Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
  • Open Access

Magnetic field induced softening of spin waves and hard-axis order in the Kondo-lattice ferromagnet CeAgSb2

S. E. Nikitin, A. Podlesnyak, J. Xu, D. Voneshen, Manh Duc Le, S. L. Bud'ko, P. C. Canfield, and D. A. Sokolov
Phys. Rev. B 104, 115169 – Published 30 September 2021
PDFHTMLExport Citation
Abstract
Authors
Article Text
  • INTRODUCTION
  • BULK MEASUREMENTS
  • SPIN DYNAMICS AT ZERO FIELD
  • FIELD-INDUCED BEHAVIOR OF SPIN WAVES
  • DISCUSSION
  • CONCLUSION
  • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
  • APPENDICES
    • References

    Abstract

    A significant number of Kondo-lattice ferromagnets order perpendicular to the easy magnetization axis dictated by the crystalline electric field. The nature of this phenomenon has attracted considerable attention, but remains poorly understood. In the present paper we use inelastic neutron scattering supported by magnetization and specific heat measurements to study the spin dynamics in the hard-axis ferromagnet CeAgSb2. In the zero-field state we observed two sharp magnon modes, which are associated with Ce ordering and extended up to ≈3 meV with a considerable spin gap of 0.6 meV. Application of a magnetic field perpendicular to the moment direction reduces the spectral intensity and suppresses the gap and significantly enhances the low-temperature specific heat at a critical field of Bc≈2.8 T via a mean-field-like transition. Above the transition, in the field-polarized state, the gap eventually reopens due to the Zeeman effect. We modeled the observed dispersion using linear spin-wave theory taking into account the ground-state Γ6 doublet and exchange anisotropy. Our model correctly captures the essential features of the spin dynamics including magnetic dispersion, distribution of the spectral intensity, as well as the field-induced behavior, although several minor features remain obscure. The observed spectra do not show significant broadening due to the finite lifetime of the quasiparticles. Along with a moderate electronic specific heat coefficient γ=46 mJ/mol K2 this indicates that the Kondo coupling is relatively weak and the Ce moments are well localized. Altogether, our results provide profound insight into the spin dynamics of the hard-axis ferromagnet CeAgSb2 and can be used as solid ground for studying magnetic interactions in isostructural compounds including CeAuSb2, which exhibits nematicity and unusual mesoscale magnetic textures.

    • Figure
    • Figure
    • Figure
    • Figure
    • Figure
    • Figure
    • Figure
    4 More
    • Received 28 March 2021
    • Revised 12 September 2021
    • Accepted 14 September 2021

    DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.104.115169

    Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI. Open access publication funded by the Max Planck Society.

    Published by the American Physical Society

    Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

    1. Research Areas
    Kondo effectMagnetic anisotropyMagnetic interactionsMagnetic orderMagnetic phase transitions
    1. Physical Systems
    Ferromagnets
    1. Techniques
    Neutron scattering
    Condensed Matter, Materials & Applied Physics

    Authors & Affiliations

    S. E. Nikitin1,2, A. Podlesnyak3, J. Xu4,5, D. Voneshen6,7, Manh Duc Le6, S. L. Bud'ko8,9, P. C. Canfield8,9, and D. A. Sokolov2

    • 1Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), CH-5232 Villigen, Switzerland
    • 2Max-Planck-Institut für Chemische Physik fester Stoffe, D-01187 Dresden, Germany
    • 3Neutron Scattering Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
    • 4Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie GmbH, Hahn-Meitner-Platz 1, D-14109 Berlin, Germany
    • 5Heinz Maier-Leibnitz Zentrum (MLZ), Technische Universität München, 85748 Garching, Germany
    • 6ISIS, STFC, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Chilton, Didcot OX11 0QX, United Kingdom
    • 7Department of Physics, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, TW20 0EX, United Kingdom
    • 8Ames Laboratory US DOE, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011, USA
    • 9Department of Physics and Astronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011, USA

    Article Text

    Click to Expand

    References

    Click to Expand
    Issue

    Vol. 104, Iss. 11 — 15 September 2021

    Reuse & Permissions
    Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

    Authorization Required

    Log In
    Other Options
    ×

    Images

    • Figure 1
      Figure 1

      (a) Isothermal magnetization m, measured for B∥c and B∥a axes at 1.8 K. (b) Temperature dependence of magnetization measured for B=0.1T∥c and B∥a axes. Note the crossing of magnetizations near TC=9.6 K. Inset shows inverse magnetization 1/m for both orientations of magnetic field. (c) Temperature dependence of the specific heat divided by temperature in magnetic fields applied along the a axis. (d) Magnetic field dependence of the specific heat at 1.8 K with B∥a.

      Reuse & Permissions
    • Figure 2
      Figure 2

      Spin-wave dispersion of CeAgSb2 in ferromagnetic state at 1.7 K and 0 T measured at CNCS in (HK0) (a) and (H0L) (c) scattering planes. The data are integrated by ±0.08 Å−1 in two orthogonal directions. (b), (d) Magnon spectra for the same path as in panels (a) and (d), respectively, calculated using SpinW software. (e), (f) Sketches of structural “small” and magnetic “large” Brillouin zones for (H0L) and (0KL) scattering planes shown by orange dotted and blue solid lines, respectively. The green arrows show the paths in the reciprocal space for the spaghetti plot in panels (a)–(b) and (c)–(d), respectively.

      Reuse & Permissions
    • Figure 3
      Figure 3

      Zero-field magnetic structure and anisotropic exchange interactions in CeAgSb2 in order of increasing Ce-Ce bond length. Only Ce ions are shown. (a) J1 and J3 are in-plane interactions along [100] and [110] directions; J2 and J4 are nonequivalent out-of-plane interactions due to the fact that the z coordinate of Ce 0.2388≠14. (b) J5, J7, and J6 are out-of-plane and in-plane interactions between Ce in neighboring unit cells. (c) J8 and J9 are interactions along [120] and [331] directions correspondingly.

      Reuse & Permissions
    • Figure 4
      Figure 4

      Spin-wave dispersion measured in (HK0) scattering plane with magnetic field applied along the c axis using CNCS spectrometer. Left and right parts of the figure show the spaghetti plots along the same Γ→M→X path in the reciprocal space at 0 and 2 T as indicated in the panels. The data are integrated by ±0.07 (r.l.u.) in two orthogonal directions. Black lines shows results of spin-wave modeling. The width of the lines here and in all other figures represents intensities of the magnetic modes.

      Reuse & Permissions
    • Figure 5
      Figure 5

      Spin-wave dispersion measured in (H0L) scattering plane with magnetic field applied along the b axis using LET spectrometer. Panels (a), (b), and (c) show the data collected at 0, 1, and 3 T. The data are integrated by ±0.07 (r.l.u.) in two orthogonal directions. The color scale is identical for each panel. Black lines show results of spin-wave modeling. (d) Orange and blue lines show sketches of the structural and magnetic Brillouin zones; the green arrows show the path of spaghetti plots.

      Reuse & Permissions
    • Figure 6
      Figure 6

      CEF excitations extracted from high-energy INS data measured using LET spectrometer with Ei=14.9 meV. (a), (b) Powder-averaged INS signals of CeAgSb2 measured at B=0 T and different temperatures, as indicated in panels. Note that these patterns differ from the real powder signal, because the integration was performed within the (H0L) scattering plane, rather than full reciprocal space. Bright vertical excitation at high-|Q| is due to acoustic phonons emanating from (200) structural peak. (c) Field dependence of magnetic excitations at T=1.7 K and B=0,1,3 T. The curves were obtained by integration of the INS signal at low Q within H=0±−1.5;K=0±0.1;L=0±1.5 r.l.u. Two shaded peaks at ≈2 and ≈6 meV show magnon and CEF excitations, respectively. The data are shifted vertically for clarity.

      Reuse & Permissions
    • Figure 7
      Figure 7

      Spin-wave dispersion measured in (H0L) scattering plane with magnetic field B=6 T applied along the b axis using CNCS spectrometer. The data are integrated by ±0.07 (r.l.u.) in two orthogonal directions. Black lines shows results of spin-wave modeling. (a) Dispersion along (003)→(002)→(1202) direction. (b) Two energy-momentum slices along the equivalent directions of the Brillouin zone (1052)→(0052) and (0032)→(1032) clearly show the absence of the mode crossing. (c) Orange and blue lines show sketches of the structural and magnetic Brillouin zones; the green and purple arrows show the paths for panels (a) and (b), respectively.

      Reuse & Permissions
    • Figure 8
      Figure 8

      INS spectra of CeAgSb2 measured using FLEXX spectrometer at Gamma point Q=(101). Temperature was fixed to T=1.7 K and magnetic fields are indicated in legends. Panels (a) and (b) show the data collected below and above the critical field Bc, respectively. Data in both panels are vertically shifted for clarity.

      Reuse & Permissions
    • Figure 9
      Figure 9

      Spin gap at Γ point calculated from the INS spectra (colored dots) and temperature of spin-reorientation transition deduced from thermodynamic measurements (gray dots) plotted as a function of magnetic field. Red and blue lines show the spin gap calculated with Eqs. (3), (4), and (5) for g=3 and g=3.43. Black line is a fit of the transition temperature with Tc∝Bc2−B2. The temperature and energy axes are shown on the same scale E=kBT.

      Reuse & Permissions
    • Figure 10
      Figure 10

      INS spectra of CeAgSb2 measured using CNCS spectrometer at T=1.7 K and B=0 T obtained by integration of the signal around Γ(101) point, H=1±ΔQ,K=0±ΔQ,L=1±ΔQ with different ΔQ as indicated in the legend. Green lines show model calculations using SpinW software (on top of an empirical linear background), which take into account Q integration and energy-dependent experimental resolution of CNCS instrument. The data are shifted vertically for clarity.

      Reuse & Permissions
    • Figure 11
      Figure 11

      INS spectra calculated by RPA and INS. The color plots were obtained using SpinW software for the S=1/2 model and are similar to Figs. 2 and 2. Solid lines show low-energy magnon dispersion calculated for Hamiltonian (D1) using RPA with McPhase software.

      Reuse & Permissions
    ×

    Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

    Reuse & Permissions

    It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

    ×

    Log In

    Cancel
    ×

    Search

    Article Lookup

    Paste a citation or DOI
    Enter a citation
    ×