Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
  • Editors' Suggestion

Topology invisible to eigenvalues in obstructed atomic insulators

Jennifer Cano, L. Elcoro, M. I. Aroyo, B. Andrei Bernevig, and Barry Bradlyn
Phys. Rev. B 105, 125115 – Published 11 March 2022
PDFHTMLExport Citation

Abstract

We consider the extent to which symmetry eigenvalues reveal the topological character of bands. Specifically, we compare distinct atomic limit phases (band representations) that share the same irreducible representations (irreps) at all points in the Brillouin zone and, therefore, appear equivalent in a classification based on eigenvalues. We derive examples where such “irrep-equivalent” phases can be distinguished by a quantized Berry phase or generalization thereof. These examples constitute a generalization of the Su-Schrieffer-Heeger chain: neither phase is topological, in the sense that localized Wannier functions exist, yet there is a topological obstruction between them. We refer to two phases as “Berry obstructed atomic limits” if they have the same irreps, but differ by Berry phases. This is a distinct notion from eigenvalue obstructed atomic limits, which differ in their symmetry irreps at some point in the Brillouin zone. We compute exhaustive lists of elementary band representations that are irrep equivalent, in all space groups, with and without time-reversal symmetry and spin-orbit coupling, and use group theory to derive a set of necessary conditions for irrep equivalence. Finally, we conjecture, and in some cases prove, that irrep-equivalent elementary band representations that are not equivalent can be distinguished by a topological invariant.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 12 July 2021
  • Accepted 16 February 2022

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.105.125115

©2022 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Condensed Matter, Materials & Applied Physics

Authors & Affiliations

Jennifer Cano1,2, L. Elcoro3, M. I. Aroyo3, B. Andrei Bernevig4,5,6, and Barry Bradlyn7

  • 1Department of Physics and Astronomy, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York 11974, USA
  • 2Center for Computational Quantum Physics, Flatiron Institute, New York, New York 10010, USA
  • 3Department of Physics, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Apartado 644, 48080 Bilbao, Spain
  • 4Department of Physics, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA
  • 5Donostia International Physics Center, P. Manuel de Lardizabal 4, 20018 Donostia-San Sebastian, Spain
  • 6IKERBASQUE, Basque Foundation for Science, Bilbao, Spain
  • 7Department of Physics and Institute for Condensed Matter Theory, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801-3080, USA

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

Supplemental Material (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 105, Iss. 12 — 15 March 2022

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article Available via CHORUS

Download Accepted Manuscript
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×

Images

  • Figure 1
    Figure 1

    (a) The black lines outline the conventional unit cell of F222 (No. 22). The blue atoms are in the 4a (0,0,0) position, while the red atoms are at the 4b (0,0,12) position. (b) The (0,0,z) [and (12,12,z)] lines each separately implement the Rice-Mele chain, where C2,100 or C2,010 play the role of the inversion-symmetry operation in 1D. Since the 4a Wyckoff position has no free parameter, it is impossible to continuously deform a single Wannier function centered on a blue lattice site to be centered on a red lattice site while preserving C2,100 symmetry, or vice versa. However, two Wannier functions both centered on a blue lattice site could be deformed to be centered on red lattice sites by moving pairwise, as indicated by the blue dashed circles. (Similarly, two Wannier functions both centered on a red lattice site could be deformed to be centered on blue lattice sites by moving pairwise.) (Figure reproduced from Ref. [49].)

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 2
    Figure 2

    Reciprocal lattice vectors defining the topological invariant in Eq. (26). Light gray dotted lines outline cubes in the BZ with sides of length 2π. The vectors g1,g2,g3 and g1g2g3 outline a loop . The surface Σ that appears in Eq. (25) can be any surface whose boundary is ; one such surface consists of the two blue shaded triangles.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 3
    Figure 3

    Unit cell, lattice vectors, and maximal Wyckoff positions in P112 in the z=0 plane.

    Reuse & Permissions
×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×