Abstract
Carbon and water fluxes are key properties of ecosystem processes and functions. A better understanding of their temporal dynamics and coupling mechanism between these fluxes will help us improve ecosystem management for mitigation as well as adaption to future climatic change. From 2003 to 2009, carbon and water flux data were obtained by the eddy covariance method over an old-growth forest in the lower subtropical China. The 7 years of observational data indicated that the water-use efficiency (WUE) of the old-growth forest exhibited weak inter-annual variability. The mean annual WUE ranged from 1.70 to 1.98âgâC kgâ1 H2O. An analysis of the effects of environmental variables on the monthly gross primary productivity (GPP) and evapotranspiration (ET) indicated that solar radiation, air temperature, precipitation and vapor pressure deficit (VPD) produced similar effects on the monthly GPP and ET, which suggests that photosynthesis and ET were similarly driven by the climatic variables. At the monthly scale, the WUE decreased significantly as the precipitation and soil moisture content increased. However, a significant correlation was not detected between the WUE and the VPD at the monthly scale. Moisture conditions tend to be major drivers of the ecosystem WUE.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Monsoon evergreen broad-leaved forests (MEBFs) in southern China is the climax vegetation of the subtropics with a monsoon climate characteristics. In recent decades, however, droughts have become more frequent and severer because of the intensification of rainfall storms and the increasing number of annual rainless days caused by global climate change1, which have led to dramatic changes in the community composition and structure of MEBFs2. Carbon and water fluxes are key properties of ecosystem processes and functions3. Understanding the effects of carbon and water exchange on climatic and soil variables and their interactions is critically important for modeling and assessing the responses of vegetated systems to future climate change.
Carbon fluxes, including photosynthesis and respiration, are tightly coupled to water cycle in terrestrial ecosystems4,5. Water-use efficiency (WUE) is commonly defined as the ratio of gross primary productivity (GPP) to evapotranspiration (ET) for ecosystem-level studies6,7,8, and it is an important eco-physiological index that reflects the coupled relationship between ecosystem water and carbon cycles9. Previous studies have shown that WUE at the ecosystem level is typically controlled by climatic and soil variables, including precipitation, air temperature, vapor pressure deficit (VPD) and soil water content, because of their effects on energy partitioning and canopy conductance8,9, although the magnitude and direction of the response might be different or even opposite10. For example, Guo et al.11 found that high temperatures have a positive effect on crop WUE, whereas Li et al.12 reported that high temperatures have a negative effect on crop WUE. Krishnan et al.13 found drought enhanced growing-season WUE in an aspen forest, while Reichstein et al.14 proposed that drought has the opposite effect on WUE in a Mediterranean evergreen forest. Grünzweig et al.15 reported the same opposite effect on WUE in an Aleppo pine forest. These mixed results deeply reflected the complexity between carbon and water coupling at the ecosystem scale, which varies under different environments and vegetation characteristics.
Plants control the opening of their stomata to optimally satisfy the trade-off between the amount of carbon assimilated and the amount of water transpired16, and the constant diffusion coefficient of H2O is 1.6 times greater than that of the CO2 molecules17. At the ecosystem scale, however, seasonal and inter-annual climate variability and interactions between plant demands and soil supply for water and nutrients may differentially influence the GPP and ET and hence the WUE. Moreover, ecosystem ET involves water loss from both the canopy (transpiration) and the soil surface (evaporation) that inherently differ in response to changing water availability18. Therefore, understanding the variability of the GPP, ET and ecosystem WUE and the environmental factors that control these variables is valuable for evaluating the potential impacts of climate change on ecosystem carbon budgets and water resources.
Eddy covariance (EC) measurements represent a valuable approach for measuring carbon and water fluxes and examining WUE at the ecosystem level19,20. Based on EC technique, many studies have investigated the interactions between GPP, ET, and WUE in different forest ecosystems across China, including evergreen coniferous forests, deciduous broadleaf forests, evergreen broadleaf forests and the mixed forests7,9,21,22. However, limited by the number of flux towers in the subtropical area and the length of observation period23, previously related studies mainly focus on relatively short time-scales (e.g., diurnal, daily and seasonal), which inhibits our ability to accurately predict ecosystem carbon and water response to environmental change24. Long-term studies investigating the inter-annual variability in WUE and its environmental controls are therefore needed, especially for lower subtropical forests.
EC flux tower measurements have been performed in an old-growth subtropical forest in southern China since 2002 within the ChinaFLUX network. By looking into the importance of investigating carbon and water exchange and coupling in climatically sensitive subtropical forest ecosystem, we set-forth three objectives: (1) to analyze the seasonal and inter-annual variability in the GPP, ET and ecosystem WUE in old-growth subtropical forest for understanding the relationship between carbon gain and water consumption, (2) to estimate the effect of meteorology on variations in the monthly GPP and ET, and (3) to examine the environmental factors that control variations in the WUE.
Results
Environmental conditions from 2003 to 2009
The seasonal patterns of the climatic variables and soil moisture are shown in Fig. 1. The monthly solar radiation was 371.2âMJ mâ2 on average and ranged from 110.0âMJ mâ2 to 665.0âMJ mâ2 from 2003 to 2009. The solar radiation was highest in July, with a value of 535.1â±â90.0âMJ mâ2. The annual solar radiation varied from 4070.0âMJ mâ2 (in 2005) to 5047.3âMJ mâ2 (in 2007), and it was 2535.1âMJ mâ2 during the wet season (April-September) on average and 1919.4âMJ mâ2 during the dry season (October-March) on average. The mean annual air temperature was 20.2â±â5.5â°C and ranged from 19.7 (in 2008) to 20.5â°C (in 2003). The vapor pressure deficit (VPD) varied between 0.25âkPa (during the wet month of March) and 0.92âkPa (during the dry month of October), with a mean of 0.54âkPa. At the annual scale, the mean VPD in 2004 and 2007 was greater than that in the other years because of the relatively lower precipitation and higher solar radiation. The pattern of solar radiation, air temperature and precipitation from 2003 to 2009 is representative of typical seasonal trends for this area, which presents warm wet summers and cool dry winters. Seasonal variations in soil moisture are closely tied to precipitation inputs, and the soil water content during the wet season (0.28âcm3âcmâ3) was significantly higher than that in the dry season (0.21âcm3âcmâ3) (Pâ<â0.01).
Seasonal and inter-annual variation in GPP, ET and WUE
The calculated GPP peaked in August from 2003 to 2009 and presented a mean value of 149.6â±â7.3âgâC mâ2 monthâ1 (Fig. 2a). The monthly GPP maximum ranged from 152.9 to 179.5âgâC mâ2 monthâ1. On average, the GPP during the wet seasons was approximately 37.0% higher than that during the dry seasons and presented mean values of 798.8â±â47.1 and 582.9â±â39.3âgâC mâ2 for the wet seasons and dry seasons, respectively.
ET was the highest in July and presented a value of 98.7â±â14.2âkg H2O mâ2 monthâ1 during the 7-year monitoring period. The mean ET during the wet season was 505.3â±â14.4âkg H2O mâ2, which was approximately 73.6% higher than that during the dry season (291.0â±â30.0âkg H2O mâ2). At the inter-annual scale, the annual ET varied from 738.9âkg H2O mâ2 yearâ1 (in 2007) to 835.7âkg H2O mâ2 yearâ1 (in 2004).
The results of the regression analysis showed that the monthly GPP and ET from 2003 to 2009 were positively correlated (yâ=â1.096 xâ+â42.35, R2â=â0.67, Pâ<â0.01). The strong correlation between GPP and ET demonstrated that the carbon and water cycles are coupled in the old-growth subtropical forest, which resulted in seasonal variations in the WUE (Fig. 2b). The annual WUE in the old-growth subtropical forest from 2003 to 2009 ranged from 1.70âgâC kgâ1 H2O to 1.98âgâC kgâ1 H2O. The annual average WUE was 1.83âgâC kgâ1 H2O and presented mean values of 1.60â±â0.11âgâC kgâ1 H2O during the wet season and 2.03â±â0.11âgâC kgâ1 H2O during the dry season (Table 1).
Impact of climatic variables on GPP and ET
At the monthly scale, the total GPP and ET were strongly correlated with solar radiation, air temperature, precipitation and VPD, and they exhibited similar responses (Fig. 3), suggesting that photosynthesis and ET were driven by climatic variables some degree. As the main driver of photosynthesis and transpiration, solar radiation can explain 74% of the seasonal variation in GPP and 56% of the seasonal variation in ET. The monthly total GPP and ET both increased exponentially as the mean air temperature increased (Pâ<â0.01). Air temperature explained 70% and 80% of the seasonal variation in GPP and ET, respectively. The relationships between GPP and ET and precipitation can be expressed by quadratic equations (Pâ<â0.01), whereas the relationships between GPP and ET and VPD are best fit with logarithmic functions (Pâ<â0.01). Besides, results from the path-analysis (Fig. 4) showed that the direct effects of air temperature and solar radiation were similar in shaping the temporal patterns of GPP and ET, which were higher than that of precipitation and VPD in magnitude.
Impact of environmental factors on WUE
During the 7-year experimental period, the WUE in the old-growth subtropical forest decreased exponentially as precipitation increased at the monthly scale (Pâ<â0.01). The WUE showed a larger initial response through ET to wetting, whereas the GPP showed a comparatively weak response to wetting (Fig. 5a). At the monthly scale, the relationship between the ecosystem WUE and air temperature can be best fit by quadratic functions (Pâ<â0.01) (Fig. 5b). Changes in the WUE were tightly coupled to changes in the moisture content of the upper (0â20âcm) soil profile. A strong negative linear relationship (R2â=â0.41, Pâ<â0.01) was observed between the ecosystem WUE and soil moisture content in this subtropical environment (Fig. 5c). The relationship between the WUE and VPD was not significant (Pâ=â0.71) (Fig. 5d). Results from the path-analysis (Fig. 6) showed that the temporal patterns of ecosystem WUE was largely affected by the direct effect of soil water content and precipitation, which were higher than that of air temperature and VPD in magnitude.
Discussion
Ecosystem carbon and water coupling
Carbon and water fluxes are key properties of ecosystem processes and functions. Their coupling processes are complicated over terrestrial ecosystems3,24. The eddy covariance method provides a convenient and efficient method of evaluating this coupling relationship between water and carbon cycles across different vegetation types at the ecosystem level worldwide25,26,27. During this 7-year experiment period, GPP was significantly correlated to ET at the monthly scale (R2â=â0.67, Pâ<â0.01) and showed a strong linear relationship between C gain and water loss. Moreover, the monthly total GPP and ET exhibited similar responses to the climatic variables, especially solar radiation and air temperature.
WUE represents the trade-off between carbon gain and water consumption during the process of plant photosynthesis, and it exhibited relatively slight inter-annual variability in the old-growth subtropical forest. The annual average WUE from 2003 to 2009 was 1.83âgâC kgâ1 H2O, which was lower than the values reported by Yu et al.7 for a conifer plantation forest (2.53âgâC kgâ1 H2O) and a deciduous broadleaf forest (2.57âgâC kgâ1 H2O). The annual average WUE in our study was also lower than the values reported by Rodrigues et al.28 for a Eucalypt plantation and the values reported by Tang et al.24 for a mixed forest in Michigan (2.18âgâC kgâ1 H2O) (Table 2). The lower WUE in the old-growth subtropical forest was primarily attributed to the relatively mature stand (ageâ>â100 years), which presented a lower GPP20 but higher ET because of the unique subtropical monsoon climate in southern China of abundant rainfall and consistently warm temperature1. Brümmer et al.29 reported that the WUE was in the range of 2.6â3.6âgâC kgâ1 H2O at most forest sites across an eastâwest continental-scale transect in Canada. Xiao et al.22 obtained WUE values between 0.87 and 3.59âgâC kgâ1 H2O from 22 sites across China. Essentially, WUE varies with the type of terrestrial ecosystem and differs strongly depending on the location, climatic factors, vegetation characteristics and disturbance regime19,30.
GPP and ET in relation to climatic variables
Terrestrial ecosystem GPP is strongly affected by several abiotic and biotic factors, which can vary at different time scales31,32,33. At the monthly scale, the total GPP from 2003 to 2009 was significantly affected by the total solar radiation and precipitation, the mean air temperature and the VPD. The total monthly solar radiation could explain 74% of the seasonal variation in GPP; thus, solar radiation was expected to be one of the most important climatic variables governing GPP. Understandably, plant photosynthesis only occurs in environments with sufficient quantities of photosynthetically active radiation34. The annual GPP in the old-growth subtropical forests was quite steady and presented relatively limited inter-annual variation (1381.7â±â65.0âgâC mâ2 yearâ1). This finding is consistent the results obtained by Yan et al.35 for a tropical seasonal rain forest (ageâ>â180 years).
Similar to carbon fluxes, the monthly ET was also strongly correlated with the monthly mean temperature, solar radiation and total precipitation. Especially, Air temperature can explain 80% of the seasonal variation in ET. Both the monthly ET and GPP increased exponentially as the mean air temperature increased (Pâ<â0.01). The exponential relationship with air temperature in this study was consistent with the results reported by Singh et al.3 for a subtropical pine (Pinus roxburghii) forest and Tong et al.9 for a warm-temperate mixed plantation. Here, the stronger ET and air temperature relationship than ETâVPD relation (Fig. 3d), clearly indicates that this ecosystem is more energy-limited than water-limited3,36.
Response of ecosystem WUE to environmental factors
WUE is of considerable importance when investigating site-specific water cycles and the effect of drought on the water balance and C sequestration10,13,37. In this study, we found that the ecosystem WUE decreased with monthly precipitation, with strong decreases in WUE observed at precipitation levels of up to 200âmm and declining slowly thereafter. This finding is consistent with the results reported by Singh et al.3 for a subtropical pine (Pinus roxburghii) ecosystem and Yu et al.7 for a synthesis of three different ecosystems along a terrestrial transect in eastern China. Furthermore, enhanced WUE in dry years in the old-growth subtropical forest was also suggested. For example, during the dry year of 2007, the WUE was slightly higher than that during the years before the 2007 drought (i.e., 2003â2006). In 2007, the GPP in the old-growth subtropical forest was approximately 1433.8âgâC mâ2 yearâ1, whereas in the pre-drought years, the average was approximately 1376.2âgâC mâ2 yearâ1 (2003 to 2006). In addition, a greater amount of annual rainfall reduced the annual GPP because of a higher fraction of cloudy days20, whereas the annual ET decreased from 801.3âkg H2O mâ2 yearâ1 to 738.9âkg H2O mâ2 yearâ1 (Table 1).
Increases in temperature may increase or decrease the photosynthetic rate of plants and subsequently influence the accumulation of dry matter. However, temperature changes influence ET at the ecosystem level by affecting leaf stomatal conductance and soil evaporation12. Our study indicates that the ecosystem WUE exhibited a âsaddle patternâ as the monthly mean air temperature increased. This result is inconsistent with the negative linear trend reported by Li et al.12 for a sparse vineyard in arid northwest China and the negative linear trend reported by Niu et al.27 for a temperate steppe. Zhou et al.38 suggested that plants may prioritize resistance to high temperature via opening the stomata unequally to improve the transpiration of leaves and dissipate heat at the cost of low WUE.
Soil moisture is expected to be the primary factor that controls the exchange of water and carbon between the land surface and atmosphere39. Our study also indicates that the WUE of the old-growth subtropical forest was negatively related to soil water content at the monthly scale, which is consistent with previous studies9,40. Many studies at the ecosystem level have also confirmed that under moderate drought, canopy conductance will decrease and ecosystem WUE will increase, whereas under extreme drought stress, WUE would then decrease because of the limited capacity for electron transport and carboxylation14,41,42.
A negative relationship between WUE and VPD has commonly been reported for ecosystem or leaf-level studies19,43,44. However, our study indicated that as the VPD increased in the wet and dry seasons, a significant response was not observed in the WUE. Increases in VPD influenced ET, especially transpiration, through a purely physical effect (a larger gradient of vapor pressure between the leaf air spaces and the atmosphere) and a biological effect (response of stomatal conductance to VPD)42. However, photosynthesis is mediated by changes in stomatal conductance. Thus, ET and photosynthesis were driven by VPD to similar degrees in the old-growth subtropical forest.
Our findings have important implications for understanding climatic change effects on carbon and water processes in subtropical ecosystems. With the projected decrease in soil moisture because of the intensification of rainfall storms and the increasing number of annual rainless days in southern China1, we expect that the WUE of the old-growth forest ecosystem will consequently increase at the ecosystem level. However, elevated temperature may increase or decrease ecosystem WUE at the monthly scale. As a consequence, changes in ecosystem WUE under climatic change will depend on the relative impact of concurrent changes in precipitation and temperature in this area.
Conclusions
Here, we presented data on the seasonal variations in the GPP, ET and ecosystem WUE for an old-growth subtropical forest in southern China. In addition, the biophysical responses of these variables to climatic factors and soil moisture were also evaluated. The results from this study demonstrate that GPP and ET were similarly related to climatic variables (e.g., solar radiation, air temperature, precipitation and VPD), suggesting that variations in climatic factors controlled photosynthesis and ET to similar degrees at the monthly scale. Based on the 7-year experimental data, the WUE in the old-growth subtropical forest exhibited relatively slight inter-annual variations and presented a mean annual value of 1.83â±â0.12âgâC kgâ1 H2O. The relatively low WUE was primarily attributed to the relatively mature stand that presents a lower GPP but higher ET in lower subtropical China. The ecosystem WUE was significantly correlated with precipitation, soil water content and air temperature but not VPD. This study will aid in predictions of the influence of global warming and drought stress on carbon and water fluxes in zonal forests of subtropical China.
Methods
Site description
The study was conducted in southern China at the Dinghushan Biosphere Reserve (DBR) (112°31â²E and 23°10â²N), which is approximately 90âkm west of Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province. The reserve was established in 1950 to protect the natural monsoon broad-leaved evergreen forests in the lower subtropics and accredited as the first National Natural Reserve in China in 1956. The reserve has a total area of 1156 ha and experiences a typical subtropical humid monsoon climate and an average annual temperature of 20.9â°C. The highest and lowest extreme temperatures are 38.0â°C and â0.2â°C, respectively. The annual average precipitation is 1678âmm (1956â2009), and it has a distinct seasonal pattern, with approximately 80% of the precipitation falling during the wet season (April-September) and the remainder falling during the dry season (October-March)1. Soils are classified in the Ultisol group and the Udult subgroup according to the USDA soil classification system. The soil profile usually ranges from 50 to 80âcm in depth, with soil pH-values ranging from 4.5 to 6.0.
Because of the subtropical monsoon climate and the long history of protection in the DBR, this ecosystem contains well-protected old-growth forest (monsoon evergreen broadleaved forest) and various prophase successional forests. The monsoon evergreen broadleaved forest is greater than 400 years in stand age. Dominant species located in the central portion of the reserve include Castanopsis chinensis, Canarium tramdenum, Schima superba, Cryptocarya chinensis, Cryptocarya concinna, and Machilus chinensis. The height of the canopy is approximately 22âm, and the mean leaf area index (LAI) is 4.9 during the dry season and 5.6 during the wet season.
Experimental measurements
Eddy covariance (EC) measurements of carbon and water fluxes and the associated environmental factors were collected from 2003 to 2009 at a study site in the forest stand with a fetch of greater than 5âkm in every direction. The observation mast (cross-section 80âcmâÃâ80âcm) was 38âm tall, the eddy covariance measurement height was 27âm, and the sensors used for the measurements included a CO2/H2O analyzer (Model LI-7500, Li-Cor Inc., NE, USA) and a three-dimensional ultrasonic anemometer (CSAT3, Campbell Scientific, Inc., Logan, UT, USA), which were used to measure fluctuations and averages of the wind velocity, temperature, CO2 and water vapor concentrations. The data were sampled at 10âHz, averaged over 30âmin, and directly recorded using the synchronous device for measurement (SDM) technique with a data logger (CR5000, Campbell Scientific, Inc.).
Along with the flux measurements, standard meteorological data were collected, including precipitation (52203; R.M. Young), solar radiation (CM11, CNR1; Kipp & Zonen), temperature, humidity, vapor pressure (HMP45C; Campbell and IRTS-P: Apogee), soil temperature (105-T and 107-L; Campbell) and soil moisture (CS616; Campbell). All of the routine meteorological data were recorded as 30-min mean values with the data loggers (3 CR10X and 1 CR23X; Campbell).
Data processing and WUE calculation
To ensure the reliable processing of flux data, ChinaFLUX has developed a series of proven methodologies for carbon and water fluxes data quality assessment and quality control23. In this study, a three-dimensional rotation of the coordinates was applied to the wind components to remove the effect of sensor tilt or irregularity on airflow45. The Webb-Pearman-Leuning (WPL) correction was then used to eliminate the influence of air density fluctuations caused by the transfer of heat and water vapor46. We omitted abnormal data that were measured during periods of inadequate turbulence (u*â<â0.2âmâsâ1). Data gaps were filled using nonlinear regression methods47. Additional details on the flux data quality assessment and quality control can be found in Yu et al.23. The percentage of missing or rejected data was 14% for this site.
GPP was calculated as follows:
where NEP denotes the net ecosystem productivity (=âNEE, g C mâ2 timescaleâ1), which was converted from the net ecosystem exchange measured by the eddy covariance system. Reco was calculated as the sum of daytime ecosystem respiration and nighttime ecosystem respiration and estimated from empirical equations derived from soil temperature at a depth of 5âcm and water content in the top 10âcm of soil7.
ET was measured directly by EC technique. Daily ET was calculated as the sum of the H2O flux (kg H2O mâ2 timescaleâ1).
Ecosystem WUE was calculated as follows:
Statistical analysis
Data analyses were carried out using the SAS (version 9.2, SAS Institute, Inc) software. The generalized linear model of regstats was used to conduct the regression analyses between GPP, ET and WUE and environmental variables and test the significance of the regressions, which were also conducted with nonlinear regression. By comparing the R2 and root mean squared error, we selected the better-fit functions that had a higher R2 and lower root mean squared error48. The path-analysis was conducted to evaluate the dependence of the temporal variations of GPP, ET and WUE on environmental factors.
Additional Information
How to cite this article: Liu, X. et al. Water-use efficiency of an old-growth forest in lower subtropical China. Sci. Rep. 7, 42761; doi: 10.1038/srep42761 (2017).
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
Zhou, G. Y. et al. Quantifying the hydrological responses to climate change in an intact forested small watershed in Southern China. Glob. Change Biol. 17, 3736â3746 (2011).
Zhou, G. Y. et al. A climate change-induced threat to the ecological resilience of a subtropical monsoon evergreen broad-leaved forest in Southern China. Glob. Change Biol. 19, 1197â1210 (2013).
Singh, N. et al. Analyzing the dynamics and inter-linkages of carbon and water fluxes in subtropical pine (Pinus roxburghii) ecosystem. Agric. Forest Meterol. 197, 206â218 (2014).
Morales, P. et al. Comparing and evaluating process-based ecosystem model predictions of carbon and water fluxes in major European forest biomes. Glob. Change Biol. 11, 2211â2233 (2005).
Liu, Y. et al. Water use efficiency of Chinaâs terrestrial ecosystems and responses to drought. Sci. Rep. 5, 13799 (2015).
Scanlon, T. M. & Albertson, J. D. Canopy scale measurements of CO2 and water vapor exchange along a precipitation gradient in southern Africa. Glob. Change Biol. 10, 329â341 (2004).
Yu, G. R. et al. Environmental controls over carbon exchange of three forest ecosystems in eastern China. Glob. Change Biol. 14, 2555â2571 (2008).
Jassal, R. S., Black, T. A., Spittlehouse, D. L., Brümmer, C. & Nesic, Z. Evapotranspiration and water use efficiency in different-aged Pacific Northwest Douglas-fir stands. Agric. Forest Meterol. 149, 1168â1178 (2009).
Tong, X., Zhang, J., Meng, P., Li, J. & Zheng, N. Ecosystem water use efficiency in a warm-temperate mixed plantation in the North China. J. Hydrol. 512, 221â228 (2014).
Yang, B. et al. Environmental controls on water use efficiency during severe drought in an Ozark Forest in Missouri, USA. Glob. Change Biol. 16, 2252â2271 (2010).
Guo, R., Lin, Z., Mo, X. & Yang, C. Responses of crop yield and water use efficiency to climate change in the North China Plain. Agr. Water Manage. 97, 1185â1194 (2010).
Li, S. et al. Ecosystem water use efficiency for a sparse vineyard in arid northwest China. Agr. Water Manage. 148, 24â33 (2015).
Krishnan, P. et al. Impact of changing soil moisture distribution on net ecosystem productivity of a boreal aspen forest during and following drought. Agric. Forest Meterol. 139, 208â223 (2006).
Reichstein, M. et al. Severe drought effects on ecosystem CO2 and H2O fluxes at three Mediterranean evergreen sites: revision of current hypotheses? Glob. Change Biol. 8, 999â1017 (2002).
Grünzweig, J. M., Lin, T., Rotenberg, E., Schwartz, A. & Yakir, D. Carbon sequestration in arid-land forest. Glob. Change Biol. 9, 791â799 (2003).
Keenan, T. F. et al. Increase in forest water-use efficiency as atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations rise. Nature 499, 324â327 (2013).
Beer, C. et al. Temporal and among-site variability of inherent water use efficiency at the ecosystem level. Global Biogeochem. Cy. 23, 1â13 (2009).
Liu, X. D. et al. Partitioning evapotranspiration in an intact forested watershed in southern China. Ecohydrology 8, 1037â1047 (2015).
Ponton, S. et al. Comparison of ecosystem water-use efficiency among Douglas-fir forest, aspen forest and grassland using eddy covariance and carbon isotope techniques. Glob. Change Biol. 12, 294â310 (2006).
Yan, J. H. et al. Substantial amounts of carbon are sequestered during dry periods in an old-growth subtropical forest in South China. J. Forest Res. 18, 21â30 (2013).
Zhang, M. et al. Effects of cloudiness change on net ecosystem exchange, light use efficiency, and water use efficiency in typical ecosystems of China. Agric. Forest Meterol. 151, 803â816 (2011).
Xiao, J. et al. Carbon fluxes, evapotranspiration, and water use efficiency of terrestrial ecosystems in China. Agric. Forest Meterol. 182â183, 76â90 (2013).
Yu, G. R., Fu, Y. L., Sun, X. M., Wen, X. F. & Zhang, L. M. Recent progress and future directions of ChinaFLUX. Sci. China Ser. D. 49, 1â23 (2006).
Tang, X. et al. How is water-use efficiency of terrestrial ecosystems distributed and changing on Earthâ?âSci. Rep. 4, 7483 (2014).
Baldocchi, D. et al. FLUXNET: A new tool to study the temporal and spatial variability of ecosystem-scale carbon dioxide, water vapor, and energy flux densities. B. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 82, 2415â2434 (2001).
Berbigier gier, P., Bonnefond, J.-M. & Mellmann, P. CO2 and water vapour fluxes for 2 years above Euroflux forest site. Agric. Forest Meterol. 108, 183â197 (2001).
Niu, S. et al. Water-use efficiency in response to climate change: from leaf to ecosystem in a temperate steppe. Glob. Change Biol. 17, 1073â1082 (2011).
Rodrigues, A. et al. Eight years of continuous carbon fluxes measurements in a Portuguese eucalypt stand under two main events: Drought and felling. Agric. Forest Meterol. 151, 493â507 (2011).
Brümmer, C. et al. How climate and vegetation type influence evapotranspiration and water use efficiency in Canadian forest, peatland and grassland ecosystems. Agric. Forest Meterol. 153, 14â30 (2012).
Hu, Z. et al. Effects of vegetation control on ecosystem water use efficiency within and among four grassland ecosystems in China. Glob. Change Biol. 14, 1609â1619 (2008).
Wang, F., Jiang, H. & Zhang, X. Spatial-temporal dynamics of gross primary productivity, evapotranspiration, and water-use efficiency in the terrestrial ecosystems of the Yangtze River Delta region and their relations to climatic variables. Int. J. Remote Sens. 36, 2654â2673 (2015).
White, M. A., Running, S. W. & Thornton, P. E. The impact of growing-season length variability on carbon assimilation and evapotranspiration over 88 years in the eastern US deciduous forest. Int. J. Biometeorol. 42, 139â145 (1999).
Beer, C. et al. Terrestrial gross carbon dioxide uptake: global distribution and covariation with climate. Science 329, 834â838 (2010).
Churkina, G. & Running, S. W. Contrasting climatic controls on the estimated productivity of global terrestrial biomes. Ecosystems 1, 206â215 (1998).
Yan, J. et al. Seasonal and inter-annual variations in net ecosystem exchange of two old-growth forests in southern China. Agric. Forest Meterol. 182â183, 257â265 (2013).
Das A. J. et al. Climatic correlates of tree mortality in water-and energy-limited forests. PLoS One 8, e69917 (2013).
Law, B. E., Williams, M., Anthoni, P. M., Baldocchi, D. D. & Unsworth, M. H. Measuring and modelling seasonal variation of carbon dioxide and water vapour exchange of a Pinus ponderosa forest subject to soil water deficit. Glob. Change Biol. 6, 613â630 (2000).
Zhou, H. H., Chen, Y. N., Li, W. H. & Chen, Y. P. Photosynthesis of Populus euphratica in relation to groundwater depths and high temperature in arid environment, northwest China. Photosynthetica 48, 257â268 (2010).
Kurc, S. A. & Small, E. E. Soil moisture variations and ecosystem-scale fluxes of water and carbon in semiarid grassland and shrubland. Water Resour. Res. 43, W06416 (2007).
Dean-Knox, D. E., Devitt, D. A., Verchick, L. S. & Morris, R. L. Physiological response of two turfgrass species to varying ratios of soil matric and osmotic potentials. Crop Sci. 38, 175â181 (1998).
Chen, X., Rubin, Y., Ma, S. & Baldocchi, D. Observations and stochastic modeling of soil moisture control on evapotranspiration in a Californian oak savanna. Water Resour. Res. 44, W08409, doi: 10.1029/2007WR006646 (2008).
Eamus, D. et al. Carbon and water fluxes in an arid-zone Acacia savanna woodland: An analyses of seasonal patterns and responses to rainfall events. Agric. Forest Meterol. 182â183, 225â238 (2013).
Boulain, N. et al. Towards an understanding of coupled physical and biological processes in the cultivated Sahelâ2. Vegetation and carbon dynamics. J. Hydrol. 375, 190â203 (2009).
Linderson, M. L. et al. Up-scaling of water use efficiency from leaf to canopy as based on leaf gas exchange relationships and the modeled in-canopy light distribution. Agric. Forest Meterol. 152, 201â211 (2012).
Wilczak, J. M., Oncley, S. P. & Stage, S. A. Sonic anemometer tilt correction algorithms. Bound-Lay. Meteorol. 99, 127â150 (2001).
Webb, E. K., Pearman, G. I. & Leuning, R. Correction of flux measurements for density effects due to heat and water vapor transfer. Q. J. Roy Meteor. Soc. 106, 85â100 (1980).
Falge, E. et al. Gap filling strategies for defensible annual sums of net ecosystem exchange. Agric. Forest Meterol. 107, 43â69 (2001).
Yu, G. R. et al. Spatial patterns and climate drivers of carbon fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems of China. Glob. Change Biol. 19, 798â810 (2013).
Acknowledgements
This study was financially supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2016YFD0600201), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 31600353, 41430529, 31500357 and 31600339) and the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China (Grant No. 2016A030310450). This work used eddy covariance data acquired by the ChinaFLUX network. We are also grateful for sustained support from the staff of the Dinghushan Forest Ecosystem Research Station.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
X.D.L. and J.Y.L. designed this study and wrote the main manuscript text. X.D.L., X.Z.C. and Q.M.Z. collected and analyzed the data and prepared figures and tables. R.H.L., F.L.L. and L.Z. contributed to the discussion of results. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the articleâs Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, X., Chen, X., Li, R. et al. Water-use efficiency of an old-growth forest in lower subtropical China. Sci Rep 7, 42761 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep42761
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep42761
This article is cited by
-
Increased Water Use Efficiency in China and Its Drivers During 2000â2016
Ecosystems (2022)
-
Climate change scenarios and projected impacts for forest productivity in Guanacaste Province (Costa Rica): lessons for tropical forest regions
Regional Environmental Change (2020)
-
Dynamics of Ecosystem Water Use Efficiency in Citrus Orchards of Central India Using Eddy Covariance and Landsat Measurements
Ecosystems (2020)
-
Halotolerant plant-growth promoting rhizobacteria modulate gene expression and osmolyte production to improve salinity tolerance and growth in Capsicum annum L.
Environmental Science and Pollution Research (2018)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.