Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Effect of pseudogap on electronic anisotropy in the strain dependence of the superconducting Tc of underdoped YBa2Cu3Oy

M. Frachet, Daniel J. Campbell, Anne Missiaen, S. Benhabib, Francis Laliberté, B. Borgnic, T. Loew, J. Porras, S. Nakata, B. Keimer, M. Le Tacon, Cyril Proust, I. Paul, and David LeBoeuf
Phys. Rev. B 105, 045110 – Published 4 January 2022
PDFHTMLExport Citation

Abstract

For orthorhombic superconductors we define thermodynamic anisotropy NdTc/dε22dTc/dε11 as the difference in how superconducting Tc varies with strains εii, i=(1,2), along the in-plane directions. We study the hole doping (p) dependence of N on detwinned single crystals of underdoped YBa2Cu3Oy (YBCO) using the ultrasound technique. While the structural orthorhombicity of YBCO reduces monotonically with decreasing doping over 0.065<p<0.16, we find that the thermodynamic anisotropy shows an intriguing enhancement at the intermediate doping level, which is of electronic origin. Our theoretical analysis shows that the enhancement of the electronic anisotropy can be related to the pseudogap potential in the electronic spectrum that itself increases when the Mott insulating state is approached. Our results imply that the pseudogap is controlled by a local energy scale that can be tuned by varying the nearest-neighbor Cu-Cu bond length. Our work opens the possibility to strain engineer the pseudogap potential to enhance the superconducting Tc.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 1 June 2021
  • Revised 10 November 2021
  • Accepted 30 November 2021

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.105.045110

©2022 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Condensed Matter, Materials & Applied Physics

Authors & Affiliations

M. Frachet1,*, Daniel J. Campbell1, Anne Missiaen1, S. Benhabib1, Francis Laliberté1, B. Borgnic1, T. Loew2, J. Porras2, S. Nakata2, B. Keimer2, M. Le Tacon3, Cyril Proust1, I. Paul4,†, and David LeBoeuf1,‡

  • 1LNCMI-EMFL, CNRS UPR3228, Université Grenoble Alpes, Université Toulouse, Université Toulouse 3, INSA-T, Grenoble and Toulouse, France
  • 2Max-Planck-Institut für Festkörperforschung, Heisenbergstrasse 1, D-70569 Stuttgart, Germany
  • 3Institute for Quantum Materials and Technologies, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, D-76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany
  • 4Laboratoire Matériaux et Phénomènes Quantiques, CNRS, Université de Paris, F-75205 Paris, France

  • *Present address: Institute for Quantum Materials and Technologies, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, D-76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany.
  • indranil.paul@univ-paris-diderot.fr
  • david.leboeuf@lncmi.cnrs.fr

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

Supplemental Material (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 105, Iss. 4 — 15 January 2022

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×

Images

  • Figure 1
    Figure 1

    Superconducting contribution to c22(T) (red, left column) and c11(T) (black, right column) near Tc as a function of doping in YBCO. A fit based on a thermodynamic model [27] is shown in blue. It is used to extract Δcii(Tc), the mean-field jump-like anomaly at Tc. When no jump is observed we can extract an upper limit for dTc/dεii which depends on measurement noise level and on the amplitude of the specific heat jump at Tc. Tc is defined as the position of the mean-field anomaly in Δcii(T). The scale is the same for all doping levels except for p=0.071 where the vertical scale is reduced for clarity.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 2
    Figure 2

    (a) Temperature-doping phase diagram of YBCO in zero magnetic field. The green line is the superconducting dome, black dashed line is the dome of short-range CDW, and blue dashed line is the pseudogap onset temperature T. (b) Doping dependence of dlnTc/dε11 (black) and dlnTc/dε22 (red). (c) Thermodynamic anisotropy N=dTc/dε22dTc/dε11. The shaded area highlights the doping range where the anisotropy is mostly controlled by the physics of the CuO2 planes, and consequently where comparison with the theoretical model is most relevant (see text). Dashed lines are guides to the eyes. Data from this study are shown using solid symbols [43].

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 3
    Figure 3

    Theoretical N=4u0λ2/a0 computed with Pg0 (solid circles) and Pg=0 (open circles), using a doping dependent orthorhombicity u0 from scattering measurements [27], and the pseudogap potential from Ref. [57]. Without the pseudogap, N increases monotonically, mimicking the doping-dependent orthorhombicity. The effect of the pseudogap is to produce a nonmonotonic N.

    Reuse & Permissions
×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×