Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Quantitative measurement of giant and quantized microwave Faraday rotation

Vishnunarayanan Suresh, Edouard Pinsolle, Christian Lupien, Talia J. Martz-Oberlander, Michael P. Lilly, John L. Reno, Guillaume Gervais, Thomas Szkopek, and Bertrand Reulet
Phys. Rev. B 102, 085302 – Published 5 August 2020

Abstract

We report quantitative microwave Faraday rotation measurements conducted with a high-mobility two-dimensional electron gas (2DEG) in a GaAs/AlGaAs semiconductor heterostructure. In a magnetic field, the Hall effect and the Faraday effect arise from the action of Lorentz force on electrons in the 2DEG. As with the Hall effect, a classical Faraday effect is observed at low magnetic field along with a quantized Faraday effect at high magnetic field. The high electron mobility of the 2DEG enables a giant single-pass Faraday rotation of θFmax45(0.8 rad) to be achieved at a modest magnetic field of B100 mT. In the quantum regime, we find that the Faraday rotation θF is quantized in units of α*=2.80(4)α, where α1/137 is the fine-structure constant. The enhancement in rotation quantum α*>α is attributed to electromagnetic confinement within a waveguide structure.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 8 August 2019
  • Revised 19 May 2020
  • Accepted 15 July 2020

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.102.085302

©2020 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Condensed Matter, Materials & Applied Physics

Authors & Affiliations

Vishnunarayanan Suresh1, Edouard Pinsolle1, Christian Lupien1, Talia J. Martz-Oberlander2, Michael P. Lilly3, John L. Reno3, Guillaume Gervais2,*, Thomas Szkopek4,*, and Bertrand Reulet1,*

  • 1Département de Physique and Institut Quantique, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada J1K 2R1
  • 2Department of Physics, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada H3A 2T8
  • 3Center for Integrated Nanotechnologies, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87185, USA
  • 4Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada H3A 0E9

  • *Author to whom correspondence should be addressed: gervais@physics.mcgill.ca; thomas.szkopek@mcgill.ca; Bertrand.Reulet@USherbrooke.ca

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 102, Iss. 8 — 15 August 2020

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×

Images

  • Figure 1
    Figure 1

    Classical Hall and Faraday effects and experimental setup. A schematic representation of the classical (a) Hall and (b) Faraday effects is shown, along with the definition of the Hall angle θH and the Faraday rotation angle θF. (c) Experimental setup to measure microwave Faraday rotation. A linearly polarized electromagnetic wave is injected into a circular hollow waveguide (port 1) that supports two orthogonally polarized TE11 modes. The transmitted field is measured using an orthomode transducer in a direction parallel (port 3) and perpendicular (port 4) to the incoming electromagnetic wave.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 2
    Figure 2

    Scattering parameters and Faraday rotation measurements at 11.2 GHz. (a) Perpendicular port scattering parameter S41 and (b) parallel port scattering parameter S31 versus magnetic field B. The solid (dashed) line denotes the positive (negative) magnetic field polarity. (c) Magnetic field dependence of the Faraday angle θF (red circles) at the base temperature of the dilution refrigerator (7 mK). The blue line is a fit of the Faraday rotation versus magnetic field with a classical Drude conductivity model (see text). The inset shows a zoom of the same data at low magnetic field.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 3
    Figure 3

    Quantized Faraday rotation. (a) Faraday angle plotted as tan(θF) versus 1/B (solid red line) at the base temperature of the dilution refrigerator. The expected position of each observed Faraday plateau is shown by horizontal markers with the quantization condition tan(θF)=iα*. The rotation quantum α for a 2DEG in vacuum is illustrated for reference. The inset shows a comparison of Faraday angle measurements at 10 mK (red line) and 3.2 K (blue line) temperature of the dilution refrigerator. (b) Landau level index i versus plateau midpoint 1/B (markers), with a linear fit (dashed line) from which the 2DEG electron sheet density n is inferred.

    Reuse & Permissions
×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×