Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Spectral crossovers and universality in quantum spin chains coupled to random fields

Debojyoti Kundu, Santosh Kumar, and Subhra Sen Gupta
Phys. Rev. B 105, 014205 – Published 21 January 2022
PDFHTMLExport Citation

Abstract

We study the spectral properties of and spectral crossovers between different random matrix ensembles [Poissonian, Gaussian orthogonal ensemble (GOE), Gaussian unitary ensemble (GUE)] in correlated spin-chain systems, in the presence of random magnetic fields, and the scalar spin-chirality term, competing with the usual isotropic and time-reversal invariant Heisenberg term. We have investigated these crossovers in the context of the level-spacing distribution and the level-spacing ratio distribution. We use random matrix theory (RMT) analytical results to fit the observed Poissonian-to-GOE and GOE-to-GUE crossovers, and examine the relationship between the RMT crossover parameter λ and scaled physical parameters of the spin-chain systems in terms of a scaling exponent. We find that the crossover behavior exhibits universality, in the sense that, it becomes independent of lattice size in the large Hamiltonian matrix dimension limit. Moreover, the scaling exponent obtained from such a finite size scaling analysis, seems to be quite robust and independent of the type of crossover considered or the specific spectral correlation measure used.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
12 More
  • Received 23 July 2021
  • Accepted 9 December 2021

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.105.014205

©2022 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Interdisciplinary Physics

Authors & Affiliations

Debojyoti Kundu*, Santosh Kumar, and Subhra Sen Gupta

  • Department of Physics, Shiv Nadar University, Gautam Buddha Nagar, Uttar Pradesh 201314, India

  • *debojyoti.kundu.physics@gmail.com
  • Corresponding author: skumar.physics@gmail.com
  • Corresponding author: subhro.sengupta@gmail.com

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

Supplemental Material (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 105, Iss. 1 — 1 January 2022

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×

Images

  • Figure 1
    Figure 1

    NNSD for N=16. (a) Shows Poissonian distribution when magnetic field is zero; (b) NNSD follows GOE for h=0.2; and (c) shows how Poisson distribution is recovered due to eigenvector localization for a typical large magnetic field (h=2.5).

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 2
    Figure 2

    Variation of DKL(PGOE||P) [KL divergence of NNSD P(s) with respect to PGOE(s)] with increasing value of the symmetry-breaking crossover parameter h for the (a) N=14 and (b) N=16 systems.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 3
    Figure 3

    NNSD for N=14. Poissonian-to-GOE crossover with increasing h. (a), (c) Show the two limiting cases Poissonian and GOE, respectively and (b) shows one of the intermediate cases. We have used fPO(λ,s) to fit this crossover and the values of the RMT crossover parameter λ are determined.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 4
    Figure 4

    Plots of NNSD for N=16, similar to the N=14 cases in Fig. 3.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 5
    Figure 5

    Variation of DKL(PGUE||P) [KL divergence of NNSD P(s) with respect to PGUE(s)] with the increasing value of symmetry-breaking crossover parameter Jt for (a) N=14 and (b) N=16 systems.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 6
    Figure 6

    NNSD for N=14; GOE-to-GUE crossover with increasing scalar spin-chirality amplitude (Jt) by keeping the system at constant random magnetic field (h=0.2). (a), (c) Show the two limiting cases GOE and GUE, respectively, and (b) shows one of the intermediate states. We have used fOU(λ,s) to fit this crossover and the value of the RMT crossover parameter λ is determined.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 7
    Figure 7

    Plots of NNSD for N=16, similar to the N=14 cases in Fig. 6.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 8
    Figure 8

    Inverted basis GOE distribution for the (a) N=14, (b) N=16, and (c) N=18 systems, at the crossover points.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 9
    Figure 9

    Inverted basis GUE distribution for the (a) N=14, (b) N=16, and (c) N=18 systems, at the crossover points.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 10
    Figure 10

    Variation of RMT crossover parameter λ [of the crossover function fPO(λ,s)] with (a) physical crossover parameter h, for the N=14, 16, and 18 (inverted basis) systems. Poissonian-to-GOE crossover is observed when λ gets saturated, for N=14 the crossover value is h=0.17, for N=16 it is h=0.13, and for N=18 it is h=0.085. (b) The coinciding linear region of the plots is fitted with the scaling function nah. λ is plotted against nah. The universal scaling exponent a=0.23. The dashed green line is a fit based on the data points occurring in the linear regime.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 11
    Figure 11

    Variation of RMT crossover parameter λ [of the crossover function fOU(λ,s)] with (a) physical crossover parameter Jt for N=14, 16, and 18 (inverted basis) systems. GOE-to-GUE crossover is observed when λ gets saturated, for N=14 the crossover value is Jt=0.62, for N=16 it is Jt=0.42, and for N=18 it is Jt=0.28. (b) The coinciding linear region of the plots is fitted with the scaling function naJt. λ is plotted against naJt. The universal scaling exponent a=0.25. The dashed green line is a fit based on the data points occurring in the linear regime.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 12
    Figure 12

    (a) Poissonian (b) intermediate (c) GOE crossover for probability distribution of ratios with the increasing value of h for the N=14 system.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 13
    Figure 13

    (a) Poissonian (b) intermediate (c) GOE crossover for probability distribution of ratios with the increasing value of h for the N=16 system.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 14
    Figure 14

    (a) Poissonian (b) intermediate (c) GOE crossover for probability distribution of ratios with the increasing value of h for the N=18 system.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 15
    Figure 15

    Ratio distribution for N=14; (a)–(c) Show the GOE-to-GUE crossover with the increasing value of physical crossover parameter Jt, while the value of the range of the random magnetic field (h) is kept at 0.2. FOU(λ,r) interpolates this crossover properly.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 16
    Figure 16

    Ratio distribution for the N=16 system, similar to the N=14 cases in Fig. 15.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 17
    Figure 17

    Ratio distribution for the N=18 system, similar to the N=14 cases in Fig. 15.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 18
    Figure 18

    Scaling in ratio distribution for the Poissonian-to-GOE crossover. λ of the interpolating matrix model's level-spacing ratio distribution EPO(λ,r) is plotted against the scaled physical crossover parameter h. Here the universal scaling exponent a=0.25. The dashed green line is a fit based on the data points occurring in the linear regime.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 19
    Figure 19

    Scaling in ratio distribution for the GOE-to-GUE crossover. λ of the interpolating function FOU(λ,r) is plotted against the scaled physical crossover parameter Jt. Here the universal scaling exponent a=0.26. The dashed green line is a fit based on the data points occurring in the linear regime.

    Reuse & Permissions
×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×