Abstract
Hepatic fibrosis, a progressive chronic disease mainly caused by hepatitis viral infections, alcohol abuse or metabolic syndrome leading to liver dysfunction and is the growing cause of mortality worldwide. Tyrosine kinase inhibitor BIBF1120 (Nintedanib) has been evaluated in clinical trials for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and advanced Hepatocellular carcinoma, but has not been explored for liver fibrosis yet. In this study, we aimed to investigate the therapeutic effects and mechanism of BIBF1120 in liver fibrogenesis. The effects of BIBF1120 were evaluated in TGFβ-activated mouse 3T3 fibroblasts, LX2 cells, primary human hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) and CCl4-induced liver fibrogenesis mouse model. Fibroblasts-conditioned medium studies were performed to assess the paracrine effects on macrophages and endothelial cells. In-vitro in TGFβ-activated fibroblasts, BIBF1120 significantly inhibited expression of major fibrotic parameters, wound-healing and contractility. In vivo in CCl4-induced acute liver injury model, post-disease BIBF1120 administration significantly attenuated collagen accumulation and HSC activation. Interestingly, BIBF1120 drastically inhibited intrahepatic inflammation and angiogenesis. To further elucidate the mechanism of action, 3T3-conditioned medium studies demonstrated increased 3T3-mediated macrophage chemotaxis and endothelial cells tube formation and activation, which was significantly decreased by BIBF1120. These results suggests that BIBF1120 can be a potential therapeutic approach for the treatment of liver fibrosis.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Liver fibrosis is characterized by the extensive accumulation of abnormal extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins leading to liver dysfunction1,2,3. Hepatocellular damage, inflammatory cells infiltration and extensive tissue remodelling, vascular disorganisation and tissue hypoxia ultimately culminate into progressive fibrosis, cirrhosis or end-stage liver failure, leading to high morbidity and mortality worldwide1,2,3. Despite our increasing understanding of cellular and molecular mechanisms contributing to liver fibrosis or cirrhosis, no anti-fibrotics are currently licensed for use in humans4,5. Activated hepatic stellate cells (HSCs or liver myofibroblasts) are the main effector cells involved in the pathogenesis of liver fibrogenesis6. In normal liver, quiescent HSCs store vitamin A in lipid droplets, but in response to liver injury, damaged hepatocytes and inflammatory cells released growth factors and pro-fibrogenic cytokines, HSCs undergo characteristic morphological and functional changes to transform to proliferative, contractile and ECM-producing myofibroblasts characterized by the loss of vitamin droplets6.
Macrophages, found in close proximity to HSCs also play a key role in fibrosis initiation and progression7,8. Hepatic macrophages can arise either from circulating bone-marrow derived monocytes, which are recruited to the injured liver, or from proliferating resident macrophages (Kupffer cells). Resident macrophages have shown to play a role in initiating inflammatory responses during tissue injury, while infiltrating monocyte-derived macrophages leads to chronic liver inflammation and fibrogenesis8,9,10. Both resident and recruited macrophages produce pro-fibrotic mediators and chemokines that directly activate and recruit fibroblasts and inflammatory cells and control ECM turnover by regulating the balance of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and tissue inhibitors of matrix metalloproteinases (TIMPs)7,8. During recruitment due to liver damage, inflammatory monocytes undergo differentiation into two distinct subsets of macrophages that are categorized as classically-activated inflammatory M1-like macrophages activated by Th1 cytokines e.g. IFN-γ, TNF-α or IL-12, or alternatively-activated resolving M2-like macrophages stimulated by Th2 cytokines IL-4 or IL-139. There exists a positive interplay between HSCs and inflammatory macrophages strongly contributing to amplification of fibrosis8. We have also recently shown a Notch-mediated cross-talk between fibroblasts and macrophages in liver fibrosis11. Additionally, recent data have revealed that angiogenesis contributes significantly to the progression of fibrosis during the wound healing process in chronic liver damage12,13,14. A critical link between angiogenesis, inflammation and fibrosis has been investigated during chronic liver diseases13,15. HSCs activated in response to hypoxia, play a key role in angiogenesis through interactions with endothelial cells via PGDF and VEGF signaling16. These data suggests the multidimensional role of HSCs i.e. exaggerating inflammation and angiogenesis in liver fibrosis6,16. Liver sinusoidal endothelial cells (LSECs) has shown to play a critical role in liver fibrosis17,18. LSECs are required to maintain HSCs quiescence, but during liver fibrosis, LSECs become highly pro-inflammatory and are a critical component of intrahepatic inflammation19. Thus, there is an intricate interplay between the non-parenchymal cells that either prevents or sustains HSC activation and thereby determines fibrosis17.
HSCs are also important source of growth factors e.g. Platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), Transforming growth factor (TGF) and epidermal growth factor (EGF) that stimulate HSCs in autocrine manner and also activate other key cell types via paracrine signaling6,16. PDGF signaling pathway is a well-known pathway for HSC activation. PDGF is the most potent mitogen for HSCs and induction of its receptor, PDGFβR, is a hallmark of early HSCs activation, followed by HSCs transformation to contractile phenotype, and correlates with the degree of fibrosis20. PDGF antagonism and pharmacological inhibition of PDGFβR has shown to be a promising therapeutic approach21,22. Receptors for vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGF) and fibroblast growth factor (FGF) are also shown to be induced during HSC activation that contribute to angiogenesis and fibroblasts activation respectively16. BIBF1120 (or Nintedanib) is a triple tyrosine kinase or tyrosine kinase inhibitor that blocks key HSCs receptors e.g. FGFR, PDGFR and VEGFR. BIBF1120 has been tested previously and showed potential therapeutic effects in a preclinical idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) models and in clinical trials23,24. However, BIBF1120 and its mechanism of action remained unexplored in liver fibrosis.
In this study, we explored the therapeutic effects of BIBF1120 in vitro in 3T3 fibroblasts, LX2 cells, primary human hepatic stellate cells and in vivo in CCl4-induced acute liver fibrogenesis mouse model. Using conditioned medium studies, we further investigated the antagonistic effects of BIBF1120 on fibroblasts resulting in inhibitory paracrine effects on macrophages and endothelial cells.
Results
Tyrosine kinase inhibitor BIBF1120 inhibited PDGF-BB induced proliferation and TGFβ-mediated activation of mouse fibroblasts in vitro
We first examined the anti-proliferative effects of tyrosine kinase inhibitor in mouse fibroblasts. We found that BIBF1120 inhibited PDGF-induced cell proliferation in 3T3 fibroblasts (Fig. 1A). We further examined the effect of BIBF1120 on TGFβ-induced collagen deposition and activation of fibroblasts. We observed that following TGFβ activation, there was a significant increase in protein and gene expression of major fibrotic parameter (collagen-I) (Fig. 1B,C). Treatment with BIBF1120 induced significant dose-dependent reduction in collagen-I protein expression in TGFβ-activated mouse 3T3 fibroblasts (Fig. 1B) and also a substantial inhibition in the respective mRNA expression levels was observed (Fig. 1C). Furthermore, BIBF1120 led to the inhibition of TGFβ-stimulated fibroblasts activation as depicted by attenuation of mRNA expression levels of α-SMA (alpha smooth muscle actin); PDGFβR (Platelet derived growth factor beta receptor) and TIMP1 (Tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteases 1) (Fig. 1DâF). Periostin is a TGFβ superfamily-responsive matricellular protein, produced by fibroblasts, has been shown to be important for collagen fibrillogenesis and overall organization of ECM. We also analyzed the effects of BIBF1120 on Periostin expression and observed substantial upregulation of Periostin in response to TGFβ which was drastically reduced to normal levels following incubation with BIBF1120 (Fig. 1G). We also assessed the effects on the fibronectin receptor, Integrin alpha 5 (ITGA5) since it has been shown that α5β1 is highly expressed in fibroblasts and promotes fibroblast motility and survival25,26. We found that BIBF1120 inhibited TGFβ-stimulated ITGA5 expression (Fig. 1H). No significant effect on cell viability was found at these concentrations (500ânM and 1âμM) of BIBF1120 as can also be seen in Supplementary Fig. S1A.
Tyrosine kinase inhibitor BIBF1120 inhibited differentiation, migration and contractility of LX2 cells in vitro
We further performed the studies in human hepatic stellate cell line (LX2). Following TGFβ mediated activation of LX2 cells, we observed significant upregulation of protein expression of ECM molecules i.e. collagen I and Vimentin, and HSCs activation marker i.e. α-SMA (Fig. 2A). Inhibition of tyrosine kinase signaling pathway using BIBF1120 resulted in dose-dependent inhibition in protein expression levels of these fibrogenic parameters (Fig. 2A and Supplementary Fig. S2A,B). We further examined the effect of BIBF1120 on gene expression of major fibrosis-related parameters Collagen I, TGFβ1, TIMP1 and ITGA5 and observed highly significant down-regulation in the expression levels of these parameters as shown in Fig. 2B. In addition, we examined, using western blot analysis, protein expression of Collagen I, fibronectin receptor integrin alpha 5 (ITGA5)27 and Integrin-signaling molecule pFAK28 and found that expression of these parameters were significantly reduced (Supplementary Fig. S3AâC). No significant effect on cell viability was found at these concentrations (500ânM and 1âμM) of BIBF1120 (Supplementary Fig. S4).
Since HSCs can migrate to the sites of tissue injury during fibrogenesis and differentiate into contractile myofibroblasts that promote liver stiffness29, we further examined the effect of BIBF1120 on migration using wound-healing assays and contractility of LX2 cells using 3D-collagen contraction assay. We found that 1âμM BIBF1120 significantly inhibited TGFβ-induced migration of LX2 cells after 24âhrs as shown in Fig. 3A. Furthermore, BIBF1120 drastically diminished TGFβ-induced collagen gel contraction after 24âh, 48âh and 72âh (Fig. 3B). Maximal inhibitory effects were observed after 72âh of incubation as depicted in Fig. 3C. To confirm if these effects are not related to differences in proliferation, we performed Alamar blue assay at different times of incubations both in wound healing and gel contraction assays and did not observe any differences in proliferation following BIBF treatment.
Tyrosine kinase inhibitor BIBF1120 inhibited differentiation of primary human hepatic stellate cells in vitro
We further extrapolated our studies in primary human hepatic stellate cells (pHSCs) to demonstrate the role and importance of tyrosine kinase signaling pathway during human liver fibrosis. We therefore further investigated the effect of BIBF1120 on the activation of human pHSCs. Following TGFβ mediated activation, we observed significant upregulation of protein expression of collagen I and α-SMA (Fig. 4A). Inhibition of tyrosine kinase signaling pathway using BIBF1120 resulted in significant inhibition in collagen I and α-SMA protein expression (Fig. 4A and Supplementary Fig. S5A,B). We further examined the effect of BIBF1120 on gene expression of major fibrosis-related parameters in pHSCs i.e. Collagen I, α-SMA, TIMP1, TGFβ1, ITGA5 and Periostin, and observed highly significant down-regulation in the mRNA expression levels of these parameters (Fig. 4B).
Tyrosine kinase inhibitor BIBF1120 inhibited ECM accumulation and HSC activation in acute liver injury mouse model
We further investigated the anti-fibrotic effects of BIBF1120 on early fibrogenesis in CCl4-induced acute liver injury mouse model. We first examined the expression of different receptors which are regulated by tyrosine kinase inhibitor BIBF1120 in CCl4-induced acute liver injury mouse model. We found that VEGFR (vascular endothelial growth factor receptor); FGFR (fibroblasts growth factor receptor) and PDGFβR (platelet derived growth factor receptor beta) were upregulated following fibrosis induction (Fig. 5A). We then investigated the effects of BIBF1120 on Collagen I expression and HSCs activation in vivo. Post-disease intra-peritoneal treatment with BIBF1120 (5âmg/kg) induced significant down-regulation of early fibrogenesis as shown by the significant decrease in protein and gene expression of major extracellular matrix (ECM) component, collagen I and HSCs activation markers (desmin and α-SMA) in BIBF1120 treated mice as compared to untreated CCl4 mice (Fig. 5BâF). Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels were also measured and we observed highly significant increase in ALT levels following single administration of CCl4 while no significant differences were observed in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels following treatment with BIBF1120 (Supplementary Fig. S6).
Furthermore, we investigated the effects of BIBF1120 on other crucial ECM proteins e.g. Cadherin 1130, fibronectin, Periostin, ITGA5 and observed strong inhibition in the expression of these parameters following BIBF1120 treatment as depicted in Fig. 5G. Furthermore, ECM regulatory protein, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 1 (TIMP1) was highly reduced following BIBF1120 treatment (Fig. 5G). Altogether, these results suggests that inhibition using BIBF1120 results in the highly significant downregulation of ECM accumulation, HSCs activation and amelioration of liver fibrogenesis.
BIBF1120 inhibited angiogenesis in acute liver injury mouse model
Since hepatic angiogenesis positively correlates with fibrosis i.e. angiogenesis induced by hypoxia within an injured liver appears to aggravate hepatic fibrogenesis and vice versa i.e. hepatic stellate cells produce growth factors that stimulate angiogenesis, we further investigated the effects of BIBF1120 on angiogenesis in acute liver injury mouse model. As shown in Fig. 6AâD, BIBF1120 treatment significantly inhibited fibrosis-induced expression of major pan-endothelial cell markers CD31 and CD34. Expression of VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) was also found to be reduced following treatment with BIBF1120 (Fig. 6E). These anti-angiogenic effects could be partially mediated via inhibition of Notch signaling pathway (Hes1, Notch downstream pathway signaling molecule) and SOX9 (sex determining region Y)-HMG box 9 (Fig. 6F,G).
In vivo effects of BIBF1120 in intrahepatic inflammation and macrophages
As described earlier that macrophages play very crucial role in liver inflammation and development of fibrosis, we further examined the effect of BIBF1120 on liver inflammation. We analyzed gene expression of major inflammatory cytokines i.e. TNFα (tumor necrosis factor alpha) and CCL2 (C-C motif chemokine ligand 2) or MCP1 (macrophage chemotactic protein), and IL-6 (Interleukin-6) and found that intrahepatic expression of these cytokines were strongly attenuated following BIBF1120 administration (Fig. 7A,B and Supplementary Fig. S7).
Thereafter, we investigated the status of M1 (inflammatory) and M2 (restorative) macrophages in the control and BIBF1120 treated livers. As shown in Supplementary Fig. S8AâC, we found that BIBF1120 induced no change in M1 macrophages as confirmed with NOS2 (iNOS or nitric oxide synthase, specific M1 marker) gene expression and MHC-II protein expression as confirmed by western blot. Further, we analyzed expression of specific M1 markers i.e. LY-6C31 and IRF532 using immunostainings but observed no differences (data not shown). However, BIBF1120 induced M2 macrophage polarization, as confirmed by Arg I (Arginase I, specific M2 marker) gene expression (Fig. 7C) and YM1 expression (M2 marker) (Fig. 7D, Supplementary Fig. S9).
BIBF1120 inhibited fibroblasts-driven angiogenesis, macrophage migration and inflammation in vitro
As mentioned, fibroblasts (or HSCs) plays multifactorial role in liver fibrosis via different paracrine signaling pathways by release of growth factors, thereby significantly induces angiogenesis and inflammation6,16,29. Additionally, the positive feedback loop between fibroblasts activation, inflammation and angiogenesis further aggravate fibrosis2,16. Here, we hypothesized that BIBF1120 inhibitory effects on 3T3 fibroblasts induces paracrine inhibitory effects on angiogenesis and macrophage migration and polarization. To effectuate this, we studied the paracrine effect of BIBF1120-treated 3T3 fibroblasts on endothelial cells and macrophages. Based on previous in vitro and in vivo results, we hypothesized that secretory factors derived from fibroblasts induces angiogenesis and macrophage activation and migration and inhibition of fibroblasts using BIBF1120 inhibits secretion of these factors and therefore inhibits angiogenesis and inflammation i.e. macrophage activation/migration.
To model fibroblasts-induced angiogenesis, we activated 3T3 fibroblasts with TGFβ with or without 1âμM BIBF1120. Thereafter, we washed them to remove the initial stimuli and then cultured in a fresh medium. After 24âhr, this conditioned medium was added to H5V endothelial cells and tube formation assay was performed. Conditioned media derived from control fibroblasts and TGFβ-stimulated fibroblasts enhanced tube formation compared to that of control (non-cell treated) medium. Interestingly, medium derived from 3T3 fibroblasts after treatment with BIBF1120 significantly inhibited the TGFβ-induced tube formation suggesting deactivation of fibroblasts using BIBF1120 inhibit fibroblasts-induced angiogenesis (Fig. 8A,B). We further analyzed the NOS3 (eNOS or nitric oxide synthase 3, endothelial marker) expression following incubation with conditioned medium and observed that conditioned medium derived from TGFβ-treated 3T3 fibroblasts induced significant upregulation in NOS3 expression which was strongly inhibited following incubation with conditioned medium derived from BIBF1120-treated 3T3 fibroblasts (Fig. 8C).
We further developed in vitro model to study fibroblasts-induced macrophage migration and activation. We added the conditioned medium from control 3T3 cells, TGFβ-treated 3T3 or TGFβâ+âBIBF1120 treated 3T3 in the lower chamber and macrophages in the upper chamber/insert to study the effect on macrophage migration through the membrane. We observed that conditioned medium from control 3T3 fibroblasts induced macrophage migration as compared to control (non-cell treated) medium suggesting chemotactic factors secreted by 3T3 fibroblasts (Fig. 8D,E). This macrophage migration was significantly enhanced in response to conditioned medium derived from TGFβ-treated 3T3 fibroblasts and was strongly inhibited following incubation with conditioned medium derived from BIBF1120-treated 3T3 fibroblasts (Fig. 8D,E). We further analyzed the expression levels of NOS2 (iNOS or nitric oxide synthase 2, M1 inflammatory macrophage marker) and IL-1β (inflammation marker). We observed that conditioned medium derived from TGFβ-treated 3T3 fibroblasts induced significant upregulation in NOS2 and IL-1β expression as compared to conditioned medium derived from 3T3 fibroblasts. This increase in expression levels were strongly inhibited following incubation with conditioned medium derived from TGFβâ+âBIBF1120 treated 3T3 fibroblasts (Fig. 8F).
BIBF1120 inhibited primary human HSCs-driven LSECs and kupffer cells activation in vitro
We further extrapolated the conditioned medium studies using primary human hepatic stellate cells, hepatic sinusoidal endothelial cells and hepatic kupffer cells to reinforce the findings observed with 3T3 conditioned medium. We incubated hepatic kupffer cells with conditioned medium obtained from pHSCs incubated with medium, TGFβ and TGFβâ+âBIBF1120. We observed that TGFβ-incubated pHSCs conditioned medium significantly upregulated NOS2 and TNFα expression in primary human kupffer cells suggesting activation of primary human liver-derived macrophages (Supplementary Fig. S10A,B). This activation was abrogated following incubation with conditioned medium derived from BIBF1120-treated pHSCs (Supplementary Fig. S10A,B). Since it has been shown that LSECs are required to maintain HSCs quiescence and during liver fibrosis, LSECs secrete fibronectin, and become highly pro-inflammatory and are a critical component of intrahepatic inflammation6,7,33, we analyzed HSCs-mediated effect on primary LSECs. We observed that following incubation with conditioned medium derived from TGFβ-activated pHSCs led to increased expression of TNFα (inflammation marker) and fibronectin (Supplementary Fig. S11A,B). This increase was inhibited by incubation with conditioned medium obtained from BIBF1120-treated pHSCs suggesting that the soluble factors produced by pHSCs stimulate both kupffer cells and LSECs and these factors or effects of pHSCs-derived factors were inhibited by BIBF1120.
Discussion
In this study, we investigated the therapeutic efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitor BIBF1120 (Nintedanib) in liver fibrogenesis. We demonstrate that tyrosine kinase inhibitor BIBF1120 strongly attenuated TGFβ-activated fibroblasts and HSC activation, collagen deposition, HSC contractility and migration in vitro. In vivo in CCl4-induced early liver fibrogenesis in mice, BIBF1120 significantly inhibited collagen deposition and HSC differentiation. Remarkably, BIBF1120 suppressed intrahepatic inflammation and angiogenesis. To understand the role of BIBF1120 in inflammation and angiogenesis, we performed conditioned medium in vitro studies and showed that BIBF1120 inhibited fibroblasts induced paracrine effects on macrophages (inflammation) and endothelial cells (angiogenesis). This preliminary pre-clinical investigative study exploring BIBF1120 in liver fibrosis suggests the potent inhibitory effects of BIBF1120 and suggests that BIBF1120 should be explored in the clinical trials for the treatment of liver fibrosis.
Liver fibrogenesis is a chronic progressive disease, characterized by scar formation due to the increased production and deposition of ECM proteins1,2,16,34. The key fibrogenic effector cell type is the activated hepatic stellate cells also known as myofibroblasts. HSCs have matrix producing functions and contractile properties resulting in liver distortion and dysfunction. HSCs also make a major contribution to the important aspects of the wound healing process including regeneration, inflammation and angiogenesis6,29,34. Upon activation due to liver damage, activated HSCs secrete growth factors e.g. PDGF, FGF, TGF, EGF, VEGF and chemokines i.e. MCP1, IL-6 etc. These mediators stimulates HSCs in autocrine fashion and also stimulates other cell types i.e. hepatocytes, macrophages and endothelial cells in paracrine manner important for liver regeneration, intrahepatic inflammation and angiogenesis respectively. HSCs are also shown to induce the expression of several receptors importantly PDGFRα and PDGFRβ, VEGFR and FGFR and are important for the autocrine activation16,34. Simultaneous blocking of these receptors will therefore induce significant de-differentiation of HSCs and therefore would influence downstream processes like intrahepatic inflammation and angiogenesis.
BIBF1120 (or Nintedanib) is a potent tyrosine inhibitor that blocks PDGFR, VEGFR and FGFR. It has been shown in lung fibroblasts that apart from these receptors, BIBF1120 has inhibitory effects on Lck, Lyn as analyzed using in vitro kinase assays24. BIBF1120 has been extensively examined in lung fibrosis mouse models, and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) patients and demonstrated inhibitory effects23,24 and therefore currently actively investigated in ongoing clinical trials for IPF patients. But this potent multikinase inhibitor has not been explored in liver fibrosis. In lung fibroblasts, it has been shown that BIBF1120 exert inhibitory effects by inhibiting PDGFR phosphorylation, fibroblasts proliferation and activation23,24. In this study, we showed that BIBF1120 at increasing doses inhibit PDGF-induced fibroblasts proliferation. BIBF1120 exerted significant reduction in Collagen I expression and deposition, fibroblasts activation and matrix remodeling proteins i.e. TIMP1 (tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases 1) inducing collagen degradation by MMPs (matrix metalloproteinases), Integrins (ITGA5) and periostin (ligand for integrins) that support cell adhesion and migration via signaling through FAK-mediated signaling pathway28. We further examined the specific effects of BIBF1120 in human HSCs, and found that BIBF1120 attenuated TGFβ-stimulated HSCs activation, collagen I expression, HSCs migration and contractility.
BIBF1120 has shown to exhibit anti-fibrotic and anti-inflammatory effects in lung fibrosis mouse models. In this study, we first demonstrate upregulation of PDGFR, VEGFR and FGFR in acute liver fibrogenesis mouse model. Thereafter, we analyzed BIBF1120 in acute liver fibrogenesis mouse model. Interestingly, we observed anti-fibrotic, anti-inflammatory and anti-angiogenic effects of BIBF1120. We found that BIBF1120 significantly inhibited adhesion proteins (Periostin, fibronectin, ITGA5 and cadherin-11) that are important in cell adhesion, motility and contractility which are important factors for portal hypertension since increased portal hypertension further deteriorates the liver function. Furthermore, we observed strong inhibition of angiogenesis partially exhibited due to the drastic inhibition of Notch signaling pathway and SOX9 expression that has shown to regulate many developmental processes including angiogenesis11,33,35. To delineate the anti-inflammatory effects, we analyzed specific M1 and M2 macrophages markers and we found that inflammatory M1 macrophages remained unchanged while there was significant upregulation in suppressive M2 macrophages suggesting BIBF1120 via indirect pathways stimulate M2-directed macrophage polarization. Since inflammatory cytokines TNFα and CCL2 play an important role in development of fibrosis10, the inhibition of these pro-fibrogenic factors resulted in reduced fibrosis.
To further understand the effects of BIBF1120 on angiogenesis and intrahepatic inflammation, we performed paracrine cross-talk studies with fibroblasts (and HSCs), macrophages (and kupffer cells) and endothelial cells (and LSECs). We observed that fibroblasts conditioned medium contains factors that stimulate macrophage activation, and endothelial cells activation in paracrine fashion. Interestingly, BIBF1120 incubated fibroblasts inhibited release of these paracrine factors and therefore exhibited attenuated macrophage activation, and endothelial cells activation.
However, there are number of limitations within this study. This study has been performed in acute (or mild) liver fibrogenesis model that does not correspond to the clinical situation. Patients normally presents to the clinic when liver damage progresses to cirrhosis associated with portal hypertension and liver dysfunction. Nevertheless, this study provided first proof-of-concept results suggesting BIBF1120 can be an effective therapeutic drug to be explored further in liver fibrosis. Multi-kinase inhibitors however have shown to be highly toxic since they inhibit number of crucial pathways that are involved in number of cellular processes and long-term treatment or multi-dose treatment might be needed to overcome poor pharmacokinetics of these small molecule inhibitors might lead to toxicity. Therefore, HSC-selective delivery of these inhibitors using nanocarriers should be investigated as future promising therapies for the treatment of liver fibrosis36,37.
In conclusion, we demonstrated the anti-fibrotic, anti-inflammatory and anti-angiogenic effects of BIBF1120 in vitro and in vivo in acute liver fibrogenesis mouse model. These findings unveil the novel pathways regulated by BIBF1120 in fibrosis and further studies are warranted to investigate therapeutic efficacy of BIBF1120 in advanced models of liver fibrosis and finally poses an interesting drug to be explored in the clinical trials for the treatment of liver fibrosis.
Materials and Methods
Cell Lines
Human hepatic stellate cells (LX2 cells), immortalized human derived cell line were kindly provided by Prof. Scott Friedman (Mount Sinai Hospital, New York). Murine H5V heart capillary endothelial cells were kindly provided by Dr. A. Vecchi (Mario Negri, Institute for Pharmacological Research, Milan, Italy). Murine NIH3T3 fibroblasts and murine RAW264.7 macrophages were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA). LX2 cells were cultured in DMEM-Glutamax (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) supplemented with 10% FBS and antibiotics (50âU/ml Penicillin and 50âμg/ml streptomycin, Sigma). RAW macrophages were cultured in Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) 1640 medium (Lonza, Verviers, Belgium), and 3T3 and H5V cells were cultured in Dulbeccoâs modified Eagleâs (DMEM) medium (Lonza) supplemented with 2âmM L-glutamine (Sigma, St. Louis, MO), 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Lonza) and antibiotics (50âU/ml Penicillin and 50âμg/ml streptomycin, Sigma).
Primary human cells
Primary human hepatic stellate cells (pHSCs), primary human liver sinusoidal endothelial cells (pLSECs) and primary human kupffer cells were obtained from Sciencell (Sciencell, CA). pHSCs were cultured on poly(L-lysine) coated plates in stellate cell medium (SteCM, Sciencell) supplemented with stellate cells growth supplements (SteCGS), 2% FBS and antibiotics (Penicillin and streptomycin). pLSECs were cultured on fibronectin-coated plates in endothelial cell medium (ECM, Sciencell) supplemented with endothelial cells growth supplements (ECGS), 5% FBS and antibiotics (Penicillin and streptomycin). Primary human kupffer cells were cultured on poly(L-lysine) coated plates in macrophage medium (MM, Sciencell) supplemented with macrophage growth supplements (MaGS), 5% FBS and antibiotics (Penicillin and streptomycin).
Effects of Tyrosine kinase inhibitor BIBF1120 in mouse fibroblasts
Cells were seeded in 24-well plates (3âÃâ104 cells/well for stainings) and 12-well plates (8âÃâ104 cells/well for quantitative PCR analysis) and cultured overnight. To assess the effects on fibrotic parameters, cells were starved for 24âh and then incubated with starvation medium alone, 1âμM BIBF1120 and 5âng/ml of human recombinant TGFβ1 (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) for 24âh. Cells (24 well plates) were then fixed with chilled acetone:methanol (1:1) for 20âmin, dried and stained for collagen-I (Supplementary Table 1). In addition, cells (12 well plates) were lysed with RNA lysis buffer to perform quantitative real-time PCR analyses. Stainingâs and quantitative PCR analysis was performed at least in three independent experiments.
To assess the effects on proliferation, cells plated in 96 well plates were serum-starved for 24âh and incubated with different concentrations of BIBF1120 (01, 0.5, 1, 2.5, 5, 10 and 25âμM) with 50âng/ml human recombinant PDGF (Peprotech) for 24âh. Control cells were treated with 50âng/ml PDGF and DMSO. Subsequently cells were incubated with Alamar Blue reagent (Invitrogen) for 4âhrs. The results are represented as % inhibition of fibroblasts proliferation. All measurements were performed in duplicates in three independent experiments.
Effects of Tyrosine kinase inhibitor BIBF1120 in LX2 cells and primary human HSCs (pHSCs)
Cells were seeded in 24-well plates (3âÃâ104 cells/well for stainings) and 12-well plates (8âÃâ104cells/well for quantitative PCR analysis) and cultured overnight. To assess the effects on fibrotic parameters, cells were starved for 24âh and then incubated with starvation medium alone, 500ânM or 1âμM BIBF1120 and 5âng/ml of human recombinant TGFβ1 (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) for 24âh. Cells (24 well plates) were then fixed with chilled acetone:methanol (1:1) for 20âmin, dried and stained for collagen-I, α-SMA or vimentin (antibodies summarized in Supplementary Table 1). In addition, cells (12 well plates) were lysed with RNA lysis buffer to perform quantitative real-time PCR analyses. Stainingâs and quantitative PCR analysis was performed at least in three independent experiments.
Scratch wound healing assay
Cells were plated in 12-well culture plates (1âÃâ105 cells/well) for 24âh and starved overnight in 0.5% FBS containing medium. A standardized scratch was made using a 200âμl pipette tip fixed in a holder. Then, cells were washed and incubated with 1âml of 0.5% FBS containing medium with or without TGFβ (5âng/ml) together with 1âμM BIBF1120. To measure the migratory response of the cells into the scrape wounds, microscopic photographs were taken at 0âh and 24âh. Images were analyzed by NIH ImageJ software (NIH, Bethesda, MD) to calculate the area of scratch wound and represented as % of wound healed relative to the control wells.
3D collagen-I gel contraction assay
A collagen suspension (5âml) containing 3.0âml Collagen G1 (5âmg/ml, Matrix biosciences, Morlenbach, Germany), 0.5âml 10x M199 medium (Sigma), 85âμl 1N NaOH (Sigma) and sterile water was mixed with 1.0âml (2âÃâ106) cells. Collagen gel-cells suspension (0.6âml/well) was plated in a 24âwell culture plate and allowed to polymerize for 1âh at 37â°C. For the effect studies: polymerized gel was incubated with 1âml of 0.5% FBS containing medium with or without TGFβ (5âng/ml) together with 1âμM BIBF1120 followed by detachment of the gels from the culture wells. For other experiments, medium with or without TGFβ was added before gel detachment. Photographs were made with a digital camera at different time points (0, 24, 48 and 72âh). The size of the gels were digitally measured and normalized with their respective well size in each image. Gel contraction experiments were performed in duplicates in three independent experiments.
Conditioned medium studies
3T3 fibroblasts and primary human HSCs (pHSCs) were plated in complete medium in 12-well plates and cultured overnight. Then cells were serum-starved for 24âh. Then 3T3 fibroblasts and pHSCs were incubated with or without TGFβ (5âng/ml), with and without 1âμM BIBF1120. After 24âh, incubated cells were washed and fresh medium (0%âFBS) was added. After 24âh, conditioned medium was collected and stored at â70â°C until use. 3T3-conditioned medium (from different conditions) was added on unstimulated RAW macrophages and H5V endothelial cells with an equal volume of fresh respective medium to avoid nutrient depletion effects. pHSCs-conditioned medium (from different conditions) was added on unstimulated primary human kupffer cells and pLSECs with equal volume of respective medium. After 24âh incubation with the conditioned medium, cells were lysed for quantitative PCR analysis. All the conditioned medium studies were performed in three independent experiments.
Tube Formation Assay
The fibroblasts-mediated paracrine effects of BIBF1120 on endothelial cells (H5V) were examined using the tube formation assay. GeltrexTM reduced growth factor basement membrane matrix (Invitrogen) was thawed at 4â°C overnight before use. GeltrexTM matrix was added to wells of a 8-chambered slides (Lab-TekTM) (150âμl/well) and then incubated at 37â°C for 1âhr to allow polymerization. H5V cells (40,000 cells/well) were seeded onto the layer of GeltrexTM matrix containing the conditioned medium collected from 3T3 cells after different treatment as mentioned above. After 20âh at 37â°C, 5 random selected fields of view were captured using EVOS fluorescent microscope (AMG, Life Technologies). Tube formation was quantified by measuring the number of tubes counted and represented as relative percentage of tube formation.
Transwell Migration Assay
The transwell migration assay was performed on RAW macrophages using a polycarbonate membrane inserts (8âμm pore size; Transwell Coster Corning Inc.). The lower chambers were filled with 650âul medium (455âul of conditioned medium +â175âul of fresh medium). The conditioned medium was collected from 3T3 cells after different treatment as mentioned above. Cells (1âÃâ105 cells/100âμl) were added in the upper chamber (or insert), then incubated at 37â°C for 24âh to allow cell migration through the membrane. After incubation, the chambers were removed and washed twice with PBS and the non-invading cells were discarded using a cotton swab. The cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, permeabilized in 100% methanol and stained using DAPI nuclear stain. 5 random selected fields of view were captured using EVOS fluorescent microscope (AMG, Life Technologies) and the number of invading cells were quantified using NIH ImageJ software and represented as relative percentage of cell migration.
Animal Experiments
All the animal experiments in this study were performed in strict accordance with the guidelines and regulations for the Care and use of Laboratory Animals, Utrecht University, The Netherlands. The protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Ethics Committee of the University of Twente, The Netherlands. Male 6- to 8-week old C57BL/6 mice were purchased from Harlan (Zeist, Netherlands) and kept at 12âh light/12âh dark cycles with ad libitum normal diet.
CCl4-induced acute liver injury mouse modelh
To study the effect of BIBF1120, male C57BL/6 mice were treated with a single intraperitoneal injection of olive-oil or CCl4 (1âml/kg in olive-oil) at day 1. At day 2 and day 3, CCl4-treated mice received intra-peritoneal administration of 5âmg/kg tyrosine kinase inhibitor BIBF1120 (Selleckchem, Boston, NY) prepared in 1% DMSO (Sigma) and 5% β-hydroxycyclodextrin (Sigma) or vehicle treatment (1%DMSO/5%β-hydroxycyclodextrin/PBS) (nâ=â5 per group). At day 4, all mice were sacrificed and livers were harvested for the subsequent analysis. Alanine Transaminase (ALT) levels in the plasma was measured using ALT Colorimetric Activity Assay Kit (Cayman Chemical Company, Michigan, MI, USA) as per manufacturerâs instructions.
Immunohistochemistry
Liver tissues were harvested and transferred to Tissue-Tek OCT embedding medium (Sakura Finetek, Torrance, CA), and snap-frozen in 2-methyl butane chilled in a dry ice. Cryosections (4âμm) were cut using a Leica CM 3050 cryostat (Leica Microsystems, Nussloch, Germany). The sections were air-dried and fixed with acetone for 10âmin. Cells or tissue sections were rehydrated with PBS and incubated with the primary antibody (refer to Supplementary Table 1) for 1âh at room temperature. Cells or sections were then incubated with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibody for 1âh at room temperature. Then incubated with HRP-conjugated tertiary antibody for 1âhr at room temperature. Thereafter, peroxidase activity was developed using AEC (3-amino-9-ethyl carbazole) substrate kit (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) for 20âmin and nuclei were counterstained with hematoxylin (Fluka Chemie, Buchs, Switzerland). For tissue sections, endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked by 3% H2O2 prepared in methanol. Cells or sections were mounted with Aquatex mounting medium (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). The staining was visualized and the images were captured using light microscopy (Nikon eclipse E600 microscope, Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). Furthermore, sections were scanned using Hamamatsu NanoZoomer Digital slide scanner 2.0HT (Hamamatsu Photonics, Bridgewater, NJ) for quantitative histological analysis.
Quantitative histological analysis
For quantitation, stained sections were scanned at high resolution using Hamamatsu NanoZoomer Digital slide scanner 2.0HT (Hamamatsu Photonics). High resolution scans were viewed using NanoZoomer Digital Pathology (NDP2.0) viewer software (Hamamatsu Photonics). About 20 images (100x) of each entire section (from NDP) were imported into NIH ImageJ software (NIH, Bethesda, MD) and were analyzed quantitatively at a fixed threshold.
Western blot analysis
Cells or liver tissues were homogenized in cold RIPA buffer [50âmM TrisâHCl, 150âmM NaCl, 0.1% SDS, 0.1% Igepal in 0.5% sodium deoxycholate with 1 tablet of protease inhibitor cocktail and 1 tablet of phosphatase inhibitor (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) in 10âml] on ice with a tissue homogenizer and the lysates were centrifuged at 12,000ârpm for 1âh at 4â°C. The supernatants were stored at â70â°C until use. The samples were boiled in standard protein sample buffer (Life Technologies) and subjected to SDS-PAGE with 10% Tris-glycine gels (Life Technologies) followed by protein transfer onto PVDF membrane. The membranes were developed according to the standard protocols using primary and secondary antibodies as mentioned in Supplementary Table 1. The bands were visualized using ECL detection reagent (Perkin Elmer Inc., Waltham, MA) and photographed using FluorChem M Imaging System (ProteinSimple, Alpha Innotech, San Leandro CA). Intensity of individual bands was quantified using ImageJ densitometry software, and expressed in % relative to β-actin.
RNA extraction, reverse transcription, quantitative real time PCR and RT2 profiler PCR array
Total RNA from cells and liver tissues was isolated using GenElute Total RNA Miniprep Kit (Sigma) and SV total RNA isolation system (Promega Corporation, WI) respectively according to manufacturerâs instructions. The RNA concentration was quantitated by a UV spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmington, DE). Total RNA (1âμg) was reverse-transcribed using iScript cDNA Synthesis Kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). All the primers were purchased from Sigma-Genosys (Haverhill, UK). Real-time PCR was performed using 2x SensiMix SYBR and Fluorescein Kit (Bioline, QT615-05, Luckenwalde, Germany), 20âng cDNA and pre-tested gene-specific primer sets (listed in Supplementary Tables 2 and 3). The cycling conditions for the BioRad CFX384 Real-Time PCR detection system were 95â°C for 10âmin, 40 cycles of 95â°C/15âsec, 58â°C/15âsec and 72â°C/15âsec. Finally, cycle threshold (Ct) values were normalized to reference gene GAPDH and fold changes in expression were calculated using the 2âÎÎCt method.
Statistical analyses
All the data are presented as meanâ±âstandard error of the mean (SEM). The graphs and statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism version 5.02 (GraphPad Prism Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA). Comparison to control group were analyzed using unpaired studentsâ t test while multiple comparisons between different groups were performed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni post-hoc test. The differences were considered significant at pâ<â0.05.
Additional Information
How to cite this article: Ãztürk Akcora, B. et al. Tyrosine kinase inhibitor BIBF1120 ameliorates inflammation, angiogenesis and fibrosis in CCl4-induced liver fibrogenesis mouse model. Sci. Rep. 7, 44545; doi: 10.1038/srep44545 (2017).
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
Friedman, S. L. Hepatic fibrosis â overview. Toxicology 254, 120â129, doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2008.06.013 (2008).
Friedman, S. L. Mechanisms of hepatic fibrogenesis. Gastroenterology 134, 1655â1669, doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.03.003 (2008).
Schuppan, D. & Afdhal, N. H. Liver cirrhosis. Lancet. 371, 838â851 (2008).
Albanis, E. & Friedman, S. L. Antifibrotic agents for liver disease. Am.J.Transplant. 6, 12â19 (2006).
Gressner, O. A., Weiskirchen, R. & Gressner, A. M. Evolving concepts of liver fibrogenesis provide new diagnostic and therapeutic options. Comp Hepatol. 6, 7 (2007).
Friedman, S. L. Hepatic stellate cells: protean, multifunctional, and enigmatic cells of the liver. Physiol Rev. 88, 125â172 (2008).
Kershenobich, S. D. & Weissbrod, A. B. Liver fibrosis and inflammation. A review. Ann.Hepatol. 2, 159â163 (2003).
Wynn, T. A. & Barron, L. Macrophages: master regulators of inflammation and fibrosis. Semin Liver Dis 30, 245â257, doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1255354 (2010).
Heymann, F., Trautwein, C. & Tacke, F. Monocytes and macrophages as cellular targets in liver fibrosis. Inflamm Allergy Drug Targets 8, 307â318 (2009).
Ju, C. & Tacke, F. Hepatic macrophages in homeostasis and liver diseases: from pathogenesis to novel therapeutic strategies. Cell Mol Immunol 13, 316â327, doi: 10.1038/cmi.2015.104 (2016).
Bansal, R., van Baarlen, J., Storm, G. & Prakash, J. The interplay of the Notch signaling in hepatic stellate cells and macrophages determines the fate of liver fibrogenesis. Sci Rep 5, 18272, doi: 10.1038/srep18272 (2015).
Elpek, G. O. Angiogenesis and liver fibrosis. World J Hepatol 7, 377â391, doi: 10.4254/wjh.v7.i3.377 (2015).
Paternostro, C., David, E., Novo, E. & Parola, M. Hypoxia, angiogenesis and liver fibrogenesis in the progression of chronic liver diseases. World J Gastroenterol 16, 281â288 (2010).
Valfre di Bonzo, L. et al. Angiogenesis and liver fibrogenesis. Histol Histopathol 24, 1323â1341 (2009).
Ehling, J. et al. CCL2-dependent infiltrating macrophages promote angiogenesis in progressive liver fibrosis. Gut 63, 1960â1971, doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-306294 (2014).
Lee, U. E. & Friedman, S. L. Mechanisms of hepatic fibrogenesis. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 25, 195â206, doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2011.02.005 (2011).
DeLeve, L. D. Liver sinusoidal endothelial cells in hepatic fibrosis. Hepatology 61, 1740â1746, doi: 10.1002/hep.27376 (2015).
Xie, G. et al. Role of differentiation of liver sinusoidal endothelial cells in progression and regression of hepatic fibrosis in rats. Gastroenterology 142, 918â927 e916, doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.12.017 (2012).
Connolly, M. K. et al. In hepatic fibrosis, liver sinusoidal endothelial cells acquire enhanced immunogenicity. J Immunol 185, 2200â2208, doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1000332 (2010).
Borkham-Kamphorst, E. et al. Platelet-derived growth factor isoform expression in carbon tetrachloride-induced chronic liver injury. Lab Invest 88, 1090â1100, doi: 10.1038/labinvest.2008.71 (2008).
Borkham-Kamphorst, E., Stoll, D., Gressner, A. M. & Weiskirchen, R. Antisense strategy against PDGF B-chain proves effective in preventing experimental liver fibrogenesis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 321, 413â423, doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.06.153 (2004).
Wang, Y. et al. New insights into the antifibrotic effects of sorafenib on hepatic stellate cells and liver fibrosis. J Hepatol 53, 132â144, doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2010.02.027 (2010).
Richeldi, L. et al. Efficacy of a tyrosine kinase inhibitor in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. N Engl J Med 365, 1079â1087, doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1103690 (2011).
Wollin, L., Maillet, I., Quesniaux, V., Holweg, A. & Ryffel, B. Antifibrotic and anti-inflammatory activity of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor nintedanib in experimental models of lung fibrosis. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 349, 209â220, doi: 10.1124/jpet.113.208223 (2014).
Huveneers, S., Truong, H., Fassler, R., Sonnenberg, A. & Danen, E. H. Binding of soluble fibronectin to integrin alpha5 beta1 - link to focal adhesion redistribution and contractile shape. J Cell Sci 121, 2452â2462, doi: 10.1242/jcs.033001 (2008).
Margadant, C. & Sonnenberg, A. Integrin-TGF-beta crosstalk in fibrosis, cancer and wound healing. EMBO Rep 11, 97â105, doi: 10.1038/embor.2009.276 (2010).
Altrock, E. et al. Inhibition of fibronectin deposition improves experimental liver fibrosis. J Hepatol 62, 625â633, doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2014.06.010 (2015).
Lawson, C. et al. FAK promotes recruitment of talin to nascent adhesions to control cell motility. J Cell Biol 196, 223â232, doi: 10.1083/jcb.201108078 (2012).
Lemoinne, S., Cadoret, A., El Mourabit, H., Thabut, D. & Housset, C. Origins and functions of liver myofibroblasts. Biochim Biophys Acta 1832, 948â954, doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2013.02.019 (2013).
Langhe, R. P. et al. Cadherin-11 localizes to focal adhesions and promotes cell-substrate adhesion. Nat Commun 7, 10909, doi: 10.1038/ncomms10909 (2016).
Ramachandran, P. et al. Differential Ly-6C expression identifies the recruited macrophage phenotype, which orchestrates the regression of murine liver fibrosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109, E3186â3195, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1119964109 (2012).
Weiss, M., Blazek, K., Byrne, A. J., Perocheau, D. P. & Udalova, I. A. IRF5 is a specific marker of inflammatory macrophages in vivo . Mediators Inflamm 2013, 245804, doi: 10.1155/2013/245804 (2013).
Ramasamy, S. K., Kusumbe, A. P., Wang, L. & Adams, R. H. Endothelial Notch activity promotes angiogenesis and osteogenesis in bone. Nature 507, 376â380, doi: 10.1038/nature13146 (2014).
Wynn, T. A. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of fibrosis. J Pathol 214, 199â210, doi: 10.1002/path.2277 (2008).
Morell, C. M. & Strazzabosco, M. Notch signaling and new therapeutic options in liver disease. J Hepatol 60, 885â890, doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2013.11.028 (2014).
Poelstra, K. Liver fibrosis in 2015: Crucial steps towards an effective treatment. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 13, 67â68, doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2015.224 (2016).
Poelstra, K. & Schuppan, D. Targeted therapy of liver fibrosis/cirrhosis and its complications. J Hepatol 55, 726â728, doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2011.04.008 (2011).
Acknowledgements
We thank B. Klomphaar for the technical assistance. This project was supported by Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development, ZonMw, VENI innovation grant 916.151.94 (to R.B.).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
R.B. conceived and designed the project. R.B. and B.O. performed the experiments and analyzed the data. R.B. interpreted the data and wrote the manuscript. G.S. and J.P. discussed the results and provided the research facilities. All the authors have read the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the articleâs Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Ãztürk Akcora, B., Storm, G., Prakash, J. et al. Tyrosine kinase inhibitor BIBF1120 ameliorates inflammation, angiogenesis and fibrosis in CCl4-induced liver fibrogenesis mouse model. Sci Rep 7, 44545 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep44545
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep44545
This article is cited by
-
Downregulation of miR-20b-5p Contributes to the Progression of Liver Fibrosis via the STAT3 Signaling Pathway In Vivo and In Vitro
Digestive Diseases and Sciences (2023)
-
Nintedanib Alleviates Chronic Pancreatitis by Inhibiting the Activation of Pancreatic Stellate Cells via the JAK/STAT3 and ERK1/2 Pathways
Digestive Diseases and Sciences (2023)
-
Nintedanib promotes antitumour immunity and shows antitumour activity in combination with PD-1 blockade in mice: potential role of cancer-associated fibroblasts
British Journal of Cancer (2021)
-
Nintedanib inhibits intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma aggressiveness via suppression of cytokines extracted from activated cancer-associated fibroblasts
British Journal of Cancer (2020)