Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Signatures for strong-field QED in the quantum limit of beamstrahlung

W. L. Zhang, T. Grismayer, and L. O. Silva
Phys. Rev. A 108, 042816 – Published 20 October 2023

Abstract

Signatures for strong-field quantum electrodynamics are determined for collisions between round ultrarelativistic leptonic beams in the quantum limit of beamstrahlung. In the low-disruption regime, we derive the integrated beamstrahlung photon spectrum that features a characteristic peak close to the beam energy. The conditions to precisely observe this peak experimentally are given regarding the beam parameters. Moreover, the effects of electron-positron pair creation and beam disruption on the photon spectrum are discussed and explored with three-dimensional particle-in-cell QED simulations. The photon spectrum is associated with the emission of ultrashort and highly collimated γ-ray beams with a peak spectral brightness exceeding 1030photons/(smm2mrad20.1%BW) at the 100-GeV level of photon energy (close to the beam energy).

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 31 January 2023
  • Revised 12 July 2023
  • Accepted 28 September 2023

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.108.042816

©2023 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Accelerators & BeamsPlasma Physics

Authors & Affiliations

W. L. Zhang1,2,*, T. Grismayer2,†, and L. O. Silva2,‡

  • 1Engineering Research Center of Nuclear Technology Application, Ministry of Education, East China University of Technology, Nanchang 330013, China
  • 2GoLP/Instituto de Plasmas e Fusão Nuclear, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal

  • *wenlong.zhang@tecnico.ulisboa.pt
  • thomas.grismayer@tecnico.ulisboa.pt
  • luis.silva@tecnico.ulisboa.pt

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 108, Iss. 4 — October 2023

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×

Images

  • Figure 1
    Figure 1

    The dN/dχe distribution of particles in leptonic beam-beam collisions. A Monte Carlo code is developed, where the colliding beams are represented by pseudoparticles created using random number generation. Each pseudoparticle is assigned with a weight given by the corresponding initial local density within the beam. The beams are set to cross each other at the speed of light. The χe(r,t) of each particle is calculated based on the local fields from the oncoming beam. The dN/dχe distribution shown here is taken at the peak interaction moment (when the centers of colliding beams cross) in a collision with χemax=200. The distribution is normalized by the particle number of the beam (N0). For each colliding beam, 106 pseudoparticles are initialized. Different beam profiles are compared here. The blue line is for Gaussian colliding beams with energy E0=90 GeV, longitudinal length σz=30.7nm, transverse size σ0=30.7 nm, and particle number N0=1.37×109. The orange line is for the approximated uniform profile as specified in the text. The green dashed line represents the theoretical distribution for the approximated uniform profile, i.e., dN/dχe=2χe/χemax2.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 2
    Figure 2

    The normalized energy spectrum ξSω(ξ) of photon radiation from a head-on collision between two identical, cold, round, and Gaussian electron beams with χemax=200. The beam parameters are the same as those used in Fig. 1, i.e., E0=90 GeV, σ0=30.7 nm, σz=30.7 nm, and N0=1.37×109. The blue line is for a 3D PIC simulation. The orange dashed line is for the analytical spectrum, Eq. (6). The green dashed line is for the direct numerical calculation of Sω(ξ) using the original Gaussian beam profile.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 3
    Figure 3

    The energy spectrum of photons from the same electron-electron collision in Fig. 2, but with stronger beamstrahlung by employing longer beams. Here, σz=230nm, leading to Nγ¯=1.5 according to our theory [using Eq. (8)]. The initial disruption is weak with D0=0.04. The other parameters, including E0, σ0, n0, and χemax, remain unchanged. Insets: Density maps at the yz slice across the beam axis, at the end of the collision. (a) Positrons from the created pairs in one colliding beam; (b) corresponding photons radiated from the same beam.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 4
    Figure 4

    The dN/dχe distribution of particles in the same leptonic collision but with different misalignment Δ0 (offset between the colliding beams). The beam parameters are the same as those used in Figs. 1 and 2, and the distribution is obtained using the same Monte Carlo method as in Fig. 1.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 5
    Figure 5

    Comparison between the differential probability rate of the nonlinear Compton process [d2W/dtdξ, given by Eq. (A1) and shown by the blue solid line] and its approximation proposed by this work [using Eq. (A6), shown by the orange dashed line]. The comparison is examined for different electron energy E0 and field strength (electric field Er of the beams). The corresponding χe of the electron under study is given by χe=2(E0/mc2)Er/Es. Upper panels: An electron with E0=10GeV under fields of 1×1014V/m in panel (a), 4×1014V/m in panel (b), and 8×1014V/m in panel (c). Lower panels: an electron with E0=100 GeV under the same fields as the upper panels.

    Reuse & Permissions
×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review A

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×