Ivlm3. It is also not reported for Neoptera28. The only argument for identifying Ivlm3’ as a separate unit is the fact that it does not insert directly on the tentorial bar, like Ivlm3, but on a membrane right underneath it. It is very likely that Ivlm3’ is only a separate strand of Ivlm3, which is missing in Zygoptera18. Muscle IIvlm3 is only present in zygopteran nymphs and IIIvlm3 is only present in Epiprocta20.

IIvlm7 (42) is a longitudinal muscle connecting the profurca and the metathoracic preepisternal apodeme. According to Asahina1, it supposedly connects the profurca and the first abdominal segment through IIvlm6 (68). Büsse & Hörnschemeyer20 stated that IIvlm7 connects the metafurca and the abdomen in Anisoptera, an interpretation confirmed here. In E. laidlawi and E. superstes, however, IIvlm7 does not continue through the metathorax. It inserts on the anterior margin of the metathoracic preepisternal apodeme. Muscle IIvlm7 is missing in the Zygoptera nymphs investigated.

IIvlm6 (68) originates from the posterior surface of the metathoracic preepisternal apodeme. It has exactly the same width as IIvlm7 and inserts on the anterior process of a thin structure arising from the ventral phragma of the first abdominal segment. This structure might either be a cap tendon or a very fragile apodeme, since it could not be properly identified from the datasets. It might be a nymphal muscle since it is present in immatures of Zygoptera and Anisoptera20, but not in adult Zygoptera17. Muscle Ivlm6 only occurs in Zygoptera nymphs.

IIIvlm4* (64) has its origin on the anterior process of the thoracic-abdominal tendon mentioned above, just posterior to IIvlm6. It is the last muscle in a row of longitudinal muscles connecting the tentorial bar, the furcae and the abdomen. It is missing in nymphs of Anisoptera20, but is present in all examined nymphs of Epiophlebia. In adults of Zygoptera IIIvlm4 is replaced by a tendon, which connects the metafurca with the bar between the first and second abdominal segment17. Muscle IIIvlm4 is missing in nymphs of Zygoptera. According to Maloeuf27 this muscle is absent in adult Odonata, but Asahina1 identified it in adults of E. superstes. A possible explanation is that IIIvlm4 retracts at a certain stage into the abdomen, which gets elongated after the last ecdysis. Further examination might be necessary, to clarify the status of IIIvlm4.

Muscles Ivlm6 und IIvlm3 could be identified in nymphs of Zygoptera, the first evidence for the presence of theses muscles in Odonata. Muscles Ivlm6 and IIvlm3 show exactly the same attachment points as described for Neoptera28.

Muscle summary

All muscles described for the Odonata by Maloeuf27 and for adults of E. superstes by Asahina1 could be identified in the nymphs of E. superstes and E. laidlawi. Five muscles differ from the descriptions of both authors: Ivlm3, muscle, IIvlm7, IIvlm6 and IIIvlm4. Six muscles, IIIvlm4, II (III)tvm1, Iscm4, IIdvm7 and IIIdvm7 could be newly identified in the Odonata1,18,20,27.

In Anisoptera four muscles are present that are missing in Epiophlebia: II (III)dvm1, IIscm2 and IIscm7.

The Zygoptera have eight muscles, which are not present in Epiophlebia: II (III)dvm1, II (III)dvm2, II (III)tpm2, Ivlm6 and IIvlm3.

These results confirm that E. superstes and E. laidlawi are highly similar in almost all aspects of their thoracic morphology as well as on the genetic level, as stated by Büsse et al.2.

Poletaïev31 reported that the wing buds of Odonata appear in the 3rd or 4th instar but that the corresponding musculature is still indiscernible. Maloeuf27 noted that the flight muscles in these instars are still diminutive. Our investigation confirms Maloeuf’s observation: some flight muscles of the adult first appear in early instars as sets of very few muscle fibres. Some are scarcely traceable, like for instance Itpm10 and Itpm11 and then grow significantly during ontogenesis, like II (III)dvm3, II (III)pcm2, II (III)tpm7.

Some other muscles, like IIIdlm1, are not necessary for flight in the adult but seem to be important for the movements of the nymph1,27. IIIdlm1 starts out as a broad muscle whose origin covers roughly a fourth of the posterior surface of the intersegmental ridge in the two earlier instars and shrinks to a few fibres in the last instar.

Maloeuf27 also stated that nymphs of Odonata have more and larger leg and cervical muscles than the adults 1,20. We can confirm these findings: muscles Idlm1, Idvm10, Itpm10, Itpm11, IIscm7, II (III)spm2, IIvlm7, IIIdlm1, IIIvlm2, IIIvlm4 are present in the nymphs and absent in the adults of Epiophlebia1.

During ontogenesis the thoracic muscles are, in part, newly formed, transformed or reduced26,27,31. The extent of these modifications seems to be exceptional in Odonata, compared to other non-holometabolous pterygote insects, which usually display a nearly complete set of muscles from the first instar 21,32.

Muscles missing in Epiophlebia

As mentioned above, muscles II (III)dvm1, IIscm2 and IIscm7 are present in Anisoptera but not in Epiophlebia. The muscles II (III)dvm1 and IIscm7 are present in Zygoptera and Neoptera28 and muscle II (III)dvm1 is also known for Ephemeroptera32. This distribution through higher taxa indicates that the presence of these muscles is a plesiomorphic condition for Pterygota. Therefore the missing of these muscles in recent Epiophlebia is a derived state. This interpretation may also be true for muscle IIscm2, which, among Odonata, is only present in Anisoptera20. Assuming a new formation of this muscle in Anisoptera is not parsimonious, because it is also present in Neoptera32,33.

Zygoptera have four muscles that are missing in Epiophlebia and Anisoptera: II (III)dvm2, Ivlm6 and IIvlm3. These are nymphal muscles in Zygoptera18. The muscles Itpm3, Itpm7, Itpm8 and Itpm9 as well as II (III)tpm3 and IIvlm7 are only present in nymphs of Epiprocta. Since Itpm3, II (III)tpm3 and IIvlm7 are missing in Zygoptera18 but are present in Neoptera28 and IIvlm7 also in Ephemeroptera32, it is most parsimonious to assume that their presence is a plesimorphic character for Epiprocta. The muscles II (III)scm1, IIscm8, IIIscm2 and Ispm1 have only been found in nymphs of Odonata. They seem to be generally missing in the adults1,18,27. The odonate ground pattern most likely encompassed IIvlm3 (present in Zygoptera) as well as IIvlm7 (present in Epiprocta), with IIvlm3 secondarily missing in Epiprocta and IIvlm7 in Zygoptera, because both muscles are present outside of Odonata, i.e. in Neoptera and in Ephemeroptera28,32.

Asahina1 depicted and labelled transverse muscles (II (III)tvm1) in the thorax of adult E. superstes. Likewise Maleouf27 and Maki30 mentioned ventral transverse muscles and Barlet34,35 and Matsuda33 found them in Zygentoma and in Archaeognatha. None of them named these muscles. Chadwick36 gave an overview of the occurrence of ventral transverse muscles in several insect orders. Together with these data, our results clearly indicate that a ventral transverse muscle belongs to the ground pattern of the pterygote thorax. Therefore, the absence of such a muscle in Zygoptera and in Anisoptera suggests that it was lost independently in the last common ancestors of each of these two monophyla and that only Epiophlebia retained this plesiomorphic character.

Assuming the commonly accepted monophyly of Ptergygota, it is most likely that its last common ancestor was morphologically similar to the extant species of Zygentoma. This also indicates that the number of muscles in the thorax was quite high in the ground pattern, since in Zygentoma and Archaeognatha33,34,35,36,37 many more thoracic muscles are present than in any extant pterygote insect investigated. This interpretation is supported by our results. We found several muscles in the thorax of Odonata that are not present in Neoptera28 (cf. Fig. 7). Among Odonata, species of Epiophlebia are those with the highest number of thoracic muscles, indicating that this state is plesiomorphic and that the missing of muscles like Iscm4 & IIIscm4 in Zygoptera or IIscm4 in Anisoptera represent the apomorphic state.

Figure 7
figure 7

Phylogenetic relationships of Odonata.

1. Ground pattern of Odonata comprising all known odonate muscles. 2. Reduction of II (III)dvm7, II (III)tvm1, II (III)vlm4. 3. Reduction of II (III)tpm2, II (III)dvm2. 4. Reduction of Iscm4, II (III)dvm7, IIscm4, II (III)tvm1, IIIvlm4. 5. Reduction of IIscm2, IIscm7, II (III)dvm1. Drawings by S. Büsse.

Full size image

Therefore, the statement of Blanke et al.4 that Epiophlebia has preserved the most ancestral characters in Odoanta is supported.

Material and Methods

Three different instars (early, middle and last) of both, E. laidlawi and E. superstes, as well as nymphs of three species of Anisoptera and two species of Zygoptera were investigated (Table 2). The specimens of E. laidlawi were fixed in 4% formaldehyde and stored in 80% ethanol. The other specimens were fixed and stored in 80% ethanol. Prior to scanning, the samples were critical point dried (Balzers CPD030) and mounted on facility specific specimen holders. All applicable regulations concerning the protection of free-living species were followed.

Table 2 Specimens investigated and voxel resolution of μCT data. Voxels are isometric in x-, y- and z-axis in all datasets.
Full size table

As basis for analysing the nymphal morphology and for the three-dimensional reconstructions high resolution X-ray tomography (μCT) datasets38 were acquired at the Institut für Paläontologie, University Bonn (Germany) with a GE Phoenix|x-ray v|tome|x tomograph with a 180 kV X-ray source, at the Swiss Light Source, Villigen (Switzerland)39 at 10.05 keV and at the Deutsches Elektronen Synchrotron (DESY), Hamburg (Germany)40 at 8 keV. Voxel resolutions for the datasets used are given in Table 2. The data were visualized with Amira® 5.4.3 (FEI SAS, Mérignac, France, www.vsg3d.com).

We received the raw tomography data as stacks of TIFF-images containing reconstructed virtual cross-sections (cf. Supplemental Figure 4). Depending on the machine that was used and on the size of the specimen between 800 and 2000 cross-sections were produced per specimen. The TIFF-images were loaded into Amira®, which automatically fuses them into a three-dimensional dataset, which then was stored in the proprietary file-format “.am” that can be processed more easily. To visualize and estimate the quality of the datasets, we first used Amira®’s volume-rendering and section-visualization tools (visualization modules “Volren” and “OrthoSlice”). The set with the best resolution was then chosen to be our point of reference for comparisons with the other specimens. The module “LabelField” was then used to individually label each muscle and the cuticle by scrolling through the slices and marking the relevant structures with either the paint-brush-, lasso- or magic-wand-tool, sometimes in combination with the module’s masking-function. Eventually, we used Amira®’s surface-generation-tools (module “SurfaceGen”) to compute surfaces of the structures of interest: These surfaces can be visualized using the “SurfaceView” module. Images were taken with Amira®’s “SnapShot” function.

These images were further processed (enhancement of brightness/contrast, cropping) with Photoshop® 6.0 (Adobe System Inc., San José, USA). Exemplary sections reconstructed from X-ray tomography data are shown in Supplementary figure 4. A virtual 3D model (produced using Adobe Acrobat Pro® 9.0: “.obj” files of surfaces were exported from Amira®, imported into Adobe 3D Reviewer®, which is part of Acrobat Pro® 9.0, exported to “.u3d” files, which can be inserted into “.pdf”-files) of the thoracic musculature of an Epiophlebia nymph is given in Supplementary Figure 5.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Büsse, S. et al. The thorax morphology of Epiophlebia (Insecta: Odonata) nymphs – including remarks on ontogenesis and evolution. Sci. Rep. 5, 12835; doi: 10.1038/srep12835 (2015).