Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
  • Letter

Anomalous noise spectra in a spin-exchange-relaxation-free alkali-metal vapor

K. Mouloudakis, J. Kong, A. Sierant, E. Arkin, M. Hernández Ruiz, R. Jiménez-Martínez, and M. W. Mitchell
Phys. Rev. A 109, L040802 – Published 30 April 2024

Abstract

We perform spin-noise spectroscopy on an unpolarized Rb87 vapor in the spin-exchange-relaxation-free (SERF) regime. We observe noise spectral distributions that deviate strongly from Lorentzian models that accurately describe lower-density regimes. For example, at magnetic fields of 1 µT and Rb87 densities of 1×1014 atoms/cm3 we observe an asymmetric spin-noise distribution in which the resonance line is depleted by about half its power, with the diverted power becoming a broad spectral component that could be mistaken for optical shot noise. The results are in good agreement with recent models accounting for correlations between the ground hyperfine states. We discuss implications for quantum sensing and absolute noise calibration in spin squeezing and entanglement detection. The results suggest similarly anomalous spectra for other noise spectroscopies, when noise mechanisms are not aligned with system dynamics.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 31 July 2023
  • Revised 6 December 2023
  • Accepted 28 March 2024

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.109.L040802

©2024 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Atomic, Molecular & Optical

Authors & Affiliations

K. Mouloudakis1,*, J. Kong2,*, A. Sierant1, E. Arkin2, M. Hernández Ruiz1, R. Jiménez-Martínez3, and M. W. Mitchell1,4

  • 1ICFO - Institut de Ciències Fotòniques, The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, 08860 Castelldefels (Barcelona), Spain
  • 2Department of Physics, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou 310018, China
  • 3FieldLine Industries, Boulder, Colorado 80303, USA
  • 4ICREA - Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats, 08010 Barcelona, Spain

  • *These authors contributed equally to this work.

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

Supplemental Material (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 109, Iss. 4 — April 2024

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×

Images

  • Figure 1
    Figure 1

    Experimental setup and representative spectra. (a) Schematic representation of the experimental setup (see text). (b) Predicted non-Lorentzian spin-noise contributions (i) SF̂za,F̂za(ν), (ii) SF̂zb,F̂zb(ν), (iii) SF̂za,F̂zb(ν), and SF̂zb,F̂za(ν), computed using Eq. (6) and experimentally relevant parameters: Rse3.02×105 s1 and Rsd0.03×105 s1, corresponding to 3.4×1014 atoms/cm3 and temperature T=169C. The magnetic field is B=385 nT along the x̂ direction. (c) Example of a non-Lorentzian spectrum at a magnetic field of B1292 nT fitted to a Lorentzian plus dispersive curve (see Ref. [39] for details). (d) Spin-noise spectra acquired at a magnetic field of B=385 nT and a number density of n3.4×1014 atoms/cm3. The mean PSN level is depicted by the green dashed line and has been subtracted from the spectrum. Data are fitted by a Lorentzian model (black solid line) and Eq. (1) (red solid lines) with and without “1/f-noise”. The departure from the Lorentzian spectrum is demonstrated.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 2
    Figure 2

    Single-sided power spectral density (PSD) of the polarimeter signal (in volts, conversion to rotation angle 35 mrad/V) for transverse magnetic fields ranging from 280 nT to 12 µT while the vapor cell is maintained at approximately 169C. Each spectrum shows the linear average [39] of 150 spectra, each computed on a 0.5-s acquisition with a sampling rate of 200 kSa s1. A 20-Hz (ten-bin) boxcar smoothing has also been applied [8]. Black solid lines: Fit of Eq. (1) (excluding 1/f and electronic noise) to the observed spectra (see text). Inset: The left axis shows spin-noise precession frequency ωq normalized to ω0=gsμBB/[(2I+1)] versus ω0 known by calibration of the coils at low density [39]. The right axis shows the spin-noise linewidth (half width at half maximum) versus ω0. Data are obtained by fitting the spectra with a distorted Lorentzian (see text). Error bars show ±1 standard deviation in the fit estimation parameters over 150 acquisitions. The blue (purple) solid line shows Im[λ] (Re[λ]) of the eigenvalues of the drift matrix A, as given by Eq. (7) of Ref. [39]. The parameters are discussed in the main text.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 3
    Figure 3

    Non-Lorentzian spectra and apparent (but not real) violation of the area conservation law. (a) Spin-noise spectra (single-sided PSD) as a function of the Rb87 number density for a fixed magnetic field of B=918 nT. Each spectrum shows the linear average of 100 spectra. Long high-frequency tails are apparent. Inset: Resonant noise power fraction as a function of number density as calculated using Eq. (8). The cutoff frequency νbr at 20 kHz is indicated by the red dashed line. Error bars show ±1 standard deviation in the numerical integration over 100 acquisitions. (b) For visualizing the power redistribution, the spin-noise resonances of Fig. 3 are plotted with the frequency axis shifted so that each is centered at 0. Curves are plotted for a constant field B=918 nT and varying number density. The values for the number densities are reported in Ref. [39]. The inset shows spin-noise resonances for the lower (5.1×1012 /cm3) and higher (4.4×1014 /cm3) atomic densities acquired.

    Reuse & Permissions
×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review A

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×