Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Pressure dependence of the magnetic ground state in CePtSi2

S. E. Dissanayake, F. Ye, W. Tian, M. Matsuda, H. Muto, S. Suzuki, T. Nakano, S. Watanabe, J. Gouchi, and Y. Uwatoko
Phys. Rev. B 105, 245111 – Published 9 June 2022
PDFHTMLExport Citation

Abstract

CePtSi2 was reported to exhibit an antiferromagnetic order below T*=1.8 K at ambient pressure, a valence state change at 1.2 GPa, and superconductivity in the range between 1.4 and 2.1 GPa with a maximum transition temperature of 0.14 K [T. Nakano et al., Phys. Rev. B 79, 172507 (2009)]. We have performed polycrystalline and single-crystal neutron diffraction experiments to determine the magnetic structure under ambient and high pressures. We found incommensurate magnetic peaks with a magnetic propagation vector of (0.32,0,0.11) at ambient pressure below TSDW1.25 K. Those magnetic peaks originate from a spin-density-wave order with the easy axis along the c axis and an averaged ordered moment of 0.45(5)μB, suggesting that there may be an intermediate phase between T* and TSDW. Applying pressures, the magnetic propagation vector shows no change and the magnetic order disappears around 1.0 GPa, which is much lower than the critical pressure for the superconducting phase. The results suggest that other than magnetic fluctuations may play a primary role in the superconducting pairing mechanism.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 22 July 2021
  • Revised 2 November 2021
  • Accepted 26 May 2022

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.105.245111

©2022 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Condensed Matter, Materials & Applied Physics

Authors & Affiliations

S. E. Dissanayake*, F. Ye, W. Tian, and M. Matsuda

  • Neutron Scattering Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA

H. Muto, S. Suzuki, and T. Nakano

  • Graduate School of Science and Technology, Niigata University, Ikarashi, Niigata 950-2181, Japan

S. Watanabe

  • Department of Basic Sciences, Kyushu Institute of Technology, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka 804-8550, Japan

J. Gouchi and Y. Uwatoko

  • Institute for Solid State Physics, University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8581, Japan

  • *Present address: Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627, USA.
  • Corresponding author: matsudam@ornl.gov

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

Supplemental Material (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 105, Iss. 24 — 15 June 2022

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article Available via CHORUS

Download Accepted Manuscript
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×

Images

  • Figure 1
    Figure 1

    Temperature-pressure phase diagram of CePtSi2. The solid circles and triangles represent the data in Refs. [9, 12, 13] and the present results, respectively. The lines are guides to the eye.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 2
    Figure 2

    Contour maps of neutron diffraction intensity at a low-Q region in the (H0L) plane in CePtSi2 measured at (a) 0.24 K and (b) 2.0 K, at ambient pressure. Magnetic peaks are observed at (0.32,0,0.11), (0.32,0,0.11), (0.32,0,0.11), and (0.32,0,0.11) at 0.24 K. (c) and (d) Temperature dependence of the (0.32,0,0.11) magnetic Bragg peak intensity. The solid line is the result of a fit to a power-law function.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 3
    Figure 3

    Two possible spin-density-wave structures for CePtSi2. The spin directions of S1 and S2 as well as those of S3 and S4 are parallel in model 1 (a) and antiparallel in model 2 (b), respectively. Model 1 was found to be the appropriate magnetic structure. Atomic coordinates of the atoms corresponding to S1, S2, S3, and S4 are S1: (0,0.39465,0.25), S2: (0,0.60535,0.75), S3: (0.5,0.89465,0.25), and S4: (0.5,0.10535,0.75). (See the Supplemental Material [16].)

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 4
    Figure 4

    Neutron diffraction intensities around (0.32,0,0.11), (0.32,2,0.11), and (0.68,1,0.11) measured on HB-1A using a polycrystalline sample of CePtSi2. The background signal measured at 3 K was subtracted. A constant value was added to help the refinement using fullprof. The open circles are observed points. The bold solid line represents the result of the Rietveld refinement. The thin blue line is the difference between the observed and fitted intensities. The magnetic form factor for Ce3+ was used for the magnetic structure refinement. The residual intensity at Q1.05Å1 is too sharp for an actual magnetic peak and is most probably due to imperfect background subtraction.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 5
    Figure 5

    A (0.32,0,0.11) magnetic Bragg peak measured at (a) 0.12 GPa, (b) 0.25 GPa, and (c) 0.4 GPa. The background intensities measured above TSDW are subtracted in (b) and (c). The solid lines are the results of fits to a Gaussian function. The data shown in (a)–(c) were measured at CORELLI diffractometer, HB-1, and HB-1A triple-axis spectrometers, respectively. (a) represents the d-spacing dependence of integrated intensities obtained using the instrument view window in CORELLI, while (b) and (c) represent background subtracted θ2θ scans.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 6
    Figure 6

    Temperature dependence of the (0.32,0,0.11) magnetic Bragg peak intensity measured at (a) 0.12 GPa and (b) 0.25 GPa. The solid lines are the fitting results to a power-law function. (c) Averaged magnetic moment around 0.3 K as a function of applied pressure. The dashed line is a guide to the eye.

    Reuse & Permissions
×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×