Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Unitary symmetry-protected non-Abelian statistics of Majorana modes

Jian-Song Hong, Ting-Fung Jeffrey Poon, Long Zhang, and Xiong-Jun Liu
Phys. Rev. B 105, 024503 – Published 5 January 2022
PDFHTMLExport Citation

Abstract

Symmetry-protected topological superconductors (TSCs) can host multiple Majorana zero modes (MZMs) at their edges or vortex cores, while whether the Majorana braiding in such systems is non-Abelian in general remains an open question. Here, we uncover in theory the unitary symmetry-protected non-Abelian statistics of MZMs and propose the experimental realization. We show that braiding two vortices with each hosting N MZMs protected by commutative or noncommutative unitary symmetries generically reduces to N independent sectors, with each sector braiding two different Majorana modes. This renders the unitary symmetry-protected non-Abelian statistics. We demonstrate the proposed non-Abelian statistics in a spin-triplet TSC which hosts two MZMs at each vortex and, interestingly, can be precisely mapped to a quantum anomalous Hall insulator. Thus the unitary symmetry-protected non-Abelian statistics can be verified in the latter insulating phase, with the application to realizing various topological quantum gates being studied, and an experimental scheme of observation being proposed. This work suggests that there are a much broader range of symmetry-protected topological superconductors which host non-Abelian Majorana modes.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 3 November 2020
  • Revised 27 October 2021
  • Accepted 15 December 2021

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.105.024503

©2022 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Condensed Matter, Materials & Applied Physics

Authors & Affiliations

Jian-Song Hong1,2,*, Ting-Fung Jeffrey Poon1,2,*, Long Zhang1,2, and Xiong-Jun Liu1,2,3,4,†

  • 1International Center for Quantum Materials and School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
  • 2Collaborative Innovation Center of Quantum Matter, Beijing 100871, China
  • 3CAS Center for Excellence in Topological Quantum Computation, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
  • 4Institute for Quantum Science and Engineering and Department of Physics, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China

  • *These authors contributed equally to this work.
  • Author to whom correspondence should be addressed: xiongjunliu@pku.edu.cn

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

Supplemental Material (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 105, Iss. 2 — 1 January 2022

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×

Images

  • Figure 1
    Figure 1

    Schematic diagrams for MZMs residing at vortices in a unitary symmetry-protected TSC. The gray circles with arrows denote vortices, the blue dots are MZMs, and the dashed lines represent the branch cuts of MZMs. (a1) and (a2) The braiding of multiple pairs of MZMs is reduced into multiple individual sectors, each of which braids two MZMs independently. (b) Sketch of B23 in the concrete model. The local MZMs γia and γib define a complex fermion ηi. The nonlocal complex fermions fia(b) are defined by MZMs in different vortices.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 2
    Figure 2

    Numerical results of braiding two vortices with perturbations. (a) Evolution of MZM wave function in a full braiding. (b) and (c) Evolution with symmetry-preserving randomized chemical potential δμ and disordered spin-orbit coupling δtSO. (d) Evolution with symmetry-breaking s-wave pairing Δs. The non-Abelian braiding is confirmed in (a)–(c), in that η(t)=γ1a(0)|γ1a(t) (denoted by blue curves) is equal to 1 at t=2T (similar for other MZMs), and breaks down in (d). The adiabatic condition is satisfied in that ζ(t)=j=1,2[|γ1a(t)|γja(0)|2+γ1a(t)|γjb(0)|2] (denoted by red curves) returns to unity after a single (t=T) and a full (t=2T) braiding. Here, μ=1/m and Δ=1/2m.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 3
    Figure 3

    Numerical simulation of a full braiding between η2 and η3. (a) Orange balls denote the lattice sites, and vortices (antivortices) are denoted by blue (red) circles. (b) The evolution of wave function |η1(t). The system evolves into a superposition of the four single-particle states while braiding η2 and η3 once. After a full braiding, |η1(t) evolves into |η1+. (c) The energy E of |η1(t) as a function of time. The absolute value of |η1(0) is denoted by E0. The dashed curves show the energy evolution with certain randomization δmz in the mz term. After a full braiding, all three curves arrive at the positive energy E0, demonstrating the robustness of non-Abelian statistics. Here, we set mz=2t0 and tSO=t0.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 4
    Figure 4

    (a) Sketch of the experimental realization scheme. The atoms reside on a primary checkerboard lattice (black lines) with a staggered on-site Zeeman potential Vs. The Raman potential M induces the spin-flip nearest-neighbor hopping. A shaking lattice Vt is applied to drive the spin-conserved hopping by compensating the neighboring on-site energy difference. (b) The phase of Raman potential θM with l=1. (c) The phase of the spin-flip hopping θ in the x direction produced by the Raman potential with l=1. (d) The energy spectrum of the system with a vortex (l=1) and an antivortex (l=1). See details in Ref. [63].

    Reuse & Permissions
×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×