Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Nonanalyticity of circuit complexity across topological phase transitions

Zijian Xiong, Dao-Xin Yao, and Zhongbo Yan
Phys. Rev. B 101, 174305 – Published 7 May 2020

Abstract

The presence of nonanalyticity in observables is a manifestation of phase transitions. Through the study of two paradigmatic topological models in one and two dimensions, in this work we show that the circuit complexity based on our specific quantification can reveal the occurrence of topological phase transitions, both in and out of equilibrium, by the presence of nonanalyticity. By quenching the system out of equilibrium, we find that the circuit complexity grows linearly or quadratically in the short-time regime if the quench is finished instantaneously or in a finite time, respectively. Notably, we find that for both the sudden quench and the finite-time quench, a topological phase transition in the pre-quench Hamiltonian will be manifested by the presence of nonanalyticity in the first-order or second-order derivative of circuit complexity with respect to time in the short-time regime, and a topological phase transition in the post-quench Hamiltonian will be manifested by the presence of nonanalyticity in the steady value of circuit complexity in the long-time regime. We also show that the increase of dimension does not remove, but only weakens the nonanalyticity of circuit complexity. Our findings can be tested in quantum simulators and cold-atom systems.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 28 June 2019
  • Revised 7 March 2020
  • Accepted 20 April 2020

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.101.174305

©2020 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

General Physics

Authors & Affiliations

Zijian Xiong, Dao-Xin Yao*, and Zhongbo Yan

  • State Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Materials and Technologies, School of Physics, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China

  • *yaodaox@mail.sysu.edu.cn
  • yanzhb5@mail.sysu.edu.cn

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 101, Iss. 17 — 1 May 2020

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×

Images

  • Figure 1
    Figure 1

    (a) Phase diagram. ν denotes the winding number, and the horizontal (μ/t1=0.2) and vertical (t2/t1=1.2) red dashed lines are two paths that we choose to vary the parameters. (b) Circuit complexity (in units of system size, below this is implicitly assumed) for several reference states. Parameters are t1=1, t2=1.2, and Δ1=Δ2=1. (c) The derivative of circuit complexity with respect to μT. Parameters are the same as in (b). |dC/dμT| turns out to be independent of μR, and is equal to γ(μ). (d) The derivative of circuit complexity with respect to t2T. Parameters are t1=1, μ=0.2, and Δ1=Δ2=1. |dC/dt2T| is also found to be independent of t2R and coincide with γ(t2). Throughout this work, vertical pink dashed lines [see (b)–(d)] correspond to the critical points at which topological phase transitions take place.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 2
    Figure 2

    Common parameters are t1=1, t2=1.2, and Δ1=Δ2=1. (a) The evolution of post-quench circuit complexity. μi=0.9. (b) Steady value of post-quench circuit complexity shown in (a). (c) Dynamical growth rate. μf=0.3 is fixed.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 3
    Figure 3

    (a) Common parameters are t1=1, t2=1.2, and Δ1=Δ2=1. (a) The evolution of circuit complexity under a finite-time quench. The quench duration time tq is fixed to 1 and μi=0.9. (b) The dependence of steady value on μf, tq, and μi keep the same as in (a). (c) tC, the dynamical growth rate of circuit complexity, in the short-time regime, μi=0.9, μf=1.8. The slope of tC is found to increase with the quench speed. (d) t2C in the limit t0+. The concrete value of t2C depends on the quench speed, but the presence of nonanalyticity at the critical points does not rely on the quench speed.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 4
    Figure 4

    (a) Phase diagram with n denoting the Chern number. The horizontal (μ/t1=0.5) and vertical (t2/t1=1.5) red dashed lines are two paths that we choose to vary the parameters. (b) Circuit complexity for several reference states. Parameters are t1=1.0 and t2=1.5. (c) The derivative of circuit complexity with respect to μT. Parameters are the same as in (b). (d) The derivative of circuit complexity with respect to t2T. Parameters are t1=1 and μ=0.5.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 5
    Figure 5

    Common parameters are t1=1, t2=1.5. (a) The evolution of post-quench circuit complexity. μi=0.9. (b) Steady value of post-quench circuit complexity shown in (a). (c) Dynamical growth rate. μf=0.7 is fixed.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 6
    Figure 6

    θkk curves near critical points. Common parameters are t1=1, t2=1.2, and Δ1=Δ2=1. (a) Across the critical point μc=0.2, one can see that θk has a sudden jump at k=π. (b) Across the critical point μc=1.1, θk has a sudden jump at k=2π/3.

    Reuse & Permissions
×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×