Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Letter

c-axis transport in UTe2: Evidence of three-dimensional conductivity component

Yun Suk Eo, Shouzheng Liu, Shanta R. Saha, Hyunsoo Kim, Sheng Ran, Jarryd A. Horn, Halyna Hodovanets, John Collini, Tristin Metz, Wesley T. Fuhrman, Andriy H. Nevidomskyy, Jonathan D. Denlinger, Nicholas P. Butch, Michael S. Fuhrer, L. Andrew Wray, and Johnpierre Paglione
Phys. Rev. B 106, L060505 – Published 24 August 2022
PDFHTMLExport Citation

Abstract

We study the temperature dependence of electrical resistivity for currents directed along all crystallographic axes of the spin-triplet superconductor UTe2. We focus particularly on an accurate determination of the resistivity along the c axis (ρc) by using a generalized Montgomery technique that allows extraction of crystallographic resistivity components from a single sample. In contrast to expectations from the observed highly anisotropic band structure, our measurement of the absolute values of resistivities in all current directions reveals a surprisingly nearly isotropic transport behavior at temperatures above Kondo coherence, with ρcρb2ρa, that evolves to reveal qualitatively distinct behaviors on cooling. The temperature dependence of ρc exhibits a peak at a temperature much lower than the onset of Kondo coherence observed in ρa and ρb, consistent with features in magnetotransport and magnetization that point to a magnetic origin. A comparison to the temperature-dependent evolution of the scattering rate observed in angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy experiments provides important insights into the underlying electronic structure necessary for building a microscopic model of superconductivity in UTe2.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 25 January 2021
  • Accepted 1 August 2022

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.106.L060505

©2022 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Condensed Matter, Materials & Applied Physics

Authors & Affiliations

Yun Suk Eo1, Shouzheng Liu2, Shanta R. Saha1, Hyunsoo Kim1,*, Sheng Ran1,3,†, Jarryd A. Horn1, Halyna Hodovanets1,*, John Collini1, Tristin Metz1, Wesley T. Fuhrman1, Andriy H. Nevidomskyy4, Jonathan D. Denlinger5, Nicholas P. Butch1,3, Michael S. Fuhrer6,7, L. Andrew Wray2, and Johnpierre Paglione1,8,‡

  • 1Maryland Quantum Materials Center and Department of Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA
  • 2Department of Physics, New York University, New York, New York 10003, USA
  • 3NIST Center for Neutron Research, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, USA
  • 4Department of Physics and Astronomy, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005, USA
  • 5Advanced Light Source, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
  • 6School of Physics and Astronomy, Monash University, Victoria 3800, Australia
  • 7ARC Centre of Excellence in Future Low-Energy Electronics Technologies, Monash University, Victoria 3800, Australia
  • 8Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 1Z8

  • *Present Address: Department of Physics, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, Missouri 65409, USA.
  • Present address: Department of Physics, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri 63130, USA.
  • paglione@umd.edu

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

Supplemental Material (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 106, Iss. 6 — 1 August 2022

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article Available via CHORUS

Download Accepted Manuscript
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×

Images

  • Figure 1
    Figure 1

    UTe2 crystal structure and Fermi surface. (a) Crystal structure of UTe2; a=4.161 Å, b=6.122 Å, c=13.955 Å. (b) Schematic picture of the rectangular Fermi pockets (shown in blue) in the ab plane of the BZ (based on Ref. [20]). (c) Schematic picture of the Z pocket in the presence of the less dispersive rectangular pocket in the ac plane of the BZ (based on Ref. [20]).

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 2
    Figure 2

    Electrical resistivity of UTe2 extracted using a generalized Montgomery measurement technique on two crystalline samples, including a diamond-shaped sample with bc plane orientation (sample S1) and a nearly-rectangular-shaped sample with ac plane orientation (sample S2). Absolute resistivities are obtained by extracting principal components of resistivities from a combination of resistance measurement geometries and numerical modeling (see SM [29] for more details, including extracted ρc data for sample S2 and sample photos in Fig. S3).

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 3
    Figure 3

    Temperature dependence of ARPES. (a) An ARPES image of the UTe26d bands, measured at 20 K along the ΓX axis at hν=74 eV, in normal emission from the [011] crystal face. (b) Temperature (Temp) dependence of quasielastically scattered photoelectrons. ARPES intensity on the uranium O-edge resonance (hν=110 eV) was integrated in a region with no visible bands [from k=0.6 Å1 to k=1.0 Å1]. (c) Momentum distribution curves (MDCs) of 6d band electrons at 25 meV, measured at hν=74 eV and temperatures of 20, 30, 40, 50, and 65 K, from top to bottom. (d) The feature width from Lorentzian fits (see SM [29] Sec. VII for details) of the MDCs in (c), used for comparison with resistivity (see text).

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 4
    Figure 4

    Low-temperature resistivity of UTe2, exhibiting Fermi liquid behavior for all three crystallographic orientations. Data were obtained from four-wire measurements on bar-shaped samples (samples S3, S5, and S6).

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 5
    Figure 5

    Magnetotransport results at 14 T. (a) ρa vs temperature for both fixed at 0 T (in black), Ha at 14 T (in red), and Hb at 14 T (in blue). Data were taken using bar-shaped sample S7. (b) ρc vs temperature for both fixed at 0 T (in black), Ha at 14 T (in red), and Hb at 14 T (in blue). Data were taken using bar-shaped sample S3. (c) MR vs temperature and ΔMa/Ha. Field is applied along the a-axis direction. (d) MR vs temperature and ΔM/Hb. Field is applied along the b-axis direction. Comparison of magnetoresistance for both ρa and ρc samples and ΔM/H. Magnetoresistance (MR) is defined as MR=[ρ(14T)ρ(0T)]/ρ(0T) and ΔM/H=χCWM/H(14T), where χCW is the Curie-Weiss susceptibility fitted at high temperatures.

    Reuse & Permissions
×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×